SOQ Appendix C.pdf
PDF 180 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CITY OF ALAMO FY27 CDBG SEWERAGE
- Solicitation number
- PE-66394-NONST-2027-000000011
- Issued by
- Georgia
About this file
This is a Statement of Qualifications Scoring form used to evaluate architectural and engineering firms for a state or local contract opportunity. The document serves as an evaluation rubric for assessing qualified firms based on defined criteria and assigns point values to determine comparative competitiveness among respondents. The form does not specify particular project details, quantities, response deadlines, due dates, site visits, bidders' conferences, award dates, or contract terms. Instead, it functions as a standardized assessment tool that evaluates firms across five primary criteria: the ability to provide necessary project disciplines, key personnel and firm experience with similar project types, quality of reference information, demonstrated experience with comparable projects, and price competitiveness. Each criterion is scored on a scale of zero to two points, with designations for poor, good, and excellent performance, allowing evaluators to circle the assigned points for a total scoring outcome.
The form includes supplementary evaluation questions addressing the firm's capacity to meet Per/Par deadlines and confirmation of current Errors and Omissions insurance coverage. The document provides space for reviewer comments, name, title, and review date but does not establish pricing terms, set-asides, incumbent information, funding sources, or amounts. No specific contract duration, renewal options, or environmental considerations are detailed on this scoring form, as it functions solely as an evaluation mechanism for the qualification assessment process.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Notice for RFP 2027.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
SCORING
CONTACT: ________________________
NAME OF FIRM: __________________________
FIRM ADDRESS: ___________________________________
Evaluate the Architectural and/or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each selected criterion.
CIRCLE POINTS
CRITERION
POOR
GOOD
EXCELLENT
POINTS
ASSIGNED
1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary for this project. 0 1 2
2. The Firm’s and Key personnel experience with this type of Project 0 1 2
3. Quality of reference information. 0 1 2
4. Has the Firm had experience with similar projects (provides examples)? 0 1 2
5. Is the price competitive? % 0 1 2
TOTAL POINTS
Firm can meet PER/PAR deadline? Yes No
Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? Yes No
REVIEW COMMENTS: ______________________________________________________________
NAME & TITILE: ________________________________
DATE OF REVIEW: ______________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .