Exhibit A - Technical Requirements (SPRBL1-19-Q-0051) 11-14-2018.pdf

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 1 of 23 Issue: 14 November 2018

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

Image Intensifier Tube, NSN 5855-01-623-0645, MX-12389

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 2 of 23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

CONFIGURATION BASELINE

PACKAGING

Wood Packing Material

Marking

Military Packaging

SPECIALIZED TESTING

CONTRACT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

Program Management requirements

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENT LIST (CDRL) DD 1423-1

CDRL List

Individual CDRLs

Test Procedures

DI-NDTI-80603

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 3 of 23

APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

Military and Federal Standards MIL-STD-129R Military Marking for Shipment and Storage MIL-STD-2073-1E w/Chg 1 Standard Practice for Military Packaging Military and Federal Specifications

MIL-PRF-A3297322A Performance Specification, Image Intensifier Assembly, 18MM, Microchannel Wafer MX-12389/AVS-6

Other Documents

Commercial Documents ISPM Number 15 Regulation of Wood Packaging in International Trade ANSI/ISO/ASQ(E) Q9001-2015 American National Standard, Quality Management Systems

Requirements EIA-649-1 Configuration Management Requirements For Defense Contracts ANSI/NCSL Z540.3-2006 Requirements for the Calibration of Measuring and Test Equipment ANSI/ASQ Q10012-2003 Measurement Management Systems – Requirements for

Measurement Processes and Measuring Equipment ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2003 (R2013) Sampling Procedures and Tables For Inspection By Atrributes

Security Documents SCG Security Classification Guide for Image Intensifier Devices (31

October 2013)

CONFIGURATION BASELINE

The applicable Configuration Baselines (CB), for the listed Configuration Item (CI) and/or Computer Software Configuration Item (CSCI), are as listed in the table below.

NSN Nomenclature Part Numbers/Drawings 5855-01-623-0645 Image Intensifier A3297322-1

Each CI/CSCI, as developed/built and delivered, shall conform to the cited CB and (if applicable) all subsequent CB’s that will be made contractually binding by the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO). The Contractor shall establish a Configuration Management Program in accordance with EIA-649-1.

No changes or departures from the CB are acceptable except for changes or departures which are submitted in accordance with EIA-649-1, CDRL A001, CDRL B001, and CDRL C001, and are approved by the Government Configuration Manager (C Mgr.) or Configuration Management Officer (CMO) and which are made applicable to the contract by the PCO.

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 4 of 23

An Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) describes the changes to be made to the CI/CSCI and all associated Government documents and data that are affected by the proposed engineering change. ECP should be prepared in accordance with EIA-649-1, CDRL A001, and DI-SESS-80639.

A Request For Variance (RFV) is a specific written authorization to depart from a particular requirement(s) of an item’s approved configuration documentation for a specific number of units or a specified period of time, either as an advance request or after the fact. The contractor shall identify the impact of the RFV on performance, operational readiness and logistics support of the affected CIs. The Government may require consideration for any RFV. RFV should be prepared in accordance with EIA-649-1, CDRL B001, and DI-

SESS-80640.

A Notice of Revision (NOR) shows the detailed changes that must be made to technical documentation, except specifications, following approval of an ECP. A NOR shall be submitted for each document affected by an ECP. NOR should be prepared in accordance with EIA-649-1, CDRL C001, and DI-SESS-80642.

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 5 of 23

PACKAGING

Preservation, packing and marking for shipment shall be in accordance with Section "D" of the contract.

Packaging/packing shall be in accordance with MIL-STD-2073-1E w/Chg 1, Level of Protection (LOP):

Military, Level of Pack, (LPK): Quantity Unit Pack (QUP): 001. Marking shall be accordance with MIL-STD- 129R.

Wood Packing Material Wood packing material includes pallets. See DLAD 52.247-9012 Requirements for Treatment of Wood Packaging Material (WPM).

Marking

All unit packs, intermediate packs, and exterior shipping containers shall be legibly and durably marked in accordance with MIL-STD-129R.

Wood Packing Material

Wood Packaging Materials (WPM) shall meet the following requirements:

Wood packaging material (WPM) includes but is not limited to pallets, skids, load boards, pallet collars, wooden boxes, reels, dunnage, crates, frames and cleats. This requirement excludes materials that have under gone a manufacturing process, such as corrugated fiberboard, plywood, particleboard, veneer, and oriented strand board (OSB).

All WPM shall meet the requirements of the International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPM) Number 15, “Regulation of Wood Packaging Material in International Trade”. DoD shipments inside and outside of the United States shall meet the requirements of ISPM 15 whenever WPM is used to ship DoD cargo.

All WPM shall comply with the official quality control program for heat treatment (HT) or kiln dried heat treatment (KDHT) in accordance with American Lumber Standard Committee (ALSC), Incorporated, Wood Packaging Material Program and WPM Enforcement Regulations (see http://www.alsc.org/).

All WPM shall include certification/quality markings IAW the ALSC standard. Markings shall be placed in an unobstructed area that will be readily visible to inspectors. Pallet markings shall be applied to the stringer or block on diagonally opposite sides of the pallet and be contrasting and clearly visible. All containers shall be marked on a side other than the top or bottom, contrasting and clearly visible. All dunnage used in configuring and/or securing the load shall also comply with ISPM 15 and be marked with an ALSC approved DUNNAGE stamp.

Failure to comply with these requirements may result in refusal, destruction, or treatment of materials at the point of entry. The Government reserves the right to recoup from the contractor any remediation costs incurred by the Government.

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 6 of 23

Military Packaging DS7029 and/or DS7033 Preservation, Packing and Marking Instructions

DS7029 - DS7033 LEGEND

Qty Quantity Prot Req Protection Required PGE-REF Packaging Reference (Military Standard) LPK Level of Packing QUP Quantity per Unit Pack ICQ Intermediate Container Quantity Pkg Reqmt Codes Packaging Requirement Codes when PKG-REF cites MIL-STD-2073 The below codes are for special markings:

PC Project Code WG Warranty/Guarantee SL Shelf Life BC Bar Code FMS Foreign Military Sales

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 7 of 23

DS7029 - DS7033

NSN Prot Req PKG-REF or SPI LPK QUP ICQ Special Markings

Pkg J. J J J J J J J J J Reqmt I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VII.a IX X Codes (MP) (CD) (PM) (WM) (CD) (CT) (UC) (IC) (PK) (SM) 5855-01-623-0645

Military

MIL-STD-2073-1E

w/Chg 1 B 001 51 1 00 JA GH H ED 03

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 8 of 23

SPECIALIZED TESTING

The contractor shall perform Initial Production Testing (IPT) and Conformance Inspection (CI) IAW MIL-PRF- 49428, MIL-PRF-A3279602, MIL-PRF-A3297322, and this document. Products delivered on this contract shall be qualified (also referred to as certified) by Product Manager Soldiers Manuever Sensors via performance of an IPT. Test methods for the IPT and CI shall be in accordance with (IAW) the Government approved Quality Validation Plan (QVP) and Test Procedures.

The Government may require that IPT be repeated over the life of this contract to requalify the product; should the contractor fail to deliver any of these items for a period of one year, make changes to products and/or processes, change a supplier of a component, or move the production line.

The Government reserves the right to waive IPT for contractors that have previously qualified by Product Manager Soldier Manuever Sensors and have completed a Initial Production Testing. The contractor shall be required to provide evidence that their product has been previously qualified by Product Manager Soldier Manuever Sensors and have maintained production, with deliveries to the Government, prior to the Governemnt approving a waiver.

The Government reserves the right to conduct an operational test (OT), to include compatibility testing, to ensure the system is operationally effective and suitable, and interoperable with other Army equipment. If an OT is required, IPT approval is contingent on a successful OT.

As part of IPT, the contractor shall:

a) Develop the test procedures and plans necessary to demonstrate that these units conform to the requirements established by the applicable specification(s) and other technical data provided in this contract.

b) Notify the Government and test the First Article units.

c) Provide a First Article Test Report to the Government which documents the IPT results.

d) Insure all equipment used to take performance readings for acceptance tests are kept within the performance parameters delineated by the manufacturer of that equipment and capable of satisfying the performance parameters of this contract. All equipment manufactured by the contractor shall be listed and the parameters established and maintained for this equipment also.

The sample size shall be 20 units. All IPT samples shall be assembled at the same location at which production units will be assembled, using the same parts, materials, and manufacturing processes to be employed for subsequent production.

The contractor shall submit a Quality Validation Plan (QVP) in accordance with CDRL D001 and this document. IPT and Conformance Inspection shall be performed in accordance with the Government approved QVP. In addition to the information required by DI-NDTI-81307A, this submission shall contain:

a. The delineation and allocation of tests to be performed on each of the First Article units and the order of such tests.

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 9 of 23

b. The delineation and allocation of tests to be performed as Conformance Inspection on subsequent production lots, to include the order of tests and the sampling plan.

c. Step-by-step test procedures for each test and the data sheets to be employed to document the results of testing. Test procedures may be submitted separate from the QVP, in accordance with CDRL E001.

d. Identification of required test facilities, equipment and personnel.

e. Test milestones schedules and the contractor's test readiness posture.

f. A table which cross references the paragraph number of the specification requirement (including a brief description of the requirement) and the associated paragraph number of the QVP.

The contractor shall submit an Initial Production Testing Report in accordance with CDRL F001 and this document. Initial Production Testing approval shall be contingent upon the submission of a complete and acceptable IPT Report to include verification of corrective action for reported IPT Failures to include adequacy of identified changes to the design/manufacturing process. IPT samples shall meet all contractual requirements or all variances shall be documented by Government approved waivers.

The IPT Report shall be complete, accurate, and readable and shall provide sufficient data to determine that the hardware item meets all the requirements delineated in the contract. The report will include the following:

a. Contractor's name and address.

b. Contract number.

c. Nomenclature, type number and (if assigned) stock number of item represented by the First Article.

d. Name and address of plant where First Article was fabricated and assembled.

e. Place and date of performance of tests.

f. Identification of applicable test and inspection equipment used in performance of Initial Production Testing.

g. Sample size or quantity submitted for test or inspection.

h. A table which cross-references the paragraph numbers of the specification, the test procedures, and data sheet entry.

i. Complete test results showing actual or quantitative observations and all required calculations, allowable tolerances for each parameter, date the test was performed, the name and signature of tester, name and signature of the Government verifier/witness, and serial number of the equipment.

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 10 of 23

j. The final revision of the Government approved FIAR for each failure that occured.

The contractor shall report all IPT Failures and submit a Failed Item Analysis Report (FIAR) IAW CDRL G001 and this document. For any failure that occurs in a Government conducted Operational Test (OT), the contractor shall submit a FIAR and incorporate corrective actions.

The IPT samples shall NOT serve as a manufacturing standard. Upon successful completion of IPT, Items which are refurbishable and made fully compliant with contractual requirements shall be delivered as production items. The Government shall determine the acceptability of all IPT samples. Those items which are not refurbishable shall not be delivered as production items.

The contractor shall conduct Conformance Inspections for all product delivered in accordance with the Government approved Quality Validation Plan and the requirements of this document. Conformance Inspection procedures used to test production units shall be identical to those used to test First Article samples. After IPT is approved, any proposed changes to the QVP and/or production test procedures will be submitted per CDRL D001 and E001 for evaluation. Such submissions will provide complete justification for the change. Changes to the approved test procedures shall not be implemented without written Government approval.

Delivery of subsequent lots shall not be made prior to successful completion of Conformance Inspection.

The contractor shall notify the cognizant Government Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) in writing at least 2 days in advance, of the time and place for each Conformance Inspection. The contractor shall notify the QAR in writing within 2 working days of completion of Conformance Inspection for a specific production lot.

The contractor shall notify the PCO and Technical Activity in writing upon completion of Conformance Inspection. This notification will be submitted by email not later than 10 days after the test is completed, and will include:

- Contract Number.

- Item Identification (Nomenclature and/or Part Number)

- Date of Testing

- Lot Size, Number, and time frame represented

- Sample Size

- List of any associated failures

The contractor shall report each IPT Failure and each Conformance Inspection failure occurring in Test Groups B, C, and D, to the Government Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) and the Technical Activity (see Block 16 of DD Form 1423 for CDRL G001) within 48 hours of failure occurrence. Within 10 working days of failure occurrence, the contractor shall submit a Failed Item Analysis Report (FIAR) through the cognizant QAR to the Technical Activity as required by CDRL G001. In addition to the information required by DI- SESS-81315B, the report shall include:

a. Contractor's name, address and applicable contract number

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 11 of 23

b. Identification of failed item

c. Number of units in lot and sample size

d. Date and time of failure occurrence

e. Failure Mode

f. Summary of failure analysis

g. Root cause of failure

h. History of the failure

i. Proposed Corrective Action to eliminate root cause, contain the failure, and prevent reoccurrence

j. Re-inspection plan to validate the corrective action

k. Proposed disposition of failed item and lot

l. Verification that Corrective Action was effective.

The contractor shall implement the proposed corrective action on all units in the lot, select new samples and conduct re-inspection and other required re-testing in accordance with the re-inspection plan in the FIAR.

Results of the re-inspection and validation of the corrective action shall be included in the FIAR.

Final acceptance and shipment approval will be withheld until results of the re-inspection substantiate that the corrective action was effective and the FIAR was accepted, as authorized by the PCO.

The contractor shall prepare and submit a Reliability Test Report for each production lot subjected to Reliability Testing. The Reliability Test Report shall be prepared in accordance with CDRL H001 and this document.

Reliability Report shall include but not be limited to a test summary, test description, identification of item(s) under test, lot from which the test sample was taken, lots represented by the sample, test group number, performance requirements, measured values taken during the test, conclusions, and applicable failed item analysis reports (FIARs).

In the event of an Image Intensifier Reliability lot failure, the Government may, with Contractor concurrence, agree to accept consideration in lieu of correcting units that have already been delivered to the Government.

The following calculation shall be used to determine the amount of consideration.

Damages = [ ( MTTFREQ – MTTFDEM ) / ( MTTFREQ ) ] * # of units * cost per unit

MTTFREQ = Mean Time To Failure Required MTTFDEM = Mean Time To Failure Demonstrated

The number of units in the above calculation shall be all units delivered since the last production lot to successful complete Reliability test, or any other number of units as agreed to by the Government. The MTTF used in the equation is a cumulative total of all samples subjected to Reliability Testing in that particular lot.

When calculating the MTTFDEM for the lot, the MTTF demonstrated for an individual unit shall not exceed the required MTTF for that unit.

CONTRACT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 12 of 23

In the event of a discrepancy between the signed DD 254 Contract Security Classification Specification, included as an attachment to the solicitaition/contract, and the language in this section, the signed DD 254 information shall take precedence.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS

The Government and contractor shall incorporate an Integrated Product and Process Team (IPPT) discipline into the ANVIS program. The objective of the IPPT is to implement an open shared data/information environment with results oriented objectives of on schedule delivery of specification compliant units, continuously improving the various Government/contractor processes, and reducing the system life cycle cost.

The IPPT shall also complete the following additional actions throughout the life of the contract:

a) Hold IPPT reviews.

b) Use risk management techniques to document, track, and manage program areas of risk.

c) Review/concur in program documentation.

d) Review follow-on Initial Production Tests (IPTs) with the goal of reducing repetitive testing.

e) Review/concur on all Failed Item Analysis Reports (FIARs), ECPs, Request for Variances, and Trade studies.

The IPPT process as described in paragaraph(s) is solely to facilitate communications between the Government and contractor during contract administration. Responsibility for dealing with issues raised and for meeting all contract requirements remains with the contractor. No communication made during the IPPT process may be construed as a change unless specifically designated by the contracting officer.

The IPPT membership shall consist of Government and contractor personnel associated with the ANVIS program and related efforts. CECOM, Logistics Readiness Center (LRC), Enterprise Soldier Aviation (ESA) Directorate shall co-chair the IPPT with the associated contractor counterpart. The IPPT chairpersons shall concur on all items requiring IPPT concurrence. The co-chairs shall define IPPT membership and issue escalation procedures at the post award conference. For each meeting, the contractor shall prepare and submit an agenda and briefing charts to the Government in accordance with CDRL J001. The contractor and Government at the end of each review/meeting shall jointly prepare action items and review/meeting minutes.

The contractor shall submit the meeting minutes and action item list to the Government in accordance with CDRL K001. The contractor shall schedule, prepare for, and conduct the following reviews/meetings with Government concurrence:

The contractor shall participate in and support IPPT reviews at approximately 90-day intervals when required.

The first IPPT review shall be conducted on or about 45 days after the post award conference. IPPT reviews may be conducted as teleconferences or video-teleconferences (VTCs) if mutually agreed upon by the IPPT chairpersons. IPPT reviews shall provide a working level forum to identify, discuss, and resolve issues that are, or could, affect the systems performance, design, production, testing, logistics support, system deliveries, life cycle cost, and program schedule. Risk mitigation documentation shall also be reviewed.

Reports, Reviews, Meetings. Reports, reviews and meetings shall be required on a bi-weekly basis for this contract. The contractor shall be available for informal reviews and Government visits in addition to the IPPT

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 13 of 23 reviews. The contractor shall participate in an informal bi-weekly meeting, to identify, discuss, and resolve issues.

The contractor shall submit, as a minimum, written program correspondence or documentation via electronic submittal. The preferred method of file submission is via e-mail. Deviations from this requirement are allowed on a case by case basis, with Government verbal concurrence (either Government IPPT chairpersons or Government contracting officer).

Transmission of Classified Material shall be in accordance with DoD 5220.22-M.

Data items shall be submitted, to the Government via electronic media. The electronic format shall be compliant with Microsoft Office for text documents, spreadsheets, graphics presentations, and program schedules.

It is the Government’s intent to use Contractor Integrated Technical Information Service (CITIS) to gain on-line access to contractor maintained data, configuration files, and information supporting this contract. The type of information to be placed on CITIS shall be concurred to by the IPPT prior to its implementation. The most recent version of all data shall be made available within five working days of being updated. The CITIS shall allow the Government the capability of retrieving all current and last modified versions of documentation. If the contractor determines this to be a restrictive cost driver, they can propose any alternative data submittal process (i.e. electronic data submittals, e-mail, etc.). Classified data shall be provided on magnetic or optical media.

Classified data shall be handled in accordance with DoD 5220.22-M and DD Form 254 attached to the contract.

Any restrictions on the use of the electronic data shall be as prescribed in the Data Rights Clause.

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENT LIST (CDRL) DD 1423-1

CDRL List

CDRL

Data Line No. DID Identification Title

A001 DI-SESS- 80639 Engineering Change Proposal B001 DI-SESS- 80640 Request for Variance C001 DI-SESS- 80642 Notice of Revision D001 DI-NDTI- 81307A First Article Qualification Test Plan – Quality Validation Plan E001 DI-NDTI- 80603 Test Procedures F001 DI-NDTI- 80603 Test/Inspection Report – Initial Production Testing Report G001 DI-NDTI- 80809B Failure Analysis and Corrective Action Report H001 DI-TMSS- 81586A Reliability Test Reports J001 DI-ADMN- 81373 Presentation Material - Briefing Charts

K001 DI-ADMN- 81505 Report, Record of Meeting/Minutes - Meeting Minutes

Individual CDRLs

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 14 of 23

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

(1 Data Item)

Original Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

A001 TDP X TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

MX-12389 Image Intesifier

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE

GROUP

Engineering Change Proposal

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

DI-SESS-80639 AMSEL-LCE-INV INSERT

7. DD 250 REQ 9.DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION 14. DISTRIBUTION IN

LT ASREQ SEE ITEM 16 b. COPIES

SECT. B

8. APP CODE N/A 11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

Draft Final

SEE ITEM 16

Reg

Repro

16. REMARKS:

The contractor shall prepare and submit Engineering Change Proposal in accordance with EIA-649-1 and this DID when a change to a contractual baseline document is deemed necessary.

The Government will have 30 days to review, accept, and/or comment on the draft submission. The contractor shall incorporate changes into the electronic deliverable within 30 days after receIPT of Government comments. The Government will have 30 days to review, accept, and/or comment on the final submission.

Data shall be submitted and exchanged electronically in Microsoft Office suite of applications (MS Word, Excel, Power Point, Access, and Project). Alternate formats may be allowed subject to Government review and approval.

E-mail notification is required with any electronic submission.

AMSEL-LCE-INV

RDER-PRA-CA

QAR

PCO

ACO

15. TOTAL 0 5 0

G. PREPARED BY H. DATE I. APPROVED BY J. DATE

Adedolapo Junaid

RDER-PRA-CA

Engineer

Angel Acevedo

RDER-PRA-CA

Branch Chief

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 15 of 23

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

B001 TDP X TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

MX-12389 Image Intesifier

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE

GROUP

Request For Variance

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

DI-SESS-80640 AMSEL-LCE-INV INSERT

7. DD 250 REQ 9.DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION 14. DISTRIBUTION IN

LT ASREQ SEE ITEM 16 b. COPIES

SECT. B

8. APP CODE N/A 11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

Draft Final

16. REMARKS: The contractor shall prepare and submit Request For Variance in accordance with EIA-649-1 and this DID when a departure from a contractual baseline document is deemed necessary.

The Government will have 30 days to review, accept, and/or comment on the draft submission. The contractor shall incorporate changes into the electronic deliverable within 30 days after receipt of Government comments. The Government will have 30 days to review, accept, and/or comment on the final submission.

Data shall be submitted and exchanged electronically in Microsoft Office suite of applications (MS Word, Excel, Power Point, Access, and Project). Alternate formats may be allowed subject to Government review and approval.

E-mail notification is required with any electronic submission.

AMSEL-LCE-INV

RDER-PRA-CA

QAR

Adedolapo Junaid

RDER-PRA-CA

Engineer

Angel Acevedo

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 16 of 23

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

C001 TDP X TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

MX-12389 Image Intesifier

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE

GROUP

Notice of Revision

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

DI-SESS-80642 AMSEL-LCE-INV INSERT

7. DD 250 REQ 9.DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION 14. DISTRIBUTION IN

LT ASREQ SEE ITEM 16 b. COPIES

SECT. B

8. APP CODE N/A 11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

Draft Final

16. REMARKS: The contractor shall prepare and submit Notice of Revision in accordance with EIA-649-1 and this DID when a change to a contractual baseline document is deemed necessary.

The Government will have 30 days to review, accept, and/or comment on the draft submission. The contractor shall incorporate changes into the electronic deliverable within 30 days after receipt of Government comments. The Government will have 30 days to review, accept, and/or comment on the final submission.

Data shall be submitted and exchanged electronically in Microsoft Office suite of applications (MS Word, Excel, Power Point, Access, and Project). Alternate formats may be allowed subject to Government review and approval.

E-mail notification is required with any electronic submission.

AMSEL-LCE-INV

RDER-PRA-CA

QAR

Adedolapo Junaid

RDER-PRA-CA

Engineer

Angel Acevedo

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 17 of 23

ONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

D001 TDP TM OTHER NDTI

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

MX-12389 Image Intesifier

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE

GROUP

First Article Qualification Test Plan Quality Validation Plan

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

DI-NDTI-81307A AMSEL-LCE-INV INSER

T

7. DD 250 REQ 9.DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION 14. DISTRIBUTION IN

DD ONE/P 30 DAC b. COPIES

SECT.

B

8. APP CODE N/A 11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

Draft Final

A SEE ITEM 16

16. REMARKS: Submit draft via LT. Government requires 30 days for review/comments. Submit final within 30 days of receipt of Government comments, via DD 250.

Each draft and the final submissions shall be delivered in a format, compatible with Microsoft Office software delivered by e-mail.

Alternative delivery media may be discussed with the Contracting Officer prior to delivery. E-mail notification is required with any electronic submission.

AMSEL-LCE-INV

15. TOTAL 4 4 0

Adedolapo Junaid

RDER-PRA-CA

Engineer

Angel Acevedo

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 18 of 23

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

E001 TDP TM OTHER NDTI

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

MX-12389 Image Intesifier

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE

GROUP

Test Procedures

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

DI-NDTI-80603

AMSEL-LCE-INV INSER

T

7. DD 250 REQ 9.DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION 14. DISTRIBUTION IN

DD OTIME 30 DAC b. COPIES

SECT.

B

8. APP CODE N/A 11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE Draft

Final

16. REMARKS: Submit report of Initial Production Testing procedures via DD 250. Government requires 14 days to provide comments/approval.

Submit revised report within 7 days after receipt of government comments. Government requires 7 days to provide comments/approval.

All deliveries shall be delivered in a format, compatible with Microsoft Office software delivered by e-mail. Alternative delivery media may be discussed with the Contracting Officer prior to delivery. E-mail notification is required with any electronic submission.

Adedolapo Junaid

RDER-PRA-CA

Engineer

Angel Acevedo

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 19 of 23

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

F001 TDP TM OTHER SESS

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

MX-12389 Image Intesifier

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE

GROUP

Test/Inspection Report Initial Production Test Report

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

DI-NDTI-80809B AMSEL-LCE-INV INSERT

7. DD 250 REQ 9.DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION

14. DISTRIBUTION IN

DD OTIME 180 DAC b. COPIES SECT. B

8. APP CODE N/A 11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

. REMARKS: Submit report of Initial Production Testing results via DD 250. Government requires 14 days to provide comments/approval.

Submit revised report within 7 days after receipt of government comments. Government requires 7 days to provide comments/approval.

All deliveries shall be delivered in a format, compatible with Microsoft Office software delivered by e-mail. Alternative delivery media may be discussed with the Contracting Officer prior to delivery. E-mail notification is required with any electronic submission.

PCO

ACO

QAR

Adedolapo Junaid

RDER-PRA-CA

Engineer

Angel Acevedo

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 20 of 23

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

G001 TDP TM OTHER SESS

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

MX-12389 Image Intesifier

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE

GROUP

Failure Analysis and Corrective Action Report

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-SESS-81315B AMSEL-LCE-INV INSERT

7. DD 250 REQ 9.DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION

14. DISTRIBUTION IN

LT ASREQ SEE ITEM 16 b. COPIES SECT. B

8. APP CODE N/A 11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

16. REMARKS: Data Item Description (DID) reference to MIL specs/stds is for guidance only.

Failure reports shall be submitted within 10 days of failure occurrence.

Technical Activity Representative is Adedolapo Junaid.

Each draft and the final submissions shall be delivered in a format, compatible with Microsoft Office software delivered by e-mail.

Alternative delivery methods may be discussed and agreed upon with the Contracting Officer prior to delivery. E-mail notification is required with any electronic submission.

AMSEL-LCE-INV

RDER-PRA-CA

PCO

ACO

QAR

Adedolapo Junaid

RDER-PRA-CA

Engineer

Angel Acevedo

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 21 of 23

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

H001 TDP TM OTHER NDTI

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

MX-12389 Image Intesifier

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE

GROUP

Reliability Test Reports

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

DI-TMSS-81586A AMSEL-LCE-I INSERT

7. DD 250 REQ 9.DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION

14. DISTRIBUTION IN

LT ASREQ SEE ITEM 16 b. COPIES SECT. B

8. APP CODE N/A 11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

Draft Final

REMARKS: Report is to be submitted within 21 Days after completion of tests/inspections. Government requires 21 days for review and approval or comment. Contractor shall incorporate corrections and resubmit within 14 days of receipt of Government comments.

Frequency of reports shall be IAW frequency of Reliability Testing, identified in the Requirements for Conformance Inspection.

Data shall be submitted and exchanged electronically in Microsoft Office suite of applications (MS Word, Excel, Power Point, Access, and Project). Alternate formats may be allowed subject to Government review and approval.

E-mail notification is required with any electronic submission.

15. TOTAL 0 4 4

Adedolapo Junaid

RDER-PRA-CA

Engineer

Angel Acevedo

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 22 of 23

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

J001 TDP TM OTHER ADMIN

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

MX-12389 Image Intesifier

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE

GROUP

Presentation Material Briefing Charts

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

DI-ADMN-81373 AMSEL-LCE-INV INSERT

7. DD 250 REQ 9.DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION

14. DISTRIBUTION IN

NO ASREQ SEE ITEM 16 b. COPIES SECT. B

8. APP CODE N/A 11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

Draft Final

REMARKS: Briefing charts and a meeting agenda shall be submitted to the Government 5 business days prior to any formal IPPT Review. For all other meetings, to include informal reviews and bi-weekly meetings, briefing charts and a meeting agenda shall be submitted to the Government 2 business days prior to the meeting.

Logistics Activity Representative is Kenya Montgomery.

Each draft and the final submissions shall be delivered in a format, compatible with Microsoft Office software delivered by e-mail.

Alternative delivery methods may be discussed and agreed upon with the Contracting Officer prior to delivery. E-mail notification is required with any electronic submission.

15. TOTAL 0 2 2

Adedolapo Junaid

RDER-PRA-CA

Engineer

Angel Acevedo

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0051 Page 23 of 23

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

K001 TDP TM OTHER ADMIN

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

MX-12389 Image Intesifier

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE

GROUP

Report, Record of Meeting/Minutes - Meeting Minutes

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-ADMN-81505 AMSEL-LCE-INV INSERT

7. DD 250 REQ 9.DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION

14. DISTRIBUTION IN

NO ASREQ SEE ITEM 16 b. COPIES SECT. B

8. APP CODE N/A 11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

Draft Final

16. REMARKS:

Submit summary of meetings NLT 5 days after completion of meeting(s). Government requires 10 days for review/comment/approval. Contractor shall incorporate corrections and resubmit within 3 days of receipt of Government comments.

All deliveries shall be delivered in a format, compatible with Microsoft Office software delivered by e-mail. Alternative delivery media may be discussed with the Contracting Officer prior to delivery.

E-mail notification is required with any electronic submission.

15. TOTAL 0 2 2

Adedolapo Junaid

RDER-PRA-CA

Engineer

Angel Acevedo

DI-NDTI-80603