Section J Attachment E - Past Perf. Quest. Letter.docx
DOCX document 54 KB Posted
- Attached to
- HRSA Evidence Building and Evaluation IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 75R60224R00007
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire letter and survey for the Health Resources and Services Administration Solicitation No. RFP 75R60224R00003 for the HRSA Evidence-Building and Evaluation Services IDIQ. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by clients of firms responding to the solicitation and requests information on the client's role in the contract, percentage of work completed by subcontractors, description of work performed, ratings for quality, cost control, timeliness and business relations using defined rating guidelines, involvement of subcontracts, customer satisfaction, and whether the client would recommend the firm again. The survey is to be returned directly to HRSA by the stated deadline.
The related federal contract opportunity is for the HRSA Evidence Building and Evaluation IDIQ. The purpose is to provide evaluation and evidence-building services through task orders in four areas: program evaluations, other evidence building activities, communication and dissemination of findings, and data optimization. Task orders will specify required tasks and information. The agency is the Health Resources and Services Administration Headquarters.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HRSA E-E IDIQ SECTION A -J Final REVISED.pdf | ||
| EVAL IDIQ Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| 75R60224R00007-0001.pdf | ||
| HRSA E-E IDIQ - SECTION L and M REVISED.pdf | ||
| Section J Attachment H - Labor Categories.pdf | ||
| HRSA E-E IDIQ SECTION A -J Final.pdf | ||
| Section J Attachment A - HRSA E-E IDIQ SOW - FINAL.pdf | ||
| 75R60224R00007.pdf | ||
| Section J Attachment F -Electronic Invoicing and Payment Requirements.pdf | ||
| HRSA E-E IDIQ - Cover Letter.pdf | ||
| HRSA E-E IDIQ - SECTION L and M Final.pdf | ||
| Section J Attachment C - Disclosure of Lobbying Activities.pdf | ||
| Section J Attachment G - Pricing Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Section J Attachment D - HHS Subcontracting Plan Template.pdf | ||
| Section J Attachment B - Non-Disclosure Agreement.pdf |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HRSA Evidence-Building and Evaluation Services IDIQ Section J Attachment E
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE LETTER
Date:
Dear Client:
We are currently responding to the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Solicitation No. RFP 75R60224R00003 entitled, HRSA Evaluation & Evidence Building IDIQ. The Government is placing increased emphasis in its acquisition process on past performance as a source selection factor and is requiring that clients of firms responding to HRSA solicitations be identified and their participation in the evaluation process be requested.
Therefore, enclosed is a past performance questionnaire for your completion. We are requesting that you complete the questionnaire and send it directly to HRSA at the following address:
Email: HRSAIDIQ@hrsa.gov
RFP #75R60224R00003
Since this information will be used as one of the evaluation factors for contract award, we are requesting that you complete this questionnaire and return it to the HRSA Contract Specialist at the above email address no later than the closing date of the Request for Proposal.
We thank you for your prompt response in this matter.
Sincerely, (To be signed by offeror)
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
For: __________________________________________________________________ Name of Company
Please Return Completed Survey To:
Email: HRSAIDIQ@hrsa.gov
Please Fill In The Following:
Your Name: __________________________________________ Your Agency: _________________________________________ Address: _____________________________________________ Phone Number: ________________________________________ Fax Number: __________________________________________
Signature of Person Completing Survey: _________________________________
Contract Number / Solicitation Number: ________________________________
Your Role In This Contract (circle one)
Project Officer
Contracting Officer
Contract Specialist
Approximate Percentage of Work Competed by Subcontractors: _______ %
General Description or work or Title of Contract: _______________________________________________________________________
Standard Contractor Performance Report
Contract Type:
Contract Number / Order Number:
Contractor Name:
Contract Award Date:
Contract Expiration Date:
Contract Value:
Supplies or Services:
Ratings
Summarize contractor performance and check the selection which corresponds to the rating for each rating category (See attached Rating Guidelines). Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible.
Quality of Product or Service:
| Unsatisfactory |
| Poor |
| Fair |
| Good |
| Excellent |
| Outstanding |
Government Comments for Quality of Product or Service (2000 characters maximum):
Cost Control (Rating and Comments for Cost Control are not required if contract type is Firm Fixed Price):
| Unsatisfactory |
| Poor |
| Fair |
| Good |
| Excellent |
| Outstanding |
Timeliness of Performance:
| Unsatisfactory |
| Poor |
| Fair |
| Good |
| Excellent |
| Outstanding |
Business Relations:
| Unsatisfactory |
| Poor |
| Fair |
| Good |
| Excellent |
| Outstanding |
Additional Info
Subcontracts:
Are subcontracts involved? ____Yes ____No (Check one)
Comment on subcontracts (2000 characters maximum):
Customer Satisfaction:
Is / was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction? ____ Yes ____ No (Check one)
Would you recommend the selection of this firm again? ____ Yes ____ No (Check one)
Comments on Customer Satisfaction (2000 characters maximum):
Admin Info
Project Officer / COR Name:
Phone:
Fax:
E-mail Address:
Contracting Officer:
Name:
Phone:
Fax:
E-mail Address:
Rating Guidelines
Quality of Product or Service
| Unsatisfactory |
| Non-conformances are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards containing similar requirements. |
| Poor |
| Overall compliance requires significant Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Fair |
| Overall compliance requires minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Good |
| There are no, or very minimal, quality problems, and the contractor has met the contract requirements. |
| Excellent |
| There are no quality issues, and the contractor has substantially exceeded the contract performance requirements without commensurate additional costs to the Government. |
| Outstanding |
| The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that was significantly in excess of anticipated achievements and is commendable as an example for others, so that it justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". |
Cost Control
| Unsatisfactory |
| Ability to manage cost issues is jeopardizing performance of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, this level of ability to manage cost issues constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards. |
| Poor |
| Ability to manage cost issues requires significant Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Fair |
| Ability to control cost issues requires minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Good |
| There are no, or very minimal, cost management issues and the contractor has met the contract requirements. |
| Excellent |
| There are no cost management issues and the contractor has exceeded the contract requirements, achieving cost savings to the Government. |
| Outstanding |
| The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where the contractor achieved cost savings and performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". |
Timeliness of Performance
| Unsatisfactory |
| Delays are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards. |
| Poor |
| Delays require significant Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Fair |
| Delays require minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Good |
| There are no, or minimal, delays that impact achievement of contract requirements. |
| Excellent |
| There are no delays and the contractor has exceeded the agreed upon time schedule. |
| Outstanding |
| The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". |
Business Relations
| Unsatisfactory |
| Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues is not effective. If not substantially mitigated or corrected it should constitute a significant impediment in considerations for future awards. |
| Poor |
| Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues is marginally effective. |
| Fair |
| Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues is somewhat effective. |
| Good |
| Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues is consistently effective. |
| Excellent |
| Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues exceeds Government expectation. |
| Outstanding |
| The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .