Attachment_6_PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONAIRE.doc
DOC document 91 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DAI Compliance and Configuration Management Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SP4701-16-R-0003
- Issued by
- Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support
About this file
Attachment 6
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Tab_32_-_Amendment_02_SP4701-16-R-0003.pdf | ||
| Tab_32_-_Amendment_01_SP4701-16-R-0003.pdf | ||
| Tab_31_-_DAI_Compliance_RFP_Final_FBO_Post_-_Format_Correction.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_CONTRACTOR_NON-DISCLOSURE_AGREEMENT_CONFLICT_OF_INTEREST_.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_4_PAS_PERFORMANCE_TEMPLATE.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_5_DD254_SAMPLE.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_2_CONTRACT_WORK_BREAKDOWN_STRUCTURE-WBS.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_3_DAI_HIGH_LEVEL_WORK_BREAKDOWN_STRUCTURE.docx | DOCX document | |
| Tab_31_-_DAI_Compliance_RFP_Final_FBO_Post.pdf | ||
| Tab_29-_DAI_Compliance_Synopsis_FBO_Post.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE RFP # SP4701-16-R-0003
Questions below pertain to the vendor’s record of past and current performance (if applicable). Where the term “Vendor” is used below, it refers to this firm (or contractor). The information that you provide will be used in the best value evaluation. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual and accurate as possible.
(1) Name of Vendor questionnaire is being completed for:
(2) Contract Number:
(3) Role Contractor played in Prior Contract
Prime
Joint Venture Team Member
Subcontractor
(4) Proposed Role in Pending Contract
Prime
Joint Venture Team Member
Subcontractor
(5) Length of time your agency/firm has been involved with the Vendor:
(6) Contract type:
(7) Contract value:
(8) Description of service:
(9) Is Performance on this contract being reported in CPARS
No, complete page 2 of questionnaire
Yes, answer question (i) below
(i) Has the scope of work significantly changed since the last CPAR?
No
Yes, provide details in (iv) below
(ii) Have there been any significant changes in contractor performance between the last CPAR and now?
No
Yes, answer question (iii) below
(iii) Has an out-of-cycle CPAR been initiated to document changes in performance?
No, provide details of changes in (iv) below
Yes
(iv) Comments to support answers to questions (i), (ii) and (iii):
(10) Name of agency/company completing questionnaire:
(11) Name of person completing questionnaire:
(12) Email address of person completing questionnaire:
(13) Title of person completing questionnaire:
(14) Phone number of person completing questionnaire:
(15) Date questionnaire is being completed:
From:
| CONTRACTOR PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY FOR SERVICES |
| N/A |
| Neutral |
| Not Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Acceptable |
| Highly Acceptable |
| Exceptional |
a.) QUALITY OF SERVICE:
(1) The Vendor provided a product or service that complied with the contract requirements, specifications, and standards of quality.
(2) The Vendor submitted accurate deliverables /reports.
b.) COST CONTROL:
(1) The Vendor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.
c.) TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE AND DELIVERABLE SCHEDULE:
(1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the performance schedule, deliverable schedule and period of performance of the contract.
d.) MANAGEMENT APPROACH AND BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:
(1) The Vendor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.
e.) MANAGEMENT OF KEY and NON-KEY PERSONNEL:
(1) The Vendor maintained a trained, qualified and experienced workforce in sufficient numbers to meet contract requirements.
f.) CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
(1) The services provided adequately met the needs of the program for the contract task requirements.
(2) I am satisfied with the performance of the Vendor under this effort.
COMMENTS:
RATING SCALE: Please use the following ratings to answer the questions on page 3.
Rating Definitions
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many of the requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Highly Acceptable |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some of the requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Acceptable |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginally Acceptable |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Not Acceptable |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Neutral |
| No record exists. |
| N/A |
| (Not applicable) should be used if the ratings are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation |
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .