SOQ and Criteria _ Grant Admin(City).pdf
PDF 537 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Administrative & Related Grant Services
- Solicitation number
- PE-66384-NONST-2024-000000002
- Issued by
- Terrell County, Georgia
About this file
This document is a Statement of Qualifications for Grant Administration services sought by the City. It outlines the criteria and ratings that will be used to evaluate submissions from interested firms. The key details include:
The requested services are for grant writing and grant administration activities related to Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects. Firms must demonstrate their knowledge of CDBG guidelines and regulations, capacity to complete the required scope of work, past performance, experience in administering similar projects, ability to manage their current workload, and competitive pricing. Submissions will be rated on a scale of 0-2 points for each of these criteria. Firms claiming to be Section 3 Business Concerns must submit the required certification and action plan documentation.
The selected firm will be awarded a lump sum contract for these services. No other pricing details or funding information is provided. There is no indication of an incumbent contractor or the current contract environment.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Section 3 Solicitation Package (June 2022).pdf | ||
| Meigs _ Grant Writing RFP.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Page | 9 Rev. January 2023
GRANT ADMINISTRATION
Statement of Qualifications
GRANT ADMINISTRATION STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
NAME OF FIRM:
ADDRESS:
1. Years in Business in Present Form:
2. Firms History and Resource Capability to Perform Required Services:
3. Titles, names, and addresses of all officers.
4. List up to five (5) projects which demonstrate skills to be used on CDBG projects.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
5. If you were awarded the administration on these type of projects, what would your fee for grant writing/grant administration services be (fees can be expressed in percentages, but all agreements will be lump sum amounts)?
Page | 10 Rev. January 2023
6. Describe the organizational capacity to complete all necessary grant administration activities, including experience of all employees who will be or may be assigned to this project.
7. List references with contact information.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8. Are you a Section 3 Business Concern? Yes No
If you are claiming to be a Section 3 Business Concern, then the Attached Section 3 Business Concern Certification, Previous Certification and Action Plan must be filled out, signed, notarized, and submitted with your proposal. If you answered no, then you will not have to fill out and submit with your proposal. If you are the successful proposer, you will be asked to provide the completed Section 3 Forms for the CITY’s records.
Is the signed and notarized Section 3 Business Concern Certification, Previous Certification and Action Plan attached to your proposal? Yes No
9. Certifying that:
Mr./Mrs./Ms. being duly sworn deposes and states that he/she is the (title) of (name of firm) and that answers to the foregoing questions and all statements herein contained are true and correct.
Page | 11 Rev. January 2023
GRANT ADMINISTRATION
RATINGS CRITERION
RFP Rating Score Sheet
Consultant’s knowledge of CDBG guidelines and regulations. Years of experience
0 No Experience.
1 One to five years of combined experience with CDBG and other federal programs.
2 Six or more years of combined experience with CDBG and other federal programs.
Capacity to complete scope of work.
0 Concerns administrator does not have organizational capacity to complete scope of work 1 Administrator has average organizational capacity to complete scope of work 2 Administrator has exceptional organizational capacity to complete scope of work
Consultant’s past performance. Check references.
0 Reference information is incomplete.
1 Three or less References are listed, with average recommendations 2 More than three references are listed, with strong recommendations
Consultant’s experience in administration of this type of project.
0 Administrator has not completed a project of this type.
1 Administrator has completed one to five projects of this type.
2 Administrator has successfully completed six or more projects of this type.
Consultant’s current workload.
0 Administrator has more work than they can handle.
1 Administrator has some difficulty managing their current work load.
2 Administrator has demonstrated they can handle their projected work load.
Consultant’s fee $ .
0 Fees are high, services do not appear to be a good value for the dollar.
1 Fee is normal, services do not appear to be a good value for the dollar.
2 Fee is normal, services appear to be a good value for the dollar.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .