SERAE Attachment 1 - PPQ.pdf

ATTACHMENT 1

SYNOPSIS NUMBER: 80KSC026R0004

ARCHITECT-ENGINEER PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

INSTRUCTIONS AND RATING GUIDELINES

Instructions

This evaluation is to be completed as indicated below. The Architect-Engineering (A-E) team must provide one evaluation for each past performance customer contact identified in section F of SF 330. This package consists of the following:

Section Description Who Completes Section I Basic Contract Information Architect & Engineer team being evaluated.

Section II Evaluator Identification Information Customer Evaluator Section III A-E Past Performance Questionnaire Customer Evaluator

Past Performance Questionnaires will not be accepted directly from the A-E team.

Customer Evaluators must send evaluations directly to the Contracting Officer. The Customer Evaluator must submit their completed questionnaires to the address listed below, to arrive no later than 2:00 pm Eastern Time (ET) on April 6, 2026.

Name: LaCorsha Noel Email Address: Lacorsha.d.noel@nasa.gov Mailing Address: NASA John F. Kennedy Space Center

Procurement Office Code: OP-CS Kennedy Space Center, Florida 32899

And

Name: Stephen Crooks

Email Address: Stephen.e.crooks@nasa.gov Mailing Address: NASA John F. Kennedy Space Center Procurement Office Code: OP-CS Kennedy Space Center, Florida 32899

Section I To be completed by the A-E team submitting a submission for evaluation.

mailto:Lacorsha.d.noel@nasa.gov

A-E Team Name:

Contract Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Award Date:

Contract Completion Date:

Point of Contact (Customer Evaluator) Name/Address/Office Phone Number:

Brief Description of Work Performed:

Section II To be completed by Customer Evaluator.

NASA will NOT divulge the names of the individuals providing reference information about an A-E team’s past performance.

Name of A-E Contractor Being Evaluated:

A-E Contractor’s Status (Prime or Sub-Consultant):

A-E Contract Number:

Description of A-E Services Provided:

A-E Contract Period of Performance:

A-E Contract or Subcontract Value at Award:

A-E Contract or Subcontract Value at Completion:

For design contracts which were completed by the A-E team and awarded for construction

1) The final estimated construction contract award price

2) The actual construction award price

1) $

2) $

Evaluator’s Company/Agency Name:

Evaluator’s Name (Typed/Printed):

Evaluator’s Signature:

Phone Number:

Facsimile Number:

E-mail address:

Dates of Involvement in Contract:

Date Questionnaire Completed:

Section III

ARCHITECT-ENGINEER PAST PERFORMANCE REPORT

RATING DEFINITIONS

For each question below, please rate the contractor from Unsatisfactory to Excellent (as defined below) and please elaborate on the specifics of your rating in the Narrative Summary. A rating of Not Applicable should be used if either the question is not applicable, or the answer is unknown. The Not Applicable rating is neutral and will have no impact on the assessment of Past Performance. The Contracting Officer may contact the respondent for additional information, if needed.

Quality of Work Cost Control & Estimating

Compliance with Performance

Schedules

Management Effectiveness

Excellent There were no quality problems.

There were no cost issues.

There were no delays. Responses to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues were effective and responsive.

Good Technical issues did not impact achievement of contract requirements.

Cost issues did not impact achievement of contract requirements.

Delays did not impact achievement of contract requirements.

Response to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues were usually effective and responsive.

Fair Technical issues required minor Client resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.

Cost issues required minor Client resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.

Delays required minor Client resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.

Response to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues were somewhat effective and responsive.

Poor Technical issues required major Client resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.

Cost issues required major Client resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.

Delays required major Client resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.

Response to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues were marginally effective and responsive.

Unsatisfactory Non-conformances or technical issues compromised the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Client’s resources.

Cost issues compromised performance of contract requirements.

Delays compromised the achievement of contract requirements, despite the use of Client’s resources.

Response to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues were not effective and not responsive.

Section III (Cont’d)

It em

FACTORS/RATINGS

Excellent

G ood

Fair Poor

U nsatisfactory

N ot

A pplicable

Quality of Work 1 Overall skill level & technical competence of A-E’s personnel

2 Ability to identify risk factors and alternatives for alleviating risk

3 Ability to identify and solve problems expeditiously 4 Overall quality of delivered products

Cost Control

5 Ability to control contract cost (if the contract experienced an overrun, please comment in the Narrative Summary)

6 Ability to search for and apply cost efficient practices

7 Ability to provide accurate and complete cost estimates Compliance with Performance Schedules

8 Ability to complete major tasks or key project milestones on schedule

9 Ability to provide timely reports and documentation submittals Management Effectiveness

10 Ability to effectively coordinate, integrate & manage subcontractors

11 Ability of management team to show innovation and a proactive approach to problem identification and resolution

12 Ability to effectively interface with the Customer’s staff 13 Ability to respond to customer changes

14 Ability to meet project requirements

15 Ability to effectively communicate pertinent issues throughout the contract

Customer Satisfaction

16 How would you rate the A-E’s overall management performance on this contract

17 How would you rate the A-E’s overall technical performance on this contract

18 Would you use this A-E again? (If “No”, please comment in the Narrative Summary)

YES No

Section III (Cont’d)

NARRATIVE SUMMARY (Use this section to elaborate on the specifics of the rating and to explain additional information not included above)

Item Comments

PAST PERFORMANCE TRANSMITTAL LETTER - SAMPLE

This acquisition is for is for the Southeast Regional Architect-Engineering II, Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract at Kennedy Space Center (KSC), including Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS); Stennis Space Center (SSC); Johnson Space Center (JSC), including White Sands Test Facility (WSTF); Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC), including Michoud Assembly Facility (MAF); Vandenberg Air Force Base (VAFB), California, and any remote sites associated with these locations. This multiple award contract will provide a highly flexible contracting vehicle for participating Centers.

A-E CONTRACTOR LETTER: FORMAT

[Date of Letter] [Name and Address of A-E’s Customer] Attention: [Name and Designation of Customer Evaluator]

Dear [Customer Contact Name]:

We are currently responding to the NASA, Kennedy Space Center Request for Proposal 80KSC026R0004. NASA is requesting that customers of entities responding to the solicitation participate in the evaluation process. We have included our project for your company/agency as a past performance reference. An Architect-Engineer Past Performance Report is enclosed. We respectfully request that you complete Sections II and III of the enclosed evaluation and return the signed, completed questionnaire to the Contracting Officers at the addresses listed below. Your completed questionnaire must arrive no later than 2:00 P.M. Eastern Time (ET) on April 6, 2026.

Name: LaCorsha Noel Email Address: Lacorsha.d.noel@nasa.gov

And

Name: Stephen Crooks Email Address: Stephen.e.crooks@nasa.gov

To maintain the integrity of this process, DO NOT return the Past Performance Report to

us. Return it to the emails listed above.

Please direct any questions to the Contracting Officer, LaCorsha Noel at Lacorsha.d.noel@nasa.gov.

Sincerely, [Name of Signer] [Designation of Signer] mailto:Lacorsha.d.noel@nasa.gov mailto:Stephen.e.crooks@nasa.gov mailto:daniel.j.heggen@nasa.gov