Section L Attachment L-1 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

25 KB Posted

Attached to
Maintenance Laptops
Solicitation number
N68335-25-R-0280
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (Section L Attachment L-1), designed to capture contractor performance evaluations across multiple rating categories. The form provides a structured template for assessing contractor performance through ratings in three key areas: Quality of Product and Processes, Timeliness of Performance, and Customer Satisfaction, with potential ratings ranging from Unsatisfactory to Outstanding. The questionnaire includes space for comments, interviewer and interviewee details, and allows the evaluator to indicate whether they would select the firm again for future work.

The related federal contract opportunity is a Navy solicitation (N68335-25-R-0280) for Manufacturing P-8 Maintenance Laptop Sets, set aside exclusively for small businesses. The procurement is for a five-year Fixed Price Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract, with the award going to the lowest-price, technically acceptable offeror. Critical requirements include possessing a certified DD Form 2345 for accessing export-controlled technical drawings, which will be provided through the DoD Safe website. Offerors not selected must destroy all export-controlled data and provide proof of destruction to the Contracting Officer.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N68335-25-R-0280 Pricing Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Section L Attachment L-2 Table PP-1 Past Performance Contract Data.docx DOCX document
N68335-25-R-0280 5 Sept 2025 Final.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

SECTION L ATTACHMENT (L-1)

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

1.Contractor:

2.Customer:

3.Contract Number: Period of Performance:

4.Contract Type:Negotiated|_|Sealed Bid|_|
Fixed Price|_|Cost Reimbursement|_|
IDIQ|_|Other|_|

5.Complexity of Work: Difficult: |_| Routine: |_|

Ratings: Summarize contractor performance and circle the appropriate rating for each category.

Quality of Product and Processes: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory

Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence)

Comments:

Timeliness of Performance: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory

Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical direction, and completed on time)

Customer Satisfaction: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory

Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Satisfaction of end users with contractor’s service and product)

Would you select this firm again? Please explain.

Interviewee Name:Signature:
Phone Number: Fax Number:
Date:
Interviewer Name:Signature:
Phone Number:Fax Number:
Date:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .