Past_Performance_Questionnaire_NEHRP_IDIQ_2013.doc
DOC document 61 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SB1341-13-RP-0080
About this file
See attached Microsoft Word version of Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| REVISED_SB1341-13-RP-0080.pdf | ||
| Amendment_001.pdf | ||
| RFP_SB1341-13-RP-0080.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE
(SEE FAR 3.104)
RFP #SB1341-13-RP-0080
Template for Past Performance Information Questionnaire
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
SOLICITATION NO. SB1341-13-RP-0080
PART I: FOR COMPLETION BY OFFEROR
Instructions:
The Offeror shall complete all items set forth in this Part I for each past performance information reference and return the completed forms with the proposal.
The Offeror shall also coordinate with their identified references, supplying them with the completed Part I and a blank Part II for completion, sufficiently in advance of the due date identified in Part II. The Government may contact the Offeror’s references after proposals are received to obtain any Part II documents that are not submitted by the proposal due date and time and/or to discuss their submissions to ensure a clear understanding of their evaluation.
Name and address of company being evaluated:
Name of customer firm/agency for which the referenced work was performed:
| Description of firm/agency (check one): |
| Commercial (for Profit) FORMCHECKBOX |
Federal Government FORMCHECKBOX
Local/State Government FORMCHECKBOX
Address of customer firm/agency:
Name, title, employer, and contact information for individual providing reference:
Referenced contract/order number:
Period of performance for referenced contract/order:
Contract/order award date:
Contract/order amount (including options exercised):
| Contract type: |
| Fixed-Price FORMCHECKBOX |
Cost Plus Incentive Fee FORMCHECKBOX
Labor-Hour FORMCHECKBOX
Cost Plus Award Fee FORMCHECKBOX
Cost Plus Fixed Fee FORMCHECKBOX
Time-and-Materials FORMCHECKBOX
| Was the Offeror for which this reference is being provided the Prime Contractor? |
| Yes FORMCHECKBOX |
No FORMCHECKBOX
Description of the contract/order work:
Relevance of the contract/order work to the work described in RFP SB1341-13-RP-0080:
PART II: FOR COMPLETION BY OFFEROR’S PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION REFERENCE
Instructions:
References are asked to complete all items set forth in this Part II and should submit the completed form ELECTRONICALLY so that it is received no later than August 1, 2013 at 12:00 pm EST at:
Email: divya.soni@nist.gov
All submissions of this Part should reference Solicitation number SB1341-13-RP-0080 in the email Subject Line.
Background Information
Name of respondent:
Position and title:
Employer name:
Employer’s address:
| Contact information: |
| Telephone: |
| Fax: |
| e-mail: |
Name of Contractor for which information is being provided:
Referenced Contract/Order Number for which information is being provided:
Basis of qualification to evaluate Contractor’s past performance:
Names of key Contractor personnel:
Evaluation
For each performance element identified below, references should evaluate performance of the firm or individual identified in Part 1 of this form. Where the reference lacks sufficient information to provide an evaluation for a particular performance element, this should be noted. Where any deficiency or unfavorable information is identified, the reference should identify any mitigating factors that may weigh in favor of the person/firm on whose behalf the reference is provided (i.e., problems due to causes outside the contractor’s control). An individual within your organization who is knowledgeable of the Contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall performance should complete this questionnaire. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge of the Contractor’s performance with the judgment of others within their organization, as applicable.
Date this questionnaire was completed:
Please provide answers to the questions listed below. When responding to the questions listed, provide the letter that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation (see the “ratings” chart below for a description of each letter). For any marginal or unacceptable rating, please provide explanatory narratives in the “Remarks” section at the bottom of this questionnaire. These remarks need not be lengthy, just detailed. If more space is required, attach additional pages. Handwritten responses to this questionnaire are acceptable. However, if responses are handwritten, please print legibly.
Definitions of Potential Ratings for Questions Below:
| Adjective |
| Description |
| Outstanding (O) |
| Possessing outstanding quality or merit, remarkably good. |
| Highly Satisfactory (HS) |
| Possessing more than satisfactory quality or merit. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| Possessing satisfactory quality or merit. |
| Marginal (M) |
| Possessing limited quality or merit. |
| Unacceptable (U) |
| Possessing inadequate quality or merit. |
| Neutral (N) |
| Reference has no knowledge of Contractor’s past performance in this area, reference has insufficient information to provide a rating in this area, or question does not apply to the referenced contract. |
1) QUALITY OF REPORTS AND SERVICE
Contractor’s ability to meet technical requirements specified in contract
Contractor’s ability to effectively control the quality of reports and services provided
2) DAY-TO-DAY MANAGEMENT
Contractor’s ability to manage its financial and human resources to meet contract requirements
Contractor’s ability to effectively manage the contract/order from a contract administration standpoint
Contractor’s professionalism and business acumen
3) STAFF RETENTION
Contractor’s ability to retain key personnel to within reasonable levels of turnover
4) TIMELINESS
Contractor’s ability to meet timeliness requirements for contract deliverables
Contractor’s ability to meet schedule milestones when unanticipated events occur
5) COST CONTROL
Contractor’s ability to manage its resources within cost limitations set forth in the contract
Contractor’s ability to accurately track and report costs as required by the contract
6) MEETING PROJECT DEADLINES
Contractor’s ability to meet project deadlines in a multi-disciplinary, multi-project environment
OVERALL RATING:
Remarks:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .