SCRSRF CMGC EvaluationScoreMatrix ITA.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 39 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Sole Source** Replacement Process Valves
- Solicitation number
- S-KS0043-00006519
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an evaluation score matrix for a Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) solicitation issued by an unnamed public agency for the South Coast Regional Seismic Ready Facility project (RFP Number S-73000-00006520). The evaluation process included five team members who scored proposals across multiple criteria categories, conducted interviews with shortlisted firms, and evaluated cost submissions. Two contractors advanced to the final evaluation phase: Gerding Builders and Bremik Construction. The evaluation encompassed technical criteria including general construction experience, CM/GC experience, specialized building types, project team qualifications, pre-construction and construction service plans, and project scheduling with a maximum proposal score of 215 points. Interview evaluations were conducted separately with a maximum score of 150 points.
Gerding Builders was selected as the highest-ranked firm with a final score of 365 points, combining proposal (164 points), interview (122 points), and cost (79 points) evaluations. Gerding Builders submitted a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) of $38,000,000 with total CM/GC costs of $4,789,275, including preconstruction services of $122,050, a CM/GC fee of $1,425,000 (3.75%), bonding and insurance of $672,600 (1.77%), and general conditions of $2,569,625. Bremik Construction ranked second with a final score of 326 points and submitted a lower total CM/GC cost of $4,541,964 with an identical GMP of $38,000,000, but received a higher cost score (99 versus 79) due to reduced line-item costs across preconstruction services, CM/GC fees, and general conditions.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| DeZurik Sole Source Posting.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Summary Scores
| RFP Number: S-73000-00006520 Project Name: South Coast Regional Seismic Ready Facility CM/GC Service |
| EVALUATION SCORE SUMMARY |
| FINAL SCORES (with COST SCORES if applicable) |
| Proposal | Interview | Cost Scores | Final Scores | ||
| Firm | Average | Average | Rank | ||
| Gerding Builders | 164 | 122 | 79 | 365 | 1 |
Bremik Constructioon 143 84 99 326 2
Ver 10/20/16
Shortlist for Interviews Phase 1 Scores Technical & Cost
| Firm | Technical Average | Cost Scores | Total | Rank | |
| Gerding Builders | 164 | 1 | 79 | 243 | 1 |
Bremik Construction 143 1 99 242 2
Costs
| Gerding GMP | $38,000,000.00 | |||
| Cost % | ||||
| Preconstruction Services | $122,050.00 | 13 | ||
| CM/GC Fee % | $1,425,000.00 | 3.75% | 27 | |
| Bonding and Insurance % | $672,600.00 | 1.77% | 10 | |
| General Conditions | $2,569,625.00 | 29 | ||
| Total CMGC Costs | $4,789,275.00 | Total Score | 79 | |
| Bremik GMP | $38,000,000.00 | |||
| Cost % | ||||
| Preconstruction Services | $54,450.00 | 30 | ||
| CM/GC Fee % | $1,273,000.00 | 3.35% | 30 | |
| Bonding and Insurance % | $767,600.00 | 2.02% | 9 | |
| General Conditions | $2,446,914.00 | 30 | ||
| Total CMGC Costs | $4,541,964.00 | Total Score | 99 |
Proposal Detail Scores
| SOP SCORE DETAILS | ||||||||
| Proposal Evaluation Detail Scores | Enter actual number of evaluators: | 5 | ||||||
| Evaluation Team | Average Score | |||||||
| Maximum | ||||||||
| Score | evaluator 1 | evaluator 2 | evaluator 3 | evaluator 4 | evaluator 5 | |||
| 1 | Gerding Builders | |||||||
| General Construction Experience (Max 5 Pts each project) | 15 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 10 | |
| CM/GC Experience (Max. 10 pts. Each project) | 30 | 22 | 24 | 22 | 24 | 18 | 22 | |
| Pre-Engineered Metal Buildings and Steel Framed Office Construction (Max 5 pts each project) | 25 | 19 | 24 | 19 | 19 | 15 | 19 | |
| Retaining Walls (Max. 5 pts. Each) | 15 | 15 | 14 | 10 | 11 | 9 | 12 | |
| Mass Grading (Max. 5 pts. Each) | 10 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | |
| Project Team Approach | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | |
| Contractor's Organizational Chart and Team | 10 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 8 | |
| Project Manager Resume | 10 | 10 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | |
| Superintendent Resume | 10 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 8 | |
| Project Engineer Resume | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | |
| Cost Estimator Resume | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | |
| QE/QC Manager Resume | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |
| Plan to Complete Pre-Construction Services | 20 | 20 | 16 | 16 | 12 | 16 | 16 | |
| Development of GMP | 10 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| Plan to Complete Construction Services | 25 | 25 | 20 | 20 | 15 | 20 | 20 | |
| Project Schedule Outline | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | |
| Project Schedule Narrative | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| Mitigation Strategies | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | |
| Total | 215 | 193 | 183 | 154 | 148 | 143 | 164 |
| Evaluation Team | Average Score | |||||||
| Maximum | ||||||||
| Score | evaluator 1 | evaluator 2 | evaluator 3 | evaluator 4 | evaluator 5 | |||
| 1 | Bremik Construction |
Administrator: Scoring deductions, if any, are provided by OPO after eval committee has completed SOP evaluation and scoring.
Enter scoring deduction as percentage; i.e., "2%". (See Required Items section of RFP.)
Administrator: Scoring deductions, if any, are provided by OPO after eval committee has completed SOP evaluation and scoring.
| Enter scoring deduction as percentage; i.e., "2%". (See Required Items section of RFP.) | General Construction Experience (Max 5 Pts each project) | 15 | 6 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 9 | 10 | |||
| CM/GC Experience (Max. 10 pts. Each project) | 30 | 18 | 24 | 20 | 18 | 18 | 20 | ||||
| Pre-Engineered Metal Buildings and Steel Framed Office Construction (Max 5 pts each project) | 25 | 12 | 20 | 18 | 17 | 12 | 16 | ||||
| Retaining Walls (Max. 5 pts. Each) | 15 | 8 | 11 | 9 | 10 | 6 | 9 | ||||
| Mass Grading (Max. 5 pts. Each) | 10 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 7 | ||||
| Project Team Approach | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| Contractor's Organizational Chart and Team | 10 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | ||||
| Project Manager Resume | 10 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 | ||||
| Superintendent Resume | 10 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 7 | ||||
| Project Engineer Resume | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| Cost Estimator Resume | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| QE/QC Manager Resume | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| Plan to Complete Pre-Construction Services | 20 | 12 | 20 | 20 | 16 | 12 | 16 | ||||
| Development of GMP | 10 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 8 | ||||
| Plan to Complete Construction Services | 25 | 15 | 25 | 20 | 20 | 15 | 19 | ||||
| Project Schedule Outline | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| Project Schedule Narrative | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| Mitigation Strategies | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | ||||
| Total | 215 | 122 | 174 | 154 | 142 | 125 | 143 |
Interview Detail Scores
| INTERVIEW SCORE DETAILS | ||||||||
| 150 Points Total | Enter actual number of interview evaluators: | 5 | ||||||
| Evaluation Team | ||||||||
| Maximum | Interview Average Score | |||||||
| Score | evaluator 1 | evaluator 2 | evaluator 3 | evaluator 4 | evaluator 5 | |||
| Gerding Builders | ||||||||
| Proposer's Presentation | 30 | 30 | 24 | 18 | 24 | 24 | 24 | |
| Eval criterion/question A | 20 | 20 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 12 | 16 | |
| Eval criterion/question B | 20 | 20 | 20 | 16 | 12 | 12 | 16 | |
| Eval criterion/question C | 20 | 20 | 20 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 18 | |
| Eval criterion/question D | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 12 | 16 | 18 | |
| Eval criterion/question E | 20 | 20 | 12 | 16 | 16 | 12 | 15 | |
| Eval criterion/question F | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 | |
| Proposer's Closing Statement | 10 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| TOTAL | 150 | 148 | 128 | 118 | 112 | 106 | 122 |
| Evaluation Team | |||||||
| Maximum | |||||||
| Score | evaluator 1 | evaluator 2 | evaluator 3 | evaluator 4 | evaluator 5 | ||
| Bremik Construction | |||||||
| Proposer's Presentation | 30 | 18 | 18 | 24 | 6 | 12 | 16 |
| Eval criterion/question A | 20 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 12 |
| Eval criterion/question B | 20 | 8 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 11 |
| Eval criterion/question C | 20 | 12 | 8 | 16 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| Eval criterion/question D | 20 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 10 |
| Eval criterion/question E | 20 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 8 | 10 |
| Eval criterion/question F | 10 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| Proposer's Closing Statement | 10 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| TOTAL | 150 | 76 | 76 | 108 | 80 | 80 | 84 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .