Barrier Performance and Physical Property.docx
DOCX document 15 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SPE1C1-20-R-0137
About this file
This document contains test methods and physical property requirements for disposable surgical gowns being solicited by the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Clothing and Textiles. The solicitation seeks Level 2, 3, and 4 barrier gowns that meet standards for impact penetration resistance, viral penetration resistance, tensile strength, tear resistance, seam strength, lint generation, evaporative resistance, and water vapor transmission rate as defined in Tables 1 and 2. Gowns must be tested according to the specified ASTM or ISO test methods for each physical property. The solicitation also provides recommendations for measuring breathability to assess thermal comfort and cautions that product comparisons are only valid if conducted using the same test method. Offerors are advised to submit proposals via the DIBBS website at https://www.dibbs.bsm.dla.mil/ by the response date given on the site for Solicitation SPE1C1-20-R-0137.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TABLE 1 – Barrier Performance
| Barrier Performance |
| Test Method |
| AAMI PB70 Barrier Classification |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| Level 4 |
| Impact Penetration |
| AATCC 42 |
| <1.0 g AQL 4.0 |
| <1.0 g AQL 4.0 |
| A |
| Hydrostatic Resistance |
| AATCC 127 |
Or
EN 20811
| >20 cm AQL 4.0 |
| >50 cm AQL 4.0 |
| A |
Viral Penetration Resistance
ASTM F1671
Or
ISO 16604
A
A
Pass AQL 4.0 Or ≥ 14 kPa at the critical zones defined in ANSI/AAMI PB70
A Not required for this level.
TABLE 2 – Physical Properties
| Physical Property |
| Test Method |
| Section of ASTMF2407 |
| Reported Data Documentation A’ |
| Tensile strength B’ |
| ASTM D5034 |
| 11.3 |
| Average tensile strength each material direction C’ |
| Tear resistance B’ |
| ASTM D5587 (woven); |
| 11.4 |
| Average tearing force each material direction C’ |
ASTM D5733 (non-woven)
| Seam Strength |
| ASTM D751 (stretch woven or knit) |
| 11.5 |
| Average seam strength for each seam type in the critical zone(s) |
| Lint Generation D’ |
| ISO 9073 Part 10 |
| 11.6 |
| Particle count for each side, unless material is the same on each side |
| Evaporative resistance E’ |
| ASTM F1868, Part B |
| 11.7 |
| Average evaporative resistance for both critical and non-critical zone(s) |
or
| Water vapor transmission rate E’ |
| ASTM D6701 |
| 11.8 |
| Average water vapor transmission rate for both critical and non-critical zone(s) |
A’ Appendix X1 provides a description of each method, its intended application, and limitations.
B’ Measurement of tensile and tear strength properties may not be indicative of snag or puncture resistance. There are no generally accepted test methods for snag or puncture resistance available at this time."
C’ This specification follows industry practice for reporting strength properties in both material directions (warp and fill, machine and cross-machine, or wales and course as specified by the manufacturer) to provide the end user with a comparison of material performance because a material may have different strengths associated with each direction of its manufacture."
D’ Results from lint testing are highly operator and equipment dependent. It is recommended that data be collected using a single piece of equipment, using a single operator, and on the same day to minimize variability."
E’ This specification permits reporting either evaporative resistance or water vapor transmission rate. Appendix X1 provides a comparison of the two methods with their respective procedures, application, and limitations. Garment comfort is a function of several factors, including but not limited to, fabric “breathability,” garment design, weight, fabric stiffness, the degree of garment fit on the individual wearer, and other possible individual wearer preferences (for example, noise, odor). Due to the complexity of these factors the best assessment of overall gown comfort can be made through actual wear tests. Measuring the breathability of the fabrics used to construct surgical gowns is one method of predicting thermal comfort. Those gowns that are designed and constructed of materials which more freely allow evaporation of perspiration and body heat transfer provide better thermal comfort. When gowns are constructed or reinforced with different materials in the critical and non-critical zones then testing the breathability of all the materials is important to help gain an understanding of the impact of overall garment design on thermal comfort. Comparisons of breathability between different surgical gowns (or gown materials) should only be made using the same test method. Also included in Appendix X1 are other potential factors that can affect comfort."
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .