Score Sheet SOI Structural Engineer.pdf

PDF 50 KB Posted

Attached to
0002 RFQ - SOI Structural Engineering Assessment - Classroom Building WW2 Airbase
Solicitation number
PE-66812-NONST-2027-000000078
Issued by
Columbia County, Georgia

About this file

This is an evaluation score sheet for a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) issued by the City of Douglas, Georgia for structural engineering assessment services at a World War II Flight Training Base classroom building. The RFQ seeks a qualified structural engineer to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the historic building, evaluating its structural integrity across masonry, reinforced concrete, wood, and steel components. The project encompasses adaptive reuse and historic preservation considerations, requiring the selected firm to develop recommendations for treatment and restoration aligned with preservation standards and potentially federal funding requirements.

The evaluation criteria assigns points across seven categories totaling 100 maximum points: specialized experience and Georgia engineering licensure (25 points), qualifications of the project team including resumes and credentials (20 points), historic preservation experience with at least three comparable projects completed within ten years (20 points), project approach and methodology understanding (15 points), past performance and references (10 points), capacity to perform and personnel availability (5 points), and fee proposal with itemized expenses and deliverables (5 points). The scoring guidelines range from excellent qualifications (22-25 points) to poor qualifications (0-7 points). Evaluators complete the score sheet by assigning points in each category, providing comments on strengths and weaknesses, and making a ranking recommendation among first, second, third, or not recommended.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
BID DOCUMENT MASTER.pdf PDF
RFQ SOI Structural Engineer 2026.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CITY OF DOUGLAS, GEORGIA

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)

SOI Structural Engineering Assessment Classroom Building

World War II Flight Training Base

EVALUATION SCORE SHEET

Evaluator: ___________________________________ Date: __________________

Firm Being Evaluated: __________________________________________

Firm Address: ______________________________________________________________________

Maximum Score: 100 Points

Evaluation Criteria Maximum Points

Score

1. Specialized Experience and License Firm information; Copy of Georgia Engineering License; Experience completing structural assessments of historic buildings, masonry, reinforced concrete, wood and steel structures; experience with adaptive reuse and historic preservation projects.

25 _____

2. Qualifications of Project Team Resumes, Education, licenses, certifications, and experience of the Structural Engineer and key personnel assigned to this project;

Description of team organization and responsibilities; Additional consideration for personnel meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards.

20 _____

3. Historic Preservation Experience Description of at least three comparable historic preservation or structural assessment projects completed within the last ten years;

Experience working with National Register properties, Georgia local governments, State Historic Preservation Offices (SHPO), Georgia Department of Community Affairs, federally funded preservation projects, WWII-era buildings, and compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties.

20 _____

4. Project Approach and Understanding Demonstrated understanding of the project objectives, proposed methodology, investigation techniques, testing procedures, report format, recommendations, and schedule.

15 _____

5. Past Performance and References Quality of previous work, client satisfaction, ability to complete projects on schedule and within scope, responsiveness, and references from similar projects. Included references contact information.

10 _____

6. Capacity to Perform Current workload, availability of key personnel, ability to meet project schedule, and local/regional resources.

5 _____

7. Fee Proposal Lump-sum fee to include breakdown (itemized) list of anticipated expenses and deliverables.

5 _____

TOTAL SCORE

Total Points Awarded: ________ / 100

SCORING GUIDELINES

22–25 Points (Excellent): Qualifications significantly exceed requirements with extensive directly relevant experience.

18–21 Points (Very Good) : Qualifications exceed requirements with substantial relevant experience.

14–17 Points (Good): Meets requirements with adequate relevant experience.

8–13 Points (Fair): Meets minimum qualifications but has limited directly applicable experience.

0–7 Points (Poor): Fails to demonstrate adequate qualifications or relevant experience.

Evaluator Comments

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Questions/Clarifications:

Recommended Ranking:

☐ 1st

☐ 2nd

☐ 3rd

☐ Not Recommended

Evaluator Signature: ______________________________________________

Date: _____________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .