Section L Attachment L-1 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Maintenance Laptops
- Solicitation number
- N68335-25-R-0280-U01
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire template designed to capture contractor performance evaluations across multiple rating categories. The form allows for comprehensive assessment of a contractor's performance by rating three primary areas: Quality of Product and Processes, Timeliness of Performance, and Customer Satisfaction, with scoring options ranging from Unsatisfactory to Outstanding. The template includes spaces for detailed comments, interviewer and interviewee information, contract details, and provides an opportunity to indicate whether the contractor would be selected again for future work.
The questionnaire is structured to provide a holistic evaluation of a contractor's performance, enabling future contracting officers and decision-makers to systematically review past performance through a standardized assessment instrument. Each performance category includes specific sub-criteria for evaluation, such as compliance with contract requirements, meeting interim milestones, technical excellence, responsiveness, and end-user satisfaction, which allows for a nuanced and comprehensive performance review.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N68335-25-R-0280 Pricing Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| N68335-25-R-0280 Amendment 02 12 Dec 2025.pdf | ||
| N68335-25-R-0280 Pricing Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| N68335-25-R-0280 Amendment 01 13 Nov 2025.pdf | ||
| Section L Attachment L-2 Table PP-1 Past Performance Contract Data.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SECTION L ATTACHMENT (L-1)
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
1.Contractor:
2.Customer:
3.Contract Number: Period of Performance:
| 4.Contract Type: | Negotiated | |_| | Sealed Bid | |_| | |||
| Fixed Price | |_| | Cost Reimbursement | |_| | ||||
| IDIQ | |_| | Other | |_| |
5.Complexity of Work: Difficult: |_| Routine: |_|
Ratings: Summarize contractor performance and circle the appropriate rating for each category.
Quality of Product and Processes: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory
Highly Satisfactory Outstanding
(Compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence)
Comments:
Timeliness of Performance: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory
Highly Satisfactory Outstanding
(Met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical direction, and completed on time)
Customer Satisfaction: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory
Highly Satisfactory Outstanding
(Satisfaction of end users with contractor’s service and product)
Would you select this firm again? Please explain.
| Interviewee Name: | Signature: |
| Phone Number: Fax Number: | |
| Date: |
| Interviewer Name: | Signature: |
| Phone Number: | Fax Number: |
| Date: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .