Attachment 2 Questions and Answer_20220926.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 13 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SBS0035
- Issued by
-
Defense Information Systems Agency
View the file
Other files
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Answers 20220923
| FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | |||
| HC101322R0005 | |||
| ATTACHMENT 2 - QUESTION TEMPLATE | |||
| Question # | Questions / Comments | RFP Reference | Government Response |
| 001 | Would the government provide the PWS in word format for vendor utilization in replying to the RFP? | Document "HC101322R0005" PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT | Posted MS Word version of the PWS to sam.gov RFP listing. |
| 002 | Table L2.5.1 lists the Volume 2 contents as: Technical/management Volume - 20 Pages Service Readiness (Gate) (Factor 1) - 5 Pages Example Service Management Plan (Factor 2) - 15 Pages Are these 3 separate sections totaling 40 pages of content or do the 5 pages for Factor 1 and the 15 pages for Factor 2 total 20 pages of content for the volume? | HC101322R0005L2.5.1Page 162 | The Technical/Management volume is in addition to the factor page limitations of (Factor 1 (5), Factor 2 (15) requirements. The Technical Volume should be no more than 40 pages, apart from exclusions previously allowed in Section L. |
| 003 | Section M2.1(b) states in part "Offerors shall submit an Example Service Management Plan as part of their proposal. The Government will evaluate whether the Example Service Management Plan sufficiently meets the following requirements…"What criteria will evaluators apply to determine if the Example Service Management Plan sufficiently meets these requirements? | HC101322R0005M2.1(b)Page 172 | Section M2.2 states how the offeror will be rated acceptable, The Government’s technical evaluation team will evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described below in Table 2-1 for each subfactor. Proposals must address all the criteria in Section M2.1 to be rated “Acceptable.” M2.1(b) will be used to evaluate whether the Example Service Management Plan sufficiently meets the following requirements listed under PWS Section 6.6.10: |
| 004 | The SAM.Gov posting does not include the CDRLs. |
• Section L2.3 (page 161) states in part “The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the Performance Work Statement (PWS), and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL).”
• Section L2.7 (page 164) states in part “The offeror shall fill out the Requirements Traceability Matrix Attachment 4 of this RFP indicating the proposal reference information as it relates to the RFP, PWS, CLIN numbers, and CDRL references found therein.”
• In our read of the solicitation package, no Contract Data Requirements List was provided. In the remainder of the package, only one CDRL (CDRL 0018) is referenced (Table 6-4, page 30), the numbering of which suggests that there are additional CDRLs not mentioned in the text.
• In order to ensure bidder compliance with the instructions, will the Government provide the complete Contract Data Requirements List? HC101322R0005 L2.3 Page 161 L2.7 Page 164 Table 6-4 Page 30 Reference to CDRLs in the PLEO RFP is an error; there is no CDRL List for this procurement. All deliverables associated with the PLEO PWS are defined in PWS Table 6-3 Task 7, Initial Task Order Deliverables; PWS Table 6-4, Section 6 Deliverables and Table 7-3, Section 7 Deliverables. The following changes will be made to the RFP:
1. Parenthetical reference to CDRL 0018 in Table 6-4 (RFP Page 30) will be removed. 2. Reference to Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) in section L2.3 a. (page 161) of RFP will be removed.
3. Reference to Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) in second paragraph of section L2.7 (page 164) of RFP will be removed.
005 Page 124 of the RFP lists attachment 9 Acronym list. Would the government add this to the attachment provided? (We only see 8 attachments) Section J - List of Attachments Acronym List attachment reference is in error no acronym list was provided, acronyms are spelled out with first use in the documentation. Reference will be removed.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .