Attachment_10_-_USAID_Afg_PMP_2015-2018_final_8.24.15.docx
DOCX document 6 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Regional Agricultural Development Program East Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SOL-306-15-000082
About this file
Attachment 10 - USAID_Afg_PMP_2015-2018_final_8.24.15
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Afghanistan Performance Management Plan:
Afghanistan Implementation Plan for transition 2015 - 2018
MONTH YEAR
AFGHANISTAN
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Status: Author - Alei ElDorry
First Draft Review - May 13, 2014 Technical Offices’ Monitoring and Evaluation Team Leads and Office of Program and Project Development Monitoring and Evaluation Team
Second Draft Review - May 28, 2014 Paige Miller, Deputy M&E Team Lead
Third Draft Review - June 3, 2014 Kevin Smith, Deputy Office of Program and ProjectDevelopment Director
Fourth Draft Review - July, 2015 Melinda Woywod, Monitoring Division Lead Fifth Draft Review Office of Afghanistan and Pakistan Affairs and Bureau for Policy, Planning and Learning/Learning, Evaluation, and Research Office
Date of Publication:
CONTENTS
| ACRONYMS | 4 | |
| INTRODUCTION/OVERVIEW | 6 | |
| I. | RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS | 7 |
| A. | Results Framework | 7 |
| B. | Development Objectives | 8 |
| 1. | Development Objective – Sustainable, Agriculture-led Economic Growth Expanded | 9 |
| 2. | Development Objective – Gains in Health, Education, and the Empowerment of Women Maintained and Enhanced | 10 |
| 3. | Development Objective – Performance and Legitimacy the Afghan Government Improved | 11 |
| 4. | Cross Cutting – Gender Equality, Female Empowerment, Capacity Building | 12 |
| C. | Performance Indicators | 14 |
| D. | Context Indicators | 25 |
| II. | MONITORING AND EVALUATION | 28 |
| A. | USAID Afghanistan Monitoring Approach | 28 |
| 1. | Five Tier Monitoring Overview Strategy | 28 |
| 2. | Data Quality Assessment | 30 |
| B. | USAID Afghanistan Evaluation Approach | 32 |
| 1. | Agency Guidance on Selecting Evaluations | 32 |
| 2. | USAID Afghanistan Evaluation Framework | 32 |
| 3. | Evaluation Plan Summary | 34 |
| III. | COLLABORATION, LEARNING AND ADAPTING PLAN | 36 |
| A. | Afghan Info | 36 |
| B. | Portfolio Review | 37 |
| IV. | PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TASKS AND RESPONSIBILITIES SCHEDULE | 39 |
| V. | ANNEXES | 41 |
| A. | PMP Change Tracker Table | 41 |
| B. | Performance Indicator Reference Sheet Template | 42 |
| C. | Data Quality Assessment Checklist and Recommended Procedures | 43 |
| D. | Monitoring Overview Template | 48 |
| E. | Performance Indicator Reference Sheets | 50 |
ACRONYMS
| ADS | |
| Automated Directive Service |
| AOR |
| Agreement Officer Representative |
| BHS |
| Basic Package of Health Services |
| BPHS |
| Basic Package of Health Services |
| CBO |
| Community Based Organization |
| COR |
| Contracting Officer Representative |
| CSO |
| Civil Society Organization |
| DABS |
| Da Afghanistan Breshna Sherkat |
| DO |
| Development Objective |
| DoD |
| Department of Defense |
| DQA |
| Data Quality Assessment |
| EPHS |
| Essential Package of Hospital Services |
| EQUALS |
| Engineering Quality Assurance and Logistical Support |
| EVAW |
| Elimination of Violence Against Women |
| F |
| Foreign Assistance |
| GDP |
| Gross Domestic Product |
| GIRoA |
| Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan |
| IMU |
| Independent Monitoring Unit |
| IR |
| Intermediate Result |
| ISAF |
| International Security Assistance Forces |
| IST |
| Implementation Support Team |
| M&E |
| Monitoring and Evaluation |
| Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock |
| MEW |
| Ministry of Energy and Water |
| MFA |
| Ministry of Foreign Affairs |
| MISTI |
| Measuring Impact of Stabilization Initiatives |
| MoE |
| Ministry of Education |
| MoF |
| Ministry of Finance |
| MoHE |
| Ministry of Higher Education |
| MoMP |
| Ministry of Mines and Petroleum |
| MoPH |
| Ministry of Public Health |
| MORE |
| Ministry of Women’s Affairs Restructuring and Women’s |
| MSP |
| Monitoring Support Project |
| NGO |
| Non-government organization |
| NPP |
| National Priority Programs |
| OAA |
| Office of Acquisition and Assistance |
| OAG |
| Office of Agriculture |
| ODG |
| Office of Democratic Governance |
| OEGI |
| Office of Economic Growth and Infrastructure |
| OPPD |
| Office of Program and Project Development |
| OSSD |
| Office of Social Sector Development |
| PAD |
| Project Appraisal Document |
| PIRS |
| Performance Indicator Reference Sheet |
| PLSO |
| Partnering Liaison Security Office |
| PMP |
| Performance Management Plan |
| PPR |
| Performance Plan and Report |
| PROMOTE |
| Promoting Gender Equity in National Priority Program |
| REZ |
| Regional Economic Zone |
| RF |
| Results framework |
| SME |
| Small and Medium Enterprise |
| SNG |
| Subnational Governance |
| SUPPORT II |
| Service under Program and Project Offices for Results Tracking, Phase II |
| TAF |
| The Asia Foundation |
| TVET |
| Technical and Vocational Education and Training |
| UNAMA |
| United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan |
| UNDP |
| United Nations Development Program |
| USAID |
| U.S. Agency for International Development |
| USG |
| U.S. Government |
| WB |
| World Bank |
| WTO |
| World Trade Organization |
INTRODUCTION/OVERVIEW
The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Afghanistan Implementation Plan for Transition 2015 – 2018 was approved and came into effect ****** 2015. The plan will guide USAID investments over the next three years through 2018. USAID Afghanistan is currently the Agency’s largest bilateral Mission.
This Performance Management Plan (PMP) will guide the Mission to measure progress toward achieving the Development Objectives (DOs) detailed in the USAID/Afghanistan Implementation Plan for Transition 2015 – 2018 and the Results Framework (RF). The PMP operationalizes how USAID Afghanistan will manage the performance of its portfolio. It serves as a tool to guide the Mission on learning, data collection and analysis approaches, and how to monitor and manage a core set of performance indicators against their targets and baselines. It will help ensure the accountability of US Government (USG) resources being used in a difficult and constantly changing implementing environment.
The PMP has been designed collaboratively with input from all USAID/Afghanistan’s technical offices – the Office of Education (OED); the Office of Health and Nutrition (OHN) ; the Office of Agriculture (OAG); the Office of Democracy and Governance (ODG); the Office of Economic Growth and Infrastructure (OEGI); the Office of Program and Project Development (OPPD). Through a series of facilitated technical team meetings, the Mission identified a list of PMP indicators associated with the Implementation Plan’s results that were selected to track performance results and systematically collect and analyze information to determine project outcomes.
The PMP includes the RF that illustrates the development hypothesis for achieving the Mission’s goal and three DOs, and a table of performance indicators that will measure progress toward achieving the results laid out in the RF. The second section of the PMP provides a review of the Mission’s robust Multi-tiered Monitoring approach and Data Quality Assessments (DQA). The Agency’s guidance and the Mission’s framework for evaluations will explain how they will be conducted and used to inform the decision making process. The PMP also includes the Mission’s collaboration, learning, and adaptation resources: a) Afghan Info, a powerful information management, collaboration and learning online platform that allows for access to real time project data; b) the Implementation Support Team (IST), which promotes collaboration and decision making through information aggregation and dissemination; and c) annual Portfolio Reviews, which examine how well the Implementation Plan’s PMP indicator targets are being met, and Quarterly Multi-tiered Monitoring Reviews. Finally, the PMP specifies the different performance management tasks and the technical offices and positions responsible for each component.
It is important to note that the PMP is a living document that will be reviewed at least annually. The Agency’s PMP Toolkit serves as a guide for the Mission to use to adapt and update the PMP (https://programnet.usaid.gov/library/pmp-toolkit). The PMP is only a useful tool if technical offices and OPPD actively use and update the document as necessary.
RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Results Framework
Development Objectives The Mission’s development strategy is articulated in the USAID/Afghanistan Implementation Plan for Transition 2015-2018. This section describes the goal, DOs, Intermediate Results (IRs) and Sub-Intermediate Results:
Goal: Afghan-led, Sustainable Development DO 1: Sustainable Agricultural-led Economic Growth Expanded
| IR 1.1: Employment Opportunities Increased | |
| Sub IR 1.1.1: Access to Electricity Increased | |
| Sub IR 1.1.2: Equitable Access to Financial Services Increased | |
| Sub IR 1.1.3: Competitiveness of Businesses and Entrepreneurs Increased | |
| Sub IR 1.1.4: Regional Trade Increased | |
| IR 1.2: Vibrant and Prosperous Agriculture Sector Developed | |
| Sub IR 1.2.1: Productivity of Key Agriculture Crops Increased | |
| Sub IR 1.2.2: Commercial Viability of Agribusinesses Increased | |
| Sub IR 1.2.3: Public and Private Agriculture Service Delivery Strengthened | |
| Sub IR 1.2.4: Natural Resource Management Practices Improved |
DO 2: Gains in Health, Education, and the Empowerment of Women Maintained and Enhanced IR 2.1: Health Outcomes Improved Sub IR 2.1.1: Afghan Ownership to Ensure an Effective Health Response Strengthened Sub IR 2.1.2: Use of Quality Health Services Increased
| IR 2.2: Equitable Access to Quality, Relevant Education Increased | |
| Sub IR 2.2.1: Reading and Numeracy Skills Improved |
Sub IR 2.2.2: Education Systems Strengthened to Prepare Afghans for Employment IR 2.3: Women’s Equality and Empowerment Increased Sub IR 2.3.1: Women’s Contribution to Afghanistan’s Economy, Government, and Civil Society Increased Sub IR 2.3.2: Gender Policy Implementation Strengthened Sub IR 2.3.3: Afghan Perceptions toward Women’s Inclusiveness Improved DO 3: Performance and Legitimacy of Afghan government Improved IR 3.1: Citizens Hold the GIRoA Accountable Sub IR 3.1.1: Citizen Awareness of Rights and Responsibilities within the Afghan Constitution Increased Sub IR 3.1.2: Civil Society’s Ability to Advocate Reform Strengthened Sub IR 3.1.3: Political Participation Increased Sub IR 3.1.4: Access to Quality, Independent Information Increased
| IR 3.2: Governance at the National and Subnational Level Strengthened | |
| Sub IR 3.2.1: Access to Justice Services based on Afghan Law Increased | |
| Sub IR 3.2.2: Policies and Procedures Improved | |
| Sub IR 3.2.3: Transparency and Accountability Mechanisms Strengthened | |
| Sub IR 3.2.4: Public Financial Management Strengthened | |
| Sub IR 3.2.5: Capacity to Administer Elections Improved |
The PMP will measure progress toward achieving results under these three DOs and their corresponding IRs and Sub-IRs using performance indicators. The routine collection of performance indicator data, along with other information described in the learning agenda, will help reveal if the intended measurable results are being achieved and if implementation is on track. Every PMP indicator has a Performance Indicator Reference Sheet (PIRS) (Annex B, Indicator Reference Sheet Template) that specifically defines the performance indicator and provides a comprehensive record of how it is being tracked.
Development Objective 1 – Sustainable, Agriculture-led Economic Growth Expanded An overwhelming 75 percent of Afghans depend on agricultural activities for their livelihoods, making agriculture the most important sector of the country’s economy that contributes 24 percent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). As such, this DO will build on USAID’s previous investments and continue to develop a vibrant and prosperous agricultural sector and increase employment opportunities. USAID is relying on two IRs to achieve this objective:
1. IR 1.1. Employment Opportunities Increased Projects fostering economic expansion and increased employment will initially focus on maintaining the viability of critical components of the country’s electrical infrastructure that are indispensable to promote growth. Toward this goal, OEGI will work to improve the sustainability, management, and commercial viability of the Afghan’s national power company, Da Afghanista Breshna Sherkat (DABS), to help it increase the electricity it provides to its customers and increase revenue generation. The number of beneficiaries of energy services will indicate a sustained economic growth and social development.
Increased economic growth will also depend on increasing business activities and competition among entrepreneurs and facilitating regional trade. Toward this goal, USAID will promote a competitive business sector by improving financial management, strategic planning, marketing, and sales in the private sectors. USAID will help stimulate economic and employment growth, and increase revenue, by providing equitable credit access to farmers, households, small and medium enterprises (SME). The Mission will promote financing opportunities and investment growth in industrial sectors that have a high potential for success. OEGI activities will contribute to this IR.
2. IR 1.2. Vibrant and Prosperous Agricultural Sector Developed As the largest sector of the Afghan economy, agriculture has the potential to spark and sustain Afghan-led growth. USAID will help create a vibrant agricultural sector and increase farmers’ agricultural output and sales. OAG will work with farmers to introduce new technologies, management practices, and key high value crops. The primary focus of activities in this sector is to work with agribusinesses to introduce new technologies and business practices to increase commercial viability and sales of agricultural products. Projects include working with a broad range of agribusiness stakeholders ranging from private enterprises, water associations, women’s groups, community based organization (CBO) and civil society organization (CSO) to improve their efficiency and promote commercial viability within Afghanistan and across borders to increase regional trade.
To help create a prosperous agricultural sector, projects will implement improved natural resources management and focus on creating new or rehabilitating existing irrigation and drainage systems. The effective management and conservation of natural resources will contribute to increasing the agricultural output of Afghanistan.
Development Objective 2 – Gains in Health, Education, and the Empowerment of Women Maintained and Enhanced Viable Afghan led growth will depend on the government’s effective delivery of key services to its citizenry, thereby also establishing its legitimacy. This DO is divided among health, basic and higher education, and gender IRs. The Mission has worked with the Government of Afghanistan and other donors to decrease infant mortality by 33 percent and reduce maternal mortality to 80 percent. In the education sector, the Mission worked to increase enrollment in primary and secondary education by eightfold, including three million girls. Such achievements will springboard into greater investments in Afghan women’s social, economic and political opportunities.
USAID will work to enhance the important gains that have been achieved in the health and education sectors – both highly rated by Afghan citizens as an indication of government effectiveness. Approaches to sustaining and enhancing these social gains, made in coordination with Government of Afghanistan and the donor community, will focus on three intermediate results (IRs):
1. IR 2.1. Health outcomes improved It is critical to the improvement of health outcomes that the Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) maintain ownership and exercise the ability to deliver quality health care through the Basic Package of Health Services (BPHS) and an Essential Package of Hospital Services (EPHS). OHN health projects will work with the MoPH to improve health outcomes among women and ensure that they are not disenfranchised from accessing health care. USAID activities will work with health posts to ensure to include at least one female health worker is on staff at all times. USAID will strengthen the MoPH’s administrative, executive, human resources, and procurement systems to foster stewardship and ownership of health care delivery. The percentage of Afghan government revenue that is appropriated for the improvement of health services and aligned with USAID interventions will be monitored.
USAID/Afghanistan’s projects will increase the quality of health services and improve health outcomes during child birth and among infants and children. Children, especially those younger than five years of age, will benefit from nutrition-focused health interventions to prevent stunting. Together with the MoPH, USAID’s health activities will increase the number of childbirths attended by a health professional, among the poorest Afghans. Health outcomes will also improve with the administration of the Pentavalent 3 vaccine to children between 12 and 13 months who are living in extreme poverty on less than $1.25 a day.
1. IR 2.2. Equitable Access to Quality, Relevant education increased USAID and the donor community have achieved remarkable performance results in the primary, secondary, and tertiary levels of Afghanistan’s education sector. Education is regarded by Afghans as an important service, one they expect their government to provide. USAID’s approach will help provide equitable access to education and technical skills that are in demand by the job market. Education projects will build on gains that USAID Afghanistan has made and strengthen systems to develop curricula that are relevant to employment opportunities.
OSSD projects will focus on increasing early grade reading for Afghanistan’s educational system. Projects will deliver higher literacy rates at the primary level by providing in- and pre-service training and coaching to teachers and educators. These interventions, coupled with textbooks and other teaching and learning material, will help deliver equitable access to an education and skill sets that are in demand by the Afghan labor market.
IR 2.3. Women’s equality and empowerment increased Afghan-led long-term development gains will only be possible if women can advance in their society and contribute to its political and economic growth. The Mission has played an essential role in helping Afghanistan achieve tremendous gains in promoting gender inclusiveness. Activities will increase women’s access to productive economic resources and encourage and facilitate income generation. Activities will be designed to increase access to assets, credit, income, and employment. Higher educational opportunities such as scholarships and support to Afghan university gender-focused programs will help to create a cadre of better qualified, more informed and more empowered Afghan women.
At the local, regional, and national level, the Mission will improve women’s equality and empowerment through interventions that target the legislative process and support organizations that advocate for women’s equal treatment and inclusiveness. USAID activities will support the GoA to propose, draft, and adopt new legislation that promotes gender equality at all governance levels.
Activities will be designed to strengthen the ability of Afghan women-focused CSO’s to manage, implement, communicate, and advocate for women’s rights and a greater role as partners in development. The Mission will provide assistance to women-focused CSOs to draft and advocate for passage of laws eliminating barriers to women’s effective political participation; support the adoption of a comprehensive policy on sexual harassment; and assist the government to implement gender-sensitive survey design and data collection. Progress toward women’s equity among Afghans will be promoted at the local level. To achieve this goal, USAID will implement activities aimed at assisting the GoA and Afghan civil society to change attitudes toward gender based violence.
3. Development Objective 3 – Performance and Legitimacy the Afghan Government Improved USAID projects will secure gains made during the transition by supporting the Afghan government to effectively address its citizens’ needs. USAID will take a two-fold approach to strengthening government performance – 1) helping Afghan citizens hold their government accountable and, 2) assisting the government to deliver services that respond to citizen’s needs – that will increase the government’s legitimacy.
1. IR 3.1. Citizens hold Afghan government accountable Citizens can hold their government accountable if they understand how to successfully advocate for their needs at different governance levels. ODG will help citizens understand their rights and responsibilities under the Constitution so that they can engage positively and hold their government accountable. Project activities will focus on increasing Afghan citizens’ understanding of a democratic government and encourage their participation in the democratic process.
ODG activities will help local non-governmental organizations (NGOs) monitor and advocate for human rights. The Mission will support and strengthen CSOs’ ability to promote reform with the Afghan government. Activities focusing on strengthening human rights reform through advocacy and monitoring will increase citizen participation and engagement with government accountability. Projects will increase civic participation in the political process by providing individuals with political party training.
Non-state news outlets will receive support to provide independent and accurate reporting and empower citizens with information that can be used to hold their government accountable. Activities will train journalists on how to supply independent and accurate news information to citizens, from independent non-state sources, which is vital to an informed and engaged citizenry.
2. IR 3.2. Governance at the national and subnational level strengthened To improve the performance and perception of legitimacy of government of Afghanistan, USAID projects will increase access to justice by improving court case management and creating a justice system with clear and fairly applied rules. Projects will address access to civil justice and work to create an effective criminal justice system.
The Mission will support good governance by assisting the introduction, repeal, or modification of policies that citizen’s prioritize and advocate for. The legislature will improve government performance by providing oversight of public resources. Transparency and accountability will increase with external oversight mechanisms that report how public resources are being used. USAID interventions will strengthen the government’s financial management systems through the administration of fiscal policy, fiscal administration, and financial management.
Afghan perception that their government can administer elections credibly will be critical to ensuring its legitimacy. Projects will strengthen governance performance by promoting laws and amendments that ensure elections are credible. ODG will monitor if Afghans perceive that elections are free and fair as a measure of whether they view their government as legitimate.
Cross Cutting Issues Gender Equality and Female Empowerment The Mission has made significant progress towards advancing gender equality and empowering females in Afghanistan. Afghan women and girls significantly benefit through economic development, improvements in health and education, leadership opportunities, and better access to justice. These initiatives are fundamental to Afghanistan’s success as a nation. The Mission makes women and girls’ rights an essential part of the Afghan development strategy and current and future project designsaddress this priority.
To empower women and girls, USAID trains and supports women professionals in the justice, media and civil society sectors. Through loans, grants, and training, USAID supports the growth of women-owned business and employment opportunities, paving the way for women to become leaders in agricultural-led economic growth. Inclusive health and education initiatives provides the basis for female empowerment starting at an early age.
The Mission makes gender equality and female empowerment a cross cutting issue that is incorporated across the entire project portfolio. In FY15, projects across all technical sectors will report on gender indicators.
Capacity Development The Mission will improve the GoA’s performance, accountability and capacity by helping strengthen key democratic institutions, policies, and practices while building citizen trust and support. Major progress is being made towards increasing public confidence in GIRoA, democratic election processes, and civil-society organizations (CSOs).
Increasing the management effectiveness of key GoA institutions will remain an important priority for both the U.S. and Afghan governments. USAID enhances the GoA’s ability to develop, manage, and execute budgets, deliver services, and create a more conducive, pro-development regulatory environment. By increasing the management effectiveness of government institutions, GIRoA will continue to become more accountable for their own results and their own role in advancing the development of Afghanistan.
Prior to the decision to program funds on-budget, USAID conducted the requisite analyses to determine the capacity of the targeted GoA partner institutions. USAID will continue to work with the respective institutions to ensure that they address weaknesses in the areas of financial management, procurement, monitoring and evaluation, and human resources prior to award and/or the disbursement of funds, or through risk mitigation measures during implementation. USAID will also continue to provide technical assistance through off-budget components to complement on-budget programs.
Performance Indicators The full set of PMP performance indicators listed below was developed through a series of workshops facilitated by OPPD. The table lists the Mission’s indicators that will measure an intended result of the strategy and attendant project or activity. These indicators are the foundation for observing if progress is being made to achieve the Mission’s expected results. The performance indicators selected from the standard F indicators list are identified with an asterisk. Several custom and third party indicators are included. Annex E includes the PIRS for each indicator, and provides precise definitions to maintain a comprehensive record for each PMP indicator.
| Results / Indicators |
| Type |
| Office |
GOAL: Afghan-led Sustainable Development
| Growth in (real) gross domestic product (GDP) per capita |
| 4-15 |
Outcome* Mission
Human Development Index[footnoteRef:1] [1: * Standard F Indicators HDI is a composite index of life expectancy at birth, mean years of schooling, expected years of schooling, and gross national income (GNI – which includes GDP + income received from other countries, including remittances). UNDP’s HDI also breaks out per capita GNI, and Inequality HDI (the actual level of human development (taking into account inequality) versus HDI indexing the potential human development that could be achieved if there is no inequality).]
| UNDP |
| Mission |
DO 1: Sustainable Agriculture-led Economic Growth Expanded
| Percentage increase in household income from licit agriculture in targeted areas |
| Custom |
Outcome
OAG
| Ease of Doing Business – Trading Across Borders Rank |
| 4-16 WB |
Outcome*
OEGI
IR 1.1: Employment Opportunities Increased
| Number of persons receiving new employment or better employment (including better self-employment) as a result of participation in USG-funded workforce development programs |
| 4.6.3.2 |
Outcome*
OEGI/ OED
| Number of people employed through USG assistance in infrastructure activities |
| Custom |
Output
OEGI
| Number of people receiving USG supported training in transportation Management and technical fields |
| Custom |
Output
OEGI
Sub IR 1.1.1: Access to Electricity Increased
| DABS collected revenue as a percentage of total cost |
| Custom |
Output
OEGI
| Percent of substation infrastructure completed to date |
| Custom |
Output
OEGI
| Number of Substations complete/upgraded as a result of USG assistance |
| Custom Output |
| OEGI |
| Percent of power line transmission lines completed/upgraded as a result of USG assistance |
| Custom Output |
| OEGI |
| Number of beneficiaries with improved energy services due to USG assistance |
| 4-4.1-31 |
Outcome*
OEGI
Sub IR 1.1.2: Equitable Access to Financial Services Increased
| Number of farmers benefitting from financial instruments |
| Custom |
Output
OAG
| Total number of clients (households and/or microenterprises) benefiting from financial services provided through USG-assisted financial intermediaries |
| 4.7.1-12 |
Output*
OEGI
| Number of SMEs that have received loans from financial institutions |
| Custom |
Output
OEGI
| Value of finance accessed through lending |
| Custom Output |
| OAG |
| Number of innovative lending products established by financial intermediaries |
| Custom Output |
| OAG |
Sub IR 1.1.3: Competitiveness of Businesses and Entrepreneurs Increased
| Number of new USG sponsored Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) formed |
| PPP5 Output |
| OEGI |
| Number of private sector firms that have improved management practices as a result of USG assistance |
| 4.6.2-9 Output |
| OEGI |
Sub IR 1.1.4: Regional Trade Increased
| Foreign trade (X+M) as a % of GDP |
| 4.2-10 WB |
Outcome*
OEGI
| Number of documents required to export/import goods across borders decreased as a result of USG assistance |
| 4.2.1-17 WB |
Outcome*
OEGI
| Time to export/import (days) |
| 4.2.1-16 WB |
Outcome*
OEGI
| Kilometers of roads constructed or repaired with USG assistance |
| 4.4.3-13 |
Output*
OEGI
| Number of beneficiaries receiving improved transportation services due to USG assistance |
| 4.4.3-7 |
Output
OEGI
IR 1.2: Vibrant and Prosperous Agriculture Sector Developed
| Value of sales of targeted commodities as a result of USG assistance (disaggregated by cereals, high value crops, domestic sales, exports and livestock) |
| Custom |
Outcome
OAG
| Number of households benefitted by agriculture and alternative development interventions in targeted areas. |
| Custom Outcome |
| OAG |
| Number of target households and agribusinesses engaged in nutrition-sensitive agriculture activities |
| Custom Outcome |
| OAG |
Sub IR 1.2.1: Productivity of Key Agricultural Crops Increased
| Number of hectares under improved technologies or management practices as a result of USG assistance |
| 4.5.2-2 |
Outcome*
OAG
| Number of farmers or others who applied new technologies or management practices as a result of USG assistance |
| 4.5.2-5 |
Outcome*
OAG
| Number of farmers growing high value crops as a result of USG assistance |
| Custom |
Outcome
OAG
| Number of hectares with increased high value crop production as a result of USG assistance |
| Custom |
Outcome
OAG
| Percentage of change in annual production of key crops by the target farmers, as compared to non-beneficiary farmers |
| Custom Outcome |
| OAG |
| Kilometers of irrigation canals and drainage ditches rehabilitated |
| 5.2.2-4 |
Output*
OAG/OEGI
| Percentage increase in crop productivity attributable to improved water use efficiency |
| Custom Outcome |
| OAG/OEGI |
Sub IR 1.2.2: Commercial Viability of Agribusinesses Increased
| Value of incremental sales of Agribusinesses as a result of USG assistance |
| Custom Outcome |
| OAG |
| Number of private enterprises, producers organizations, water users associations, women’s groups, trade and business associations and CBOs that applied new technologies or management practices as a result of USG assistance |
| 4.5.2-42 Outcome* |
| OAG |
| Number of firms (excluding farms) or Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) engaged in agricultural and food security-related manufacturing and services now operating more profitably (at or above cost) because of USG assistance |
| 4.5.2-43 |
Output*
OAG
Sub IR 1.2.3: Public and Private Agricultural Service Delivery Strengthened
| Number of technologies or management practices in development phases of research, field testing or made available for transfer of development as a result of USG assistance. |
| 4.5.2-39 |
Output*
OAG
| Number of individuals who have received USG supported short-term agriculture sector productivity or food security training (RiA) (WOG) |
| 4.5.2-7 |
Outcome*
OAG
| Score, in percent, of combined key areas of organization capacity amongst USG and indirect local implementing partners |
| CBLD-5 |
Outcome
Sub IR 1.2.4: Natural Resource Management Practices Improved
| Number of hectares with new or improved irrigation and drainage services as a result of USG assistance |
| 4.5.1-28 |
Output*
OAG
| Number of people with increased economic benefits derived from sustainable natural resource management and conservation as a result of USG assistance |
| 4.8.1-6 |
Output*
OAG
| Number of natural gas wells drilled or rehabilitated with technical and contract management support |
| Custom Output |
| OEGI |
| Number of days of USG funded technical assistance in technical energy fields provided to counterparts or stakeholders |
| 4.4.1-35 |
Output
OEGI
DO 2: Gains in Health, Education, and the Empowerment of Women Maintained and Enhanced
| Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) |
| 3.1.6-58 |
Outcome*
OHN
| Total Fertility Rate (TFR) |
| 3.1.7-40 |
Outcome*
OHN
| Under Five Mortality Rate (U5MR) |
| 3.1.6-54 |
Outcome*
OHN
| Net enrollment rate for primary education |
| Custom |
Outcome*
OED
IR 2.1: Health outcomes Improved
| Modern Method Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (CPR) |
| 3.1.7-38 |
Outcome*
OHN
| Prevalence of stunted children under five years of age |
| 3.1.9-11 |
Outcome*
OHN
| Newborn Mortality Rate |
| 3.1.6-60 |
Outcome*
OHN
| Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age |
| 3.1.9-6 |
Outcome*
OHN
| Development stage for an essential package of health services in the host country |
| 3.1-5 |
Outcome*
OHN
| Number of people gaining access to an improved drinking water resources |
| 3.1.8.1-2 |
Output*
OEGI
Sub IR 2.1.1: Afghan Ownership to Ensure and Effective Health Response Strengthened
| MoPH capacity to manage host country contracts |
| Custom Outcome |
| OHN |
| Percent of MoPH managerial staff demonstrating use of data for planning, managing, or budgeting |
| Custom Outcome |
| OHN |
| Domestic investment (public & private) in health as a percentage of total health expenditure |
| Custom Outcome |
| OHN |
Sub IR 2.1.2: Use of Quality Health Services Increased
| Number of children who received DPT3 by 12 months of age in USG assisted programs |
| 3.1.6-61 |
Output*
OHN
| Percent of births receiving at least 4 antenatal care (ANC) visits during pregnancy |
| 3.1.6.1-2 |
Outcome*
OHN
| Percent of births attended by a skilled doctor, nurse or midwife |
| 3.16.1-1 |
Outcome*
OHN
| Case notification rate in new sputum smear positive pulmonary TB cases |
| 3.1.2.1-2 |
Outcome*
OHN
| Percent of population using an improved sanitation facility |
| 3.1.8-32 |
Outcome*
OHN
IR 2.2: Equitable Access to Quality, Relevant Education Increased
| Number of learners enrolled in primary schools and/or equivalent non-school based settings with USG support |
| 3.2.1-14 |
Output*
OED
| Percentage of graduates from USG-supported tertiary education programs reporting themselves as employed |
| 3.2.2-37 |
Outcome*
OED
Sub IR 2.2.1: Reading and Numeracy Skills Improved
| Number of learners receiving reading interventions at the primary level |
| 3.2.1-35 |
Output*
OED
| Number of teachers/educators/teaching assistants who successfully completed in-service training or received intensive coaching or mentoring with USG support |
| 3.2.1-31 |
Output*
OED
| Number of teachers/educators/teaching assistants who successfully completed pre-service training with USG support |
| 3.2.1-32 |
Output*
OED
| Number of textbooks and other teaching and learning materials (TLM) provided with USG assistance |
| 3.2.1-33 |
Output*
OED
Sub IR 2.2.2: Education Systems Strengthened to Prepare Afghans for Employment
| Number of tertiary institution faculty or teaching staff whose qualifications are strengthened through USG-supported tertiary education programs |
| 3.2.2-42 |
Outcome*
OED/
OAG
| Number of persons receiving new employment or better employment (including better self-employment) as a result of participation in USG-funded workforce development programs |
| 4.6.3-2 |
Output*
OEG/OEGI
IR 2.3: Women’s Equality and Empowerment Increased
| Proportion of target population reporting increased agreement with the concept that males and females should have equal access to social, economic, and political opportunities. |
| GNDR-4 |
Outcome Mission
| Proportion of females who report increased self‐efficacy at the conclusion of U.S. government supported training/programming |
| GNDR-3 Outcome |
| Mission |
Sub IR 2.3.1: Women’s Contribution to Afghanistan’s Economy, Government, and Civil Society Increased
| Proportion of female participants in USG-assisted programs designed to increase access to productive economic resources (assets, credit, income or employment) |
| GNDR-2 |
Output Mission
Sub IR 2.3.2: Gender Policy Implementation Strengthened
| Number of laws, policies, or procedures drafted, proposed or adopted to promote gender equality at the regional, national or local level |
| GNDR-1 |
Output Mission
Sub IR 2.3.3: Afghan Perceptions toward Women’s Inclusiveness Improved
| Percentage of target population that views Gender-Based Violence (GBV) as less acceptable after participating in or being exposed to USG programming |
| GNDR-7 |
Outcome Mission
DO 3: Performance and Legitimacy of GIRoA Improved
| Percentage change in Afghan citizens reporting they believe GIRoA is doing a very good job |
| TAF Survey of Afghan People |
| ODG |
| Government Effectiveness Index Score |
| 2.2-2 WB |
Outcome*
ODG
IR 3.1: Citizens Hold GIRoA Accountable
| Percent change in World Bank Voice and Accountability Score |
| WB |
| ODG |
| Number of public forums resulting from USG Assistance in which national and sub-national representatives and member of the public interact |
| 2.2.1-6 |
Output*
ODG
Sub IR 3.1.1: Citizen Awareness of Rights and Responsibilities within the Afghan Constitution Increased
| Number of individuals receiving voter and civic education through USG-assisted programs |
| 2.3.2-12 |
Output*
ODG
| Percentage of target population that demonstrates an increased understanding of democracy and how they can participate in the democratic process |
| Custom |
Outcome
ODG
| Number of communities around mining sites who received mining awareness training with USG Assistance |
| Custom |
Output
OEGI
Sub IR 3.1.2: Civil Society’s Ability to Advocate Reform Strengthened
| Number of civil society organizations (CSOs) receiving USG assistance engaged in advocacy intervention |
| 2.4.1-9* |
Output
ODG
Sub IR 3.1.3: Political Participation Increased
| Number of Individuals who Receive USG-Assisted Political Party Training |
| 2.3.3-1 |
Output*
ODG
Sub IR 3.1.4: Access to Quality, Independent Information Increased
| Number of training days provided to journalists with USG Assistance, measured by person-days of training |
| 2.4.2-8 |
Output*
ODG
| Number of Reservioir Studies Completed |
| Custom |
Output
OEGI
IR 3.2: Governance at the National and Sub-national Level Strengthened
| Number of sub-national entities receiving USG assistance that improve their performance |
| 2.2.3-5 |
Output*
ODG
| Tax administration and compliance improved (% increase in tax collections) as a result of USG assistance |
| 4.1.1-12 |
Outcome*
ODG/OEGI
Sub IR 3.2.1: Access to Justice Services based on Afghan Law Increased
| Averaged score for “access to civil Justice” and “Effective Criminal Justice” factors from the World Justice Project Rule of Law Index |
| 2.1.-6 |
Outcome*
ODG
| Number of USG-assisted courts with improved case management systems |
| 2.1.3-13 |
Outcome*
ODG
Sub IR 3.2.2: Policies and Procedures Improved
| Number of public policies introduced, adopted, repealed, changed or implemented consistent with citizen input |
| 2.4.1-12 |
Outcome*
ODG
OEGI
OED
OHN
OAG
| Number of policies, regulations, or administrative procedures that were introduced, adopted, revised, repealed or implemented within Afghan Government entities with USG assistance |
| Custom Outcome* |
| ODG |
OEGI
OED
OHN
OAG
| Number of policy reforms/laws/regulations/administrative procedures drafted and presented for public/stakeholder consultation to enhance sector governance and/or facilitate private sector participation and competitive markets as a result of USG assistance.* |
| 4.4.1.33 |
Output
OEGI
| Number of policies or regulations or administrative procedures in development stages of analysis, drafting and consultation, legislative review, approval or implementation as a result of USG assistance |
| 4.5.1-24 |
Outcome
OEGI
| Number of Executive Oversight Actions Taken by Legislature Receiving USG Assistance |
| 2.2.1-4 |
Output*
ODG
| Number of mining contracts facilitated (reported by stage: drafted, reviewed or negotiated) |
| Custom Output |
| OEGI |
| Number and nature(technical area, bilateral or regional) of new partnerships built and sustained between and among developing country researchers and US Federally funded researchers or other entities-custom output |
| Custom Output |
| OEGI |
Sub IR 3.2.3: Transparency and Accountability Mechanisms Strengthened
| Corruption Perception Index Score |
| 2.2.4-8 |
Outcome*
ODG
| Number of mechanisms for external oversight of public resource use supported by USG assistance |
| 2.2.4-4 |
Outcome*
ODG
Sub IR 3.2.4: Public Financial Management Capacity Strengthened
| Number of public sector entities with improved public financial management systems as a result of USG assistance |
| Custom |
Outcome
ODG/OEGI
| Number of days of USG funded technical assistance in financial sector capacity provided to counterparts or stakeholders |
| 4.3.2-9 |
Output*
ODG/OEGI
| Number of days of USG supported technical assistance in fiscal policy and fiscal administration provided to counterparts or stakeholders |
| 4.4.1-15 |
Output*
OEGI
Sub IR 3.2.5: Capacity to Administer Elections Improved
| Number of domestic election observers (and/or party agents) trained with USG assistance |
| 2.3.2-11 |
Output*
ODG
| Number of Laws or Amendments to Ensure Credible Elections Drafted with USG Technical Assistance |
| 2.3.2-6 |
Output*
ODG
Sub-IR 3.2.6: Sub-national Government’s Engagement with the Population Improved
| Number of citizen identified priorities included in the development plans of provincial sub-national government entities |
| Custom |
Outcome
ODG
Context Indicators A Context indicator is data which provides simple, reliable information that measures whether the assumptions upon which the strategy, and therefore the results framework, is based. These indicators are outside of USAID/Afghanistan’s manageable interest and serve as a tool to gauge the country’s progress as at a Macro Level.
| Context Indicator & Source |
| Indicator Description |
Security Apparatus
Source: The Fund for Peace Fragile States Index < http://library.fundforpeace.org/library/cfsir1423-fragilestatesindex2014-06d.pdf > The security apparatus should have a monopoly on use of legitimate force. The social contract is weakened where this is affected by competing groups.
Includes pressures and measures related to:
· Internal Conflict
· Small Arms Proliferation
· Riots and Protests
· Fatalities from Conflict
· Military Coups
· Rebel Activity
· Militancy
· Bombings
· Political Prisoners
External Intervention
< http://library.fundforpeace.org/library/cfsir1423-fragilestatesindex2014-06d.pdf > When the state fails to meet its international or domestic obligations, external actors may intervene to provide services or to manipulate internal affairs. Includes pressures and measures related to:
• Foreign Military Intervention
• Presence of Peacekeepers
• Presence of UN Missions
• Foreign Assistance
• Sanctions
• Credit Rating
Foreign Direct Investment, net inflows
Source: The World Bank http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.CD.WD International Monetary Fund, Balance of Payments database, supplemented by data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development and official national sources.
Foreign direct investment are the net inflows of investment to acquire a lasting management interest (10 percent or more of voting stock) in an enterprise operating in an economy other than that of the investor.
It is the sum of equity capital, reinvestment of earnings, other long-term capital, and short-term capital as shown in the balance of payments.
Gender Inequality Index
Source: UN Human Development Index 2014 < http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi > The Gender Inequality Index presents a composite measure of gender inequality using three dimensions: reproductive health, empowerment and labour market participation.
Reproductive health is measured by two indicators: the maternal mortality ratio and the adolescent birth rate.
Empowerment is measured by the share of parliamentary seats held by women and the share of population with at least some secondary education.
The labour market is measured by participation in the labour force. A low GII value indicates low inequality between women and men, and vice-versa.
Gender Development Index
Source: UN Human Development Index 2014 < http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi >
The Gender Development Index, measures disparities in HDI by gender. The HDI values estimated separately for women and men; the ratio of which is the GDI.
The closer the ratio is to 1, the smaller the gap between women and men. There are three HDI components—longevity, education (with two indicators) and income—are also presented by gender.
State Legitimacy
< http://library.fundforpeace.org/library/cfsir1423-fragilestatesindex2014-06d.pdf > Corruption and lack of representativeness in the government directly undermine social contract. Includes pressures and measures related to:
• Corruption
• Government Effectiveness
• Political Participation
• Electoral Process
• Level of Democracy
• Illicit Economy
• Drug Trade
• Protests and Demonstrations
• Power Struggles
MONITORING AND EVALUATION
USAID Afghanistan has a multi-tiered monitoring strategy and a robust evaluation approach to measure and track results for its large portfolio. Taking into consideration the dynamic and constantly changing operational environment and the withdrawal of international military forces and USG civilian staff from the field, the Mission has adapted to the complex circumstances in Afghanistan to successfully measure progress toward the achievement of its strategy’s RF.
A. USAID Afghanistan Monitoring Approach
1. Multi-tiered Monitoring Overview To implement its performance management strategy, USAID Afghanistan will rely on the triangulation of data from different sources to verify activities. The sources of information for data verification include independent third-party monitors, implementing partners, the Government of Afghanistan, other donors, CSOs, and beneficiaries. Monitoring using data from multiple sources enables the triangulation of information to ensure confidence in reporting.
The Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and Agreement Officer’s Representative (AOR) are responsible for creating a project Monitoring Overview (Annex D, Monitoring Overview Template) that adapts this multi-tiered monitoring approach to meet the specific needs of their project. The implementation of this monitoring system will be presented to the Mission’s Front Office at Quarterly Monitoring Reviews. Through these reviews, technical office Directors will highlight successes and identify challenges in the implementation of the monitoring strategies.
The five tiered monitoring actors are: Tier 1: USAID and other USG entities; Tier 2: Implementing Partners; Tier 3: the Government of Afghanistan and other Donors; Tier 4: Civil society, local organizations, and beneficiaries; and Tier 5: Independent Monitoring Contractors.
Tier 1: USAID and other USG Oversight
· Although reduced, USAID field staff will continue to conduct site visits, hold meetings, and verify performance monitoring data when the security environment permits.
· Through the Department of Defense (DoD), USAID has access to over 46 radio stations throughout Afghanistan. These stations receive an average of 2,000 calls per month from the Afghan population regarding radio programs dealing with governance, development and security. USAID will use the radio network to monitor and collect feedback on programming and other development issues.
· The National Geospatial Intelligence Agency supports USAID monitoring efforts by providing aerial imagery of areas where implementing partners report activity data. USAID can visually verify if specific project activities occurred, such as roads or buildings constructed.
Tier 2: Implementing Partner Reporting
· Implementing partners are required to have their own internal M&E system to collect activity data and information on precise activity locations. This information is linked to geographic locations to map project outputs.
· Implementing partners conduct site visits to verify that sub-contractors are reporting accurate results.
· Quarterly and annual reports keep CORs and AORs informed about project performance and include progress towards achieving performance indicator targets.
Implementing partners are required to share accurate and timely information with the tier-five independent monitoring contractors to enable third-party verification.
Tier 3: Afghan government and Other Donors
· USAID will work closely with the Government of Afghanistan to monitor project activities.
· USAID and the donor community have identified several possible areas for information sharing. Collaboration includes providing contextual information about security and other trends in parts of the country that can affect monitoring and programming efforts; sharing best practices and lessons learned from operating in similar development contexts; and building the capacity of the Governement of Afghanistan’s M&E systems to help them play a more prominent role.
· USAID works with the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) in specific situations to improve information sharing. Because of UNAMA’s extensive field presence, USAID Afghanistan is able to benefit from their monitor activities in remote areas.
Tier 4: CSOs and Beneficiaries
· CSOs are able to report to field or Kabul-based USAID representatives to verify activities and observe performance
· The Mission plans to support citizen call centers in Afghanistan to allow Afghans to report opinions and reactions to USAID projects, suspected misbehavior, and other related information.
Tier 5: Independent Monitoring Contractors
· USAID Afghanistan has independent monitoring contracts in place that provide objective verification of project activities and perform DQAs of activity data.
· The Monitoring Support Project (MSP) independently monitors and verifies project activities and, as requested, conducts DQAs.
· The Equals Quality Assurance and Logistical Support (EQUALS) project provides short and long term monitoring of infrastructure projects, ensuring that infrastructure projects are built according to established and agreed upon standards and contract specifications. The Engineering Support Project will continue when EQUALS ends, and include environmental compliance monitoring.
· The Measuring Impacts of Stabilization Initiatives (MISTI) project supports the stabilization portfolio by sharing M&E best practices through an online knowledge management portal. By working to create a community of practice for M&E and program learning, MISTI shares their high standard systems for data verification and data quality.
· The Independent Monitoring Unit (IMU) allows monitoring to take place in increasingly non-permissive environments in Afghanistan.
The Mission’s…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .