Sol_140A0324R0002.pdf

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

6. PROJECT NO. 4. CONTRACT NO. 5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO.

PAGE OF PAGES

7. ISSUED BY CODE 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

SOLICITATION

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO. 3. DATE ISSUED

IMPORTANT -- The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

9.

INFORMATION CALL

a. NAME b. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder."

FOR

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

0040644070

BIA SPRO 00003

100 NORTH RIVERSIDE DRIVE

Contracting Office Anadarko OK 73005-0328

A03

JOCELYN LITTLECHIEF, CONTRACTING OFFICER

BIA/SPRO

PO BOX 368

ANADARKO, OK 73005

Jocelyn Littlechief 405-247-1527

1x 02/23/2024

140A0324R0002

INVITATION FOR BID

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying no., date)

This information is provided for the following project: Southern Plains Indian

Museum, Exterior Renovations Project.

The Project consists of a Base renovation of buildings with three (3) Alternate scopes. In general, Work includes the removal of exterior wood siding, limited landscape treatment, minor duct work, and roof and soffit replacement. The three (3)

Alternates include additional exterior building treatments, ADA sidewalks at building entrance, and other elements as described in drawings and specifications dated September 1, 2023, as attached.

1. Location: Anadarko, Oklahoma; Caddo County.

2. Funding: An award will be made under this solicitation, as funds are presently available. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation / Task

Order Request for Proposal (TORFP) before the closing date.

3. Contract Clauses: All contract clauses contained in the base Construction

Multiple Award Contracts (C-MAC) IDIQ contract are hereby incorporated into this solicitation. The clauses contained in this TORFP will supplement the clauses in the

Continued ...

11. The Contractor shall begin performance within

12a. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

award, notice to proceed. The performance period is mandatory negotiable. (See ________________________________________________.)

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

a. Sealed offers in original and is not required.is, b. An offer guarantee

c. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

(date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers will be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

d. Offers providing less than

12b. CALENDAR DAYSYES NO

(If "YES", indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12b.)

0 0 calendar days and complete it within ________________ ________________ calendar days after receiving

03/29/2024

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

x x x x copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by _____________ ___________________ (hour) local time calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected . _________________

STANDARD FORM 1442 (Rev. 12/2022)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR(48 CFR) 53.236-1(d)

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within ____________________ calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal to or greater than the minimum requirement stated in item 13d. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in item 13d.)

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code) 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than item 14.)

CODE FACILITY CODE

AMOUNTS

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AMENDMENTS

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE.

20a. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER (Type or print) 20b. SIGNATURE 20c. OFFER DATE

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

ITEM 25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO THE UNITED STATES CODE AT

26. ADMINISTERED BY CODE 27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this document solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.

30a. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN (Type or print) 31a. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30b. SIGNATURE 30c. DATE 31b. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31c. DATE

BY

2PAGE OF

BIA SPRO 00003

100 NORTH RIVERSIDE DRIVE

Contracting Office Anadarko OK 73005-0328

A03

Jocelyn Littlechief

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT 29. AWARD

and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations,certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish

10 U.S.C. 3204(a) 41 U.S.C. 3304(a)

STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 12/2022) BACK

Continued...

and return

(Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this

ITEM NO.

(A)

SUPPLIES/SERVICES

(B)

QUANTITY

(C)

UNIT

(D)

UNIT PRICE

(E)

AMOUNT

(F)

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

3 20

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF

140A0324R0002 base C-MAC IDIQ contract.

4. Proposal Acceptance Period/Date: The proposal acceptance period shall extend ninety (90) days past the TORFP closing date.

5. TORFP Deadline: Proposals are due by March 29, 2024, 3:00 P.M. Central Time (CT).

6. Questions and Answers: Any questions relating to this solicitation shall be submitted to the

Contracting Officer (CO) no later than March 14, 2024.

7. Pre-Bid Site Visit: A Pre-bid Site Visit has been set for March 13, 2024, at 1:00pm, at project site.

8. Period of Performance: To be Submitted with

Proposal and evaluated.

9. Special attention is called to FAR Clause

52.236-7, Permits and Responsibilities and FAR

Clause 52.229-3, Federal, State, and Local Taxes.

Offerors are responsible for contacting the tax authorities involved with regard to any requirements regarding state taxes. Any costs associated with this section shall be included in the contractor's firm fixed price proposal.

Please refer to Section H and the applicable clauses for additional information about these requirements. There is not a TERO Ordnance that will apply to this project.

10. Points of Contact: Contracting Officer:

Jocelyn LittleChief. Email is:

Jocelyn.littlechief@bia.gov.

Delivery: 09/30/2024

Delivery Location Code: 0008351353

DOI S PLAINS REGION

P O Box 368

Anadarko OK 73005-0368 US

00010 SPIM EXTERIOR RENOVATION PROJECT

Continued ...

NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

Sponsored by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.110

ITEM NO.

(A)

SUPPLIES/SERVICES

(B)

QUANTITY

(C)

UNIT

(D)

UNIT PRICE

(E)

AMOUNT

(F)

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

4 20

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF

140A0324R0002

Product/Service Code: R499

Product/Service Description: SUPPORT-

PROFESSIONAL: OTHER

Period of Performance: 06/01/2024 to 09/30/2024

NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

Sponsored by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.110

SECTION B – PRICE SCHEDULE

B.1. Propose your best price for each of the work items in accordance with the Statement of Work (SOW) and attachments. The Price Schedule is included as an attachment which is required to be used as part of the Pricing Proposal.

B.2 Alternates. This project has been broken down into the main project and three (3) alternates.

Government will be awarding the Main Museum Building under this solicitation, but also reserves the right to award one or more of the Alternates under the same contract. Contractors shall submit pricing independently for each Alternate, as not all may be awarded. The Alternates are listed in order of priority, but may not be awarded in that order, but will be based on available funding.

SECTION C – DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/STATEMENT OF WORK

C.1. Disclosure of the magnitude of construction projects. In accordance with FAR 36.204, the estimated price range of this project is:

Between $500,000 and $1,000,000.

* Please refer to Section J of this solicitation for additional scoping documents.

SECTION D – PACKAGING AND MARKING

* Please refer to the C-MAC IDIQ contract for requirements related to this section.

SECTION E – INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

* Please refer to the C-MAC IDIQ contract for requirements related to this section.

SECTION F – DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

F.1. Commencement, Prosecution, and Completion of Work

Contractor shall provide a schedule for the main project, which will be made a part of the evaluation. Contractor should also state the additional time needed, in any, for each alternate if accepted.

F.2. FAR 52.211-12 Liquidated Damages—Construction (September 2000)

(a) If the Contractor fails to complete the work within the time specified in the contract, the Contractor will pay liquidated damages to the Government in the amount of $800.00 for each calendar day of delay until the work is completed or accepted.

(b) If the Government terminates the Contractor's right to proceed, liquidated damages will continue to accrue until the work is completed. These liquidated damages are in addition to excess costs of repurchase under the Termination clause.

(End of Clause)

* Please refer to the C-MAC IDIQ contract for all additional requirements related to this section.

SECTION G – CONTRACT ADMINISTATION DATA

G.1. FAR 52.216-32 Task-Order and Delivery-Order Ombudsman (September 2019)

a. In accordance with 41 U.S.C. 4106(g), the Agency has designated the following task order and delivery order Ombudsman for this contract. The Ombudsman must review complaints from the Contractor concerning all task order and delivery order actions for this contract and ensure the Contractor is afforded a fair opportunity for consideration in the award of orders, consistent with the procedures in the contract.

Tiffany Harvey Chief of Acquisition Division Office of Acquisition and Property Management U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240 Tiffany_Harvey@ios.doi.gov

b. Consulting an ombudsman does not alter or postpone the timeline for any other process (e.g., protests).

c. Before consulting with the Ombudsman, the Contractor is encouraged to first address complaints with the Contracting Officer for resolution. When requested by the Contractor, the Ombudsman may keep the identity of the concerned party or entity confidential, unless prohibited by law or agency procedure.

(d) Contracts used by multiple agencies.

(1) This is a contract that is used by multiple agencies. Complaints from Contractors concerning orders placed under contracts used by multiple agencies are primarily reviewed by the task-order and delivery-order Ombudsman for the ordering activity.

(2) The ordering activity has designated the following task-order and delivery-order Ombudsman for this order:

Tiffany Harvey Chief of Acquisition Division Office of Acquisition and Property Management mailto:Tiffany_Harvey@ios.doi.gov

U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240 Tiffany_Harvey@ios.doi.gov

(3) Before consulting with the task-order and delivery-order Ombudsman for the ordering activity, the Contractor is encouraged to first address complaints with the ordering activity's Contracting Officer for resolution. When requested by the Contractor, the task-order and delivery-order Ombudsman for the ordering activity may keep the identity of the concerned party or entity confidential, unless prohibited by law or agency procedure.

(End of Clause)

* Please refer to the C-MAC IDIQ contract for requirements related to this section.

SECTION H – SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

H.1. TAXES, REQUIREMENTS AND/OR RESTRICTIONS

(a) Special attention is called to FAR Clause 52.236-7, Permits and Responsibilities and FAR Clause 52.229-3, Federal, State, and Local Taxes. Offerors are responsible for contacting the tax authorities involved with regard to any requirements regarding state taxes. Any costs associated with this section shall be included in the contractor’s proposal. There is no Tribal/TERO Taxes that will apply to this project.

H.2. BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

Background investigations are not required for this project.

H.3. PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENTS

This task order does not require a project labor agreement.

SECTION I – CONTRACT CLAUSES

I.1. DIAR 1452.228-70 LIABILITY INSURANCE – DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

(JULY 1996)

(a) The Contractor shall procure and maintain during the term of this contract and any extension thereof liability insurance in form satisfactory to the Contracting Officer by an insurance company which is acceptable to the Contracting Officer. The named insured parties under the policy shall be the Contractor and the United States of America. The amounts of the insurance shall be not less than as follows:

$_100,000.00__each person, Workers Compensation and Employers’ Liability Insurance

$_500,000.00__each occurrence, General Liability Insurance, Bodily Injury Liability Insurance

$_500,000.00__property damage

(b) Each policy shall have a certificate evidencing the insurance coverage. The insurance company shall provide an endorsement to notify the Contracting Officer 30 days prior to the effective date of cancellation or termination of the policy or certificate; or modification of the policy or certificate which may adversely affect the interest of the Government in such insurance. The certificate shall identify the contract number, the name and address of the Contracting Officer, as well as the insured, the policy number and a brief description of contract services to be performed. The contractor shall furnish the Contracting Officer with a copy of an acceptable insurance certificate prior to beginning the work.

* Please refer to the C-MAC IDIQ contract for all additional requirements related to this section.

SECTION J – LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

NO. TITLE OF DOCUMENT OR FORM

NO. OF

PAGES

1 PROJECT MANUAL 42

2 PLANS 5

3 ORIGINAL BUILDING DRAWINGS 1975 31

4 BID SCHEDULE 1

5 DOL WAGE DETERMINATION 6

6 DSRM FINAL INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY

GUIDELINES 13

7 STANDARD FORM 24 BID BOND 2

SECTION K – REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS, AND OTHER

STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS OR RESPONDENTS

All representations, certifications, and other statements made at the C-MAC IDIQ level.

* Please refer to the C-MAC IDIQ contract for all additional requirements related to this section.

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS OR

RESPONDENTS

L.1. General: To assure timely and equitable evaluation of the proposal, the offeror shall follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors.

Failure to meet all requirements may result in an offer being ineligible for award. The response must consist of two (2) separate volumes:

L.1.1. Volume 1, Technical Proposal

L.1.2. Volume 2, Price Proposal

L.2. Price Evaluation: The Contracting Officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition for this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the Contracting Officer will review this determination and if, in the Contracting Officer’s opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional cost information will be requested.

L.3. Submittal of Proposals and Inquiries: Offerors must submit one proposal via e-mail (may be broken into multiple e-mails if the proposal’s total file size exceeds 10MB) separated in two (2) separate volumes: Volume 1, Technical Proposal, and Volume 2, Price Proposal.

L.4. SPECIAL NOTICE TO OFFERORS.

L.4.1. The exclusive responsibility for Source Selection will reside with the Government.

Proprietary information submitted in response to this solicitation shall be clearly marked as such and will be protected from unauthorized disclosure as required by Subsection 27 of the Office of Procurement Policy Act as amended (41 U.S.C. 423) (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") as implemented in the FAR. Any unmarked proprietary information will be considered releasable under the restrictions of the Freedom of Information Act.

L.4.2. For submission requirements designated as “shall” or “must,” failure to provide the requested information may be considered a deficiency. For submission requirements designated as “should,” failure to provide the requested information may result in a lower rating for the specified factor.

L.5. FORMAL COMMUNICATIONS

The following Points of Contact (POC) are provided for this acquisition. Address any questions or concerns you may have to the POC via e-mail listed below no later than the date specified in

Form SF-1442. Answers will be provided only in response to written requests for clarification.

Written questions shall be emailed to the addresses indicated below.

Jocelyn LittleChief , Contracting Officer; Jocelyn.littlechief@bia.gov

The Government will not accept a facsimile proposal.

L.6. GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

L.6.1. Submissions exceeding a file size of 10MB shall be broken into multiple e-mails or coordinated with the POCs to assure successful file sharing. No hard copies of proposals will be accepted (hand delivered or traditional mail). The Government reserves the right to request hard copies in binder format in the event of a formal protest.

L.6.2. Proposals shall not contain classified data. The use of hyperlinks in proposals are prohibited. The Government will not be responsible for proposals delivered to any location or to anyone other than the Contracting Office.

L.6.3. Offerors are cautioned to strictly comply with all instructions within this solicitation to ensure submission of a complete proposal. Failure to furnish a complete proposal at the time of proposal submission may result in an unacceptable proposal that the Government eliminates from consideration for award.

L.6.5. Offerors are cautioned that “parroting” of the requirements of the SOW or Plans and Specifications with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of their proposal.

L.6.6. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs.

L.6.7. Disposition of Unsuccessful Proposals: in compliance with FAR Subpart 4.8, the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals.

L.7. FORMATTING REQUIREMENTS

L.7.1. Proposal submission shall be in PDF format compatible with the latest version of Adobe Acrobat, with the exception of price breakdown information, which shall be submitted in a spreadsheet format compatible with the latest version of Microsoft Excel.

L.7.2. Please title files in the following format:

L.7.2.1. Solicitation Number _Company Name_ Volume 1 Technical Proposal

L.7.2.2. Solicitation Number _Company Name_ Volume 2 Price Proposal

L.7.3. Each paragraph shall be separated by at least one blank line. A standard, 12-point minimum font size applies. Arial or Times New Roman fonts are required. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8-point and may be landscape oriented.

Files shall use the following page setup parameters: Margins – Top, Bottom, Left, Right – 1” Gutter – 0” From Edge – Header, Footer 0.5” Page Size, Width – 8.5” Page Size, Height – 11.”.

L.7.4. The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be numbered consecutively and identified by the complete company name, date and solicitation number in the header and/or footer. A Table of Contents shall be included.

L.8. PAGE LIMITS

Volume Evaluation

Factor Title Page Limit

1 Technical Approach Narrative 10 2 Past Performance 2 3 Key Personnel 101

4 Capacity 5 2 5 Price no limit

L.8.1. All pages with written content, except cover letters, Table of Contents pages, tables, illustrations, glossary, section dividers, sketches or drawings, and appendices will be counted in the page calculation. Pages that exceed the page limitations will be removed, not read, and not evaluated.

L.8.2. Page limits will not apply to Past Performance Questionnaires submitted for Factor 2.

Past Performance Questionnaires shall not be included in consecutive page numbering.

L.9. VOLUME I – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

L.9.1. Factor 1: Technical Approach Narrative

L.9.1.1. The Offeror shall submit a narrative discussion in response to the project described in the project documents.

L.9.1.2. The narrative shall describe the Offeror's approach to the work. It shall:

L.9.1.2.1. Describe an overall approach to the work that demonstrates the offeror’s understanding of the work, including creativity and thoroughness shown in understanding the objectives of the SOW, specific tasks, risks and risk mitigation measures, and planned execution of the project.

L.9.1.2.2. Provide an organizational diagram showing clear, logical lines of authority from the Project Manager to Subcontracting Management, including Superintendence, Safety, and Quality

Control.

L.9.1.2.3. Describe teaming arrangements, including overall structure and management of the project team; identify roles, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms. The team proposed for this factor will be binding to the Offeror selected for task order award. Any changes to this team after award must be approved in writing by the Contracting Officer.

L.9.1.2.4. Describe how the Offeror will ensure quality consistently across the team.

L.9.1.2.5. Describe the Schedule for the main project and anticipated calendar days to complete all work. Also, state the additional days, if needed for each Alternate.

L.9.1.3. Offerors must assume the Government has no prior knowledge of their capabilities, work processes, facilities, and experience. The Government will base its evaluation on the information presented in the Offeror’s proposal. Elaborate brochures or documentation binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

L.9.2. Factor 2: Past Performance

L.9.2.1. The Government will review the Offeror’s record of performance in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

L.9.2.2. If the Offeror describes significant portions of work to be accomplished by subcontractors or other team members in Factor 1, Technical Approach Narrative, the Government may consider the past performance of subcontractors or team members.

L.9.2.3. If the Offeror particularly wants to draw the Government’s attention to specific projects in its record of past performance, the Offeror may provide a description of up to three projects. The description should state the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this solicitation (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods, location, customer, etc.). The role of the Offeror or team member on each project should be clear and related to that entity's role under the proposed task order. For Federal Government projects with a CPARS Evaluation: provide the contract number and Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) number. In the case of IDV type contracts, GSA contracts, and Blanket Purchase Agreements, include Task Order or Delivery Order Numbers.

L.9.2.4. If the Offeror wishes the Government to consider past performance for projects that do not have CPARS reports, the Offeror may submit contact information for those projects. Offerors are limited to the submission of 5 projects, although they are encouraged to submit less than maximum and focus on recent and relevant projects. No information is necessary if there is an existing CPARS report.

L.9.2.5. The Government may use data provided by the Offeror in its proposal, and data obtained from other sources, including data in Government files. The Government reserves the right to obtain past performance information from any source available and has the right to contact customers other than those listed by the Offeror to evaluate past performance.

The Government reserves the right to verify statements the Offeror makes regarding its past performance to determine whether they are substantiated.

L.9.2.6. Offerors may choose to submit no material for this factor and rely on the Government’s use of CPARS reports.

L.9.3. Factor 3: Key Personnel: Identify and provide résumés for Key Personnel who will perform the work of this project and their assigned roles. Key Personnel will include: the Principal Architect, Project Manager, Site Superintendent, Quality Control Manager, and Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO). All roles shall be filled by separate individuals; dual-hatting is not acceptable. Résumés shall be provided for all Key Personnel, including name, employee’s position description, education, and qualifying academic, design, construction, Professional Registration, and experience. The proposal shall clearly indicate the entity employing the Key Personnel. Minimum standards for each Key Personnel position are addressed in Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award. The Key Personnel proposed for this factor will be binding to the Offeror selected for award. Any changes to Key Personnel after task order award must be approved in writing by the Contracting Officer.

L.9.4 Factor 4: Capacity: Describe how the offeror and its team have the capacity to undertake the work described by this solicitation given all work currently being performed by the offeror and all work scheduled to be performed during the period of performance described in the solicitation. Proposals should include a list of all on-going and scheduled work for the offeror and proposed team members. Specifically identify any work on this list that is being performed for Indian Affairs.

L.10. VOLUME II – PRICE PROPOSAL

L.10.1. Factor 5: Price

L.10.1.1. The Offeror shall provide a table of contents and shall number all pages consecutively.

Volume II shall be submitted in a separate file from Volume I. The price proposal shall be broken down into sections as defined below.

L.10.1.2. Section 1: The name(s) and title(s) of the person(s) authorized to negotiate and sign a contract. Also, provide a Certificate of Corporate Authority or other applicable documentation of authorized signature(s) for each authorized individual.

L.10.1.3. Section 2: The Offer (the SF1442) duly executed with an original signature by an official authorized to bind the company.

L.10.1.4. Section 3: Acknowledgement of all amendments to the solicitation in accordance with the instructions on the Standard Form 30 (Amendment form).

L.10.1.5. Section 4: The completed Section K of the solicitation (i.e., Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors). All cost and pricing data supplied by

Offerors will represent data other than certified cost or pricing data as defined by FAR

2.101. Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements may also be accomplished via sam.gov, but must be complete and up-to-date prior to the proposal deadline.

L.10.1.6. Section 5: Each Offeror is required to complete the Bid Schedule, Attachment #4 in this solicitation.

L.10.1.7. Section 6: Fully executed Bid Guarantee, Standard Form (SF) 24, Bid Bond.

SECTION M – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M.1. GENERAL INFORMATION

M.1.1. The policies in FAR subpart 15.3 do not apply to this ordering process. This order will utilize the fair opportunity process outlined in FAR 16.505(b)(1). This order will be placed on a competitive basis. The factors below will be used in evaluating proposals, and award will be made on a best value basis.

M.1.2. The Government intends to award without requesting proposal revisions. In the event that proposal revisions are required, the Government may request revisions from any number of offerors, including only one, some, or all offerors.

M.2. BASIS FOR AWARD

M.2.1. The award will be made based on the best overall (i.e., best value) proposal that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government with trade offs made between the non-price and price factors. The Government may select other than the lowest price or other than the most highly rated Offer. To receive consideration for award, a rating of no less than Neutral Confidence must be achieved for the Past Performance factor and a rating of no less than “Acceptable” must be achieved for the other non-price factors.

M.2.2. During the evaluation of each proposal, the Government will assign a rating for Factors 1 through 4. The following factors will be used to evaluate each proposal:

M.2.2.1. Factor 1: Technical Approach Narrative

M.2.2.2. Factor 2: Past Performance

M.2.2.3. Factor 3: Key Personnel

M.2.2.4. Factor 4: Capacity

M.2.2.5. Factor 5: Price

M.2.3. For the best value determination, Factors 1-4 are of approximately equal importance.

All evaluation factors other than price, when combined, are approximately equal to price.

M.3. Factor 1: Technical Approach Narrative

M.3.1. This factor will evaluate the Offeror’s narrative describing its approach for accomplishing the work described in the SOW and project documents. In order to be considered acceptable, the Offeror must demonstrate an understanding of the specific requirements described in the solicitation and demonstrate the ability of their approach to accomplish those requirements.

M.3.2. The factor will be evaluated on the extent to which the narrative:

M.3.2.1. Is logical and free of contradictory or conflicting information.

M.3.2.2. Describes an approach to resourcing, organizing, and communicating on the proposed project that is consistent with requirements in the project description.

M.3.2.3. Provides a level of detail and specificity to this project that demonstrates that the Offeror understands the requirements.

M.3.3. This factor may be more highly rated if the narrative describes an approach to resourcing, organizing, executing, and communicating on the proposed project that reduces the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

M.3.4. This factor will be rated using Table 3.

Table 3. Technical Approach and Key Personnel Rating Definition

Outstanding

Proposal meets all requirements and presents substantial benefits identified by a combination of Significant Strengths and/or Strengths that significantly outweigh risk presented by evaluated Weaknesses, if any.

Generally, no Significant Weaknesses are identified. No Deficiencies are found.

Good

Proposal meets all requirements and presents benefits identified by a combination of Significant Strengths and/or Strengths. If Weaknesses and/or Significant Weaknesses are present, the associated risks are outweighed by the evaluated benefits. No Deficiencies are found.

Acceptable Proposal meets all requirements with essentially offsetting benefits and risks presented by Significant Strengths, Strengths, Weaknesses and/or Significant Weaknesses, if any are present. No Deficiencies are found.

Marginal

Proposal minimally meets all requirements, but risks presented by Weaknesses and/or Significant Weaknesses are not fully offset by Strengths or Significant Strengths, if any are present. No Deficiencies are found.

Unacceptable

Proposal may have Significant Strengths or Strengths. However, the benefits presented are irrelevant because the proposal does not meet all requirements or has a combination of Weaknesses, Significant Weaknesses or Deficiencies that present an unacceptable level of risk.

M.4. Factor 2: Past Performance

M.4.1. There are three (3) aspects to the experience and past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy, and quality of performance, which are combined to establish an integrated past performance rating at the factor level in accordance with Table 3 below for each Offeror.

M.4.2. Recency. An evaluation of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. Recency is defined as active contract performance during the six (6) years preceding the date of issuance of this solicitation. Contracts that were started prior to this time, but still in effect with active performance as of six (6) years from the date of this solicitation, will be considered recent. If a contract reference is determined recent (had some or all active performance in the six (6) years preceding the solicitation issuance date) and had active performance prior to the six (6) years preceding the date of issuance of this solicitation, the Government may evaluate the Offerors' performance record during the entire contract period.

More recent performance will have a greater impact on the Past Performance Confidence Assessment (see Table 3 below) than less recent or relevant effort.

M.4.3. Relevancy. The Government will conduct an in-depth evaluation of all recent performance information obtained to determine how closely the work performed under those contracts relate to the services described in the SOW. Specifically, relevancy is defined as contracts of similar size, scope, and magnitude, involving the type of services described in the solicitation, including the SOW.

M.4.4. Quality. The Government will consider the performance quality of recent, relevant efforts (how well the contractor performed on the contracts). For each recent, relevant past performance citation reviewed, the quality of the work performed will be assessed. All aspects of performance that relate to this acquisition may be considered.

M.4.5. Past Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings. This factor will be rated using Table 4.

Table 3. Past Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings Rating Definition

Substantial Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent, relevant, and quality performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent, relevant, and quality performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent, relevant, and quality performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent, relevant, and quality performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent, relevant, and quality performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

NOTE: Offerors without a record of recent/relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance and, as a result, will receive a “Neutral Confidence” rating for the Past Performance factor.

M.5. Factor 3: Key Personnel

M.5.1. This factor will evaluate the extent to which the key personnel meet the desired experience and education listed below. Proposals may be more highly rated if they offer key personnel who exceed the minimum requirements or offer additional professional qualifications.

M.5.2. Proposals may be more highly rated if they offer key personnel whose resumes demonstrate experience with projects similar in scope, complexity, size, and cost or price to the Southern Plains Indian Museum Renovation Project.

M.5.3. This factor will be rated using the definitions in Table 4 and the desired qualifications in Table 5.

Table 5. Key Personnel Desired Qualification Requirements Position Desired Qualification Requirements

Principal Architect/Engineer

- BS degree in an engineering or architectural discipline.

- 10 years of design experience.

- Active Licensed Professional Registration in any state in the continental United States.

Project Manager

- 10 years design-build construction management experience, BS degree in construction management or engineering related field, and at least one of the following certifications or registrations:

- Active Certified Construction Manager (CCM) certified by the Construction Manager Certification Institute.

OR

M.6. Factor 4: Capacity

M.6.1. This factor will evaluate each offeror’s team’s existing project commitments to determine if the offeror and its team have the resources (capacity) to perform the required work in the required timeframe. At a minimum, the proposal must show that the offeror has the resources or access to the resources to perform the work in the time required. This factor is not intended to provide for allocation or “equitable distribution” of orders under the C-MAC or to place an order ceiling on individual C-MAC holders, a prohibited practice that is counter to the principle of fair opportunity.

M.6.2. A proposal may be more highly rated for this factor if it demonstrates that the offeror’s resources exceed its commitments.

M.6.3. This factor will be rated using the definitions in Table 6.

- Active Project Management Professional (PMP) certification issued by the Project Management Institute

OR

- Active Certified Professional Constructor (CPC) certified by the American Institute of Constructors & Constructor Certification Commission

OR

- Active Designated Design-Build Professional certification administered by the DBIA

OR

If no certification, then Project Manager shall have 20 years of design-build construction management experience instead of 10.

Site Superintendent

- 10 years of experience as Construction Site Superintendent

- Completion of the 30-hour OSHA Construction safety class or as an equivalent, 30 hours of formal construction safety and health training covering the subjects of the OSHA 30-hour course

Quality Control Manager -5 years of experience as a Quality Control Manager

Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO)

- 5 years of construction industry safety experience or three years if she or he possesses a Certified Safety Professional (CSP) or safety and health degree.

- Completion of the 30-hour OSHA Construction safety class or as an equivalent, 30 hours of formal construction safety and health training covering the subjects of the OSHA 30-hour course

Table 6. Technical Approach and Key Personnel Rating Definition

Outstanding

The proposal indisputably shows that the offeror has the resources or access to the resources to perform the work in the time required. No Significant Weaknesses or Deficiencies are found.

Good

The proposal convincingly shows that the offeror has the resources or access to the resources to perform the work in the time required. No Deficiencies are found.

Acceptable The proposal adequately shows that the offeror has the resources or access to the resources to perform the work in the time required. No Deficiencies are found.

Marginal

The proposal minimally shows that the offeror has the resources or access to the resources to perform the work. There are some questions-represented by Weaknesses or Significant Weaknesses- about the offeror’s ability to complete the work in the time required. No Deficiencies are found.

Unacceptable

The proposal does not meet all requirements, has an identified Deficiency, or has a combination of Weaknesses and/or Significant Weaknesses that present an unacceptable level of risk that the offeror cannot perform the work in the time required.

risk.

M.7 Factor 5: Price

M.7.1. The contract awarded from this solicitation will be Firm-Fixed-Price construction. Price reasonableness analysis will be performed by the Government to determine that the proposal prices offered are complete, fair, and reasonable. Normally, competition establishes price reasonableness. Comparison of the proposed prices is expected to satisfy the requirement to perform a price analysis, however, the Government may, if necessary, analyze the Offeror’s price breakdown in Section B to establish reasonableness of an otherwise successful offeror’s price. The Government reserves the right to conduct price realism analysis.

M.7.2. For purposes of award, the total evaluated price will include all prices for the contract in its entirety as identified in Section B-PRICE SCHEDULE. Offerors must submit pricing for all line items. The total evaluated price for purposes of the Best Value Trade Off and award will be determined by the total sum of the line items in the PRICE SCHEDULE, and as shown in SF- 1442 Block 17. The additional information in the Price Breakdown will only be requested from the successful offeror and is not to be included in the proposal.

M.8. FINAL SELECTION

M.7.1. The Contracting Officer will award to the Offeror whose proposal conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government, all factors considered.

END OF TASK ORDER REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL