SOQ Appendix C.pdf
PDF 180 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- PE-77001-NONST-2027-000000025
- Issued by
- Treutlen County, Georgia
About this file
This document is a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) Scoring form used to evaluate architectural and/or engineering firms for a state or local contract opportunity. The form provides a standardized evaluation framework for assessing qualified firms across five key criteria: the firm's ability to provide necessary disciplines for the project, experience of the firm and key personnel with similar project types, quality of reference information provided, demonstrated experience with comparable projects, and price competitiveness. Each criterion is scored on a scale of 0 to 2 points (Poor, Good, or Excellent), with a maximum total score of 10 points. The form also includes yes/no checkboxes to verify that the firm can meet the applicable deadline and maintains Errors and Omissions insurance coverage.
The scoring form includes space for the reviewer to document the firm's contact information, firm name and address, assigned point values for each evaluation criterion, and comprehensive review comments. The document serves as a standardized assessment tool to facilitate consistent and objective evaluation of architectural and engineering firms competing for the contract opportunity, enabling evaluation teams to compare qualifications across multiple submissions and make informed selection decisions based on defined performance criteria.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Telfair RFP _ Architecture Senior Center.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
SCORING
CONTACT: ________________________
NAME OF FIRM: __________________________
FIRM ADDRESS: ___________________________________
Evaluate the Architectural and/or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each selected criterion.
CIRCLE POINTS
CRITERION
POOR
GOOD
EXCELLENT
POINTS
ASSIGNED
1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary for this project. 0 1 2
2. The Firm’s and Key personnel experience with this type of Project 0 1 2
3. Quality of reference information. 0 1 2
4. Has the Firm had experience with similar projects (provides examples)? 0 1 2
5. Is the price competitive? % 0 1 2
TOTAL POINTS
Firm can meet PER/PAR deadline? Yes No
Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? Yes No
REVIEW COMMENTS: ______________________________________________________________
NAME & TITILE: ________________________________
DATE OF REVIEW: ______________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .