SOQ Appendix C.pdf

PDF 180 KB Posted

Attached to
TELFAIR COUNTY FY2027 CDBG SENIOR CENTER RENOVATIONS
Solicitation number
PE-77001-NONST-2027-000000025
Issued by
Treutlen County, Georgia

About this file

This document is a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) Scoring form used to evaluate architectural and/or engineering firms for a state or local contract opportunity. The form provides a standardized evaluation framework for assessing qualified firms across five key criteria: the firm's ability to provide necessary disciplines for the project, experience of the firm and key personnel with similar project types, quality of reference information provided, demonstrated experience with comparable projects, and price competitiveness. Each criterion is scored on a scale of 0 to 2 points (Poor, Good, or Excellent), with a maximum total score of 10 points. The form also includes yes/no checkboxes to verify that the firm can meet the applicable deadline and maintains Errors and Omissions insurance coverage.

The scoring form includes space for the reviewer to document the firm's contact information, firm name and address, assigned point values for each evaluation criterion, and comprehensive review comments. The document serves as a standardized assessment tool to facilitate consistent and objective evaluation of architectural and engineering firms competing for the contract opportunity, enabling evaluation teams to compare qualifications across multiple submissions and make informed selection decisions based on defined performance criteria.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Telfair RFP _ Architecture Senior Center.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

SCORING

CONTACT: ________________________

NAME OF FIRM: __________________________

FIRM ADDRESS: ___________________________________

Evaluate the Architectural and/or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each selected criterion.

CIRCLE POINTS

CRITERION

POOR

GOOD

EXCELLENT

POINTS

ASSIGNED

1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary for this project. 0 1 2

2. The Firm’s and Key personnel experience with this type of Project 0 1 2

3. Quality of reference information. 0 1 2

4. Has the Firm had experience with similar projects (provides examples)? 0 1 2

5. Is the price competitive? % 0 1 2

TOTAL POINTS

Firm can meet PER/PAR deadline? Yes No

Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? Yes No

REVIEW COMMENTS: ______________________________________________________________

NAME & TITILE: ________________________________

DATE OF REVIEW: ______________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .