Past Performance.doc

DOC document 44 KB Posted

Attached to
Support for Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership
Solicitation number
SB1341-12-RP-0026
Issued by

About this file

See attached Word version of Past Performance questionnaire.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
REVISED RFP SB1341-12-RP-0026.pdf PDF
Amendment 002-SB1341-12-RP-0026.pdf PDF
Past_Performance_Information_Questionnaire.doc DOC document
Amendment 001-SB1341-12-RP-0026.pdf PDF
SB1341-12-RP-0026.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FOR COMPLETION BY OFFEROR’S PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION REFERENCE

Instructions:

References are asked to complete all items set forth in this Part II and should submit the completed form ELECTRONICALLY so that it is received no later than June 21, 2012 at 12:00 pm EST at:

Email: divya.soni@nist.gov

All submissions of this Part should reference Solicitation number SB1341-12-RP-0026 in the email Subject Line.

Background Information

Name of respondent:

Position and title:

Employer name:

Employer’s address:

Contact information:
Telephone:
Fax:
e-mail:

Referenced Contract/Order Number for which information is being provided:

Basis of qualification to evaluate Contractor’s past performance:

Names of key Contractor personnel:

Evaluation

For each performance element identified below, references should evaluate performance of the firm or individual identified in Part 1 of this form. Where the reference lacks sufficient information to provide an evaluation for a particular performance element, this should be noted. Where any deficiency or unfavorable information is identified, the reference should identify any mitigating factors that may weigh in favor of the person/firm on whose behalf the reference is provided (i.e., problems due to causes outside the contractor’s control). An individual within your organization who is knowledgeable of the Contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall performance should complete this questionnaire. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge of the Contractor’s performance with the judgment of others within their organization, as applicable.

Date this questionnaire was completed:

Please provide answers to the questions listed below. When responding to the questions listed, circle the letter that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation (see the “ratings” chart below for a description of each letter). For any marginal or unacceptable rating, please provide explanatory narratives in the “Remarks” section at the bottom of this questionnaire. These remarks need not be lengthy, just detailed. If more space is required, attach additional pages. Handwritten responses to this questionnaire are acceptable. However, if responses are handwritten, please print legibly.

Definitions of Potential Ratings for Questions Below:

Adjective
Description
Exceptional (E)
Possessing outstanding quality or merit, remarkably good.
Good (G)
Possessing more than satisfactory quality or merit.
Acceptable (A)
Possessing adequate quality or merit.
Marginal (M)
Possessing limited quality or merit.
Unacceptable (U)
Possessing inadequate quality or merit.
Not Applicable (N/A)
Reference has no knowledge of Contractor’s past performance in this area, reference has insufficient information to provide a rating in this area, or question does not apply to the referenced contract.

1)QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE

Contractor’s ability to meet minimum quality requirements specified in contract

E G A M U N/A

Contractor’s ability to effectively control the quality of products or services provided

E G A M U N/A

2)DAY TO DAY MANAGEMENT

Contractor’s ability to manage its financial and human resources to meet contract requirements

E G A M U N/A

Contractor’s ability to effectively manage the contract/order from a contract administration standpoint

E G A M U N/A

Contractor’s professionalism and business acumen

E G A M U N/A

3)STAFF RETENTION

Contractor’s ability to retain quality staff to within reasonable levels of turnover

E G A M U N/A

4)TIMELINESS

Contractor’s ability to meet timeliness requirements for contract deliverables

E G A M U N/A

Contractor’s ability to mitigate schedule risk when unanticipated events occur

E G A M U N/A

5)COST CONTROL

Contractor’s ability to manage its resources within cost limitations set forth in the contract (assuming no growth in requirements)

E G A M U N/A

Contractor’s ability to adequately and accurately track and report costs as required by the contract

E G A M U N/A

6)MEETING PROJECT DEADLINES

Contractor’s ability to meet project deadlines in a multidisciplinary environment

E G A M U N/A

OVERALL RATING: E G A M U

Remarks:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .