SOQ Appendix C.pdf

PDF 180 KB Posted

Attached to
CITY OF COLLINS FY27 CDBG SEWERAGE SYSTEM/STREET AND DRAINAGE
Solicitation number
PE-66866-NONST-2027-000000001
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Statement of Qualifications Scoring form used to evaluate architectural and/or engineering firms for a state or local contract opportunity. The evaluation form provides a standardized assessment framework with five primary scoring criteria: the firm's ability to provide necessary disciplines for the project, key personnel experience with similar project types, quality of reference information, demonstrated experience with comparable projects, and price competitiveness. Each criterion is scored on a scale of zero to two points, corresponding to poor, good, or excellent performance levels, for a maximum possible score of ten points. The form requires the reviewer to document firm contact information, name, and address, along with reviewer name, title, and review date. Additional compliance verification includes confirmation of whether the firm can meet the Per/Par deadline and whether the firm maintains Errors and Omissions insurance coverage.

The scoring form does not specify pricing terms, set-asides, contract duration, or funding sources within its content, as it functions solely as an evaluation instrument for comparative assessment of qualified firms. The form provides space for review comments to supplement the point-based scoring system and allows evaluators to document their professional assessment across the specified criteria.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Notice for RFP 2027.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

SCORING

CONTACT: ________________________

NAME OF FIRM: __________________________

FIRM ADDRESS: ___________________________________

Evaluate the Architectural and/or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each selected criterion.

CIRCLE POINTS

CRITERION

POOR

GOOD

EXCELLENT

POINTS

ASSIGNED

1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary for this project. 0 1 2

2. The Firm’s and Key personnel experience with this type of Project 0 1 2

3. Quality of reference information. 0 1 2

4. Has the Firm had experience with similar projects (provides examples)? 0 1 2

5. Is the price competitive? % 0 1 2

TOTAL POINTS

Firm can meet PER/PAR deadline? Yes No

Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? Yes No

REVIEW COMMENTS: ______________________________________________________________

NAME & TITILE: ________________________________

DATE OF REVIEW: ______________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .