Amendment01.10.q.0037.pdf

r. CONTRACT ID CODE IPAGE OF PAGES

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT I I

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE

01 SEE BLK 16C

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ . NO. 15. PROJECT NO. (If applicab/e).

6. ISSUED BY CODE

DEFENSE SUPPLY CENTER PHILADELPHIA

700 ROBBINS A VENUE

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19111

ADA c. TORRES-VEGAIDSCP-FQCC

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE I

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE FACILITY CODE

(X)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

SPM I C I-I 0-Q-0037

9B. DATED (SEE /TEM 11)

11/05/09

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE /TEM 13)

-11 . THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITAllONS [ZJ The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14 . The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers D is extended, [ZJ is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning ONE copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter. provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified .

12. Accounting and Appropriation Data (If required)

BX: 97X4930 5CBX 00 I 2630 S33189

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

~ A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN

THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT T HE AD MINIST RATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc .) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO

PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor D is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14 . DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The following change applies to subject solicitation:

Please see pages 2-3.

All other terms and conditions remain the same.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or lOA. as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature ofperson authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

ATTACHMENT 1 –EVALUATION FACTORS

PAST PERFORMANCE /EXPERIENCE (EVALUATION FACTOR)

The Government will make award to the responsible offeror(s) whose offer conforms with the solicitation and is most advantageous to the Government, cost or price, and other evaluation factors considered. The Government will award a contract only to concerns whose technical proposals establish that they can meet the requirements of the Government. For this solicitation, all evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are –

[ ] significantly less important than cost or price. As the evaluated cost/price becomes more equal, relative importance of all other evaluation factors becomes more significant.

[ ] approximately equal to cost or price.

[X] significantly more important than cost or price. As other evaluation factors become more equal, the evaluated cost or price becomes more important.

(b) Non-Cost/Price Evaluation Factors (listed in descending order of importance):

(1) Past Performance

(a) Experience (First Evaluation Sub-factor) The offeror shall describe the extent of experience producing the same or similar item(s) for a commercial or Government entity within two years preceding the solicitation closing date. For each contract, the offeror shall provide:

(1) The contract/order number.

(2) Date of the contract/order.

(3) The commercial or Government entity point of contact (name, address and telephone number).

(4) Average dollar amount of the contract per annum.

(5) Total contract/order quantity.

(6) Quantity shipped per month.

(7) Period of performance.

(8) Brief description of the item(s), including the National Stock Number (NSN) and specification number, if applicable.

(b) Quality of Items / Delivery Performance (Second Evaluation Sub-factor) For each contract identified in response to paragraph (a) above, the offeror shall:

(1) describe the quality of items delivered. For substandard quality, the offeror shall specifically address any warranty actions taken, quality deficiency reports issued, or returned merchandise (including one-for-one exchanges). The description of the problem shall also include an explanation for its occurrence, a clear plan or evidence of measures taken to preclude a recurrence and whether or not it was the offeror’s fault or subject to mitigating circumstances and

(2) specifically indicate whether the items were delivered on time, ahead of or behind schedule. If the items were not delivered on time, the offeror shall also provide the number of days delivered ahead of or behind schedule, whether revised delivery schedules were granted and an explanation for any delivery extensions. For delinquent delivery, the description shall also include an explanation for its occurrence, a clear plan or evidence of measures taken to preclude a recurrence and whether or not the problem was the offeror’s fault, otherwise excusable or subject to mitigating circumstances.

ADJECTIVE RATING SYMBOLOGY

• Exceptional.

o Past Performance: The offeror’s record of past performance (experience, quality of items / delivery performance, and, if an unrestricted acquisition, compliance with contractual socioeconomic subcontracting / mentoring goals) demonstrates that the offeror meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance is accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror were highly effective. The offeror has extensive experience with items/services of the similar kind and complexity as the solicited items/services. Experience is on commercial or government contracts.

An overall rating of this magnitude indicates a comprehensive understanding of the technical requirements and an ability to provide an acceptable quality product/service with the highest probability of successful contract performance.

• Very Good.

o Past Performance: Past performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance is accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror were effective. The offeror’s experience is with items/services of the similar kind and complexity as the solicited items/services and is on commercial or government contracts.

An overall rating of this magnitude indicates an understanding of the technical requirements and an ability to provide an acceptable quality product/service with a very good probability of successful contract performance.

• Satisfactory.

o Past Performance: Past performance meets contractual requirements. Contractual performance includes some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror appear or were satisfactory.

An overall rating of this magnitude indicates an understanding of the technical requirements and an ability to provide an acceptable quality product/service with a reasonable probability of successful contract performance.

• Marginal.

o Past Performance: Past performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the offeror’s corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

An overall rating of this magnitude indicates a marginal quality product/service and a questionable probability of successful contract performance.

• Unsatisfactory.

o Past Performance: Past performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery did not occur in a timely manner. Contractual performance contains serious problem(s) and corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An overall rating of this magnitude indicates a product/service of unacceptable quality with a low probability or no probability of successful contract performance.

• Neutral rating.

o The offeror has no relevant record of past performance history

In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.