Sol_140P5426R0008_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 160 KB Posted

Attached to
REPLACE HVAC AT APOLLO DISTRICT Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
140P5426R0011
Issued by
Department of the Interior National Park Service Southeast Region

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire for solicitation 140P5426R0011 issued by the Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Contracting Operations East, South Contracting Office. The questionnaire is designed to collect reference information from past clients regarding a contractor's performance on previous or current contracts. Respondents are asked to rate the contractor's ability to meet requirements, timeliness in providing products, quality of work, and ability to resolve timeliness problems using a five-point scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory) plus a Not Applicable option. The questionnaire must be completed and submitted directly to the Contracting Officer, Yujeiry Eusebio, at yujeiry_eusebio@ios.doi.gov no later than 4:00 P.M. EDT on Friday, July 3, 2026, from a corporate email account. Respondents must provide information about the referenced contract including its identifying number, value, period of performance, and brief description of items provided, along with contact details for the person completing the questionnaire.

The questionnaire is being used to evaluate contractor performance for a proposal to replace HVAC Systems at Apollo District within Canaveral National Seashore (CANA). All responses are designated as Source Selection Sensitive information and cannot be used by the contractor for advertising or promotional purposes. The document includes detailed evaluation definitions for each performance rating category and requests explanatory narratives to support assessments. An alternate point of contact may be provided if the primary respondent is unavailable for verification purposes.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to REPLACE HVAC AT APOLLO DISTRICT, newest first.
File Type Posted
Sol_140P5426R0011_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Questions_and_Responses_(Final)_0002.pdf PDF
Sol_140P5426R0011_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
B03_DBA_WD_FL20250137.pdf PDF
A04_Statement_of_Work_-_Replace_HVAC_at_Apollo_District.pdf PDF
Sol_140P5426R0011.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOL 140P5426R0011 ATTACHMENT 0002-

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation# 140P5426R0011 Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to yujeiry_eusebio@ios.doi.gov

We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Contracting Operations East, South Contracting Office, Solicitation Number:

140P5426R0011 for the replacement of HVAC Systems at Apollo District within Canaveral National Seashore (CANA). As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference for our performance for this type of construction service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.

Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail it to the Contracting Officer, e-mail:

yujeiry_eusebio@ios.doi.gov

Questionnaire is due to Tony Eusebio no later than 4:00 P.M. EDT on Friday, July 3, 2026. The questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate email account.

Notice to Contractor

Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.

This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.

The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.

If you will not be available for verification (if necessary) of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another POC for the contracting officer to contact.

Alternate POC name: ________________________________________

Alternate POC phone number: _________________________________

Alternate POC e-mail address: _________________________________

Thank you.

NAME OF OFFEROR BEING RATED:

Phone:

E-Mail:

I. Current or Historical Contract Information

CONTRACT REFERENCED:

1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________

2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________ mailto:yujeiry_eusebio@ios.doi.gov

3. Period of Performance:

4. Brief description of items provided:

5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________

Agency/Company:

Title: __________________________________ Phone: _____________________________

E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________

II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Evaluation Definitions –

The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

VERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

MARGINAL

Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide an assessment.

Past Performance Evaluation

Question 1. Performance

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Performance

Comments, if any.

Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products promptly?

Timeliness

Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems

Question 4. Quality of Work

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?

Quality of Shipments

Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance

What is your overall rating of the Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on the contract being assessed?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

General Comments:

Evaluation Definitions –
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
N/A
N/A

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .