SD FTBL BCB 10(1)_Final Hydraulics Memo.pdf
PDF 16 MB Posted
- Attached to
- SD FTBL BCB(1) Horse Soldier Road to Fort Meade
- Solicitation number
- 6982AF21B000030
About this file
This memorandum provides details regarding a federal solicitation for construction services. The solicitation number is 6982AF21B000030 and is being issued by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration for the SD FTBL BCB(1) Horse Soldier Road to Fort Meade project. Interested parties are invited to submit bids in response to Invitation for Bid IFB SD FTBL BCB(1) Horse Soldier Road to Fort Meade, as referenced in the Attachments/Links section of the solicitation notice. The IFB seeks construction services to improve a section of Horse Soldier Road leading to Fort Meade. Bids are due by the date specified in the IFB. The contract will be awarded to the responsible bidder with the lowest priced, technically acceptable offer. Standard federal contracting terms and conditions will apply.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Final Hydraulics Memo
Federal Highway Administration
Central Federal Lands Highway Division
SD FTBL BCB 10(1)
Horse Soldier to Fort Meade
Prepared by
HDR Engineering, Inc.
June 15, 2021
CFLHD TO 36 SD 1 Central Federal Lands Highway Division
Horse Soldier to Fort Meade Final Hydraulics Memo
1. Introduction
Project Description HDR is preparing a Project Delivery Plan for the Federal Highway Administration, Central Federal
Lands Highway Division (CFLHD) for roadway improvements totaling approximately 4.9 miles along Horse Soldier Road. Proposed improvements include paving the first 0.2 mile at the northern project limit at Highway 34, regrading the existing aggregate, incorporating dust palliative, creating better sight distance on identified problem curves at two locations, and realigning the horizontal curve near STA 360+00. Work will also include aggregate resurfacing and regrading existing parking areas and pullouts. Other improvements include providing erosion control at ditches and culverts, and new signing.
This report serves as the basis for hydrologic and hydraulic analysis for Horse Soldier Road drainage improvements which include the extension and replacement of various culverts as well as erosion control improvements along ditches and at culvert openings.
Project Location Horse Soldier to Fort Meade Backcountry Byway Road (BCB 10(1)), also known as Horse Soldier
Road, begins at the intersection with Highway 34 near Fort Meade and proceeds southerly ending at the I-90 Frontage Road at I-90 Exit 34 Black Hills National Cemetery at Blucksberg Drive.
Horse Soldier to Fort Meade Backcountry Byway Road is located within Meade County just east of Sturgis, SD as shown in Appendix A.
Horse Soldier Road spans four FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) for Meade County, South Dakota and Incorporated Areas, all with effective dates of September 16, 2011. Map
Numbers 46093C1186F, 46093C1188F, 46093C1200F, and 46093C1525F are included in
Appendix A for reference. The entirety of Horse Soldier Road is located within the FEMA Zone X
Floodplain. Zone X is defined as an area of minimal flood hazard and higher than the elevation of the 0.2-percent-annual-chance (500-year) flood. FEMA maps have been attached in Appendix A.
Design Criteria The Federal Highways Administration (FHWA) "Project Development and Design Manual"
(PDDM), Chapter 7, supplemented with the South Dakota Department of Transportation (SDDOT)
Drainage Manual was used as the basis to evaluate the proposed drainage features. Criteria has been summarized in Table 1 below.
Table 1 Hydrology and Hydraulic Criteria
CFLHD TO 36 SD 2 Central Federal Lands Highway Division
Criteria
Design Feature PDDM Criteria
Peak Flow Methods Rational Method
Design Storm Frequency Design: 25-yr
Check: 100-yr
Roadway Spread
Required Clear Width Limit the spread to half of one travel lane for gutter flow, both on-grade and in roadway sags.
Allowable depth
Flow depth at the curb should not exceed the curb height or the allowable spread for the design discharge.
Culverts
Capacity Design and Stability 25-year flood
Headwater
New culverts: not be greater than the bottom of the aggregate base layer for the roadway pavement structure at the local roadway low point
Minimum Size
24” or equivalent for cross road culverts
18" for parallel culverts in ditches and channels
Pipe Material
RCP: Class II, Metal 0.064"
Outlet Protection Riprap
Roadside Ditches
Return Frequency 10-yr storm event
Velocity ---
Slope Min: 0.5%
Side Slopes N/A
Freeboard
Ditch Stability
Permanent lining must be suitable for the 10-yr flood event. Use HEC-15 for design
- Vegetation
- Turf reinforcements
- Riprap
- Gabions
- Concrete liner
2. Hydrology The hydrology for the project was determined to assess the proposed culverts, inlets, and roadside ditches only. A large portion of the site will remained unchanged from a hydrologic perspective as the amount of impervious area and grading of the site will remain unchanged for areas where mill and fill is proposed (298+00 to 302+00, 354+00 to 361+00, 388+00 to 393+00, and 428+00 to the end). Hydrology was developed for the five locations where new culverts are being proposed. ArcGIS and United States Geological Survey (USGS) NED one meter Lidar Data was used to delineate basins and the rational method was used to calculate runoff. For the remainder of the site, existing hydrologic patterns will remain unchanged. The rational method was used to develop peak runoff values using rainfall data from National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas 14 precipitation intensity data for Sturgis, South
Dakota. Table 2 summarizes the hydrology completed for the site. Hydrologic calculation, basin maps, and supporting information have been attached in Appendix B.
Table 2 Hydrologic Summary
Basin ID Culvert AREA Q25 Q100
Acres CFS CFS
8 STA 275+24 74.20 66.02 165.01
22 STA 357+87 8.28 12.50 29.28
37 STA 415+55 2.58 4.85 11.08
38 STA 417+45 0.97 1.88 4.19
43 STA 434+62 15.90 20.42 48.99
3. Hydraulics Culverts
There are 43 existing culverts on the project, of which 5 are being replaced and upsized in locations where existing culverts have been identified as undersized. The culverts will be replaced at five locations; STA 275+24, 357+87, 415+55, 417+45, and 434+62. Existing and proposed culverts have been summarized in Table 3 below.
Existing culverts that will not be replaced or modified have not been analyzed since existing drainage conditions and contributing basins will remain unchanged. Only culverts that are being impacted by proposed roadway improvements or have been identified as having drainage issues will be analyzed and replaced.
CFLHD TO 36 SD 3 Central Federal Lands Highway Division
Table 3. Culvert Summary Table
Station Pipe Diameter Material Length Notes
1 204+15 54” CMP 71’
2 214+94 2 @ 60” CMP 56’ Alakali Creek
3 226+72 18” CMP 40’
4 235+71 18” CMP 41'
5 245+95 18” CMP 60'
6 255+26 18” CMP 42'
7 265+30 18” CMP 43'
275+24 28”x20”
Arch
CMP 4X43’
Road overtops, existing culvert removed 4, 20”x28” Arch CMP proposed
9 282+05 18” CMP 32'
10 291+78 18” CMP 49'
11 295+07 18” CMP 32'
12 297+06 18” CMP 60' Not at low point, re grade area
13 305+30 18” CMP 46'
14 309+52 18” CMP 44'
15 315+47 18” CMP 47'
322+05 18” CMP 76'
Culvert half silted in – Add Clean Culvert
17 324+91 18” CMP 48'
18 330+25 18” CMP 35'
19 332+92 18” CMP 40'
20 344+54 18” CMP 46'
354+09 54” CMP 69'
Riprap added upstream to help mitigate erosion
357+87 24” CMP 58’
Remove existing culvert, new culvert at 358+46 due to road realignment
23 361+98 18” CMP 40'
24 367+58 18” CMP 37'
25 374+18 18” CMP 43'
26 379+60 18” CMP 45'
27 382+37 18” CMP 52'
28 385+92 24” CMP 50'
29 387+13 18” CMP 42'
30 388+54 18” CMP 51'
31 394+87 18” CMP 41'
32 397+30 18” CMP 58'
33 398+54 18” CMP 46'
34 401+57 18” CMP 59'
35 404+33 18” CMP 64'
36 407+07 18” CMP 108'
415+55 24” CMP 39'
Erosion in ditch at existing culvert, new inlet and culvert proposed
417+45 18” CMP 34'
Erosion in ditch at existing culvert, new inlet and culvert proposed
39 419+27 24” CMP 61'
40 423+89 24” CMP 55'
41 426+90 18” CMP 49'
42 431+44 18” CMP 39'
434+62 24”x18”
Arch
CMP 2X43’
Existing culvert being removed and replaced with 2, 24”x18” Arch CMP
Note: listed stations are existing culvert locations referencing the proposed alignment
CFLHD TO 36 SD 4 Central Federal Lands Highway Division
4. Proposed Design
Proposed Culvert Sizes Proposed culverts have been analyzed using HY-8 to determine hydraulic capacity of culverts.
Culverts have been designed to convey the 25-yr storm without the headwater exceeding depth of the bottom of roadway aggregate. The HY8 calculations have been attached in Appendix C.
HY-8 Model Results
STA 275+24
There has been roadway overtopping in the existing condition in this location. There is currently an 18” CMP that will be removed. In order to mitigate the roadway overtopping, four 28”x20” Arch CMP’s are proposed to convey the 25-yr storm. Arch CMP’s are being proposed to due cover constraints.
STA 357+87
The road in the areas has been realigned and the proposed culvert at STA 358+44 is the only location where the proposed culvert is not in the same location as the 18” CMP existing culvert.
The existing culvert will be removed and a 24” CMP is proposed.
STA 415+55
There are currently issues with erosion in the roadside ditch and the culvert entrance. There is currently a 24” CMP that will be replaced with a Type 1 Catch basin on the upstream end and an 24” CMP pipe. The proposed catch basin will drain water more efficiently than the existing culvert reducing ponding and erosion. Riprap outlet protection is intended to help with erosion on the downstream end of the culvert.
STA 417+45
There are currently issues with erosion in the roadside ditch and the culvert entrance. There is currently an 18” CMP that will be replaced with a Type 1 Catch basin on the upstream side and an 18” CMP pipe. The proposed catch basin will drain water more efficiently than the existing culvert reducing ponding and erosion. Riprap outlet protection is intended to help with erosion on the downstream end of the culvert.
STA 434+62
There is currently an 18” CMP that is undersized at this location. Two 24”x18” Arch CMPs are proposed to convey the 25-year storm. Arch CMP’s are being proposed due to cover constraints at this location.
Culvert Outlet Protection Riprap outlet protection is being proposed at several locations. Riprap was sized using FHWA equation from the PPDM, Ch.10. Based on flows and velocities proposed riprap is Class 2 and
Class 3. Riprap calculations have been included in Appendix C.
CFLHD TO 36 SD 5 Central Federal Lands Highway Division
Embankment Protection In addition to outfall protection there is embankment protection in areas where erosion has been identified in the field. Riprap bank erosion is being proposed at 353+61 and 435+09. Class 2 and Class 3 riprap is being proposed at these locations.
5. Conclusion The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on the conditions of the project site and the associated watershed at the time of this study. Any modifications to the site, man-made or natural, could alter the analysis, findings, and recommendations contained herein and could invalidate the analysis, findings, and recommendations. Site conditions, completion of upstream or downstream projects, upstream or downstream land use changes, climate changes, vegetation changes, maintenance practice changes, or other factors may change over time.
Additional analysis or updates may be required in the future as a result of these changes.
6. References
Federal Lands Highway Division, "Project Development and Design Manual", Chapter 7
Hydrology and Hydraulics, December 2012.
Sando, Steven K.,1998, A Method for Estimating Magnitude and Frequency of Floods in South
Dakota: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4055.
South Dakota Department of Transportation Office of Bridge Design, “Drainage Manual”, January 2011.
Federal Lands Highway Division, "Hydraulic Engineering Circular No.14, Third Edtion", Chapter
Riprap Basins and Aprons, July 2006.
Appendix A
Maps and Supporting Documents
Site Map
COKOENIG
Highlight
COKOENIG
Highlight
Appendix B
Hydrologic Calculations
265+00
270+00
275+00
280+00
285+00
290+00
PATH: C:\USERS\JMCANALLY\DESKTOP\CFLHD HORSE SOLDIER SD\BASIN_1.MXD - USER: JMCANALLY - DATE: 3/9/2020
BASIN MAP
HORSE SOLDIER TO FORT MEADE
CFLHD TO 36 SD HORSE SOLDIER
0 400Feet
O
LEGEND
74.2
AC
0.25 0.27
B 8
BASIN ID
BASIN BOUNDARY
Area
AC
C10 C25
Basin
ID
5+0
355+00
360+00
365+00
PATH: C:\USERS\JMCANALLY\DESKTOP\CFLHD HORSE SOLDIER SD\BASIN_2.MXD - USER: JMCANALLY - DATE: 3/9/2020
BASIN MAP
HORSE SOLDIER TO FORT MEADE
CFLHD TO 36 SD HORSE SOLDIER
0 200Feet
O
LEGEND
8.28
AC
0.27 0.29
B 22
Old Stone Road
BASIN ID
BASIN BOUNDARY
Area
AC
C10 C25
410+00
415+00
420+00
+00
430+00
435+00
PATH: C:\USERS\JMCANALLY\DESKTOP\CFLHD HORSE SOLDIER SD\BASIN_3.MXD - USER: JMCANALLY - DATE: 3/9/2020
BASIN MAP
HORSE SOLDIER TO FORT MEADE
CFLHD TO 36 SD HORSE SOLDIER
0 300Feet
O
LEGEND
15.9
AC
0.25 0.28
B 43
2.58
AC
0.28 0.30
B 37
0.97
AC
0.29 0.31
B 38
¬«34 ¬«79
Custer Avenue
BASIN ID
BASIN BOUNDARY
Area
AC
C10 C25
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2 Location name: Sturgis, South Dakota, USA*
Latitude: 44.395°, Longitude: -103.4664° Elevation: 3462.41 ft**
* source: ESRI Maps ** source: USGS
POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES
Sanja Perica, Deborah Martin, Sandra Pavlovic, Ishani Roy, Michael St. Laurent, Carl Trypaluk, Dale Unruh, Michael Yekta, Geoffery Bonnin
NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland
PF_tabular | PF_graphical | Maps_&_aerials
PF tabular PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches/hour)1
Duration Average recurrence interval (years)
1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000
5-min 3.44 (2.65‑4.48)
4.34 (3.34‑5.65)
5.86 (4.49‑7.64)
7.15 (5.45‑9.40)
9.00 (6.66‑12.4)
10.5 (7.57‑14.7)
12.0 (8.40‑17.4)
13.6 (9.14‑20.3)
15.7 (10.2‑24.4)
17.4 (11.0‑27.5)
10-min 2.52 (1.94‑3.28)
3.18 (2.44‑4.13)
4.28 (3.28‑5.60)
5.23 (3.99‑6.88)
6.59 (4.87‑9.08)
7.67 (5.54‑10.8)
8.78 (6.15‑12.7)
9.94 (6.70‑14.9)
11.5 (7.48‑17.9)
12.8 (8.08‑20.1)
15-min 2.05 (1.58‑2.66)
2.58 (1.99‑3.36)
3.48 (2.67‑4.55)
4.26 (3.24‑5.59)
5.36 (3.96‑7.38)
6.24 (4.51‑8.74)
7.14 (5.00‑10.3)
8.08 (5.44‑12.1)
9.37 (6.08‑14.5)
10.4 (6.57‑16.4)
30-min 1.39 (1.07‑1.81)
1.76 (1.35‑2.29)
2.37 (1.82‑3.10)
2.90 (2.21‑3.81)
3.65 (2.70‑5.03)
4.25 (3.07‑5.96)
4.87 (3.41‑7.04)
5.51 (3.71‑8.26)
6.40 (4.15‑9.91)
7.08 (4.48‑11.2)
60-min 0.848 (0.653‑1.10)
1.08 (0.831‑1.41)
1.50 (1.15‑1.96)
1.89 (1.44‑2.48)
2.47 (1.85‑3.46)
2.96 (2.16‑4.20)
3.49 (2.46‑5.11)
4.07 (2.76‑6.15)
4.89 (3.19‑7.64)
5.56 (3.52‑8.77)
2-hr 0.500 (0.388‑0.644)
0.642 (0.498‑0.827)
0.907 (0.701‑1.17)
1.16 (0.892‑1.51)
1.56 (1.18‑2.18)
1.90 (1.40‑2.69)
2.28 (1.62‑3.31)
2.69 (1.85‑4.05)
3.30 (2.17‑5.11)
3.79 (2.42‑5.91)
3-hr 0.364 (0.284‑0.466)
0.464 (0.362‑0.595)
0.663 (0.515‑0.853)
0.861 (0.666‑1.12)
1.18 (0.910‑1.67)
1.47 (1.10‑2.09)
1.79 (1.29‑2.61)
2.15 (1.49‑3.23)
2.69 (1.79‑4.16)
3.13 (2.01‑4.85)
6-hr 0.225 (0.177‑0.285)
0.274 (0.215‑0.348)
0.381 (0.299‑0.485)
0.494 (0.386‑0.634)
0.688 (0.539‑0.971)
0.867 (0.655‑1.23)
1.07 (0.782‑1.56)
1.31 (0.915‑1.95)
1.65 (1.12‑2.54)
1.95 (1.27‑2.99)
12-hr 0.141 (0.112‑0.178)
0.165 (0.131‑0.208)
0.218 (0.173‑0.276)
0.275 (0.216‑0.349)
0.371 (0.293‑0.516)
0.460 (0.351‑0.643)
0.562 (0.414‑0.807)
0.679 (0.481‑1.00)
0.854 (0.582‑1.30)
1.00 (0.658‑1.52)
24-hr 0.090 (0.072‑0.112)
0.101 (0.081‑0.126)
0.127 (0.101‑0.159)
0.155 (0.123‑0.195)
0.204 (0.162‑0.280)
0.249 (0.192‑0.344)
0.302 (0.225‑0.428)
0.362 (0.259‑0.529)
0.453 (0.312‑0.681)
0.529 (0.351‑0.796)
2-day 0.052 (0.042‑0.064)
0.060 (0.049‑0.074)
0.077 (0.062‑0.095)
0.094 (0.075‑0.117)
0.121 (0.097‑0.163)
0.146 (0.113‑0.198)
0.173 (0.130‑0.242)
0.204 (0.147‑0.294)
0.250 (0.174‑0.371)
0.288 (0.193‑0.429)
3-day 0.038 (0.031‑0.046)
0.043 (0.035‑0.053)
0.055 (0.044‑0.067)
0.066 (0.053‑0.082)
0.085 (0.068‑0.114)
0.102 (0.080‑0.138)
0.122 (0.092‑0.169)
0.144 (0.104‑0.205)
0.176 (0.123‑0.259)
0.203 (0.137‑0.300)
4-day 0.030 (0.025‑0.037)
0.034 (0.028‑0.042)
0.043 (0.035‑0.052)
0.051 (0.042‑0.063)
0.066 (0.053‑0.088)
0.079 (0.062‑0.106)
0.094 (0.071‑0.130)
0.111 (0.081‑0.158)
0.137 (0.096‑0.200)
0.158 (0.107‑0.232)
7-day 0.020 (0.017‑0.024)
0.023 (0.019‑0.027)
0.028 (0.023‑0.034)
0.033 (0.027‑0.040)
0.042 (0.034‑0.055)
0.049 (0.039‑0.066)
0.058 (0.045‑0.080)
0.069 (0.050‑0.097)
0.084 (0.059‑0.121)
0.096 (0.066‑0.140)
10-day 0.016 (0.013‑0.019)
0.018 (0.015‑0.022)
0.022 (0.018‑0.026)
0.026 (0.021‑0.031)
0.032 (0.026‑0.042)
0.038 (0.030‑0.050)
0.044 (0.034‑0.060)
0.051 (0.038‑0.072)
0.062 (0.044‑0.089)
0.071 (0.049‑0.102)
20-day 0.011 (0.009‑0.013)
0.012 (0.010‑0.014)
0.015 (0.012‑0.018)
0.017 (0.014‑0.021)
0.021 (0.017‑0.026)
0.024 (0.019‑0.031)
0.027 (0.021‑0.036)
0.031 (0.023‑0.042)
0.036 (0.026‑0.051)
0.040 (0.028‑0.058)
30-day 0.008 (0.007‑0.010)
0.010 (0.008‑0.011)
0.012 (0.010‑0.014)
0.014 (0.011‑0.016)
0.016 (0.013‑0.021)
0.019 (0.015‑0.024)
0.021 (0.016‑0.028)
0.023 (0.017‑0.032)
0.027 (0.019‑0.038)
0.030 (0.021‑0.042)
45-day 0.007 (0.006‑0.008)
0.008 (0.007‑0.009)
0.010 (0.008‑0.011)
0.011 (0.009‑0.013)
0.013 (0.011‑0.016)
0.015 (0.012‑0.019)
0.016 (0.013‑0.021)
0.018 (0.014‑0.024)
0.020 (0.015‑0.028)
0.022 (0.016‑0.031)
60-day 0.006 (0.005‑0.007)
0.007 (0.006‑0.008)
0.008 (0.007‑0.010)
0.009 (0.008‑0.011)
0.011 (0.009‑0.014)
0.013 (0.010‑0.016)
0.014 (0.011‑0.018)
0.015 (0.011‑0.020)
0.017 (0.012‑0.023)
0.018 (0.013‑0.026)
1 Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS).
Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values.
Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information.
Back to Top
PF graphical https://www.commerce.gov/ http://www.noaa.gov/
COKOENIG
Highlight
COKOENIG
Highlight .49‑7.
COKOENIG
Highlight 5.86 (4.49‑7.6
COKOENIG
Highlight 3.34‑5.65
COKOENIG
Highlight .45‑9.40
COKOENIG
Highlight 7.15 (5.45‑9.4
COKOENIG
Highlight 66‑12.
COKOENIG
Highlight 9.00 (6.66‑12
COKOENIG
Highlight 57‑14.7
COKOENIG
Highlight 10.5 (7.57‑14
COKOENIG
Highlight 0‑17.4)
COKOENIG
Highlight 12.0
COKOENIG
Highlight .44‑4.13
COKOENIG
Highlight 3.18 (2.44‑4.1
COKOENIG
Highlight .28‑5.60)
COKOENIG
Highlight
COKOENIG
Highlight .28‑
COKOENIG
Highlight 28‑5.
COKOENIG
Highlight
COKOENIG
Highlight (3.
COKOENIG
Highlight 4.28 (3.28‑5
COKOENIG
Highlight 5.23 (3.99‑6.88)
COKOENIG
Highlight .87‑9.08
COKOENIG
Highlight .87‑9.
COKOENIG
Highlight
COKOENIG
Highlight ‑9.
COKOENIG
Highlight 4.87‑9.
COKOENIG
Highlight 6.59
COKOENIG
Highlight 7.67
COKOENIG
Highlight (5.54‑10.8)
COKOENIG
Highlight 8.78 (6.15‑12.7)
COKOENIG
Highlight 2.58 (1.99‑3.36
COKOENIG
Highlight 3.48 (2.67‑4.55)
COKOENIG
Highlight 4.26 (3.24‑5.59
COKOENIG
Highlight 5.36 (3.96‑7.38)
COKOENIG
Highlight 6.24 (4.51‑8.74
COKOENIG
Highlight 7.14 (5.00‑10.3)
COKOENIG
Highlight .35‑2.2
COKOENIG
Highlight 1.76
COKOENIG
Highlight 2.37 (1.82‑3.10)
COKOENIG
Highlight 2.90 (2.21‑3.81)
COKOENIG
Highlight 3.65 (2.70‑5.03
COKOENIG
Highlight 4.25 (3.07‑5.96)
COKOENIG
Highlight .41‑7.04
COKOENIG
Highlight (3
COKOENIG
Highlight 4.87 (3.41‑7
COKOENIG
Highlight 1.08 (0.831‑1.41)
COKOENIG
Highlight 1.50 (1.15‑1.96)
COKOENIG
Highlight 1.89 (1.44‑2.48)
COKOENIG
Highlight .85‑3.46
COKOENIG
Highlight 2.47 (1.85‑3.4
COKOENIG
Highlight 2.96 (2.16‑4.20
COKOENIG
Highlight 3.49 (2.46‑5.11
Back to Top
Maps & aerials
Small scale terrain
Large scale terrain
Large scale map
Large scale aerial
3km
2mi
100km
60mi
100km
60mi
Back to Top
US Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Weather Service National Water Center
1325 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910
Questions?: HDSC.Questions@noaa.gov
Disclaimer
100km
60mi https://www.commerce.gov/ http://www.noaa.gov/ http://www.nws.noaa.gov/ https://www.weather.gov/owp/oh mailto:HDSC.Questions@noaa.gov http://www.nws.noaa.gov/disclaimer.html
Hydrologic Soil Group—Meade County, South Dakota, Southern Part (CFLHD TO 36 SD Horse Soldier)
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey
3/9/2020
615000 616000 617000 618000 619000 620000 621000 622000 623000
616000 617000 618000 619000 620000 621000 622000 623000
44° 25' 10'' N
3°
3'
1' ' W
44° 25' 10'' N
3°
6'
4'
' W
44° 18' 53'' N
3°
3'
1'
' W
44° 18' 53'' N
3°
6'
4'
' W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 0 2500 5000 10000 15000
Feet 0 500 1000 2000 3000
Meters Map Scale: 1:56,600 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils Soil Rating Polygons
A
A/D
B
B/D
C
C/D
D
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Lines A
A/D
B
B/D
C
C/D
D
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Points A
A/D
B
B/D
C
C/D
D
Not rated or not available
Water Features Streams and Canals
Transportation Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Meade County, South Dakota, Southern Part Survey Area Data: Version 21, Sep 17, 2019
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jun 27, 2011—Feb 19, 2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Hydrologic Soil Group—Meade County, South Dakota, Southern Part (CFLHD TO 36 SD Horse Soldier)
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey
3/9/2020
Hydrologic Soil Group
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
P036D Blackpipe silt loam, moist, 6 to 15 percent slopes
C 110.9 2.6%
P038B Blackpipe-Savo complex, moist, 2 to 6 percent slopes
C 15.4 0.4%
P124E Fairburn-Butche complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes
D 177.2 4.1%
P194D Lakoa-Maitland complex, 6 to 25 percent slopes
C 701.1 16.2%
P256D Nevee-Spearfish silt loams, 6 to 20 percent slopes
B 124.9 2.9%
P264E Nihill gravelly loam, moist, 9 to 40 percent slopes
B 71.2 1.7%
P324D Pierre-Fairburn-Ucross complex, moist, 6 to 25 percent slopes
C 123.9 2.9%
P344B Rapidcreek very cobbly sandy loam, warm, 1 to 6 percent slopes, nonflooded
A 177.6 4.1%
P436D Samsil silty clay loam, moist, 6 to 25 percent slopes
D 26.5 0.6%
P480F Spearfish-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 60 percent slopes
D 131.8 3.1%
P488A St. Onge loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded
B 33.3 0.8%
P512B Thirtynine silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
C 81.2 1.9%
P514B Tilford silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
B 43.2 1.0%
Q0108E Grizzly-Mineshaft complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes
B 146.1 3.4%
Q0108G Grizzly-Mineshaft complex, 40 to 80 percent slopes
B 3.7 0.1%
Q0110E Grizzly-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes
B 245.2 5.7%
Hydrologic Soil Group—Meade County, South Dakota, Southern Part CFLHD TO 36 SD Horse Soldier
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Q0110G Grizzly-Rock outcrop complex, 40 to 80 percent slopes
B 930.7 21.6%
Q0112G Grizzly-Rubbleland- Rock outcrop complex, 40 to 80 percent slopes
B 126.3 2.9%
Q0114D Grizzly-Virkula complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes
B 19.0 0.4%
Q0229C Rapidcreek very gravelly loam, noncalcareous, 1 to 9 percent slopes, rarely flooded
B 34.3 0.8%
Q0553E Rockerville, moist-Rock outcrop complex, 6 to 40 percent slopes
D 121.2 2.8%
Q0554F Rockerville, moist- Vanocker-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 60 percent slopes
D 20.0 0.5%
Q0568B Roubaix silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes
D 0.4 0.0%
Q0568E Roubaix silt loam, 6 to 40 percent slopes
D 3.7 0.1%
Q0570F Opechekahta-Citivar- Schaeferville complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes
C 46.2 1.1%
Q0572D Schaeferville-Citivar silt loams, 6 to 20 percent slopes
C 1.7 0.0%
Q0576C Tollflat-Vanocker complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes
C 15.0 0.3%
Q0584E Vanocker-Citadel complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes
B 175.6 4.1%
Q0584F Vanocker-Citadel complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes
B 29.0 0.7%
Q0585G Vanocker-Danjay- Hopdraw, moist complex, 40 to 80 percent slopes
A 263.8 6.1%
Q0586E Vanocker-Danjay-Tollflat complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes
B 202.2 4.7%
Q0589G Vanocker-Sawdust, moist-Rock outcrop complex, 40 to 80 percent slopes
B 112.5 2.6%
Totals for Area of Interest 4,315.0 100.0%
Hydrologic Soil Group—Meade County, South Dakota, Southern Part CFLHD TO 36 SD Horse Soldier
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture.
These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Higher
Hydrologic Soil Group—Meade County, South Dakota, Southern Part CFLHD TO 36 SD Horse Soldier
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey
Rational Method
Runoff Coefficients
Project: CFLHD TO 36 SD Horse Soilder Computed: JWM Date: 3/6/2020
System Name: Horse Soldier Culvert Checked: SDA Date: 6/23/2020
Sub-Basin Data
Basin ID Description
Total Area
(ac)
8 STA 275+24 74.20 0.25 0.25 0.40 0.90 0.27 0.28 0.44 -0.09 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.93 C 0.7% 73.65 0.55
22 STA 357+87 8.28 0.27 0.25 0.40 0.90 0.29 0.28 0.44 0.91 0.51 0.50 0.50 0.93 C 2.4% 8.08 0.20
37 STA 415+55 2.58 0.28 0.25 0.40 0.90 0.30 0.28 0.44 0.91 0.52 0.50 0.50 0.93 C 4.3% 2.47 0.11
38 STA 417+45 0.97 0.29 0.25 0.40 0.90 0.31 0.28 0.44 0.91 0.53 0.50 0.50 0.93 C 6.2% 0.91 0.06
43 STA 434+62 15.90 0.25 0.25 0.40 0.90 0.28 0.28 0.44 0.91 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.93 C 0.7% 15.79 0.11
C25
ImPervious
Areas
Composite
C10
C10
Pervious Areas
C10
ImPervious Areas
Composite
C25
C25
Pervious
Areas
**C25 determined from HEC22 Urban Drainage Design Manual
Hydrologic Soils
Group Percent Impervious
Area Pervious
(ac)
Area
Impervious (ac)
C10
Gravel Areas
C100
Gravel Areas
C25
Gravel Areas
Composite
C100
*C values determined from Clark County, Hydrologic Criteria and Drainage Design Manual - Regional Flood Control District, Table 601
C100
Pervious Areas
C100
ImPervious Areas
Standard Form SF-1 . Time of Concentration Project: CFLHD TO 36 SD Horse Soilder JWM 3/6/2020
System Name: Horse Soldier Culvert CDK 6/26/2020
SUB-BASIN DATA Sheet Flow Open Channel Flow
(t3)
8 STA 275+24 0.6 0.143 120 10.70 2990 0.142 4.739 1.8 27.91 9.0 12.4 0.035 315 0.016 4.35 1.21 39.8
22 STA 357+87 0.4 0.418 150 10.08 960 0.199 6.962 3.1 5.15 4.0 8.25 0.035 235 0.016 3.32 1.18 16.4
37 STA 415+55 0.5 0.086 50 9.42 385 0.496 5.032 3.5 1.81 1.5 4.95 0.035 80 0.056 4.55 0.29 11.5
38 STA 417+45 0.5 0.378 100 9.07 230 0.453 2.516 1.7 2.26 1.1 4.21 0.035 125 0.053 4.01 0.52 11.9
43 STA 434+62 0.5 0.102 65 10.70 1680 0.283 5.032 2.7 10.46 3.5 7.42 0.035 190 0.052 5.88 0.54 21.7
Table 3-1 Table 15-3
Two-year 24-hour rainfall intensity (From NOAA ATLAS 14)(in/hr)2.44 n Surface description coefficient smooth surface 0.011 PAVED 20.328 fallow no residue 0.05 GRASS 16.135
Cultivated soils <20% Residue 0.06 UNTILLED 9.965
Notes: Velocity Method Cultivated soils >20% Residue 0.17 CROPS 8.762
Time of concentration = sum of sheet flow, shallow concentrated flow, and open channel flow segments short grass 0.15 PASTURE 6.962 dense grass 0.24 WOODED 5.032 bermuda grass 0.41 HEAVY FOREST 2.516 range 0.13
Woods light underbrush 0.4
Woods dense underbrush 0.8
Tc Reference https://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/OpenNonWebContent.aspx?content=27002.wba
USDA National Engineering Handbook, Part 630 Hydrology, Chapter 15 Time of Concentation. May 2010
Surface
Wetted
Perimeter (ft) DescriptionBasin ID
Manning n
(Table 3-1)
Slope
(ft/ft) t1
(min)
Length
(ft) Slope (ft/ft)
Surface coef
(Table 15-3)
Velocity
(fps)
Travel Time t2 (min)
Length
(ft)
Flow Area
(ft
Length
(ft) Slope (ft/ft)
FINAL Tc
(min)
Shallow concentrated flow
(t1)
Velocity
(fps)
Travel
Time t3
(min)
Manning n
Surface Roughness Tables from FHWA Drainage Design Manual
(t2)
Rational Analysis
Standard Form SF-2 . Storm Drainage System Design (Rational Method Procedure) Corridor / Design Package: CFLHD TO 36 SD Horse Soilder Computed: JWM Date: 3/6/2020
System Name: Horse Soldier Culvert Checked: SDA Date: 6/23/2020
Design Storm: 10-yr
A R
E A
D
S
IG
N
(n a m e
A R
E A
A
C
R U
N O
F F
C O
E F
F t c
(M
IN
C .A
(A C
I
IN
H
R
Q
(C
S
S U
M
C *A
(A C
I
(I N
H
R
Q
(C F
S
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13)
STA 275+24 8 74.20 0.25 39.82 18.91 2.57 48.54
STA 357+87 22 8.28 0.27 16.41 2.20 4.13 9.09
STA 415+55 37 2.58 0.28 11.53 0.72 4.93 3.54
STA 417+45 38 0.97 0.29 11.86 0.28 4.87 1.38
STA 434+62 43 15.90 0.25 21.70 4.05 3.66 14.80
(1) Basin Description linked to C-Value Sheet (7) =Column 4 x Column 5
(2) Basin Design Point (8) from IDF Tab
(3) Enter the Basin Name from C Value Sheet (9) =Column 7 x Column 8
(4) Basin Area linked to C-Value Sheet (10) max Tc of combined basins
(5) Composite C linked to C-Value Sheet (11) Add the Basin Areas (7) to get the combined basin AC
(6) Time of Concentration linked to T of C Sheet (12) from IDF Tab
(13) Column 11 x Column 12
REMARKSLOCATION
D E
S
P O
IN
T
DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF
Rational Analysis
Corridor / Design Package: CFLHD TO 36 SD Horse Soilder Computed: JWM Date: 3/6/2020
System Name: Horse Soldier Culvert Checked: SDA Date: 6/23/2020
Design Storm: 25-yr
A R
S m e
A R
E A
A
C
R U
N O
F F
C O
E F
C .A
(A C
I
IN
H
S
S U
M
C *A
(A C
I
(I N
H
R
Q
(C F
S
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13)
STA 275+24 8 74.20 0.27 39.82 20.21 3.27 66.02
STA 357+87 22 8.28 0.29 16.41 2.40 5.20 12.50
STA 415+55 37 2.58 0.30 11.53 0.78 6.21 4.85
STA 417+45 38 0.97 0.31 11.86 0.31 6.13 1.88
STA 434+62 43 15.90 0.28 21.70 4.44 4.60 20.42
(1) Basin Description linked to C-Value Sheet (7) =Column 4 x Column 5
(2) Basin Design Point (8) from IDF Tab
(3) Enter the Basin Name from C Value Sheet (9) =Column 7 x Column 8
(4) Basin Area linked to C-Value Sheet (10) max Tc of combined basins
(5) Composite C linked to C-Value Sheet (11) Add the Basin Areas (7) to get the combined basin AC
(6) Time of Concentration linked to T of C Sheet (12) from IDF Tab
(13) Column 11 x Column 12
REMARKSLOCATION
D E
S
P O
IN
T
DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF
Corridor / Design Package: CFLHD TO 36 SD Horse Soilder Computed: JWM Date: 3/6/2020
System Name: Horse Soldier Culvert Checked: SDA Date: 6/23/2020
Design Storm: 100-yr
A R
S m e
A R
E A
A
C
R U
N O
F F
C O
E F
C .A
(A C
I
IN
H
S
S U
M
C *A
(A C
I
(I N
H
R
Q
(C F
S
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13)
STA 275+24 8 74.20 0.50 39.82 37.34 4.42 165.01
STA 357+87 22 8.28 0.51 16.41 4.23 6.93 29.28
STA 415+55 37 2.58 0.52 11.53 1.34 8.28 11.08
STA 417+45 38 0.97 0.53 11.86 0.51 8.17 4.19
STA 434+62 43 15.90 0.50 21.70 8.00 6.12 48.99
(1) Basin Description linked to C-Value Sheet (7) =Column 4 x Column 5
(2) Basin Design Point (8) from IDF Tab
(3) Enter the Basin Name from C Value Sheet (9) =Column 7 x Column 8
(4) Basin Area linked to C-Value Sheet (10) max Tc of combined basins
(5) Composite C linked to C-Value Sheet (11) Add the Basin Areas (7) to get the combined basin AC
(6) Time of Concentration linked to T of C Sheet (12) from IDF Tab
(13) Column 11 x Column 12
REMARKSLOCATION
D E
S
IG
N P
O
IN
T DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF
Computed: JWM Date:
NOAA Atlas 14 Checked: 3/6/2020 Date:
Time (in/hr)
(min) 2 Yr 5 Yr 10 Yr 25 Yr 50 Yr 100 Yr
5 4.34 5.86 7.15 9 10.5 12
6 4.110 5.540 6.770 8.520 9.930 11.360
7 3.880 5.230 6.380 8.040 9.370 10.710
8 3.640 4.910 6.000 7.550 8.800 10.070
9 3.410 4.600 5.610 7.070 8.240 9.420
10 3.18 4.28 5.23 6.59 7.67 8.78
11 3.060 4.120 5.040 6.340 7.380 8.450
12 2.940 3.960 4.840 6.100 7.100 8.120
13 2.820 3.800 4.650 5.850 6.810 7.800
14 2.700 3.640 4.450 5.610 6.530 7.470
15 2.58 3.48 4.26 5.36 6.24 7.14
16 2.530 3.410 4.170 5.250 6.110 6.990
17 2.470 3.330 4.080 5.130 5.970 6.840
18 2.420 3.260 3.990 5.020 5.840 6.690
19 2.360 3.180 3.900 4.900 5.710 6.530
20 2.310 3.110 3.810 4.790 5.580 6.380
21 2.250 3.040 3.720 4.680 5.440 6.230
22 2.200 2.960 3.630 4.560 5.310 6.080
23 2.140 2.890 3.530 4.450 5.180 5.930
24 2.090 2.810 3.440 4.330 5.050 5.780
25 2.030 2.740 3.350 4.220 4.910 5.630
26 1.980 2.670 3.260 4.110 4.780 5.480
27 1.920 2.590 3.170 3.990 4.650 5.320
28 1.870 2.520 3.080 3.880 4.520 5.170
29 1.810 2.440 2.990 3.760 4.380 5.020
30 1.76 2.37 2.9 3.65 4.25 4.87
31 1.740 2.340 2.870 3.610 4.210 4.820
32 1.710 2.310 2.830 3.570 4.160 4.780
33 1.690 2.280 2.800 3.530 4.120 4.730
34 1.670 2.250 2.770 3.490 4.080 4.690
35 1.650 2.230 2.730 3.450 4.040 4.640
36 1.620 2.200 2.700 3.410 3.990 4.590
37 1.600 2.170 2.660 3.370 3.950 4.550
38 1.580 2.140 2.630 3.340 3.910 4.500
39 1.560 2.110 2.600 3.300 3.860 4.460
40 1.530 2.080 2.560 3.260 3.820 4.410
41 1.510 2.050 2.530 3.220 3.780 4.360
42 1.490 2.020 2.500 3.180 3.730 4.320
43 1.470 1.990 2.460 3.140 3.690 4.270
44 1.440 1.960 2.430 3.100 3.650 4.230
45 1.420 1.940 2.400 3.060 3.610 4.180
46 1.400 1.910 2.360 3.020 3.560 4.130
47 1.370 1.880 2.330 2.980 3.520 4.090
48 1.350 1.850 2.290 2.940 3.480 4.040
49 1.330 1.820 2.260 2.900 3.430 4.000
50 1.310 1.790 2.230 2.860 3.390 3.950
51 1.280 1.760 2.190 2.820 3.350 3.900
52 1.260 1.730 2.160 2.780 3.300 3.860
53 1.240 1.700 2.130 2.750 3.260 3.810
54 1.220 1.670 2.090 2.710 3.220 3.770
55 1.190 1.650 2.060 2.670 3.180 3.720
56 1.170 1.620 2.020 2.630 3.130 3.670
57 1.150 1.590 1.990 2.590 3.090 3.630
58 1.130 1.560 1.960 2.550 3.050 3.580
59 1.100 1.530 1.920 2.510 3.000 3.540
60 1.08 1.5 1.89 2.47 2.96 3.49
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
R a in fa ll I n te n si ty in /h r)
Time (min)
Sturgis, South Dakota IDF Curve
2 Yr
5 Yr
10 Yr
25 Yr
50 Yr
100 Yr
CFLHD TO 36 SD 3 Central Federal Lands Highway Division
Appendix C
Hydraulic Calculations
HY-8 Culvert Analysis Report
Text Box 275+24
Water Surface Profile Plot for Culvert: Proposed
Table 2 - Culvert Summary Table: Proposed Discharge
Names Total
Discharge (cfs)
Culvert Discharge
(cfs)
Headwater Elevation (ft)
Inlet Control Depth (ft)
Outlet Control
Depth (ft)
Flow Type
Normal Depth (ft)
Critical Depth (ft)
Outlet Depth (ft)
Tailwater Depth (ft)
Outlet Velocity
(ft/s)
10-yr 48.50 40.28 3441.70 1.482 1.582 2-M2c 1.253 0.903 0.903 0.882 5.330
25-yr 66.00 55.85 3442.21 1.902 2.086 7-M2c 1.667 1.092 1.092 1.022 6.106
Straight Culvert
Inlet Elevation (invert): 3440.12 ft, Outlet Elevation (invert): 3439.76 ft
Culvert Length: 43.50 ft, Culvert Slope: 0.0083
Culvert Performance Curve Plot: Proposed
Site Data - Proposed
Site Data Option: Culvert Invert Data
Inlet Station: 0.00 ft
Inlet Elevation: 3440.12 ft
Outlet Station: 43.50 ft
Outlet Elevation: 3439.76 ft
Number of Barrels: 4
Culvert Data Summary - Proposed
Barrel Shape: Pipe Arch
Barrel Span: 28.00 in
Barrel Rise: 20.00 in
Barrel Material: Steel or Aluminum
Embedment: 0.00 in
Barrel Manning's n: 0.0250
Culvert Type: Straight
Inlet Configuration: Headwall
Inlet Depression: None
Rating Curve Plot for Crossing: 275+24 Proposed
Table 3 - Downstream Channel Rating Curve (Crossing: 275+24 Proposed)
Flow (cfs) Water Surface Elev (ft)
Depth (ft) Velocity (ft/s) Shear (psf) Froude Number
48.50 3439.78 0.88 5.34 1.82 1.23
66.00 3439.92 1.02 5.80 2.10 1.26
Tailwater Channel Data - 275+24 Proposed
Tailwater Channel Option: Trapezoidal Channel
Bottom Width: 5.00 ft
Side Slope (H:V): 6.00 (_:1)
Channel Slope: 0.0330
Channel Manning's n: 0.0350
Channel Invert Elevation: 3438.90 ft
Roadway Data for Crossing: 275+24 Proposed
Roadway Profile Shape: Constant Roadway Elevation
Crest Length: 370.00 ft
Crest Elevation: 3442.66 ft
Roadway Surface: Paved
Roadway Top Width: 20.00 ft
415+55
Water Surface Profile Plot for Culvert: Culvert 1
Table 1 - Culvert Summary Table: Culvert 1
Names Total
Discharge (cfs)
Culvert Discharge
(cfs)
Headwater Elevation (ft)
Inlet Control Depth (ft)
Outlet Control
Depth (ft)
Flow Type
Normal Depth (ft)
Critical Depth (ft)
Outlet Depth (ft)
Tailwater Depth (ft)
Outlet Velocity
(ft/s)
10-yr 3.50 3.50 3436.53 2.314 0.0* 5-S2n 0.490 0.649 0.503 0.285 5.476
25-yr 4.90 4.90 3436.67 2.453 0.0* 5-S2n 0.582 0.774 0.597 0.339 6.012
100-yr 11.00 11.00 3437.17 2.949 0.240 5-S2n 0.900 1.186 0.931 0.508 7.425
Inlet Elevation (invert): 3434.22 ft, Outlet Elevation (invert): 3432.70 ft
Culvert Length: 36.03 ft, Culvert Slope: 0.0422
Inlet Throat Elevation: 3434.22 ft, Inlet Crest Elevation: 3435.98 ft
Culvert Data Summary - Culvert 1
Barrel Shape: Circular
Barrel Diameter: 2.00 ft
Barrel Material: Corrugated Steel
Embedment: 0.00 in
Barrel Manning's n: 0.0240
Culvert Type: Straight
Inlet Configuration: Square Edge with Headwall
Inlet Depression: Yes
Site Data - Culvert 1
Site Data Option: Culvert Invert Data
Inlet Station: 0.00 ft
Inlet Elevation: 3435.62 ft
Outlet Station: 36.00 ft
Outlet Elevation: 3432.70 ft
Number of Barrels: 1
Table 2 - Downstream Channel Rating Curve (Crossing: 415+55 Proposed)
Elev (ft)
Depth (ft) Velocity (ft/s) Shear (psf) Froude Number
3.50 3432.98 0.28 3.91 1.24 1.51
4.90 3433.04 0.34 4.31 1.48 1.54
11.00 3433.21 0.51 5.37 2.22 1.63
Tailwater Channel Data - 415+55 Proposed
Bottom Width: 2.00 ft
Side Slope (H:V): 4.00 (_:1)
Channel Slope: 0.0700
Channel Manning's n: 0.0350
Channel Invert Elevation: 3432.70 ft
Roadway Data for Crossing: 415+55 Proposed
Roadway Profile Shape: Constant Roadway Elevation
Crest Length: 100.00 ft
Crest Elevation: 3440.65 ft
357+87
Water Surface Profile Plot for Culvert: Existing
Table 1 - Culvert Summary Table: Existing
Names Total
Discharge (cfs)
Culvert Discharge
(cfs)
Headwater Elevation (ft)
Inlet Control Depth (ft)
Outlet Control
Depth (ft)
Flow Type
Normal Depth (ft)
Critical Depth (ft)
Outlet Depth (ft)
Tailwater Depth (ft)
Outlet Velocity
(ft/s)
10-yr 48.50 8.23 3441.70 1.843 1.901 7-M2c 1.137 1.107 1.107 0.882 5.884
25-yr 66.00 10.14 3442.21 2.270 2.405 7-M2c 1.500 1.225 1.225 1.022 6.561
Inlet Elevation (invert): 3439.80 ft, Outlet Elevation (invert): 3438.90 ft
Culvert Length: 39.01 ft, Culvert Slope: 0.0231
Culvert Data Summary - Existing
Barrel Shape: Circular
Barrel Diameter: 1.50 ft
Barrel Material: Corrugated Steel
Embedment: 0.00 in
Barrel Manning's n: 0.0240
Culvert Type: Straight
Inlet Configuration: Square Edge with Headwall
Inlet Depression: None
Site Data - Existing
Site Data Option: Culvert Invert Data
Inlet Station: 0.00 ft
Inlet Elevation: 3439.80 ft
Outlet Station: 39.00 ft
Outlet Elevation: 3438.90 ft
Water Surface Profile Plot for Culvert: Proposed
Table 2 - Culvert Summary Table: Proposed
Names Total
Discharge (cfs)
Culvert Discharge
(cfs)
Headwater Elevation (ft)
Inlet Control Depth (ft)
Outlet Control
Depth (ft)
Flow Type
Normal Depth (ft)
Critical Depth (ft)
Outlet Depth (ft)
Tailwater Depth (ft)
Outlet Velocity
(ft/s)
10-yr 48.50 40.28 3441.70 1.482 1.582 2-M2c 1.253 0.903 0.903 0.882 5.330
25-yr 66.00 55.85 3442.21 1.902 2.086 7-M2c 1.667 1.092 1.092 1.022 6.106
Inlet Elevation (invert): 3440.12 ft, Outlet Elevation (invert): 3439.76 ft
Culvert Length: 43.50 ft, Culvert Slope: 0.0083
Culvert Data Summary - Proposed
Barrel Shape: Pipe Arch
Barrel Span: 28.00 in
Barrel Rise: 20.00 in
Barrel Material: Steel or Aluminum
Embedment: 0.00 in
Barrel Manning's n: 0.0250
Culvert Type: Straight
Inlet Configuration: Headwall
Inlet Depression: None
Site Data - Proposed
Site Data Option: Culvert Invert Data
Inlet Station: 0.00 ft
Inlet Elevation: 3440.12 ft
Outlet Station: 43.50 ft
Outlet Elevation: 3439.76 ft
Number of Barrels: 4
Table 3 - Downstream Channel Rating Curve (Crossing: 275+24 Proposed)
Elev (ft)
Depth (ft) Velocity (ft/s) Shear (psf) Froude Number
48.50 3439.78 0.88 5.34 1.82 1.23
66.00 3439.92 1.02 5.80 2.10 1.26
Tailwater Channel Data - 275+24 Proposed
Bottom Width: 5.00 ft
Side Slope (H:V): 6.00 (_:1)
Channel Slope: 0.0330
Channel Manning's n: 0.0350
Channel Invert Elevation: 3438.90 ft
Roadway Data for Crossing: 275+24 Proposed
Roadway Profile Shape: Constant Roadway Elevation
Crest Length: 370.00 ft
Crest Elevation: 3442.66 ft
417+45
Names Total
Discharge (cfs)
Culvert Discharge
(cfs)
Headwater Elevation (ft)
Inlet Control Depth (ft)
Outlet Control
Depth (ft)
Flow Type
Normal Depth (ft)
Critical Depth (ft)
Outlet Depth (ft)
Tailwater Depth (ft)
Outlet Velocity
(ft/s)
10-yr 1.40 1.40 3425.51 1.508 0.0* 5-S2n 0.354 0.441 0.354 0.158 4.277
25-yr 1.90 1.90 3425.58 1.576 0.0* 5-S2n 0.413 0.516 0.413 0.187 4.640
100-yr 4.20 4.20 3425.83 1.833 0.0* 5-S2n 0.630 0.784 0.630 0.285 5.759
Inlet Elevation (invert): 3424.00 ft, Outlet Elevation (invert): 3422.80 ft
Culvert Length: 33.02 ft, Culvert Slope: 0.0364
Inlet Throat Elevation: 3424.00 ft, Inlet Crest Elevation: 3425.21 ft
Culvert Data Summary - Culvert 1
Barrel Shape: Circular
Barrel Diameter: 1.50 ft
Barrel Material: Corrugated Steel
Embedment: 0.00 in
Barrel Manning's n: 0.0240
Culvert Type: Straight
Inlet Configuration: Square Edge with Headwall
Inlet Depression: Yes
Site Data - Culvert 1
Site Data Option: Culvert Invert Data
Inlet Station: 0.00 ft
Inlet Elevation: 3425.00 ft
Outlet Station: 33.00 ft
Outlet Elevation: 3422.80 ft
Table 2 - Downstream Channel Rating Curve (Crossing: 417+45 Proposed)
Elev (ft)
Depth (ft) Velocity (ft/s) Shear (psf) Froude Number
1.40 3422.96 0.16 3.37 0.98 1.66
1.90 3422.99 0.19 3.70 1.17 1.70
4.20 3423.09 0.29 4.68 1.78 1.80
Tailwater Channel Data - 417+45 Proposed
Bottom Width: 2.00 ft
Side Slope (H:V): 4.00 (_:1)
Channel Slope: 0.1000
Channel Manning's n: 0.0350
Channel Invert Elevation: 3422.80 ft
Roadway Data for Crossing: 417+45 Proposed
Roadway Profile Shape: Constant Roadway Elevation
Crest Length: 100.00 ft
Crest Elevation: 3430.93 ft
434+62
Names Total
Discharge (cfs)
Culvert Discharge
(cfs)
Headwater Elevation (ft)
Inlet Control Depth (ft)
Outlet Control
Depth (ft)
Flow Type
Normal Depth (ft)
Critical Depth (ft)
Outlet Depth (ft)
Tailwater Depth (ft)
Outlet Velocity
(ft/s)
10-yr 14.80 14.80 3344.28 1.677 0.0* 5-S2n 0.962 1.050 0.962 0.451 5.994
25-yr 20.40 20.40 3344.88 2.281 2.214 7-M2c 1.500 1.229 1.229 0.535 6.584
Inlet Elevation (invert): 3342.60 ft, Outlet Elevation (invert): 3341.35 ft
Culvert Length: 44.02 ft, Culvert Slope: 0.0284
Culvert Data Summary - Culvert 1
Barrel Shape: Circular
Barrel Diameter: 1.50 ft
Barrel Material: Corrugated Steel
Embedment: 0.00 in
Barrel Manning's n: 0.0240
Culvert Type: Straight
Inlet Configuration: Square Edge with Headwall
Inlet Depression: None
Site Data - Culvert 1
Site Data Option: Culvert Invert Data
Inlet Station: 0.00 ft
Inlet Elevation: 3342.60 ft
Outlet Station: 44.00 ft
Outlet Elevation: 3341.35 ft
Number of Barrels: 2
Table 2 - Downstream Channel Rating Curve (Crossing: 434+62 Proposed Dual)
Elev (ft)
Depth (ft) Velocity (ft/s) Shear (psf) Froude Number
14.80 3341.80 0.45 5.65 2.11 1.70
20.40 3341.88 0.53 6.21 2.50 1.74
Tailwater Channel Data - 434+62 Proposed Dual
Bottom Width: 4.00 ft
Side Slope (H:V): 4.00 (_:1)
Channel Slope: 0.0750
Channel Manning's n: 0.0350
Channel Invert Elevation: 3341.35 ft
Roadway Data for Crossing: 434+62 Proposed Dual
Roadway Profile Shape: Constant Roadway Elevation
Crest Length: 100.00 ft
Crest Elevation: 3344.95 ft
Riprap Sizing
Reference: FHWA HEC14 Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels Ch.10
*Round up to nearest value in Table 10.1
*Choose based on D50 and Table 10.1
Outlet Pipe Size (ft) Design Discharge TW Depth G (ft/s^2) D50 (ft) D50 (IN) D50 Selected (IN) Class Length (FT) Depth (IN) Width at Outlet (FT) Width at End
STA 275 EX * 2.75 11.00 1.25 32.20 0.10 0.55 0.08 2.20 1.20 5.00 1 11 17.50 9.0 13.0
STA 275 PR 4 * 4.75 19.00 1.25 32.20 0.10 0.95 0.03 3.80 1.20 5.00 1 19 17.50 15.0 22.0
STA 358 2.00 12.50 1.21 32.20 0.19 0.40 0.28 1.65 2.26 5.00 1 8 17.50 6.0 9.0
STA 435 PR 2 * 2.50 20.40 1.00 32.20 0.32 0.50 0.26 2.50 3.90 10.00 3 10 24.00 8.0 12.0
*supercritical D'
4 pipes, extend riprap 3' either side of outer pipes at outlet and 5' at end
* Riprap placed to fit erosion in this location, calucalations done as a check
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .