Serv C25-022RN Precision Devices - Sole Source JA Revised 20250609_ COSIGNED Redacted .pdf

PDF 848 KB Posted

Attached to
Serv C25-022RN PRECISION DEVICES MAINTENANCE SERVICE Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA813225Q0026
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Air Force Sustainment Center

About this file

This document is a Sole Source (Including Brand Name) Justification for a federal contract with Precision Devices Inc. (PDI) for Preventive Maintenance (PM) and Remedial Maintenance (RM) of precision devices. The United States Air Force Sustainment Center, Maintenance Contracting Branch at Tinker Air Force Base intends to award a firm fixed-price contract for maintenance services on four Model 100 and two Model S-500 Precision Devices Indi-Ron Equipment. The contract will be for one base year with four option years, with an estimated total contract value of $279,014.32.

PDI is identified as the sole source provider, with no authorized third-party distributors or willingness to sell data rights. Market research, including review of a previous contract, confirmed PDI's exclusive capability to provide the required maintenance services. The contract will be awarded under the authority of DAFFARS 5313.501, utilizing simplified acquisition procedures. The government will continue to explore potential future competition by reaching out to PDI about selling data rights, but for the current procurement, PDI remains the only viable source for these specific maintenance services.

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Sole Source (Including Brand Name) Justification - Simplified Procedures for Certain Commercial Items

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION

March 2023 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 3 of 7March 2023 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 3 of 7

VI. Description of efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as practicable.

Precision Devices Inc. (PDI) is the sole source and the only company who will be able to bid on this requirement. This office will continue to reach out to PDI to see if they are willing to sell their data rights in the future to ensure every effort is made to open up future competition. Selecting PDI will be a sole source acquisition.

VII. Determination by the Contracting Officer that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable.

The contracting activity (AFSC/ will be required to make an individual determination of price fair and reasonableness IAW FAR 13.106-3(a) (simplified acquisitions). Some methods that may be used (where applicable) will be market research, comparison of the proposed price with prices found reasonable on previous purchases, current price lists, catalogs or advertisements, comparison with similar items in a related industry, the contracting officer's personal knowledge of the item being purchased, comparison to an independent Government estimate or any other reasonable basis. Other than certified cost or pricing data can be requested from the contractor and used for justification.

VIII. Description of the market research conducted and the results, or a statement of the reasons market research was not conducted.

Market research, including review of previous contract FA8132-20-P-0033, indicates Precision Devices Inc. (PDI), the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM), is still the sole source provider for Preventive and Remedial Maintenance. Contact on 18 March 2025 confirmed PDI has no authorized third-party distributors and is unwilling to sell proprietary data rights. Based on a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) from PDI, a cost estimate for a five-year contract (basic year with four (4) option years) with a six-month extension is requested.

Further research, utilizing contract FA8132-20-P-0033 and The System for Award Management (SAM) databases, identified NAICS code 811210 and FSC JO49 as appropriate, also proving that PDI is a small business.

Given the research and time required for this commodity to be completed, it is in the best interest of the government to proceed with this purchase through local contracting as a sole source acquisition.

IX. Any other facts supporting the use of Other Than Full and Open Competition.

N/A

Sole Source (Including Brand Name) Justification - Simplified Procedures for Certain Commercial Items

March 2023 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 6 of 7March 2023 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 6 of 7

Contracting without providing for full and open competition shall not be justified on the basis of lack of advance planning by the requiring activity or concerns related to the amount of funds available (e.g., funds will expire) (10 U.S.C. 3204)

VI. Description of efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as practicable.

(FAR 6.303-2(b)(6))

Describe all efforts taken (or to be to be taken) to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as practicable under the circumstances. Although Market Research is covered in Section VIII, the information in Section VI should correlate with the Market Research described in Section VI. The following issues should be addressed in this paragraph:

Sources Sought Synopsis (used as part of market research). If a sources sought synopsis was issued, state the date the synopsis was issued and a brief description of its content. If any responses were received, describe in detail the results of the screening process and the rationale for determining the unacceptability of any synopsis respondents. Reference FAR 13.105, Synopsis and Posting Requirements.

Other Actions. In this paragraph, discuss any other actions taken or planned to facilitate competition for this acquisition. The discussion should include actions tried or considered even if the actions were unsuccessful. If the efforts were unsuccessful, so state and describe why.

Qualifying Country Sources. If qualifying country sources have expressed interest, but are to be excluded, provide supporting rationale.

VII. Determination by the Contracting Officer that the anticipated cost to the government will be fair and reasonable. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(7))

Include a statement by the contracting officer that the anticipated cost will be considered fair and reasonable and provide the basis for this determination. The steps that will be taken to ensure the final contract price will be fair and reasonable are also described here. Describe the extent of cost or price analysis anticipated including the requirements for certified cost or pricing data, technical evaluations, and audits.

VIII. Description of the market research conducted and the results, or explain why market research was not conducted. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(8))

Generally, some form of market research should be conducted. Discuss any market research conducted pursuant to FAR Part 10 and describe results of that research. Market research is any effort undertaken to determine if sources capable of satisfying the agency's requirements exist and to determine if commercial items or non-developmental items are either available or can be modified so that they will satisfy the agency's needs. Market research should be focused not only on identifying alternate sources, but also on alternate equipment or substitutes that might fulfill the Government needs with only minor modification.

Regardless of the approach used, the results should provide a high level of confidence that no other qualified sources exist.

When other exceptions from the requirement to obtain full and open competition are relied upon, the market research might be limited to an examination of the acquisition history and experience with the marketplace under previous acquisitions for the same or similar items.

If no market research was conducted, so state and provide the rationale.

IX. Any other facts supporting the use of Other Than Full and Open Competition. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(9)(i))

Provide any other facts supporting the use of other than full and open competition, including an explanation of why technical data packages, specifications, engineering descriptions, statements of work, statements of objectives, or purchase descriptions suitable for full and open competition have not been developed, are not being developed, are not being used, or are not available.

X. List of sources, if any, that expressed interest in the acquisition. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(10))

Sole Source (Including Brand Name) Justification - Simplified Procedures for Certain Commercial Items

March 2023 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 7 of 7March 2023 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 7 of 7

If a sources sought synopsis was done and all interested sources are included in Section VI, it is acceptable to state, “See Section VI above.”

XI. A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers to competition before making subsequent acquisitions for the supplies or services required. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(11))

Describe any actions taken or to be taken to foster competition for future acquisitions of the supplies or services being acquired.

Describe potential actions that could be taken to remove the barriers to competition that have been identified in the justification and include a milestone schedule, where available, for accomplishing these actions. For example, if a follow-on competitive acquisition is planned, so state and provide the planned award date, or state that the Government will attempt to acquire rights in technical data and computer software sufficient to compete follow-on acquisitions as a priced option in the contract action that is the subject of this Justification, or (if applicable) state how the Government intends to challenge nonconforming markings on technical data and computer software delivered to it under previous contracts so those markings can be removed in order that the technical data and computer software may be used in support of a follow-on competitive acquisition, or describe plans to qualify additional sources.

Address efforts to ensure competition for future spare parts and maintenance in support of systems or equipment covered by the justification, even when these acquisitions will be accomplished by other organizations. Include a discussion on available breakout data.

If no actions are planned, so state and provide reasons. If approval is sought for more than one year, explain why a sole source effort is required for the planned time duration.

For a non-competitive follow-on acquisition to a previous award for the same supply or service supported by a Justification citing the same authority, include a discussion of the actions planned to overcome barriers to competition established in the previous justification, the status of those actions, and the results of those actions. The approval authority shall determine whether the planned actions were completed. If the planned actions were not completed, the justification for the follow-on acquisition shall be approved by the approval authority one-level above the approval authority for the previous justification (see FAR 13.501(a)(2)). If the previous justification was approved by the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE), the approval remains at the SPE level.

[DFARS 213.501(a) and DFARS PGI 206.304(a)(S-70)(ii)]

XII. Certification by the Contracting Officer. (FAR 6.303-2(b)(12))

As evidenced by his/her signature, the contracting officer has determined this document to be both accurate and complete to the best of his/her knowledge and belief.

XIII. Certification by the technical/requirements personnel. (FAR 6.303-2(c))

As evidenced by their signatures, the technical and/or requirements personnel have certified that any supporting data contained herein, which is their responsibility, is both accurate and complete.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .