SATPC0036126 Tab 06 BNJ Redacted.pdf
PDF 275 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 80NSSC24879074Q
About this file
This document is a Brand Name Justification (BNJ) for the acquisition of the ASM FS200 raised floor access panel system. The justification states that the ASM FS200 system is a unique concrete-filled flooring solution commonly used at the Langley Research Center, and leveraging this common system allows for spare usage and familiarity among facilities. Using a different flooring system would not provide this commonality and could increase maintenance and operations times. The total estimated cost is [Dollar Amount] with a period of performance through November 1, 2024. This BNJ is being provided in support of the related federal contract opportunity to purchase and install a raised floor in the Direct Connect control room, which has a solicitation number of 80NSSC24879074Q.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SATPC0036126 Tab 04 4 SOW.pdf | ||
| SATPC0036126 Tab 10 Open Market RFQ.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Page 1 V2.0 3-15-2017
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER
RECOMMENDATION AND DETERMINATION TO SOLICIT FROM ONE SOURCE
OR BRAND NAME
PICK ONE
Sole Source:
I recommend that NASA, NASA Shared Services Center negotiate with Vendor Name only for Supply or Service to be procured. The total estimated cost of this effort is Dollar Amount and the estimated period of performance is Date.
OR
Brand Name Justification:
I recommend that NASA, NASA Shared Services Center negotiate with only with vendors who can provide the subject band name from ASM Modular Systems, Inc. for ASM FS200 raised floor access panel system. The total estimated cost of this effort is and the estimated period of performance or lead-time for delivery is November 1, 2024 completion.
This recommendation is for the acquisition of supplies or services determined to be reasonably available from only one source/only one manufacture. Competition is impractical for the following reasons (please answer the questions below):
1. What are the reasons for soliciting only the suggested source/suggested brand name? Please provide the unique characteristics of the items or services along with the supporting rationale and the market research performed to substantiate your reason for the suggested source/brand name.
The ASM FS200 is a unique concrete-filled flooring system commonly used at the Langley Research Center in data processing centers and facility control rooms. The system uses 2’x2’ panels designed to fit on corner stanchions bonded to the underlying surface. This system allows flexible configuration of cable runs underneath the floor. Using a flooring system common among Langley facilitates spare usage among facilities and familiarity with the system when performing maintenance or enhancements.
2. What is the impact to the government if another vendor/brand is used? Include any dollar, schedule, or compatibility impacts if possible.
Using a flooring system other than the ASM FS200 will not allow the facility to leverage the commonality shared with other LaRC facilities since flooring panels from different manufacturers are not typically interchangeable. Unfamiliarity with maintenance and usage of other floor systems may increase maintenance and operations times.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Page 2 V3.0 01/18/2023
****FOR NSSC SAT USE ONLY****
The above justification in pursuant to one of the following (only select one):
- Recommendation and Determination to Solicit from One Source (RDSS): For open market purchases, pursuant to FAR 5.101(a)(1), the proposed contract action will be placed on SAM.gov under the authority of FAR 13.106 - 1(b)(1)(i).
- Recommendation and Determination to Solicit from One Source (RDSS): For open market purchases, pursuant to FAR 5.101(a)(2), the proposed contraction action was not placed on SAM.gov as oral solicitation will be used to solicit quotation under the authority of FAR 13.106-1(c).
- Recommendation and Determination to Solicit from One Source (RDSS): For open market purchases, pursuant to FAR 5.202(a)(2), the proposed contract action is exempt from publication on SAM.gov because the government would be seriously injured if the Agency complies with the time periods specified in FAR 5.203.
- Brand Name Justification (BNJ): For open market purchases, pursuant to FAR 13.106-1(b)(1)(i), the acquisition of the referenced brand name item is hereby justified. (Under $25,000)
- Brand Name Justification (BNJ): For open market purchases, pursuant to FAR 13.106-1(b)(1)(i), the acquisition of the referenced brand name item is hereby justified. Pursuant to FAR 5.201, any contract action over $25,000 shall be synopsized in the Government wide Point of Entry (GPE) and the brand name justification must be attached.
SEWP/IDIQ Brand Name Justification (BNJ): For schedule/IDIQ purchases, pursuant to FAR 16.505(4)(i)(ii), the acquisition of the referenced brand name item(s) is hereby justified. (under $30,000)
SEWP/IDIQ Brand Name Justification (BNJ): For schedule/IDIQ purchases, pursuant to FAR 16.505(a)(4)(i)(ii)(iii)(A), the acquisition of the referenced brand name item(s) is hereby justified. Any action over $30,000 the brand name shall be posted on the agency website used to solicit offers for orders.
- Limited Source Justification (LSJ) Sole Source: For GSA orders, pursuant to FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(B), only one source is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services are unique or highly specialized. Action will be performed against GSA Contract ___________________.
- Limited Source Justification (LSJ) Brand Name: For GSA orders, pursuant to FAR 8.405-6(b), the item is peculiar to one manufacturer. A brand name item, whether available on one or more schedule contracts, is an item peculiar to one manufacturer.
- Exception to Fair Opportunity (EFO): For SEWP orders or orders placed against other IDIQ contracts, under the authority of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) and Pursuant to FAR 16.505(b), exemption under FAR 16.505(b)(2) used is based on the following:
(A) The agency need for the supplies or services is so urgent that providing a fair opportunity would result in unacceptable delays
(B) Only one awardee is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services ordered are unique or highly specialized.
(C) The order must be issued on a sole-source basis in the interest of economy and efficiency because it is a logical follow-on to an order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given a fair opportunity to be considered for the original order.
I hereby accept the above stated recommendation and determine that the circumstances of the contract action deem only one source reasonably available.
X
Contracting Officer
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .