IESS Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionannire.docx

DOCX document 34 KB Posted

Attached to
IESS/ECK Systems Support Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
SP470324R0004
Issued by
Defense Logistics Agency

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and federal contract opportunity notice. The past performance questionnaire is for a contractor providing an integrated hardware and software solution for military fleet fuel transaction capture at unattended fuel stations, mobile fueling operations, and aviation fueling. The federal contract opportunity is a pre-solicitation notice for Integrated Electronic Security Systems and Electronic Key Control Systems support services. The requirement is set aside for small businesses with a NAICS code of 561621 and size standard of $25 million. The Defense Logistics Agency plans to award multiple IDIQ contracts under solicitation number SP4703-24-R-0004, anticipated to be posted on February 5, 2024. The draft performance work statement provides more details on the requirement. Inquiries must be submitted by the specified point of contact by the stated deadline.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to IESS/ECK Systems Support Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
IESS_EKC RFP SP4703-24-R-0004 20240701.pdf PDF
IESS Attachment 7 - Evaluation Factor Matrix 20240408.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
IESS Attachment 4 - IDIQ Cybersecurity Demonstration 20240319.docx DOCX document
IESS Attachment 1 - IDIQ PWS 20240228.docx DOCX document
RFP Continuation Sheet SP4703-24-R-0004 IESS DRAFT 4-4-2024.docx DOCX document
IESS Attachment 8 Task Order PWS 3-29-2024.docx DOCX document
IESS Attachment 2 - IDIQ ROM 3-5-2024.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
IESS Attachment 9 Task Order Pricing Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
IESS Attachment 2 - ROM v2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
IESS Attachment 6 - Contractor NDA.docx DOCX document
RFP SF1449 IESS-EKC Page 1-2.pdf PDF
RFP Continuation Sheet SP4703-24-R-0004 IESS v7.docx DOCX document
IESS Attachment 4 - Cybersecurity Demonstration 20240206.docx DOCX document
IESS Attachment 3 - Key Personnel Resume Template.docx DOCX document
IESS Attachment 7 - Evaluation Factor Matrix 20240216.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
IESS Attachment 1 - PWS 20240228.docx DOCX document
IESS and EKC IDIQ_PWS_20231130 clean copy.docx DOCX document
IESS and EKC IDIQ_PWS_20231130.docx DOCX document
Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 2

Solicitation SP4703-24-R-0004 Past Performance Questionnaire

From: DLA Contracting Services Office Richmond,
6090 Strathmore Rd, Richmond, VA 23237

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Submit completed questionnaire by Closing Date via email to heesun.redmond@dla.mil.

This requirement is for contractor to provide a turn-key hardware and software solution that captures military fleet management fuel retail transactions at unattended military service stations, mobile ground fuel transactions and aviation fuel transactions for mobile airfield/flight line operations, at all locations stated in the PWS.

I am contacting you in reference to ________who has given us your name as a reference. My questions pertain to their record of past and current performance (if applicable). Where the term “Vendor” is used below, it refers to this firm. The information that you provide will be used in the best value evaluation. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual and accurate as possible.

(1) Name of Contractor questionnaire is being completed for:

(2) Contract Number:

(3) Role Contractor played in Prior Contract

Prime

Joint Venture Team Member

Subcontractor

(4) Proposed Role in Pending Contract

Prime

Joint Venture Team Member

Subcontractor

(5) Length of time your agency/firm has been involved with the Offeror:
15 months

(6) Contract type:

(7) Contract value:

(8) Description of service:

(9) Is Performance on this contract being reported in CPARS

No, complete page 2 of questionnaire

Yes, answer question (i) below

(i) Has the scope of work significantly changed since the last CPAR?

No

Yes, provide details in (iv) below

(ii) Have there been any significant changes in contractor performance between the last CPAR and now?

No

Yes, answer question (iii) below

(iii) Has an out-of-cycle CPAR been initiated to document changes in performance?

No, provide details of changes in (iv) below

Yes

(iv) Comments to support answers to questions (i), (ii) and (iii):

(10) Name of agency/company completing questionnaire:

(11) Name of person completing questionnaire:

(12) Email address of person completing questionnaire:

(13) Title of person completing questionnaire:

(14) Phone number of person completing questionnaire:

(15) Date questionnaire is being completed:

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

RATING SCALE: Please use the following ratings to answer the questions on page 3.

Rating
Definition
Outstanding
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unacceptable
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Neutral
No record exists.
N/A
(Not applicable) should be used if the ratings are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation

NOTE: For statements indicating less than “Acceptable”, please provide a brief explanation in the comments section of the survey.

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY FOR SERVICES
N/A
Neutral
Unacceptable
Marginal
Acceptable
Good
Outstanding

a.) QUALITY OF SERVICE:

(1) The Vendor provides a product or service that complies with the contract requirements, specifications, and standards of quality.

(2) The Vendor submits accurate deliverables / reports.

(3) How well did the Vendor establish & maintain a quality program ensuring the ongoing quality of all significant processes were performed?

(4) The Vendor utilizes personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

b.) COST CONTROL:

(1) The Vendor performs the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(2) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(4) Vendor’s response to change order was timely and accurate. If the changes in costs/price were initiated or caused by the Vendor please explain in Comments Section.

c.) TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE AND DELIVERABLE SCHEDULE:

(1) The tasks required under this effort are performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the performance schedule, deliverable schedule and period of performance of the contract.

(2) The Vendor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

d.) MANAGEMENT APPROACH AND BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:

(1) The Vendor demonstrates effective management over the effort performed.

(2) The Vendor maintains an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and/or Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR) were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.

(3) The Vendor presents information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

(4) The Vendor promptly notified the COR, COTR and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

(5) The Vendor cooperates with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to identified risk areas and/or critical program issues.

(6) How well did the Vendor plan for initial implementation of the project and achieve operation of task requirements once the contract began.

e.) MANAGEMENT OF KEY and NON-KEY PERSONNEL:

(1) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Vendor performance.

(2) The Vendor provided the proposed qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract.

(3) The Vendor maintained a trained, qualified and experienced workforce in sufficient numbers to meet contract requirements.

f.) CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

(1) The services provided adequately met the needs of the program for the contract tasks requirement.

(2) The Vendor was able to perform with minimal or no direction from the COR or the COTR.

(3) I am satisfied with the performance of the Contractor under this effort.

COMMENTS:

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION

FAR 2.101 and 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .