SPRRA1-26-R-0018 AMD 0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No. 3. Effective Date 4. Requisition/Purchase Req No. 5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code) 9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print) 16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Firm Fixed Price

SPRRA1

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

5201 MARTIN ROAD/DLA-AVN-AH

REDSTONE ARSENAL AL 35898-7340

JOSH E LONG

EMAIL: JOSH.LONG@DLA.MIL

SPRRA1-26-R-0018

2026FEB05

X

X

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 4

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: JOSH E LONG

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: DLA/AHAA/(256)690-5731

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: Supply Contracts and Priced Orders

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

A-1. THE PURPOSE OF AMENDMENT SPRRA1-26-R-0018 0002 IS TO INSERT THE EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD LOCATED IN SECTION M.

A-2. ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SOLICITATION SPRRA1-26-R-0018 REMAIN.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0003 ***

2 4

SPRRA1-26-R-0018

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION CRITERIA

MINIMUM TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS. TO BE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE AND THUS, ELIGIBLE FOR AWARD, A PROPOSAL MUST CONFORM TO ALL SOLICITATION

REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS TERMS AND CONDITIONS, REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS, AND TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS PROVIDED WITHIN ALL SECTIONS

OF THIS SOLICITATION AND/OR WITHIN ITS ATTACHED ADDENDA. PROPOSALS RECEIVING A TECHNICAL RATING OF "UNACCEPTABLE" WILL BE INELIGIBLE

FOR AWARD.

PRICE. IN ADDITION TO MEETING THE SOLICITATION'S TECHNICAL AND QUANTITY INCREMENT OR RANGE REQUIREMENTS ABOVE AND COST AND PRICING

REQUIREMENTS BELOW, THE GOVERNMENT WILL EVALUATE A PROPOSAL'S PRICING FOR REASONABLENESS. EVALUATION OF A PROPOSAL'S PRICING WILL NOT

OBLIGATE THE GOVERNMENT TO ORDER THE ESTIMATED QUANTITIES OR TO DISTRIBUTE ORDERS IN THE MANNER EVALUATED. THE GOVERNMENT MAY REJECT A

PROPOSAL AS "UNACCEPTABLE", IF ITS PRICING IS DETERMINED TO BE MATERIALLY UNBALANCED.

COST AND PRICING DATA. OFFERORS MUST PROVIDE ALL COST OR PRICING INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FAR 15.4. FAILURE OF A PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE

COST OR PRICING INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FAR 15.4 WILL RESULT IN SAID PROPOSAL BEING DEEMED UNACCEPTABLE, AND THUS, INELIGIBLE FOR AWARD.

BASIS OF AWARD

(A) AWARD. THE GOVERNMENT INTENDS TO EVALUATE PROPOSALS AND, IF NECESSARY, CONDUCT DISCUSSIONS WITH ALL RESPONSIBLE OFFERORS WITHIN

THE COMPETITIVE RANGE. THE AWARD WILL BE MADE TO THE OFFEROR WHOSE PROPOSAL CONFORMS TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE SOLICITATION

AND REPRESENTS THE BEST VALUE TO THE GOVERNMENT. THEREFORE, AWARD MAY BE MADE TO OTHER THAN THE LOWEST PRICED OR THE HIGHEST

TECHNICALLY RATED OFFER.

(B) RELATIVE IMPORTANCE AND TRADE-OFFS. THE GOVERNMENT WILL BASE THE DETERMINATION OF BEST VALUE ON A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE

OFFERORS' PRICES, PAST PERFORMANCE, AND DELIVERY SCHEDULE IDENTIFIED ELSEWHERE IN THIS SOLICITATION. THE DETERMINATION OF BEST VALUE

ALSO CONSIDERS THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF THE EVALUATION FACTORS. ALL EVALUATION FACTORS, WHEN COMBINED, ARE:

[ ] SIGNIFICANTLY MORE IMPORTANT THAN COST OR PRICE. AS OTHER EVALUATION FACTORS BECOME MORE EQUAL, THE EVALUATED COST OR PRICE BECOMES

MORE IMPORTANT.

[X] APPROXIMATELY EQUAL TO COST OR PRICE; OR

[ ] SIGNIFICANTLY LESS IMPORTANT THAN COST OR PRICE. AS THE EVALUATED COST/PRICE BECOMES MORE EQUAL, RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF ALL OTHER

EVALUATION FACTORS BECOMES MORE SIGNIFICANT.

THE FINAL AWARD DECISION MAY INVOLVE A TRADE-OFF AMONG COST OR PRICE AND THE NON-PRICE FACTORS. FACTORS THAT MAY BE CONSIDERED IN THE

TRADE-OFF PROCESS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:

ITEM CRITICALITY AND WEAPONS SYSTEM APPLICATION

CURRENT INVENTORY STATUS

HISTORICAL DELIVERY OR QUALITY PROBLEMS

CONCERNS OVER LIMITED SUPPLY SOURCES AND INDUSTRIAL BASE

BENEFITS FROM OBTAINING NEW SOURCES

(C) COST OR PRICE. THE GOVERNMENT WILL EVALUATE THE OFFERED COST OR PRICE. THE GOVERNMENT WILL ADD ANY OTHER COST OR PRICE EVALUATION

FACTORS IDENTIFIED ELSEWHERE IN THIS SOLICITATION (E.G., BUY AMERICAN ACT OR FOB ORIGIN TRANSPORTATION COSTS) TO ARRIVE AT THE OFFEROR'S

EVALUATED COST OR PRICE. THE EVALUATED COST OR PRICE WILL BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OTHER NON-PRICE FACTORS TO DETERMINE THE BEST

VALUE TO THE GOVERNMENT.

(D) PAST PERFORMANCE. PAST PERFORMANCE INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, THE OFFEROR'S RECORD OF CONFORMING TO CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS AND

STANDARDS OF GOOD WORKMANSHIP; ADHERENCE TO CONTRACT SCHEDULES, INCLUDING THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASPECTS OF PERFORMANCE; THE OFFEROR'S

REPUTATION FOR REASONABLE AND COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR AND COMMITMENT TO CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; AND GENERALLY, THE OFFEROR'S BUSINESS-LIKE

CONCERN FOR THE CUSTOMER'S INTEREST.

(I) THE SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE RISK SYSTEM (SPRS) IS THE CURRENT TERM FOR PAST PERFORMANCE THAT IS FORMERLY KNOWN AS PAST PERFORMANCE

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEM STATISTICAL REPORTING (PPIRS-SR), AS APPLICABLE, WILL BE USED TO EVALUATE QUALITY AND PAST PERFORMANCE ON

DLA AWARDS.

(II) IN ADDITION, OFFERORS MAY SUBMIT WITH THEIR OFFER INFORMATION ON PAST AND CURRENT FEDERAL (NON-DLA AVIATION), STATE AND LOCAL

GOVERNMENT AND PRIVATE SECTOR CONTRACTS PERFORMED BY THE OFFEROR AT THE PROPOSED PERFORMANCE LOCATION WITHIN THE LAST THREE YEARS THAT

ARE SIMILAR IN NATURE TO THIS ACQUISITION. OFFERORS ELECTING TO SUBMIT THIS DATA MUST FURNISH AT LEAST THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: NAME

AND ADDRESS OF THE CONTRACTING ENTITY; THE CONTRACT NUMBER; AWARD AND COMPLETION DATES; THE DOLLAR VALUE; THE CONTRACT TYPE; THE ITEMS

OR SERVICES PROVIDED; TWO REFERENCES, WITH TITLE AND PHONE NUMBER; AND ANY PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED AND THE CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN BY THE

OFFEROR.

(III) BY SUBMITTING PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION, THE OFFEROR AGREES TO PERMIT THE GOVERNMENT'S REPRESENTATIVES TO CONTACT THE LISTED

REFERENCES AND INQUIRE OF THE OFFEROR'S PERFORMANCE. IF MORE THAN THREE CONTRACTS ARE IDENTIFIED, THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO

RANDOMLY SELECT AND LIMIT ITS REVIEW TO THREE CONTRACTS. IN ADDITION TO THE INFORMATION PROVIDED, THE GOVERNMENT MAY CONSIDER

3 4

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM OTHER SOURCES WHEN EVALUATING THE OFFEROR'S PAST PERFORMANCE. OFFERORS WILL BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO

DISCUSS NEGATIVE PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM REFERENCES IF THE OFFEROR HAS NOT HAD A PREVIOUS OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT ON

THAT INFORMATION.

(IV) OFFERORS WITH NO PAST PERFORMANCE HISTORY (WHETHER INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT) WILL NOT BE EVALUATED FAVORABLY

NOR UNFAVORABLY.

(E) PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FACTORS. THE GOVERNMENT WILL USE THE PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FACTORS MARKED BELOW IN ADDITION TO

COST OR PRICE AND OTHER EVALUATION FACTORS SPECIFIED IN THE SOLICITATION. UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE, PAST PERFORMANCE IS SIGNIFICANTLY

MORE IMPORTANT THAN OTHER NON-PRICE FACTORS. WITHIN THE PAST PERFORMANCE SUBFACTORS, SPRS ASSESSMENTS (AS APPLICABLE) WILL BE WEIGHED

MOST HEAVILY. HISTORICAL QUALITY HISTORY AND DELIVERY SCHEDULE COMPLIANCE (NOT CAPTURED IN SPRS) WILL BE WEIGHED MORE HEAVILY THAN THE

REMAINING PAST PERFORMANCE SUBFACTORS. ALL OTHER NON-PRICE EVALUATION FACTORS SPECIFIED IN THIS SOLICITATION WEIGH EQUALLY, UNLESS

OTHERWISE INDICATED.

[X] SPRS ASSESSMENTS (I.E., QUALITY AND DELIVERY)

USE OF SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE RISK SYSTEM (SPRS) IN PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS:

(1) THE SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE RISK SYSTEM (SPRS) (HTTPS://WWW.SPRS.CSD.DISA.MIL) (FORMERLY PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEM

STATISTICAL REPORTING (PPIRS-SR)) WILL BE USED IN THE EVALUATION OF SUPPLIERS' PAST PERFORMANCE.

(2) SPRS COLLECTS QUALITY AND DELIVERY DATA ON PREVIOUSLY AWARDED CONTRACTS AND ORDERS FROM EXISTING DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REPORTING

SYSTEMS TO CLASSIFY EACH SUPPLIER'S PERFORMANCE HISTORY BY FEDERAL SUPPLY CLASS (FSC) AND PRODUCT OR SERVICE CODE (PSC). THE SPRS

APPLICATION PROVIDES THE CONTRACTING OFFICER QUANTIFIABLE PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION REGARDING A SUPPLIER'S QUALITY AND DELIVERY

PERFORMANCE FOR THE FSC AND PSC OF THE SUPPLIES BEING PURCHASED.

(3) THE QUALITY AND DELIVERY CLASSIFICATIONS IDENTIFIED FOR A SUPPLIER IN SPRS WILL BE USED BY THE

CONTRACTING OFFICER TO EVALUATE A SUPPLIER'S PAST PERFORMANCE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SUPPLIER'S REFERENCES (IF REQUESTED). THE

GOVERNMENT WILL USE THIS PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BASIS FOR AWARD STATED IN THE SOLICITATION.

*** END OF NARRATIVE M0001 ***

REQUIREMENTS TYPE SOLICITATIONS

M-2. REQUIREMENTS FOR QUANTITY INCREMENTS OR RANGES OFFERS ARE REQUESTED FOR INCREMENTS OR RANGES OF QUANTITIES AS LISTED IN THE

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES OR SERVICES. THE AWARDED QUANTITY, OR QUANTITIES IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLE ITEMS, WILL BE BASED ON THE REQUIREMENTS

OF THE GOVERNMENT AND THE COMBINATION OF PRICE AND QUANTITY PER ITEM THAT IS MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE GOVERNMENT. QUANTITY INCREMENTS

CONSIST OF A PRIMARY AMOUNT AND ALTERNATE AMOUNTS BASED ON INCREMENTAL INCREASES. THE QUANTITY AWARDED WILL BE EITHER THE FULL PRIMARY

OR ONE OF THE ALTERNATE QUANTITIES. QUANTITY RANGES CONSIST OF A SPECIFIC SERIES OF RANGES. THE QUANTITY AWARDED MAY FALL ANYWHERE

WITHIN ANY RANGE. IF THIS IS AN INVITATION FOR BIDS (IFB), A BID THAT ONLY CONTAINS PRICES FOR QUANTITIES OTHER THAN THOSE QUANTITIES

SOLICITED IN THE SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES OR SERVICES WILL BE DETERMINED TO BE NON-RESPONSIVE. IF THIS IS A REQUEST FOR QUOTE (RFQ) OR A

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP), AN OFFER THAT ONLY CONTAINS PRICES FOR QUANTITIES OTHER THAT THOSE QUANTITIES INDICATED IN THE SCHEDULE OF

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES MAY BE PRECLUDED FROM CONSIDERATION FOR AWARD IF THE CONTRACTING OFFICER ELECTS TO MAKE AN AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSION

OF PROPOSALS. IF THIS SOLICITATION REQUESTS OFFERS QUANTITY RANGES, THE FOLLOWING APPLY: THE UNIT PRICE APPLICABLE TO THE ENTIRE

AWARD QUANTITY SHALL BE THE UNIT PRICE OFFERED FOR THE QUANTITY RANGE IN WHICH THE AWARD QUANTITY FALLS, IF AN OFFER SPECIFIES THE SAME

PRICE FOR ALL QUANTITY RANGES OF AN ITEM, THE OFFER MAY INCLUDE A STATEMENT IN THE SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES OR SERVICES THAT THE UNIT PRICE

APPLIES TO ALL QUANTITY RANGES OF THAT ITEM. IF AN OFFER SPECIFIES DIFFERENT PRICES FOR A QUANTITY RANGE OF AN ITEM, THE OFFER MUST SHOW

A UNIT PRICE IN EACH QUANTITY RANGE COLUMN IN THE SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES OR SERVICES. AWARD MAY BE MADE ON THE BASIS OF THAT QUANTITY AND

PRICE COMBINATION THAT IS MOST ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE GOVERNMENT WITHOUT DISCUSSION OF PROPOSALS.

*** END OF NARRATIVE M0001 ***

4 4