Section_J_Att_008_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 126 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ALMA FLOATING DOCK REPLACEMENT Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P8621R0016
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor bidding on the ALMA Floating Dock Replacement project. The questionnaire requests information on up to five past or current contracts for the contractor, including contract details, agency points of contact, and ratings in quality, timeliness, and business relations. The related federal contract opportunity is for the ALMA Floating Dock Replacement project with the Department of the Interior National Park Service Pacific West Region. No other details are provided on the scope of work or response requirements for the project.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP No. 140P8621R0016 Section J - Attachment No. 008
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
(OFFEROR: COMPLETE SECTIONS I AND II AND SUBMIT WITH THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL)
I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NO.:
CONTRACTOR ADDRESS: CONTRACT TYPE:
FIRM-FIXED-PRICE
COST REIMBURSEMENT
OTHER
ACTIVE COMPLETED
ROUTINE COMPLEX
DATES OF PERFORMANCE: AWARD AMOUNT $
TOTAL WITH MODS $
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
RFP No. 140P8621R0016 Section J - Attachment No. 008
II. AGENCY (CUSTOMER) IDENTIFICATION
AGENCY (CUSTOMER) NAME:
POC NAME/TITLE/PHONE:
***Government Use Only – The following to be completed by Technical Evaluation Panel***
III. PAST PERFORMANCE RATING
Rating Scale: E = Excellent references are excellent in all respects G = Good references indicate good performance on past projects A = Acceptable references indicate acceptable performance on past projects M = Marginal references indicate marginal performance on past projects U = Unacceptable references indicate unacceptable performance on past projects N = Neutral no performance information was provided or available
1. QUALITY:
(circle applicable rating)
a. Conformance with contract requirements E G A M U N
b. Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors) E G A M U N
c. General oversight by project manager and superintendent E G A M U N
d. Coordination with and control of subcontractors E G A M U N
e. Compliance with Davis-Bacon wage rate and labor usage requirements E G A M U N
f. Avoidance of accidents/safety violations E G A M U N
2. TIMELINESS:
a. Adherence to project delivery schedules E G A M U N
b. Submission of change proposals E G A M U N
c. Response to technical direction and change orders E G A M U N
d. Response to correction of identified problems E G A M U N
e. Submission of timely/accurate/complete billings E G A M U N
f. Submission of materials/other submittals E G A M U N
3. BUSINESS RELATIONS:
a. Flexibility and cooperativeness in resolving problems E G A M U N
b. Tenacity and innovativeness in resolving problems E G A M U N
c. Relationships with subcontractors, including prompt payment E G A M U N
d. End user was satisfied with services performed E G A M U N
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .