Past_Performance_Reference_SAQMMA14R0172.doc
DOC document 45 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Integrated Pest Management Services
- Solicitation number
- SAQMMA14R0172
About this file
Attachment 1 Past Performance Survey
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| A002_tables_ _iists_in_word_document.pdf | ||
| lists_ _tables_from_sections_B_ _L.docx | DOCX document | |
| Questions_ _Answers_for_SAQMMA14R0172_A-001.pdf | ||
| Contractors_release.doc | DOC document | |
| Pest_Management_Services_Solicitation_SAQMMA14R0172.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
Pest Management Services
SAQMMA14R0172
(Contractor Name) _______________________ is interested in providing integrated pest management (IPM) support services to the U.S. Department of State for its overseas posts. Please complete this evaluation questionnaire and submit it directly to Linda Dinkel at dinkeLLL@state.gov. THIS INFORMATION WILL BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAR 15.1004 (e). Your feedback on this contractor is appreciated.
Thank you very much!
CONTRACT INFORMATION
Please provide the following information to assist us in tracking responses received and resolving any conflicts in the evaluation process if necessary.
Contractor:
Contract Number:
Name of Evaluator:
Telephone Number:
Facsimile Number:
Organization/Office Symbol:
Mailing Address:
Position/Title/Grade:
Length of involvement with contract:
Degree or extent of involvement with contract:
Period of Performance:
__________________ to
Initial Contract Value:
Current or Completed Contract Value:
Brief Description of Requirement:
Complexity of effort
( ) Difficult ( ) Routine
Relevant Experience
Check whether the services provided included:
· IPM program development in partnership with property managers
· Providing advice on pest control to a remote location.
· Drywood termite assessment and treatment
· Pilot testing of new IPM technologies and strategies.
· Cultural heritage/museum objects
· Pests outside the U.S.
· Handling unusual or challenging pest control problem.
· Educational outreach to non-pest control professionals.
· Obtaining pest identification for a highly unusual pest or where the identity made a significant difference in the control strategy.
· Special security requirements
SCORING CRITERIA
Please rate the contractor’s performance on a scale of 1 to 10 where
10 is EXCEPTIONAL - Indicates the Contractor's performance within the area of evaluation clearly and consistently exceeds contractual requirements.
5 is ACCEPTABLE - Indicates no problem in area of evaluation or has only minor problems for which solutions were satisfactory.
0 is UNACCEPTABLE - Indicates serious problems in the evaluation area. The Contractor is/was in danger of being unable to satisfy contractual requirements and timely recovery is not likely or did not occur.
Score
| Practice of True IPM |
| Focuses on pest problem assessment & control of conditions that attract pests rather than relying on pesticides |
| Quality of Services |
| Provides effective and timely services that met expectations and followed up appropriately. |
| Written Products |
| Provides professional, complete, and timely deliverables geared toward the intended audience. |
| Staff Professionalism |
| Provides competent and reliable professionals appropriate for the task at hand. |
| Innovation & Creativity |
| Tries new methods and objectively evaluates efficacy. |
| Communications |
| Effectively explains why measures are needed and how they work. |
| Business Relations |
| Requires little prompting or reminders with administrative matters. Cooperative in routine matters as well as when confronted by unexpected difficulties. |
| Value and Cost Control |
| Efficient and conscientious of costs. |
| Compliance with Contract Terms and Conditions |
| Aware of and follows contractual requirements. |
Rehiring Would you like to work with this contractor in the future?
Yes, they are truly superior and I can’t imagine any other contractor coming close. (10)
Yes, but there are others who are likely as good. (5)
No way! (0)
Additional Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .