SF1449_SP470626F0029.PDF

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND

DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY

ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED

29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF. OFFER

16. ADMINISTERED BY CODE

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, & 30 See Schedule

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

SP4706-24-D-0002

2. CONTRACT NO.

2026 SEP 08

3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE

DATE

SP4706-26-F-0029

4. ORDER NUMBER 5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE

DATE

a. NAME b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (No collect calls)

8. OFFER DUE DATE/

LOCAL TIME

9. ISSUED BY CODE SP4706

DCSO-COLUMBUS-DIVISION-2

POST OFFICE BOX 3990

COLUMBUS OH 43218

USA

Local Admin: Mary Finotti C012938 Tel: DSN(392) 693-0634 Fax: 614-693-1566 Email: Mary.Finotti@dla.mil

10. THIS ACQUISITION IS UNRESTRICTED OR SET ASIDE: % FOR:

SMALL BUSINESS

HUBZONE SMALL

BUSINESS

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS

(WOSB) ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM

8 (A)

SERVICE-DISABLED

VETERAN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS

541330NAICS:

$25.5 MillionSIZE STANDARD:

11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-

TION UNLESS BLOCK IS

MARKED

Net 30 days

12. DISCOUNT TERMS

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A

RATED ORDER UNDER

DPAS (15 CFR 700)

13b. RATING

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

RFQ IFB RFP

15. DELIVER TO CODE SP4706

SEE BLOCK 9

Criticality: C PAS : None

17a. CONTRACTOR/ CODE

OFFEROR

FACILITY

CODE

SL471299789

BAE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS &

SERVICES INC.

520 GAITHER RD

ROCKVILLE MD 20850-6198

USA

TELEPHONE NO. 8504616333

18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE SL4701

DEF FIN AND ACCOUNTING SVC

BSM

P O BOX 182317

COLUMBUS OH 43218-2317

USA

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT SUCH ADDRESS IN

OFFER

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a UNLESS BLOCK

BELOW IS CHECKED.

19.

ITEM NO.

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/SERVICES

21.

QUANTITY

22.

UNIT

23.

UNIT PRICE

24.

AMOUNT

AA: 97X4930 5CFX 2034610 001 3111 S33189 $1079463.95

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

$1,079,463.95

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Govt. Use Only)

27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1, 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3 AND 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED.

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED.

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or Print) 30c. DATE SIGNED

Howard Merkle Howard.Merkle@dla.mil

31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or Print)

2026 SEP 08

31c. DATE SIGNED

0000-00-00

SEE SCHEDULE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

SEE SCHEDULE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

SEE ADDENDUM

See Schedule

DATED . YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION (BLOCK 5),

INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE SET FORTH ,

HEREIN IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

EDWOSB

Howard Merkle

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED:RECEIVED INSPECTED

COMPLETE PARTIAL FINAL

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK

36. PAYMENT

PARTIAL FINAL

19.

ITEM NO.

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/SERVICES

21.

QUANTITY

22.

UNIT

23.

UNIT PRICE

24.

AMOUNT

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f. TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

33. SHIP NUMBER 34. VOUCHER NUMBER 35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

37. CHECK NUMBER

38. S/R ACCOUNT NO. 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

CONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE

PAGE 3 OF 10 PAGES

SP4706-24-D-0002 - SP4706-26-F-0029

In accordance with DFARs 252.232-7007, this Task Order is issued under the Automated Fuel System Installation (AFSI) Multiple-Award Indefinite-Delivery / Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract SP4706-24-D-0002.

The FY26 ATG Replacement requirement overall Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract is for $1,079,463.95.

This Task Order incorporates all provisions and clauses contained in solicitation (and amendments) SP4706-26-R-0003, the IDIQ contract SP4706-24-D-0002 (and modifications). It encompasses all work of the attached PWS and its enclosures for the ATG replacement of the 8 sites described.

The CLIN descriptions are as follows:

CLIN 0001 – FY26 ATG-R Los Alamitos AASF, CA CLIN 0002 – FY26 ATG-R Barnes ARPT ANG, MA CLIN 0003 – FY26 ATG-R Will Rogers Field ANG, OK CLIN 0004 – FY26 ATG-R Assault Craft Unit 5 (Camp Pendleton), CA CLIN 0005 – FY26 ATG-R North Island NAS/Coronado NAB, CA CLIN 0006 – FY26 ATG-R Kings Bay NSB, GA CLIN 0007 – FY26 ATG-R Charlotte NG, NC CLIN 0008 – FY26 ATG-R Davenport AASF #3, IA

List of Enclosures:

Enclosure 1a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document Los Alamitos AASF, CA Enclosure 1b - ATG-R Site Survey for Los Alamitos AASF, CA Enclosure 1c - Site Drawings for Los Alamitos AASF, CA Enclosure 1d - PM Out brief Documents for Los Alamitos AASF, CA Enclosure 2a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document for Barnes ARPT ANG, MA Enclosure 2b - ATG-R Site Survey for Barnes ARPT ANG, MA Enclosure 2c - Site Drawings for Barnes ARPT ANG, MA Enclosure 2d - PM Out brief Documents for Barnes ARPT ANG, MA Enclosure 3a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document for Will Rogers Field ANG (Oklahoma City), OK Enclosure 3b - ATG-R Site Survey for Will Rogers Field ANG (Oklahoma City), OK Enclosure 3c - Site Drawings for Will Rogers Field ANG (Oklahoma City), OK Enclosure 3d - PM Out brief Documents for Will Rogers Field ANG (Oklahoma City), OK Enclosure 4a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document for Assault Craft Unit 5 (Camp Pendelton), CA Enclosure 4b - ATG-R Site Survey for Assault Craft Unit 5 (Camp Pendelton), CA Enclosure 4c - Site Drawings for Assault Craft Unit 5 (Camp Pendelton), CA Enclosure 4d - PM Out brief Documents for Assault Craft Unit 5 (Camp Pendelton), CA Enclosure 5a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document for North Island NAS / Coronado NAB, CA Enclosure 5b - ATG-R Site Survey for North Island NAS / Coronado NAB, CA Enclosure 5c - Site Drawings for North Island NAS / Coronado NAB, CA Enclosure 5d - PM Out brief Documents for North Island NAS / Coronado NAB, CA Enclosure 6a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document for Kings Bay NSB, GA Enclosure 6b - ATG-R Site Survey for Kings Bay NSB, GA Enclosure 6c - Site Drawings for Kings Bay NSB, GA Enclosure 6d - PM Out brief Documents for Kings Bay NSB, GA Enclosure 7a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document for Charlotte ANG, NC Enclosure 7b - ATG-R Site Survey for Charlotte ANG, NC Enclosure 7c - Site Drawings for Charlotte ANG, NC Enclosure 7d - PM Out brief Documents for Charlotte ANG, NC Enclosure 8a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document for AASF Davenport, IA Enclosure 8b - ATG-R Site Survey for AASF Davenport, IA Enclosure 8c - Site Drawings for AASF Davenport, IA Enclosure 8d - PM Out brief Documents for AASF Davenport, IA Enclosure 9a - Bi-Weekly Activity Report Enclosure 9b - Milestone Payment Plan Enclosure 9c - System Turnover Documentation Template Enclosure 9d - Milestone Punch List Template Enclosure 9e - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).

Enclosure 9f - Invoice Template Enclosure 9g - ATG-R Capabilities Statement Enclosure 9h - DD1149 Form Requisition and Invoice/Shipment Document

References/Inclusions:

Wage Determination 2015-4427, Rev 33, Charleston, South Carolina dated 05/13/2026

Invoicing Information using I RAPT (WAWF):

For assistance: http://www.dtra.mil/Portals/61/Documents/Business%20Docs/Vendor_FAQ_2014_12_31.pdf All payments will be processed and submitted through I RAPT (WAWF).

When entering invoice in I RAPT (WAWF), please use a unit of issue (UOI) of MO. Due to system limitations, the UOI could not be changed.

In addition, for billing purposes, the CLIN is “flipped”.

An Example of how to enter an invoice is shown below:

WAWF Entry = Qty – 10,000.00, U/P - $1.00, UOI – MO

If additional assistance is required contact the COR, Melinda Liang, Melinda.Liang@dla.mil, (571) 448-9630

PAGE 4 OF 10 PAGES

SP4706-24-D-0002 - SP4706-26-F-0029

SECTION B

SUPPLIES/SERVICES: R425-V00007570

ITEM DESCRIPTION:

See Attached Performance Work Statement for Los Alamitos, CA

DLA issues this document using the DoD authorized unit of issue, please refer to the following URL to determine the corresponding ANSI X12 unit of issue.

https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dla.mil%2FPortals%2F104%2FDocuments%2FDLMS% 2FeApplications%2FLogDataAdmin%2FUnit_of_Issue_and_Purchase_Unit.xlsx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT .

0001 R425-V00007570 102,570.600 MO $ 1.00 $ 102,570.60

CLIN 0001 -

Funding request for FFP site

PREP FOR DELIVERY:

See Attached Performance Work Statement (PWS).

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 09/21/2026 - 09/20/2027

SL4712

J-6F FORT BELVOIR

ATTN IT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

520 GAITHER RD

ROCKVILLE MD 20850-6198

US

J-6F FORT BELVOIR

ATTN IT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

520 GAITHER RD

See Attached Performance Work Statement (PWS) for Barnes ARPT ANG, MA

DLA issues this document using the DoD authorized unit of issue, please refer to the following URL to determine the https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dla.mil%2FPortals%2F104%2FDocuments%2FDLMS%

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT .

0002 R425-V00007570 91,301.140 MO $ 1.00 $ 91,301.14

CLIN 0002 -

Funding request for FFP site

See Attached Performance Work Statement (PWS)

PAGE 5 OF 10 PAGES

SP4706-24-D-0002 - SP4706-26-F-0029

SUPPLY/SERVICE: R425-V00007570 CONT'D

J-6F FORT BELVOIR

ATTN IT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

520 GAITHER RD

ATTN IT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

520 GAITHER RD

See Attached Performance Work Statement ( PWS) for Will Rogers Field ANG, OK

DLA issues this document using the DoD authorized unit of issue, please refer to the following URL to determine the https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dla.mil%2FPortals%2F104%2FDocuments%2FDLMS%

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT .

0003 R425-V00007570 108,243.490 MO $ 1.00 $ 108,243.49

CLIN 0003 -

Funding request for FFP site

See Attached Performance Work Statement (PWS)

J-6F FORT BELVOIR

ATTN IT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

520 GAITHER RD

ATTN IT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

520 GAITHER RD

PAGE 6 OF 10 PAGES

SP4706-24-D-0002 - SP4706-26-F-0029

SECTION B

SUPPLY/SERVICE: R425-V00007570 CONT'D

See Attached Performance Work Statement ( PWS) for Assault Craft Unit 5 ( Camp Pendleton, CA)

DLA issues this document using the DoD authorized unit of issue, please refer to the following URL to determine the https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dla.mil%2FPortals%2F104%2FDocuments%2FDLMS%

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT .

0004 R425-V00007570 116,130.920 MO $ 1.00 $ 116,130.92

CLIN 0004 -

Funding request for FFP site

See Attached Performance Work Statement ( PWS)

J-6F FORT BELVOIR

ATTN IT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

520 GAITHER RD

ATTN IT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

520 GAITHER RD

See Attached Performance Work Statement ( PWS) for North Island NAS/Coronado NAB, CA

DLA issues this document using the DoD authorized unit of issue, please refer to the following URL to determine the https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dla.mil%2FPortals%2F104%2FDocuments%2FDLMS%

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT .

0005 R425-V00007570 151,881.840 MO $ 1.00 $ 151,881.84

CLIN 0005 -

Funding request for FFP site

See Attached Performance Work Statement ( PWS).

PAGE 7 OF 10 PAGES

SP4706-24-D-0002 - SP4706-26-F-0029

J-6F FORT BELVOIR

ATTN IT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

520 GAITHER RD

ATTN IT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

520 GAITHER RD

See Attached Performance Work Statement ( PWS) for Kings Bay NSB, GA

DLA issues this document using the DoD authorized unit of issue, please refer to the following URL to determine the https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dla.mil%2FPortals%2F104%2FDocuments%2FDLMS%

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT .

0006 R425-V00007570 374,991.040 MO $ 1.00 $ 374,991.04

CLIN 0006 -

Funding request for FFP site

See Attached Performance Work Statement ( PWS

J-6F FORT BELVOIR

ATTN IT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

520 GAITHER RD

ATTN IT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

520 GAITHER RD

PAGE 8 OF 10 PAGES

SP4706-24-D-0002 - SP4706-26-F-0029

See Attached Performance Work Statement ( PWS) for Charlotte, NC

DLA issues this document using the DoD authorized unit of issue, please refer to the following URL to determine the https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dla.mil%2FPortals%2F104%2FDocuments%2FDLMS%

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT .

0007 R425-V00007570 66,105.070 MO $ 1.00 $ 66,105.07

CLIN 0007 -

Funding request for FFP site

See Attached Performance Work Statement ( PWS)

J-6F FORT BELVOIR

ATTN IT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

520 GAITHER RD

ATTN IT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

520 GAITHER RD

See Attached Performance Work Statement ( PWS) for Davenport, AASF #3, IA

DLA issues this document using the DoD authorized unit of issue, please refer to the following URL to determine the https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dla.mil%2FPortals%2F104%2FDocuments%2FDLMS%

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT .

0008 R425-V00007570 68,239.850 MO $ 1.00 $ 68,239.85

CLIN 0008-Funding request for FFP site s

PAGE 9 OF 10 PAGES

SP4706-24-D-0002 - SP4706-26-F-0029

SECTION B

See Attached Performance Work Statement.

J-6F FORT BELVOIR

ATTN IT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

520 GAITHER RD

ATTN IT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

520 GAITHER RD

GOVT USE

External External External Customer RDD/ ITEM PR PRLI PR PRLI Material Need Ship Date .

0001 7015041779 0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0002 7015041773 0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0003 7015041774 0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0004 7015041778 0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0005 7015041775 0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0006 7015100491 0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0007 7015042180 0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0008 7015041772 0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

CONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED: PAGE 10 OF 10 PAGES

SP4706-24-D-0002 - SP4706-26-F-0029

SECTION J - LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

List of Attachments

Description File Name ATTACH_PWS ATG-R Performance Work

Statement amend 1.pdf ATTACH_Pricing_Spreads heet BAE Systems_SP4706-26- R-0003_ATG-R TO Pricing

Spreadsheet_FPR.xlsx ATTACH_Solicitation_and_

Amendments BAE Systems_SP4706-26- R-0003_Introduction_Solici tation_ATG-R_FPR.pdf ATTACH_Tech_Proposal BAE Systems_SP4706-26-

R-0003_Vol.

_I_Factor_1_Tech_Approa ch_Factor_2_Mgmt_Appro ach_FPR.pdf ATTACH_Price_Proposal BAE Systems_SP4706-26-

R-0003_Volume_III_Factor _4_Price_ATG-R_FPR.pdf

ATTACH_Signed_Bilateral SF1449

SP470626F0029_BAE

Systems Signed.pdf

ATTACHMENT 1

Solicitation SP4706-26-R-0003

Multi-site Automated Tank Gauge – Replacement (ATG-R)

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

RFP# SP4706-26-R-0003

1.0 Introduction

The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) (i.e. the Government) is the largest logistics support agency in the United States (U.S.) Department of Defense (DoD). The DLA Director reports to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (USD AT&L) through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Logistics and Materiel Readiness (ASD L&MR).

DLA provides worldwide logistics support, acquisition, and technical services to the military services, other federal and civilian agencies, and partner nations in peacetime and wartime. DLA Energy is the executive agent for the management of the DoD wholesale and retail fuels operations including accounting operations within the Defense Working Capital Fund (DWCF).

DLA Information Operations (J62BG), Operational Energy Applications (OEA), is a key entity responsible for providing Information Technology (IT) and Operational Technology (OT) support to DLA Energy in its performance of worldwide supply chain management at numerous DoD fuel facilities including (but not limited to) defense fuel supply points (DFSPs).

As part of its mission, DLA OEA manages, installs, and maintains automated fuel systems (AFS) and equipment at DFSPs. DLA activities include standardizing, maintaining, or upgrading AFS, hydrant fueling automation maintenance (HFAM), automatic tank gauge (ATG), automated fuel handling equipment (AFHE), and other fuel related IT or OT systems at DFSPs to improve fuel inventory accountability, monitoring, and control as well as preventing fuel spills and environmental hazards. Standardized, modernized, and sustainable IT/OT systems at DFSPs enable DLA to provide real-time data acquisition and automated inventory management for capitalized fuel products. These IT/OT systems are typically comprised of web-enabled application software and internet of things (IOT) technology stacks that are fully integrated with liquified petroleum fuel storage tanks and Industrial Control Systems (ICS) at the DFSPs. The purpose of these systems is to provide worldwide access to mission essential commodities such as petroleum and fuel for the U.S. Armed Forces and North American Treaty Organization (NATO) Allies. Each ICS is unique to its deployed location and can consist of Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) computers, Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs), Remote Terminal Units (RTUs), networked data communications, and graphical user interfaces (GUIs), systems/sub-systems, control modules, and sensors/probes. These ICS are typically fully integrated with liquid petroleum fuel facilities and provide the capabilities of active/passive monitoring and remote access.

The contractor will be responsible for the design, procurement, configuration, integration, installation, system testing, and training of ATG systems upgrade projects at Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Army fuels facilities. The ATG Replacement (ATG-R) will be directed toward replacing existing End of Life (EOL) tank gauges for large bulk storage fuel tanks greater than 30K gallons, meeting requirements from Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 3-460-01 dated June 2023. ATG systems provide capabilities to measure and report product level, temperature, bottom sediment and water (BS&W) and density. For aggregation and communication of data to the existing system, via both new and/or existing base communications infrastructure. The new

SECTION C-1: INTRODUCTION

electronic ATG systems will be integrated from gauge data to a new Varec RTU8810 or RTU9810 communication system or equivalent; or direct/dial up/lease line communications when/where necessary.

1.1 Purpose / Objectives

The objective of this effort is to modernize DoD fuel management infrastructure at designated ATG-R locations by completely replacing obsolete or failing ATG systems with modern, updated, and fully integrated solutions.

2.0 SCOPE

To achieve this objective, the contractor will be required to render a wide variety of supplies and services. These supplies and services will require the contractor to possess expertise in removing, replacing, modifying, repairing, and integrating ATGs at petroleum facilities compliant with applicable codes, criteria, and federal, state, local and/or host nation regulations. All services rendered by the contractor will adhere to the Government’s requirements described in technical requirements described in Appendix A and Enclosures 1-8 of this PWS. Contractor services will also include applicable project management support to provide reoccurring status updates, coordinate resources / activities, and ensure timely completion of work. All supplies and services rendered by the contractor will need to account for the geographical disbursement of the sites / locations identified for work to be performed. The contractor will also need to account for and provide any tooling, equipment, hardware, and commercial / ancillary software necessary to render services. Services and supplies rendered by the contractor will include any of the following elements as applicable to achieve the Government’s objectives:

• Software, hardware, and firmware

• Interfaces and integrations

• Networked data communications

• Tank Instrumentation

• ATG Monitors

• ATG Sensors

• Auxiliary Equipment

• Communication Devices

• IAS Monitors and Sensors

• OPE Monitors and Sensors

• Acknowledgement Switches

• Warning Switches

• Consoles

• Horn and Lights

• Interstitial Sensors

• Modems

• Probes

• Probe Interfaces

• Tank Side Indicators

• Conduit and Wiring

• Surge Suppression

• Uninterruptable Power Supply

(UPS)

• Emulators

• Converters

• Junction Boxes

• Panels and Panel Heaters

• Power Supplies

Within the scope of work, the contractor will be expected (at a minimum) to perform the

SECTION C-2: SCOPE

following:

1. System Removal: Safely remove all existing obsolete or failing ATG systems and their components, including (but not limited to) MTS/Tempo Sonics (with Red Lion displays), Varec RTU 8130, and Pneumercator gauges.

When removing Varec RTU 8130 communications equipment, the Contractor will maintain this equipment in working order as found upon arrival. Before completion of the installation and departure from site, the Contractor will appropriately clean and package all RTU components and ship them to the ATG Maintenance contractor, address to be provided by the COR upon request.

2. System Installation: Replace the Veeder Root Item #TLS 350 Series, Varec RTU 8130, etc., ATG systems on small bulk tanks (less than 30K gallons) and Service Station (SSTA) tanks with Veeder-Root Item #TLS 450 Plus gauging systems, Varec RTU 8810 or 9810, or ATG system equivalent capabilities and measurements for each automated tank in the facility:

i. Product Level

ii. Interface Level/ Water Level

iii. Product Temperature

iv. Product Gross Volume

v. Product Net Volume

3. System Integration: Configure and interface the new gauging systems to the existing software on the site’s operation Console, enabling real-time tank fuel accountability and operational data communication via the site's operations console. (Refer to Appendix A and Enclosures 1-8 for detailed specifications and guidelines.)

4. System Acceptance: Successfully commission and turnover / deploy the replacement ATG solution. This will be measured by Government inspection of the supplies provided and services rendered, resulting in acceptance of completed work. Successful acceptance will include validation of ATG replacement full integration with existing software via accurate and reliable communication of tank fuel data.

2.1 Sites / Locations

The following Government sites / locations are within the scope of this contract for work performance:

• Los Alamitos AASF, CA

• Barnes ARPT ANG, MA

• Will Rogers Field ANG (Oklahoma City), OK

• Assault Craft Unit 5 (Camp Pendelton), CA

• North Island NAS/ Coronado NAB, CA

• Kings Bay NSB, GA

• Charlotte ANG, NC

• AASF Davenport, IA

Solicitation SP4706-XX-R-XXXX

RFP# SP4706-XX-R-XXXX

2.2 Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

Execution of this contract and breakdown of the scope of work is comprised of distinct parts as depicted in the below graphic and WBS.

Detailed information on the ATG-R program is described within this PWS. To achieve the Government’s desired objective for the scoped work effort, the supplies and services provided by the contractor must (at a minimum) be rendered to complete the following:

Figure 1 – Work Breakdown Structure

3.

Multi-Site ATG R

3.1 Task 1:

Project

Management

3.2 Task 2:

Devleopment

3.3 Task 3: Pre- Installation

3.4 Task 4:

Installation

3.5 Task 5:

Turnover

Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

PWS # Description

3.0 ATG-R Support Requirements

3.1 Task 1: Project Management

3.1.1 Subtask 1: Program Management Plan (PMP) & Quality Control Plan (QCP)

3.1.2 Subtask 2: Post Award Conference/Kick-Off Meeting

3.1.3 Subtask 3: Project Schedule / Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M)

3.1.4 Subtask 4: Bi-Weekly Activity Report & Virtual Conference

3.2 Task 2: Project Development

3.2.1 Subtask 1: Site Survey and Site Survey Report (SSR)

3.2.2 Subtask 2: Project Requirements Document (PRD)

3.3 Task 3: Pre- Installation

3.3.1 Subtask 1: Equipment and Material Support

3.3.2 Subtask 2: Fabrication and Assembly

3.3.3 Subtask 3: Final State (Pre-Installation) IDP

3.3.4 Subtask 4: Pre-Installation Conference

3.3.5 Subtask 5: Pre-Installation Testing

3.4 Task 4: Project Installation

3.4.1 Subtask 1: Demolition

3.4.2 Subtask 2: Install ATG and Communications

3.4.3 Subtask 3: Conduit

Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

PWS # Description

3.4.4 Subtask 4: Cable and Wiring

3.4.5 Subtask 5: Electrical Power Distribution

3.4.6 Subtask 6: Technical Plans and Manuals

3.4.7 Subtask 7: As-Built Documentation

3.5 Task 5: Project Turnover

3.5.1 Subtask 1: Test Plans, Procedures, and Reports

3.5.2 Subtask 2: Training Documentation

3.5.3 Subtask 3: Government Acceptance Testing

3.5.4 Subtask 4: System Turnover Conference

Table 1 – Work Breakdown Structure

SECTION C-3: Multi-Site ATG-R REQUIREMENTS

3.0 Multi-Site ATG-R Requirements

3.1 Task 1: Project Management Support

The Contractor will provide project management support activities necessary to deliver ATG-R taskings in accordance with (IAW) this task order (TO) PWS contract and on schedule. Those activities include coordination, updating, and maintenance of program deliverables, project status, project plans, and general TO oversight.

3.1.1 Subtask 1: Project Management Plan (PMP) and Quality Control Plan (QCP)

The contractor must provide complete and appropriate plans that establish a creditable management approach and understanding of the methods necessary to successfully complete the tasks, subtasks, etc. identified within this PWS. As such, the Contractor must submit a Project Management Plan (PMP) and Quality Control Plan (QCP), demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of the PWS requirements and a robust management approach for successful work completion. While the QCP can be a subset artifact within the PMP, the combined documents must detail the Offeror’s administrative oversight, including resources, processes, and controls to ensure adherence to the Government's Enclosure 9e - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). Controls identified within the combined PMP and QCP must include the Offeror’s quality control (QC) / quality assurance (QA) actions. These documents must also identify key personnel and demonstrate sufficient administrative risk mitigation strategies to render the supplies and services to successfully administer the ATG/IAS/OPE program.

Initial versions of the PMP and QCP will be submitted to the Government at the time of proposal to support technical evaluation and determination of acceptability of the contractor’s management approach. At the time of the award, the initial versions of the PMP and QCP will be considered accepted by the Government. The final versions of the contractor’s PMP and QCP will be submitted to the Government within ten (10) business days after completion of the post award conference for inspection and acceptance. After the PMP and QCP are finalized, the contractor will be required to maintain these documents and ensure services rendered are compliant with them throughout the duration of the contract. These documents will be updated by the contractor as necessary, but any proposed changes to these documents must be approved in writing by the Government post-award. The contractor must ensure the PMP and QCP do not contain Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) including (but not limited to) Personally Identifiable Information (PII).

• Deliverable: Program Management Plan (PMP) and Quality Control Plan (QCP)

(CDRL A001)

• Schedule: Initial versions at time of contractor proposal to support evaluations for acceptability. Final versions within Government within ten (10) business days after completion of the post award conference / kickoff meeting.

• Content: The contractor’s PMP and QCP in combination must clearly contain (at a minimum):

1. Organization: A logical method for organizing all content such as a table of contents, page numbers, etc.

2. Work Plan: A narrative description with sufficient details to provide a complete under-standing of the contractor’s management approach for rendering the necessary supplies and services to meet the Government’s desired outcomes. The work plan must account for all requirements, tasks, subtasks, etc. contained within the PWS. Additionally, the work plan must (at a minimum) also identify:

i. All labor categories/labor types (i.e. both essential/Key Personnel and non-essen-tial/non-Key Personnel) the contractor intends to use for successful work perfor-mance.

ii. The total number proposed contractor staff/personnel per labor category/labor type.

iii. All subcontractors, vendors, suppliers, etc.

iv. Which tasks, subtasks, etc. described in the PWS will be performed by the prime con-tractor, subcontractors, vendors, suppliers, etc.

v. Which labor categories/labor types will be on-site vs. virtual/remote throughout con-tract performance.

vi. For each essential/Key Personnel labor category or position, identification of which individual(s) are anticipated to be a full-time, part-time, matrixed, or a split resource (i.e. not a full-time equivalent (FTE)/dedicated to the performance of work described in the PWS).

vii. The methods the contractor will use to supplement resourcing if staff/personnel changes occur to ensure continuity of operations and successful work performance.

viii. The methods the contractor will use to maintain training and applicable certifications for staff/personnel.

3. Organizational Structure: A summary description with applicable figures or charts demon-strating a logical organizational structure with qualified personnel to perform all the tasks in the PWS. This description with applicable figures or charts must (at a minimum) also clearly identify:

i. The logical hierarchy (including roles/responsibilities) proposed by the contractor to conduct oversight of their personnel in alignment to the PWS tasks, subtasks, etc. for all proposed labor categories/labor types (i.e. both essential/Key Personnel and non-essential/non-Key Personnel).

ii. Clear identification of the organizational structure and incorporation of essential/Key

Personnel identified in the PWS.

iii. Identification of all labor categories/labor types by prime contractor, subcontractor, vendor, or supplier.

4. Key Personnel: The resumes and applicable supporting documentation (including but not limited to certifications) for all contractor proposed Key Personnel identified in the PWS to clearly demonstrate their capabilities and qualifications for Government determination of acceptability. The contractor will ensure all Key Personnel resumes and applicable supporting documentation does not contain any CUI including (but not limited to)

PII.

i. The resumes of Key Personnel must provide a clear demonstration that the proposed resources meet or exceed the education, qualification, and experience requirements described in the PWS.

ii. The Government reserves the right to use any available information to evaluate Key

Personnel, including (but not limited to) verification of proposed Key Personnel per-formance on other Government contracts. The Government may contact references identified in Key Personnel resumes, query databases for certification validity, and inquire with end user representatives regarding the quality of Key Personnel experi-ence and performance. The Offeror must provide, along with resumes, Letters of In-tent (LOI)/Letters of Commitment (LOC) confirming Key Personnel selection and availability immediately on contract award. The Offeror must ensure that all Key Per-sonnel possess eligibility for applicable personnel security clearance investigations and can obtain a Common Access Card (CAC).

5. Risk/Issue Management: A narrative description with applicable figures or charts on how the contractor will identify, control, manage, and elevate to the Government risks or issues encountered during contract performance. This description must (at a minimum) also in-clude:

i. Methods to address any known constraints to contractor performance identified in the

PWS

ii. Identification (including if/then statements with likelihood and consequences) of any critical risks known to the contractor at the time of proposal that could significantly impact successful contract performance.

iii. The methods the contractor will use to control cost, prevent scope creep during con-tract performance, and minimize requests for equitable adjustment (REAs).

6. Stakeholder Communications: A narrative description with applicable figures or charts of the methods the contractor will use for stakeholder identification, engagement, and com-munications. This description should include information on how communications will be disseminated between the contractor and the Government such as communication ma-trixes, integrated project teams (IPTs), group mailbox(es), etc.

7. Quality Controls (QCs): A narrative description with applicable figures or charts of the plans, processes, and methods the contractor will use to meet the performance standards identified in the PWS. Additionally, this description needs provide details on how the con-tractor will support Government oversight and implement QCs processes to successfully complete the tasks, subtasks, etc. to deliver the Government’s desired outcomes including (but not limited to):

i. Any contractor key framing assumptions associated with contract performance.

ii. The contractor’s methods of compliance with the Government QASP such as perfor-mance monitoring, Acceptable Quality Levels (AQLs), etc.

a) This information must include specific details on how the contractor will adhere to the performance standards, Key Performance Indicators (KPI), Key Perfor-mance Parameters (KPPs), etc.

iii. The contractor’s approach to QC that will identify, prevent, and ensure non-recur-rence of defective supplies or services including (but not limited to):

a) Methods, tools, and techniques for QC activities such as 100% inspection, ran-dom/periodic sampling, peer reviews, independent verification and validation (IV&V), auditing, management/second level reviews, etc.

b) Methods for addressing non-conformity of supplies or services identified by the

Government.

• Format: Electronic copies viewable using the latest version of Microsoft Office or Adobe

PDF.

3.1.2 Subtask 2: Post Award Conference/Kick-Off Meeting

The contractor will be required to participate in a single and/or multi-day post award conference that is intended to serve as orientation for contract execution compliant with FAR 42.5. At a minimum, all key personnel identified in this PWS must attend the post award conference. The post award conference may be held virtually (i.e. video teleconference) or face-to-face or at a specific location designated by the Government. The post award conference will help both the Government and contractor to achieve a clear and mutual understanding of all contractual requirements as well as identify and resolve any potential problems before they arise during contract performance. The post award conference is not a substitute for the contractor’s full understanding of the work requirements at the time their proposal was submitted, nor is it to be used to alter the final agreement arrived at in any negotiations leading to contract award. As part of the contractor’s participation in the post award conference, the contractor will be expected to prepare and present an executive overview of their plan to manage the scope, schedule, and resources for the contract. An agenda for the post award conference will be provided to the contractor by the KO, COR, and/or Designated Technical Support Representatives (DTSR) before the conference date. The contractor will support the Government oversight of the post award conference by recording meeting minutes summarizing the events that transpired during the post award conference. All documentation generated by the contractor for the post award conference will be submitted to the COR/ DTSR NLT ten (10) business days after the conclusion of the conference.

• Deliverable: Post Award Conference/Kick-Off Meeting (CDRL A002)

• Schedule: Within ten (10) business days upon conclusion of the post award conference.

• Content: As described within para. 3.1.2

• Format: Electronic copies viewable using the latest version of Microsoft Office and Adobe

PDF

3.1.3 Subtask 3: Project Schedule / POA&M

The contractor will develop a Project Schedule / POA&M outlining all tasks, milestones and events required to complete this TO for all sites / locations within the scope of this PWS. The Schedule will be updated and included in the Bi-Weekly Activity Report (CDRL A004). The schedule will detail resources required to accomplish the elements of the plan, any milestones in meeting the task, and scheduled completion dates for the milestones. The schedule will list all major tasks or phases of project planning, project development, project installation, project transfer and show interdependence between tasks, project phases, sub- systems, devices, stakeholders, site operations, MILCONs, permitting, etc. where applicable. The schedule will also include all items such as software, tanks, truck racks, pumps, valves and pipelines to be temporarily taken out of service in support of this TO. The contractor will coordinate with Site Operations, Site Public Works, and other stakeholders to identify any risks/issues in order to schedule tasking appropriately. The contractor will identify and report any conflicts or issues representing potential schedule risk to the COR/DTSR. The contractor will schedule all work to cause the least amount of interference to site operations

The contractual deliverable dates are defined as the completion dates of the major tasks (not sub-tasks). The contractor’s schedule will be developed and updated using Microsoft Project (MPP) format.

The schedule will reflect baseline dates (planned dates) and updated dates (actual dates) for each task, milestone, and event to be used as input into performance metrics. All schedule changes will be explained in the applicable cell comments.

Major tasks and events that require special attention are milestones to include:

a) In-brief and Site Survey (CDRL A005).

b) Installation Planning (Initial Installation Design Plan (IDP) and Systems Architecture)

c) Material Procurement (Expected Delivery Dates)

d) Installation of New Materials and Equipment (Start Dates, Crew Mobilization)

e) Trenching, Conduit and Infrastructure

f) ATG Equipment Installation and Integration

g) Operational Testing prior to final inspection

h) Final Government Test and Quality Assurance (QA) (Equipment and Inspection Testing, Integration)

i) Coordination with the FuelsManager® and Varec, Training, Turnover, Delivery of final IDP/As-Built

j) Updated Project Requirement Documents (PRD) for each of the ATG-R sites

k) Record of changes and reasons within the note section of the “Task Information” of the Microsoft Project file

• Deliverable: Project Schedule / POA&M (CDRL A003)

• Schedule: Initial version at time of proposal. Final version with PMP within five (5) business days after completion of post award conference / project kick-off meeting. Updated versions will be submitted with the second Bi-Weekly Activity Report on the third week of each month (See Section 3.1.4).

• Content: As described in para. 3.1.3

3.1.4 Subtask 4: Bi-Weekly Activity Report & Virtual Teleconference

To support Government oversight and monitoring of the Contractor’s performance, the Contractor will provide reoccurring Bi-Weekly Activity reports to the COR. The Contractor will also conduct monthly virtual teleconference, which will occur on a continuous basis throughout the duration of the contract on a business day (i.e. Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday) that is mutually agreed upon by the Contractor and the COR / DTSR. Any submissions or conferences that are scheduled to occur on Federal Holidays as identified in this PWS will be rescheduled at the discretion of the COR. The bi-weekly update should be intentionally designed so that it is short in duration (i.e. ideally no longer than one (1) hour).

a. Bi-Weekly Activity Report: The Contractor will submit a Bi-Weekly Activity Report to the COR, due at least two (2) business days prior to the end of the first and third week of each month and no later than Close of Business (5:00 PM EST) on Friday, throughout the duration of the contract. The contractor will use the Government-provided template (Enclosure 9a) to ensure proper content and format for the Bi-Weekly Activity Report and clearly highlight any changes since the previous report.

b. Virtual Teleconference: The Virtual Teleconference will be scheduled within two (2) business days after the second Bi-Weekly Activity Report on the third week of each month by the Contractor with the COR. The Contractor will present the Bi-Weekly report as the agenda for the virtual teleconference in collaboration with the COR and include areas(s) of Government concern as needed.

• Deliverable: Bi-Weekly Activity Report, POA&M Updates, and Presentations

(CDRL A004)

• Schedule: Within two (2) business days prior to the end of the first and third week of each month and no later than Close of Business (5:00 PM EST) on Friday. Meeting minutes from the virtual teleconference will be provided to the COR as part of the Bi- Weekly Activity Report.

• Content: The contractor’s Bi-Weekly Activity Report must clearly contain (at a minimum):

1. POA&M Updates

i. Updated versions will be submitted with the second Bi-Weekly Activity Report on the third week of each month.

2. Key Personnel Updates

i. The contractor will make updates in Enclosure 9a “Bi-Weekly Activity Report” Template.

3. A summary list of deliverables (i.e. tasks, subtasks, action items, etc.) that are:

i. Past due / behind schedule

ii. Recently completed (within the past week)

iii. Upcoming (planned to be completed in the next week)

4. Additional data identified in writing by the COR as necessary to support Government oversight of contractor performance.

• Format: Electronic copies viewable using the latest version of Microsoft Office or

Adobe PDF

3.2 Task 2: Project Development

The contractor will clearly identify and notify the Government of all framing assumptions (FAs), risks, and issues to successfully complete the work as part of their project development activities.

The Contractor will use an interdisciplinary approach to complete their work that enables realization of successful ATG systems. This interdisciplinary approach must include consideration of the business and the technical needs for users with the goal of providing a holistic replacement ATG solution that meets the Government’s requirements. For example, as project development is performed, the contractor will focus on meeting the Government’s requirements to plan the work including design synthesis, installation, testing and system validation while considering the following components of a complete project:

a) Design

b) Development

c) Installation

d) Operations

e) Performance

f) Testing and Verification

g) Manufacturing/Fabrication

h) Cost & Schedule

i) Training & Support

j) Disposal

See Enclosure 9g – ATG-R Capabilities Statement for further information regarding ATG-R capability requirements.

3.2.1 Subtask 1: Site survey and Site Survey Report (SSR)

After task order (TO) award, the Contractor will perform an onsite validation/in-brief Site Survey of each of the ATG-R sites.

The purpose of the Site Survey will be to validate the equipment/material requirements and firm up data for the Installation Design Package (IDP) for each of the sites. The personnel chosen for the trip will be qualified to evaluate the site conditions and adapt to any required changes based on site conditions.

Upon completion of the site survey, the contractor will update the Site Survey Report (SSR), Government provided enclosure, to the COR/DTSR for Government acceptance. The SSR will include all information required by the AFSI IDIQ PWS and correlate with the Base Contract, TO PWS, and address all requirements within the TO PRD (CDRL A006).

The SSR will be delivered to the COR/DTSR for Government acceptance. Government will perform a quality review on each CDRL to assure accuracy and completeness. This review and approval process includes efforts to compile a list of errors and determine if the CDRL submission is of sufficient quality to achieve COR/DTSR approval. The Contractor will rework the CDRL to correct errors and incorporate changes denoted in the Government review.

• Deliverable: Site Survey Report (SSR) (CDRL A005)

• Schedule: Within twenty (20) business days after completion of the Site Survey. Revisions are due 10 business days after Government Review

• Content: As described in paragraph 3.2.2. Initial SSRs will be provided with Attachment 1 as Enclosures 1b through 8b.

3.2.2 Subtask 2: Project Requirements Document (PRD)

The PRD serves as the basic or preliminary technical reference governing the installation of the ATG systems and/or subsystems. The individual site PRD will be updated as required based upon any/all changes in any of the ATG systems installation efforts.

The PRDs will address all conditions or capabilities that must be met or possessed by the ATG system or ATG system components, and communications device to satisfy requirements of the IDIQ PWS and this TO PWS. The contractor will update the PRD and submit for approval to the COR/DTSR five (5) business days prior to the Pre-Installation Conference.

The PRD serves as the basic or preliminary technical reference governing the installation of the ATG systems and/or subsystems. The individual site PRD will be updated as required based upon any/all changes in any of the ATG systems installation efforts.

The PRD will be considered a “living” document throughout the course of this design/build effort. The individual site PRD will be updated as required based upon any/all changes in any of the site ATG systems installation efforts and submitted via email to the COR/DTSR within 3 business days of the request or following these activities:

a) Requirements Validation Site Survey

b) Upon discovery of unforeseen site conditions

c) Design Review Meeting Installation Design Plan

The Contractor will incorporate version control for each revision of the PRD. Deletions will be notated with a strike-through. Additions will be highlighted. Cell comments will denote the date, requester, and approve of all changes and revisions.

The Contractor will update the Government provided PRD for each individual site as required to ensure it addresses all conditions or capabilities that must be met or possessed by the Automated Tank Gauging System and communications devices to satisfy the specific TO PWS work that is being performed under this document, standards, specifications, or other formally imposed documents/references.

The contractor will update the PRD through As-Built for signature by DLA J62BG Representative or designated representative, with copies going to the site POC, DLA COR, DTSR, and the contractor.

• Deliverable: Project Requirements Document (PRD) (CDRL A006)

• Schedule: Within five (5) business days prior to the PIC. Final Draft versions will be uploaded five (5) business days prior to System Turnover Conference. Final versions will be delivered twenty (20) business days after the System Turnover Conference.

• Content: As described in paragraph 3.2.1 (see enclosures 1-8)

3.3 Task 3: Pre-Installation

3.3.1 Subtask 1: Equipment and Material Support

The Contractor will provide various equipment/material support services that range from procurement, fabrication, integration, and delivery.

3.3.1.2 Equipment/Material Requirements

The Contractor is responsible for the acquisition of all needed equipment and material to complete the work. Major equipment procured is included in the PRD (Enclosures 1- 8). The contractor will provide adequate storage for all acquired property and equipment. This means the contractor will store all items procured at the contractor’s facilities, coordinate transport to the specific site as needed, and perform the work to install / integrate it into a holistic ATG system.

Product Validation – The contractor will certify that it purchases supplies from authorized resellers and/or distributers. Unless otherwise specified, the contractor will warrant that the products are new, in their original box.

a) Item Unique Identification (IUID) and Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) – In accordance with DFARS 252.211-7003, the contractor will ensure that all items purchased with a unit cost equal to or exceeding $5,000 (or less if item is serially managed or if government specifies items on individual task/delivery orders) is labeled with an item unique identification IUID number or Unique Item Identifier (UII). Prior to delivery of the item to the Government, the contractor will clearly mark and identify each applicable item based on the criteria provided in Department of Defense (DoD) MIL-STD-130N for those items not already marked.

All IUID information will be recorded and will be subject to government review as needed.

The contractor will track IUID items and maintain information being recorded.

b) Contractor will enter all items with Unique Item Identifier (UII) in the IUID Registry. Data is either submitted via Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) or manually entered via the IUID website.

c) The Contractor will be responsible maintaining and updating information in the IUID Registry. The Contractor will update custody status when items are designated as government furnished material, returned to government position, change physical location, or haves been consumed, destroyed, scrapped, lost, or abandoned during contract/TO performance.

f) Contractor Furnished Equipment (CFE) and Contractor Furnished Material (CFM) will be required to support the efforts required to complete this TO.