Schedule E - Account Management Satisfaction Survey.doc
DOC document 162 KB Posted
- Attached to
- HMO Services for MPSERS
- Solicitation number
- RFP 171 190000002803 2
- Issued by
- Michigan
About this file
This is a Contractor Performance Evaluation document for the Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (MPSERS) used to assess account management satisfaction across five key operational areas. The evaluation employs a five-point Likert scale ranging from Strongly Agree (5) to Strongly Disagree (1), with respondents required to provide comments for any ratings of 3 or below. The five evaluation sections assess: Senior Account Manager performance across 23 competency areas including responsiveness, professionalism, problem-solving, and knowledge of industry and MPSERS operations; Member Communications quality, including development, accuracy, and timeliness; Data Reporting effectiveness, covering routine and ad hoc reports, collaboration, transparency, and on-time delivery; Member Services Management addressing customer service quality, issue escalation, accurate messaging, and appropriate resource routing; and Product Management and Administrative Support focusing on clinical and financial management, process improvement, and project completion. Contractors must achieve an overall score of 4.00 across all sections to comply with the Service Level Agreement requirements.
The evaluation document does not contain pricing information, set-asides, award dates, contract terms, renewal options, or funding sources. Rather, it functions as a performance measurement tool administered by MPSERS to monitor ongoing contractor compliance and service delivery quality throughout the contract period. The scoring mechanism provides MPSERS with quantifiable data on contractor performance across administrative, communications, reporting, member services, and product management functions, enabling the organization to track performance against established service level expectations and identify areas requiring improvement or additional organizational support.
View the file
Other files
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System
Contractor Performance Evaluation for (year) The following survey gauges your Account Management satisfaction level. For each section, rate your satisfaction level using the 5 point scale provided, Strongly Agree (5) to Strongly Disagree (1). Provide comments at the end of each section for any statement you rate “3” or below. To comply with the Service Level Agreement, an overall score of 4.00 must be achieved.
Section I: Please rate your agreement with the following statements about your Senior Account Manager.
| Statement |
| Strongly Agree |
Somewhat
Agree
Neutral
Somewhat
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
My Account Manager….
· is making a positive contribution to my business
· is a good listener
· is professional and pleasant to work with
· is reliable
· is good at establishing rapport with others
· returns my calls/emails promptly
· can be reached when needed
· addresses urgent issues in a timely manner
· makes my needs a priority
· is knowledgeable about industry trends
· is knowledgeable about MPSERS-related operations
· is a good problem solver
· tries to anticipate my needs
· proactively recommends solutions
· follows through on issues until they are resolved
· makes competent decisions to effectively administer the contract
· is supported by the Contractor organization to effectively administer the contract
· leverages the Contractor’s resources to effectively administer the contract
· presents information professionally, clearly and concisely
· writes professionally, clearly and concisely
· clearly communicates meeting objectives in advance of meetings
· provides meaningful status updates and follows up on assignments until they are complete
· treats me like a long-term valued partner
Total:
Overall rating (average):
Comments for ratings 3 or below:
Section II: Please rate your agreement with the following statements about Member Communications.
| Statement |
| Strongly Agree |
Somewhat
Agree
Neutral
Somewhat
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
Member Communications are…
· developed in a manner that meet the ORS’ business needs
· well written, relevant, innovative, accurate and informative
· developed in a manner that is consultative, dynamic, flexible and adaptive to the needs of the ORS and its membership
· submitted to the ORS with sufficient review time to avoid mailing delays
Total:
Overall rating (average):
Comments for ratings 3 or below:
Section III: Please rate your agreement with the following statements about Data Reporting
| Statement |
| Strongly Agree |
Somewhat
Agree
Neutral
Somewhat
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
· Routine and ad hoc reports add value and meet the ORS’ business needs
· Report management promotes collaboration with the ORS’s business partners
· Report management is consultative, transparent, and solution-driven
· Reports are delivered on time based on Contract language and business needs
Total:
Overall rating (average):
Comments for ratings 3 or below:
Section IV: Please rate your agreement with the following statements about Member Services Management (Customer Service)
| Statement |
| Strongly Agree |
Somewhat
Agree
Neutral
Somewhat
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
I see evidence that...
· MPSERS membership consistently receives excellent customer services
· member issues are escalated appropriately to ensure timely and accurate handling, including advisement of rights afforded under the Plan
· MPSERS messaging and directives are accurately delivered in member seminars, retiree organization meetings, etc.
· the Member Services team works effectively with ORS in problem resolution
· the onsite Group Representative is courteous and willing to work with ORS in resolving issues
NA
· the Contractor correctly routes member issues to the appropriate resources
Total:
Overall rating (average):
Comments for ratings 3 or below:
Section V: Please rate your agreement with the following statements about Product Management and Administrative Support
| Statement |
| Strongly Agree |
Somewhat
Agree
Neutral
Somewhat
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Not Applicable
The Contractor...
· focuses on improving member health and reducing total member cost in a manner that is consistent with plan design and board intent
NA
· effectively manages the Plan’s medical/clinical aspects to maximize savings to the System
NA
· addresses ORS financial inquiries timely and accurately (invoices, settlements, SLA penalties, etc.)
· exhibits a sense of urgency to correct financial discrepancies
· improves internal processes to better meet performance standards
· provides robust and responsive administrative support from all departments within its organization (Finance, IT, Communications, etc.)
· presents Strategic initiative proposals and strategies to improve quality, increase member satisfaction and/or lower Plan cost
NA
· takes appropriate actions to complete projects and other activities on schedule
Total:
Overall rating (average):
Comments for ratings 3 or below:
Overall Score
| Section |
| Rating |
I. Account Management
II. Member Communications
III. Data Reporting
IV. Member Services Management
V. Product Management and Administrative Support
Total:
Overall rating (average):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .