SnowRemoval PPcriteria.docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Sandia Snow Removal Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 127EAV26Q0023
- Issued by
- Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This file is a Past Performance Evaluation Criteria document for the Sandia Snow Removal solicitation. It establishes a six-tier rating system that the contracting officer will use to assess offerors' past performance and experience in executing snow removal services for the Department of Agriculture Forest Service. The evaluation framework includes ratings of Exceptional/High Confidence, Very Good/Significant Confidence, Satisfactory/Confidence, Neutral/Unknown Confidence, Marginal/Little Confidence, and Unsatisfactory/No Confidence, each with specific definitions tied to the likelihood of successful contract performance.
The document specifies that past performance assessments will be completed for all offerors in the competitive range, with the contracting officer retaining final determination authority. Offerors with limited or no recent relevant past performance will receive a Neutral/Unknown Confidence rating and will not be rated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. The government reserves the right to investigate selected past performance references provided by offerors and may contact references beyond those listed. The evaluation process is conducted under OMB clearance number 9000-0142 and utilizes both proposal-provided information and government records to assess offeror capability.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3 - Maps.pdf | ||
| WD2015-5449.pdf | ||
| SnowRemovalSOW_20260121.pdf | ||
| 127EAV26Q0023 combined.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Ratings Past performance/Experience: Past performance/Experience assessments shall be accomplished for all offerors in the competitive range (expanded if needed). Each offeror shall be assigned one of the following ratings:
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional/high confidence |
| Based on the offeror's performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Very good/significant |
| Based on the offeror's performance record, little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Satisfactory/confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Neutral/unknown confidence |
| No performance record identifiable (see FAR 15.305{a)(2) (iii) and (iv)). |
| Marginal/little confidence |
| Based on the offeror's performance record, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Changes to the offeror's existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract requirements. |
| Unsatisfactory/no confidence |
| Based on the offeror's performance record, extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
(I) A number of past performance references provided by offerors may be selected and investigated. The final determination of past performance ratings shall rest with the contracting officer.
(2) An offeror with limited or no recent or relevant past performance will receive a rating of Neutral/unknown confidence and will not be rated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.
Note: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has authorized Federal agencies to collect past performance information under 0MB clearance number 9000-0142. Both this information provided in the proposal, and Government records will be used to evaluate the Offeror's past performance; howeer, references other than those listed may also be contacted.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .