SP060015R0423-_Kirtland_AFB-NOO-9-21-2015.pdf

Notice of Opportunity

Kirtland AFB, NM

Notification of Opportunity

Kirtland Air Force Base NM

Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) Task Order Under the Department of Energy’s

(DOE), Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract.

Solicitation: SP0600-15-R-0423

1. Notice: The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Energy, on behalf of Kirtland Air Force Base, New

Mexico plans to award an ESPC task order using the Department of Energy (DOE) Super ESPC indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts. DLA Energy invites the current 16 ESPC contract holders (herein called ESCO – energy service company) to submit a written response to this

Notice of Opportunity (NOO) for DLA Energy’s consideration. Only the 16 DOE ESPC awardees are eligible for award.

2. Authority: The DLA Energy authority is in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation

(FAR) 23.205 “Energy-savings performance contracts”, Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct) and

DOE Final Rule, 10 CFR 436 Subpart B – Methods and Procedures for Energy Savings Performance

Contracting and Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPA, 10 Apr 1995).

3. Background: Kirtland Air Force Base is located in the southeast quadrant of Albuquerque, New

Mexico. The base is roughly 50,000 acres and has 7 million square feet of facilities. Kirtland is the home of the Air Force Materiel Command’s Nuclear Weapons Center, 58 th

Special Operations Wing and Air Education and Training Command.

4. Project Approach: Kirtland desires to achieve improvements in energy efficiency, water conservation and renewable energy production in 134 buildings covering 4,162,258 square feet.

ECMs developed in the Preliminary Assessment (PA) and Investment Grade Audit (IGA) must increase energy reliability and energy surety. Refer to Attachment 1 for a list of buildings included in the scope, and pertinent data illustrating Kirtland’s energy consumption. This information is offered only for project scoping potential. The selected ESCO shall be responsible for determining the actual utility consumption during the PA and IGA phases.

In achieving their energy goals, Kirtland is interested in any energy conservation measure (ECM) defined in Attachment J-3 of the DOE IDIQ contract with the exception of two technical categories:

TC.15 - Energy Cost Reduction through Rate Adjustments and TC.20 - Future ECMs. Kirtland is interested in a centralized energy management control systems (EMCS) and such a system should be considered in the resultant project. Their existing EMCS was installed over 10 years ago, is a combination of pneumatic controls and Direct Digital Control, and should be considered near or at the end of its useful life. New systems are to be connected to the base’s civil engineer virtual local area network (CE-VAN) and will have to be certified through the Air Force Certification and

Accreditation Program (AFCAP). ECMs will have the operations, maintenance, repair and replacement performed by the selected ESCO.

5. Submission Requirements

DLA Energy, on behalf of Kirtland, invites the 16 current ESPC contract holders to submit a written response to this NOO for our consideration. This NOO constitutes your opportunity to be considered for this potential project. A site visit will not be offered as part of the down-selection process.

Kirtland AFB, NM

a. Response Preparation Instructions

(1) Document Submission:

Offers must be completed and returned to the below address prior to the exact time and location set forth as the closing date for submission of offers. Late responses will only be considered in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f). All documents shall be sent to the following address:

DLA Energy-FEABB

Attn: Cynthia J. Obermeyer, Contracting Officer, and

Carrie Boeding, Contract Specialist

8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 3827

Ft. Belvoir, VA 22060

The package shall be labeled “DO NOT OPEN/SUBMISSION OF OFFER –

KIRTLAND AFB.” Emailed or facsimile offers in response to the Notice of Opportunity are not acceptable. Due to security requirements at DLA any hand delivered proposals should be coordinated with the contract specialist three days in advance of delivery. Any formal communications such as requests for clarifications and/or information concerning this

NOO must be submitted in writing and emailed to both Carrie.boeding@dla.mil and

Cynthia.obermeyer@dla.mil. Clarifications and questions must be received by the above at least 10 days prior to the established closing date of the NOO.

To assure timely and equitable evaluation of offers, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet the requirements of the NOO and its attachments to include terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for selection.

(2) Page Limitations and Number of Copies:

Each offer submitted shall contain one electronic version and one hard copy. Failure to include all information requested may adversely affect the evaluation and may result in an offer being ineligible for consideration. Assurance of experience, capability, and qualifications that clearly demonstrate and support the offeror’s plan of action and claims are essential.

Page limitation for each offeror’s response is stated in paragraph (7) below. If page limitations are exceeded, the excess pages will not be considered as part of the evaluation of the submitted offer. Each page shall be counted except the following: blank pages, tables of contents, tabs and glossaries and those parts of the offer noted herein as exempt from the page limitations.

(3) Page Size and Format:

A page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages. Page size shall be

8.5 x 11 inches, not including foldouts. Pages shall be single-spaced. Except for the reproduced sections of the NOO and its attachments, the text size shall be no less than 12 mailto:Carrie.boeding@dla.mil mailto:Cynthia.obermeyer@dla.mil

Kirtland AFB, NM point. Use at least 1 inch margins on the top and bottom and ¾ side margins. Pages shall be numbered sequentially. These limitations shall apply to both electronic and hard copy versions of the response.

Legible tables, charts, graphs and figures shall be used wherever practical to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, etc. These displays shall be uncomplicated and shall not exceed 11 x 17 inches in size. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the offer, and count as a single page. Foldout pages may only be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams, and schematics; not for pages of text. For tables, charts, graphs and figures, the text shall be no smaller than 10 point. These limitations shall apply to both electronic and hard copy versions of the response.

(4) Electronic Copies:

The content and page size of electronic copies must be identical to the hard copy. When discrepancies exist between the written offer and those provided in electronic format, the written offer will take precedence in all cases. For electronic copies, indicate on each CD-

ROM the offeror’s name and project title. The electronic copies of the response shall be submitted in a format readable by Microsoft (MS) Word 2010®, MS Excel 2010®, and MS-

Power Point 2010®, or Micro-Soft Office XP®, as applicable. In addition to one of the aforementioned formats, the electronic copy must also contain one complete response document in Acrobat Adobe (.pdf) format.

(5) Indexing:

To the greatest extent possible, indexing shall be used to readily identify information contained in the submission. The offer shall contain a detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections. Indexing and tabbing pages shall not count against the page limitations. Any information included on these tab or index pages outside of the realm of a tab or index intent shall not be considered.

(6) Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms:

The offer shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation for each. Glossaries do not count against the page limitations.

(7) Response Requirements

The ESCOs are responsible for verifying the completeness and accuracy of all information furnished to them by the Government. Responses to this Notice of Opportunity should be received no later than 23 Oct 2015, 3:00 p.m. ET Fort Belvoir, VA. Interested

ESCOs are asked to limit the volume of the material submitted to only the pertinent information requested. All interested ESCOs should submit the following to be considered:

Factor 1 – Past Performance: (15 single sided pages maximum)

This factor considers the ESCO’s performance regarding implementation of ECMs under an ESPC contract, particularly ECMs for EMCS, as well as its performance as an ESPC prime contractor.

Kirtland AFB, NM

The ESCO’s response to this factor should include sufficient information to identify and describe the experience of the ESCO as a prime contractor for up to four (4) ESPC projects that illustrate the ESCO’s performance regarding EMCS. If an ESCO submits more than four (4) projects, only the first four (4) will be considered for evaluation. Projects that have construction completed will rate more favorably than projects that do not have construction completed at the time of submission. The total project may include other energy conservation measures (ECMs); however, the only ECM that needs to be detailed as required below is the EMCS ECM.

For each project, provide a brief narrative explaining how the project relates to each of the items (i) – (iv) below. Include the Agency/Owner point of contact (name, title, phone number, and email address), contract number, location of each project, the date of task order or contract award, the actual project construction completion date, the modified construction completion date and the performance period term for each project. For projects currently in the performance period phase, include information on whether the guaranteed savings for previous years have been achieved. ESCO submissions shall address each of the following items for each project submitted:

(i) Discuss the certification/accreditation process that was accomplished as part of the installation and implementation cyber security measures. The Government defines cyber security measures as processes and practices to protect network, equipment, programs and data from attack, damage or unauthorized access.

(ii) Discuss the EMCS scope of work to include system descriptions (i.e. front end.

Controllers, etc.), control strategies, commissioning process, and estimated/measured savings.

(iii) Describe the measurement and verification approach by control strategy.

(iv) Describe the maintenance approach used to ensure predicted savings persisted throughout the life of the contract.

In addition to the narrative statement described above, the Government will use its discretion to determine the sources of past information used in the evaluation, and the information may be obtained from references provided by the offeror, agency’s knowledge of contractor performance, other Government agencies or commercial entities, or past performance databases. In assessing this factor, the offeror’s performance capabilities related to its ECMS work will be given greater weight than its performance capabilities related solely to other ECMs or generally as a prime contractor.

Factor 2 - Price: (Five single sided pages maximum) ESCOs shall provide the project development costs, the project’s total implementation price, the profit rate and the overhead rate for each of the four (4) projects submitted under Factor 1.

Kirtland AFB, NM

6. Evaluation Methodology

a. Basis for Selection:

Task Order (TO) down selection procedures as stated in the DOE basic contract, paragraph H.3.1, will be used to make an integrated assessment for a best fit decision for ESPC services at a firm fixed price.

Proposal will be evaluated using the following two factors in descending order of importance:

1) Past Performance

2) Price

The down selection process will focus on each ESCO’s past EMCS performance and their reasonable ability to achieve Kirtland’s energy conservation and renewable energy goals.

The resultant TO may be awarded to the responsible ESCO who provides the best fit for achieving energy conservation and renewable energy production efforts for Kirtland AFB at a reasonable price. Best fit means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the

Government’s estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in satisfying the requirement and represents the best value to the Government considering the ESCO’s past performance and price.

b. Number of Contracts to be Awarded:

The Government intends to award one resultant TO for this requirement. However, the

Government reserves the right not to award a TO at all.

Attachment:

1. Site Buildings and Energy Consumption Data

Attachment 1: Site Buildings and Energy Consumption Data

Building # Bldg Function Sq Ft

Date Built

Electric (kWh)

Electric (kBTU) Gas (CF) Gas (kBTU) Total (kBTU/SF)

243 SC LAB LASER 9411 1970

30,240

103,179 - - 10.96

277 Research Lab 50048 1943 1,998,000

6,817,176

13,132,800

13,539,917 406.75

SC LAB DY-ENVRMTL 34961 1972

1,264,680

4,315,088 - - 123.43

323 SC LAB RADIAT 25484 1991

964,438

3,290,662

76,700 79,078 132.23

325 LAB, PME 16679 1968

487,160

1,662,190 - - 99.66

333 Base Operations 42879 1942 156,960

535,548

1,076,050

1,109,408 38.36

336 SHP JET ENG I/MNT 35180 1956

186,960

637,908

82,300 84,851 20.54

381 SHP A/SE STOR FCLT 16027 1963

191,720

654,149

188,500 194,344 52.94

400 Sc Lab, Laser 38526 1968 1,150,340

3,924,960

321,100 331,054 110.47

402 DPI 21360 1985

5,142,840

17,547,370 - - 821.51

SC LAB LASER 18959 1966

125,960

429,776 - - 22.67

410 DPI 8722 1977 - - - - -

413 HQ, SPECIFIED 54710 1957

565,760

1,930,373

427,500 440,753 43.34

414 HQ, SPECIFIED 8600 1962

65,880

224,783 - - 26.14

HQ CENTER

27204 1962 101,440

346,113 - - 12.72

SC LAB RADIAT 33052 1962

703,680

2,400,956

492,200 507,458 88.00

SC LAB RADIAT

59867

65,880

224,783 - - 3.75

418 SC LAB LASER 14459 1966

304,000

1,037,248

395,600 407,864 99.95

422 Sc Lab, Laser 24968 1990 1,028,400

3,508,901 - - 140.54

423 HQ, SPECIFIED 16790 1958

84,540

288,450

273,500 281,979 33.97

426 HQ, SPECIFIED 15020 1958

159,720

544,965 - - 36.28

436 FLY TNG CLASSROOM 9370 1957

91,560

312,403 - - 33.34

472 Msl/Space Rsch Tst 66628 1995 851,840

2,906,478

242,000 249,502 47.37

482 Training Classrom 50756 1945 264,480

902,406

90,700 93,512 19.62

570 Battle Space Lab 146012 2010 4,198,400

14,324,941 - - 98.11

580 Space Sensor Lab 6000 2013 141,800

483,822 - - 80.64

589 Old Chapel 10721 1960 61,600

210,179 - - 19.60

595 Prod Nav/Guid Sys 16682 1995 582,720

1,988,241

141,700 146,093 127.94

CAT MAINT BLDG 6990 2004

83,580

285,175 - - 40.80

760 SC LAB CIVIL ENGRG 78961 1976

483,960

1,651,272 - - 20.91

761 SC LAB LASER 29601 2000

172,600

588,911 - - 19.89

909 SC LAB PERS RSCH 30096 1952

672,120

2,293,273 - - 76.20

NUC ENGRG TST BLDG 28435 1971

563,000

1,920,956 - - 67.56

915 DORM, VAQ 17387 1955

86,640

295,616

67,300 69,386 20.99

916 SQ OPS 12580 1954

100,920

344,339

20,900 21,548 29.08

923 Flight Training Classroom 13961 1955 511,800

1,746,262

30,000 30,930 127.30

TECH TNG CLASSROOM

18021

117,840

402,070

103,500 106,709 28.23

ATC TECH TNG SPT 8778 2003

45,779

156,198 - - 17.79

INTEGR SPT FCLTY 75326 1999

3,779,400

12,895,313

267,200 275,483 174.85

948 Flight Simulator 24768 1992 2,341,280

7,988,447 - - 322.53

949 FLT SIMLTR TNG 32000 1996

889,280

3,034,223 - - 94.82

950 Flight Training Simulator 35073 2008 617,000

2,105,204 - - 60.02

952 Flight Training Simulator 27864 1956 125,760

429,093

63,000 64,953 17.73

953 FLY TNG CLASSROOM 11943 1964

142,560

486,415 - - 40.73

954 FLT SIMLTR TNG 7079 1972

98,960

337,652 - - 47.70

955 FLT SIMLTR TNG 5784 1977

772,520

2,635,838 - - 455.71

956 FLT SIMLTR TNG 13350 1981

739,560

2,523,379

52,800 54,437 193.09

957 FLY TNG CLASSROOM 19500 1997

242,400

827,069

1,200 1,237 42.48

975 TECH TNG CLASSROOM 26435 1992

300,800

1,026,330

80,000 82,480 41.94

985 Corrosion Control 30400 2008 570,720

1,947,297 - - 64.06

994 AERIAL DELIVERY 13344 1993

469,800

1,602,958

1,422,000

1,466,082 229.99

996 Avionics 40564 1992 546,800

1,865,682 - - 45.99

1000 HG MAINT 122375 1955

1,566,720

5,345,649 - - 43.68

1001 HG MAINT 167300 1952

1,258,760

4,294,889 - - 25.67

1002 58 SOW Log Gp 161491 1955

1,532,400

5,228,549 - - 32.38

FIRE CRASH/RESCUE

STATION 34502 2004

586,500

2,001,138

275,000 283,525 66.22

1015 WHSE SUP&EQUIP BSE 118220 1952

477,900

1,630,595

214,800 221,459 15.67

1017 HQ WG 22535 1953

513,300

1,751,380

102,300 105,471 82.40

1018 SHP, AVIONICS 17980 1953

316,820

1,080,990

160,000 164,960 69.30

1019 SQ OPS 11496 1953

189,280

645,823 - - 56.18

1020 HQ WG 15663 1953

231,400

789,537 - - 50.41

1025 WHSE SUP&EQUIP BSE 24512 1961

124,800

425,818

10,500 10,826 17.81

ADMIN OFC, NON-AF 15418 1953

600,080

2,047,473 - - 132.80

1037 MAINT DOCK, FL SYS 13150 1983

415,800

1,418,710

123,300 127,122 117.55

1038 Maint Dock, S/A 12763 1956 85,240

290,839

5,317 5,482 23.22

ADMIN OFC, NON-AF 17846 1936

377,680

1,288,644 - - 72.21

ADMIN OFC, NON-AF

11897 1936 39,480

134,706

14,400 14,846 12.57

1909 ADMIN OFC, NON-AF 11189 1936 - - - - -

ADMIN OFC, NON-AF 23300 1997

364,200

1,242,650

95,400 98,357 57.55

20107 Chapel 19272 1957 82,440

281,285

190,400 196,302 24.78

20129 HQ Center 24138 1989 764,040

2,606,904 - - 108.00

20130 HQ Center 73592 1955 826,040

2,818,448

67,300 69,386 39.24

20140 HQ Center 24700 1957 121,440

414,353

698,123 719,765 45.92

20160 CHILD CARE CEN 28772 1983

223,620

762,991

11,507,900

11,864,645 438.89

20200 HQ Center 46369 1947 582,320

1,986,876

280,100 288,783 49.08

20201 HQ Center 15948 1948 235,920

804,959

58,600 60,417 54.26

20202 HQ Center 69729 1948 1,069,120

3,647,837

568,900 586,536 60.73

20203 HQ Center 32688 1948 455,920

1,555,599

544,700 561,586 64.77

20204 Library 17413 1948 200,080

682,673

79,500 81,965 43.91

20206 Art & Crafts Center 7207 1957

36,960

126,108

128,500 132,484 35.88

20210 Fire Dept 8653 1948 216,680

739,312

263,100 271,256 116.79

20220 Law Enf. 8120 1950 116,200

396,474

76,200 78,562 58.50

20225 Base Theater 10913 1950 155,372 15.49

4,000 13,648 150,700

20234 Youth Center 21070 1997 295,680

1,008,860 - - 47.88

20245 HQ Group 74169 1988 1,122,780

3,830,925

206,600 213,005 54.52

20325 HQ Center 37180 2001 605,000

2,064,260 - - 55.52

20338 Hangar 22869 1942 1,427

4,869

280,200 288,886 12.85

20344 Allied Trades 12110 1945 79,880

272,551 - - 22.51

20349 Garage 12000 1952 49,000

167,188 - - 13.93

20350 Dining Hall 37404 1950 738,900

2,521,127

1,964,200

2,025,090 121.54

20362 FCDNA 32761 1948

586,160

1,999,978 - - 61.05

20364 ADMIN OFC, NON-AF 34252 1961

186,900

637,703 - - 18.62

20375 H/SHP, AUTOMOTIVE 8458 1953

44,360

151,356

816,500 841,812 117.42

20410 Rec Supply 14396 1952 21,520

73,426

888,000 915,528 68.70

20411 Rec Supply 13984 1949 9,180

31,322

764,700 788,406 58.62

20412 Ready Shltr Fac 7592 1949 13,497

46,052

443,200 456,939 66.25

20413 EOD 7592 1949 0 -

326,600 336,725 44.35

20414 WHSE SUP&EQUIP BSE 14196 1949

45,577

155,509

1,306,300

1,346,795 105.83

20415 HSG SUP STOR F 14196 1949 0 -

492,500 507,768 35.77

20416 RSCH EQUIP STOR 6016 1989

37,349

127,435 - - 21.18

20420 AFCS MAINT FCLTY 10940 1954

65,480

223,418

304,500 313,940 49.12

20423 Maintenance 9921 1954 153,600

524,083

137,200 141,453 67.08

20430 Det 1 8640 1999 75,520

257,674 - - 29.82

20449 COMM FCLTY 19922 1949 208,056 218.03

1,212,080 4,135,617 201,800

20451 National Assessment 20327 1950 694,380

2,369,225

215,900 222,593 127.51

20452 Jail 8056 1950 - - - - -

20602 TECH TNG LAB/SHP 101611 1953

1,097,880

3,745,967

370,600 382,089 40.63

20604 WING HQ 111783 1966

2,252,400

7,685,189

4,406,200

4,542,792 109.39

20616 Training Center 82159 2010 - - - - -

20620 Maintenance Shed 23660 2010 0 -

1,616,800

1,666,921 70.45

20676 FCDNA 47512 1955

2,421,600

8,262,499

252,500 260,328 179.38

20683 Warehouse 41400 1953 186,080

634,905

66,300 68,355 16.99

20684 Offices 10499 1973 37,400

127,609 - - 12.15

20685 Offices 10082 1953 106,440

363,173 - - 36.02

20686 Civil Engineering 24868 1953 122,220

417,015

85,900 88,563 20.33

20687 Civil Ops. 29229 1953 87,440

298,345

482,200 497,148 27.22

20724 Msl Ops Bldg 6654 1995 73,840

251,942

11,800 12,166 39.69

22001 VOQ 24480 1950

208,160

710,242

58,300 60,107 31.47

22002 VOQ 28765 1950

235,520

803,594

91,300 94,130 31.21

22003 VOQ 28288 1950

178,020

607,404

49,000 50,519 23.26

22011 VOQ (O1-O10) 12601 1953

249,280

850,543

42,000 43,302 70.93

22012 VOQ (O1-O10) 17912 1954

203,360

693,864 - - 38.74

22018 VOQ 39164 2006

969,680

3,308,548

5,178,300

5,338,827 220.80

24499 HQ AFISC 106900 1993

1,667,520

5,689,578 - - 53.22

27492 VEH MAINT SHP 10883 1997

2,044

6,976 - - 0.64

27494 MUN MAINT ADMIN 16939 1991

399,480

1,363,026 - - 80.47

27496 STOR, MU-CUB MAG 120000 1991 - - - - -

57001 SC LAB CIVIL ENGRG 24920 1961 - - - - -

57010 SC LAB CIVIL ENGRG 8280 1969

925 - - 0.11

57011

SC LAB CIVIL ENGRG 6140 1979

92,600

315,951 - - 51.46

66001 SC LAB LASER 8603 1970

701,342

2,392,979 - - 278.16

66041

SC LAB LASER 9816 1976

46,000

156,952 - - 15.99

66047 SC LAB PHYSICS 22915 1996

1,170,640

3,994,224 - - 174.31

66048

SC LAB LASER 61678 2004

2,798,520

9,548,550 - - 154.81

TOTAL SF 4,162,258

70,407,224

240,229,450

55,722,990

57,450,403