Mbabane Swaziland NEC DB FEDBIZOPPS.docx

DOCX document 40 KB Posted

Attached to
Department of State 2012 Design-Build Contract for US Embassy Mbabane, Swaziland
Solicitation number
SAQMMA-12-R0097
Issued by

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SAQMMA-12-R0097

Department of State 2012 Design-Build Contract for US Embassy Mbabane, Swaziland

RFP SAQMMA-12-R0097

Notice of Solicitation of Submissions for Contractor Pre-Qualification

THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS), Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO) is requesting submissions to pre-qualify firms for Design-Build (D/B) services for the design and construction of a modified Standard Embassy Design New Embassy Compound (NEC) in Mbabane, Swaziland. This project will be executed under OBO’s Design Excellence Program (http://www.state.gov/obo/designexcellence/). The project will consist of the design and construction of a compound to house U.S. Diplomatic functions at the particular overseas location listed below. The project is described below.

1. Project Description (Secret Facility and Personnel Security Clearances Required)

SAQMMA-12-R0097: Mbabane, Swaziland New Embassy Compound. Anticipated work includes: New Office Building (NOB), warehouse, maintenance facilities, perimeter security, vehicle and pedestrian access control facilities, site improvements, utility building, bathhouse/cabana, and surface parking. Approximate NOB size: 6,100 gsm. Other buildings total approximate size: 2,900 gsm. The site is approximately 36,100 sm (8.9 acres) in size. Estimated design-build cost: $95 – 125 million.

The constructed compound will demonstrate an elevated standard of design quality for diplomatic facilities in its architecture, engineering, and construction. OBO requires that the completed compound be sustainable with high-performance facilities. The design requirements documents, which will be provided by OBO in the Project Solicitation Phase II, are an example of OBO’s commitment to Design Excellence.

2. Project Solicitation The project solicitation will consist of two phases.

Phase I – Pre-Qualification of Offerors This announcement of solicitation of pre-qualification submissions is Phase I. DOS will evaluate and rate the pre-qualification submissions based on the procedure and evaluation criteria set forth below. DOS may refuse to pre-qualify any Offeror receiving less than a satisfactory rating on any evaluation factor or sub-factor.

The Government may conduct an information session for interested Offerors prior to the receipt of pre-qualification submissions. A separate announcement will be issued on the Federal Business Opportunities webpage (www.FBO.gov) to specify the location, date, and time.

Phase II – Requests for Proposals from Pre-Qualified Offerors Those Offerors determined to be pre-qualified in accordance with this notice will be issued a formal Request for Proposal (RFP) for the project and invited to submit proposed pricing in Phase II. The RFP will include a statement of work, standards, and criteria for the project that set out the project scope, design requirements, design process, design documentation, design expertise, construction process, post-construction activities, reference drawings and specifications, codes and standards, and security requirements.

Firms submitting proposals in Phase II may be required to make oral presentations to DOS. Offerors may be invited to present their project approach and Technical Submission in response to this RFP in person at the offices of OBO in Rosslyn, VA in a 60 minute interview following the proposal submission date. Interview times and details will be published by the Contracting Officer at least 2 weeks prior to the first interview. The presentation should emphasize the notable aspects of the offeror’s written technical proposal. Offerors are cautioned: DO NOT INCLUDE ANY PRICE INFORMATION IN THE PRESENTATION.

The selected D/B Contractor’s Architect/Engineer will be the “Designer of Record” and responsible for completing the construction drawings and specifications in accordance with the solicitation documentation provided. The contract will be “firm fixed-price.” Construction services will include providing construction labor and materials to execute the OBO-accepted design; on-site organization with management to ensure overall project coordination; and overall control throughout the life of the project. Required services include preparation of construction documents, quality control plans, safety plans, project schedules, cost estimates, and project close-out activities.

The types of design services to be provided may include architecture, structural, civil, energy conservation, mechanical, fire protection, electrical, seismic and geo-technical engineering; space planning and systems furniture design and integration; interior design; signage; security; communications; blast protection design; potable water treatment and waste water treatment; landscaping design; photo-voltaic systems; cost estimating; scheduling; energy modeling; value engineering; and administrative coordination of the various disciplines involved.

The RFP will require the D/B contractor to complete all design and engineering documents based on the project specific design direction that will be provided in the RFP design requirements. The Government will provide bridging level design documents that will include, at a minimum, a site utilization plan; building massing and exterior elevations; space and requirements standards, organizational relationships, space requirements program; building utilities and infrastructure design; and supporting narratives, where applicable.

Firms submitting information for Phase I qualification shall address the following criteria in the proposal to provide design and construction services: management of a large complex project; schedule management; logistics management to include site and transportation security; safety; and design excellence including adherence to integrated design and design quality, life-cycle cost management, maximized LEED ratings for sustainability, and reduced maintenance and operating costs.

Due to time constraints, DOS anticipates that the pre-qualified Offerors will be required to participate in visits to the project site within 30 days after the issuance of the RFP. To offset some of the cost of the site visits and other related costs, pre-qualified Offerors that do not receive the D/B contract award will be paid $25,000.00 for responsive project proposals they submit in Phase II.

DOS anticipates that a tradeoff process may be in the best interest of the Government to consider award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror. DOS anticipates that evaluation of technical and past performance considerations may play a significant role in the selection process. Evaluations to determine the best value to the Government will be made strictly on materials submitted. All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, will be approximately equal to cost or price.

3. Prior Pre-Qualification of Certain Offerors – NOT APPLICABLE This solicitation requires a complete prequalification package submission.

4.Technical Requirements
4.A.Submission Requirements and Format:
4.A.1Organization. Organize submittals by factor according to the list in Section C below. Tab and clearly identify each factor in the submittal.
4.A.2Language. Use only the English language. Submit an English translation for all information originally provided in another language. If an English translation is not provided, DOS will not review or consider the information submitted only in another language. Non-English language pages are not included in any page counts.
4.A.3Page Limits. Maximum page limits for each factor are identified in Section C. If a submission exceeds the allowable page limits, DOS may consider only the designated number of pages, starting with the first page of each factor. The pages comprising the pre-printed package required for the Certifications Relevant to Public Law 99-399, and the JV Agreement, where applicable, are not included in any page counts.
4.A.4Page Size. Pages are based on a single-sided 8 ½” x 11” (or A4) sheet. Page equivalencies are: one double-sided page = two single-sided pages; 11”x17” fold-outs = two pages per side. Except where otherwise specified, the maximum paper size permitted is 11” x 17” (or A3).
4.A.5Font. Submit offers in size 12 font minimum. Only the Standard Form (SF) 330, required for use by the design subcontractors, may be prepared in size 10 font. SF 330 is available through: http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/type/TOP
4.A.6Color. Submit text as black writing on a white background. Text that is difficult to read due to the use of colored text, colored background, and/or font selection may result in a failure of one or more factors.
4.A.7Format and Copies. Provide one electronic copy on compact disk and one original plus three copies in printed form. Index the electronic copy identical to the printed version. DOS may review either the electronic or the printed submittal; therefore both formats shall be complete and identical to each other.
4.A.8Missing Information. A proposal submission discovered to be incomplete or missing the required information may be eliminated from further consideration.
4.A.9Additional Information. Offerors are cautioned that DOS will consider only the information in the submission and that obtained by DOS from additional sources concerning past performance.
4.B.Definitions:
4.B.1Where the term “Offeror” is used, it is intended that requirements for the Offeror apply equally to either a single Contractor or to all parties of a Joint Venture (JV), where applicable.
4.B.2The project(s) included in this solicitation are referenced as “the Project” in Section 4.C.

4.C. CONTENT OF SUBMISSIONS AND FACTORS FOR EVALUATION:

FACTOR 1: Joint Venture Agreement/Signed Statement of JV Intent & Description of Partnership.

The failure of Factor 1 will result in the failure of the entire submittal. DOS will not review the remaining portions of the submittal if there is the failure of Factor 1.

1.1Page limit: Three. The JV agreement or Statement of Intent to form a JV does not count against the page limit for this factor.
1.2If the planned organizational structure for the Offeror is a JV, provide a Statement of Intent to form a JV, signed by all parties to the JV. If a formal JV has already been formed, the JV agreement may be submitted in lieu of the Statement of Intent. If the Offeror is not submitting as a JV, so state.
1.3Organizations that wish to rely upon the experience or financial resources of any other legally related entity or organization, including parent companies, subsidiaries, or other related firms, must do so by way of a JV or a “de facto” JV. In cases of a “de facto” JV where no formal joint venture agreement is in place, the parties must agree, in writing, to be jointly and severable liable for performance of any contract awarded.
1.4Describe the relationship of the JV parties.
1.5Identify each JV party’s role.
1.6Identify the type and percentage of work assigned to each JV party.
1.7For a “de facto” JV, provide the signed written agreement identified in section 1.3 above. Identify the parties’ intended roles in the Project.

If the offeror is organized as a Joint Venture, DOS will evaluate whether the roles and responsibilities of the JV parties have been adequately described. This factor is not applicable if there is no JV or “de facto” JV.

FACTOR 2: Technical Project Experience and Past Performance.

The failure of Factor 2 will result in the failure of the entire submittal. DOS will not review the remaining portions of the submittal if there is the failure of Factor 2.

Subfactor 2A: Technical Project Experience This section is intended to evaluate the technical project experience of the Offeror and its JV partners, if applicable, and is not intended to evaluate subcontractor technical project experience. Do not submit technical project experience for any proposed subcontractors.

2A.1Page limit for each project example: Three (written material); two (photographs).
2A.2Relevant Projects. The term “relevant projects” means those projects similar in scope, complexity, and dollar value (USD), in that order of importance. For example, submitting only new construction project examples would not be considered relevant to demonstrate technical project experience necessary to perform building renovations.
2A.3Project Examples. Submit three examples of relevant projects, either on-going or completed within the past five years, demonstrating the Offeror’s technical capabilities to perform the Project. If the offeror submits more than the required number of project examples, DOS will evaluate only the stated number of projects, in the order presented in the Offeror’s submittal.
2A.4JV Project Examples. Offerors organized as a JV shall submit, for each partner, at least one, but no more than two, example of projects that are relevant to demonstrate technical project experience for the partners’ proposed role in the Project. Projects may be on-going or completed within the past five years. If the offeror submits more than the required number of project examples, DOS will evaluate only the stated number of projects, in the order presented in the Offeror’s submittal. If a JV partners’ role as stated in Factor 1 does not include construction, the Offeror should submit project examples as stated in either 2A.3 above or 2A.4, based on the number of partners whose role includes construction.
2A.5Compliance with the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986 (Omnibus): Section 5, Mandatory Pre-Qualification Requirements, indicates whether this project is required to comply with Omnibus. Project examples submitted to demonstrate technical project experience are permitted to be different than those necessary to demonstrate compliance with Omnibus, if the Offeror desires.
2A.6Limits on Subcontracting. This project is subject to subcontracting limits of no more than 50% of the total value of the contract, as identified in 22 U.S. Code Section 4852. From a technical perspective, the project examples must demonstrate the Offeror’s ability to self-perform at least 30-50% of the value of each project example in order to demonstrate the technical capability to self-perform the required amount of work. Project examples in which the Offeror only acted as a General Contractor or did not self-perform at least 30% of the work will not be considered relevant.
2A.7The following additional requirements apply to the project examples:
2A.7.1At least one project shall be substantially complete.
2A.7.2At least two projects shall be D/B.
2A.7.3Include the following information for each project example:
2A.7.3.1Project Name.
2A.7.3.2Description of project scope and identification of relevancy to work required for this contract.
2A.7.3.3Name of contractor responsible for the project. Identify whether the Offeror was a subcontractor or a JV partner on the project example.
2A.7.3.4Description of the type of work performed by the Offeror including identification of specific trades self-performed.
2A.7.3.5Actual start and completion dates (month/year), and originally scheduled completion date (month/year). Explain any differences between the actual and originally scheduled completion dates.
2A.7.3.6The percentage of the construction work self-performed by the Offeror and the percentage of the construction work for which the Offeror was responsible. Percentage shall be provided as a portion of the total construction value of the project.

DOS will evaluate the Offeror’s technical project experience in executing relevant projects. For Offerors who do not have individual projects representative of the project scope and complexity, DOS will evaluate the technical project experience demonstrated by the combined project examples.

Subfactor 2B Past Performance

2B.1Page limit for each explanation in 2B.2 and 2B.3: One.
2B.2Quality: For the past five years on any project the Offeror was involved with, identify whether the Offeror has had any of the following problems, and if so, explain the reasons for and the remedy/resolution of the problem:
2B.2.1Been terminated for default;
2B.2.2Been issued a cure notice;
2B.2.3Been issued a show cause notice;
2B.2.4Been assessed liquidated damages;
2B.2.5Had its performance and payment bond surety notified that the contractor was not fulfilling its contract obligations;
2B.2.6Had its performance during design or construction evaluated as unsatisfactory or unacceptable;
2B.3For each relevant project example submitted in 2A, identify performance problems other than those specified in 2B.2 above, including schedule deviations, and describe how the problems were remedied.
2B.4References: Provide the form attached to the solicitation, Past Performance Questionnaire, to three previous clients for whom the Offeror has completed projects within the past three years. Do not include questionnaires from DOS staff on OBO projects. Instruct the clients to place the completed questionnaire in an envelope, sealed, with the signature of the person who filled out the questionnaire over the seal, and return it to the Offeror. Provide the three sealed envelopes in the submittal.

If an Offeror previously submitted information responding to this factor for a different FY12 project, DOS will accept the previously-submitted information. In this case, identify the name of the project and contract number for which the references were submitted.

2B.5Compliance with DOS Criteria
2B.5.1The Offeror is not required to submit any information for Section 2B.5.
2B.5.2DOS will gather information from interviews with the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, OBO’s Office of Security Management, and OBO’s project staff who have worked with the Offeror, to assist in the evaluation of the Offeror’s past performance with respect to compliance with DOS criteria.
2B.5.3Contractors who have no previous experience with DOS shall be given a neutral rating for this portion of the past performance section.

DOS will evaluate the quality of the Offeror’s past performance based on information submitted for Factors 2B.1-4. DOS will evaluate the Offeror’s record of compliance with Industrial Security and Construction Security requirements for Factor 2B.5. DOS will evaluate the Offeror’s record of project completion and close-out, its approach to problem and change resolution, and its responsiveness to issues and problems raised by OBO for Factor 2B.5. Additionally, DOS may gather information from other sources to assist in evaluating the quality of the Offeror’s past performance.

NOTICE: As prescribed in the Federal Acquisition Regulation at 15.305(a)(2)(iv), an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available will receive a neutral rating.

FACTOR 3: The Offeror’s Organization and Management The failure of Factor 3 will result in the failure of the entire submittal.

3.1Page limit: Sections 3.2-3.4 – five pages (construction-only projects); seven pages (design/build projects). Section 3.5 – 40 pages.
3.2Describe the management process that the Offeror would typically use to manage a project of this type and size.
3.3Identify, by position only, how the Offeror would typically staff a project of this type and size. Show staffing for Home (headquarters and support) & Field Offices. Provide a brief list that explains the roles of each of the typical positions.
3.4Provide additional relevant information, such as significant achievements, retention of key personnel, and/or timely award of sub-contractors, etc that could be considered important.
3.5Design Team:
3.5.1Identify how the Offeror will integrate the design team into the organization for the Project. Explain the role the design team will be allotted in the decision-making process for the Project.
3.5.2Identify the design disciplines the Offeror believes are required to execute the Project.
3.5.3Identify the design sources and subcontractors the Offeror intends to use for this project. (NOTE: The Offeror does not need to identify specific personnel for the design team.) Use the SF330 , Part I, Sections A, B, C, D & F, and Part II to provide documentation demonstrating the Offeror’s internal capability, existing relationships with proposed design subcontractors, and/or the capability to obtain and provide U.S. licensed professionals (architects, designers, engineers, project managers, etc.) having specialized experience and technical competence in the design of projects of similar scope, complexity, and dollar value (USD) involving multiple disciplines and subcontractors. The SF330 shall support and not contradict any text provided in the submittal.

DOS will evaluate the Offeror’s management processes and typical organization, considering decision-making; communication within the team; communication between the Home (headquarters and support) and Field Offices; authority assigned to the Field Office; and tracking of schedules, procurement, and cost. DOS will evaluate the design resources, considering whether the proposed design team has sufficient experience on projects similar in scope, complexity, and dollar value; and whether the Offeror will be able to staff the design team with appropriate licensed professionals in the required disciplines.

5. Mandatory Pre-Qualification Requirements The requirements of this section are separate and distinct from that of Section 4, Technical Requirements. Format information for this section so that it is complete without cross-referencing information submitted for other elements of the solicitation.

5.A. Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986. Firms being considered for award under this acquisition are limited to "United States Person" bidders as defined in the Act. The Offeror must complete and submit as part of its pre-qualification package the pamphlet "Certifications Relevant to Public Law 99-399, Statement of Qualifications for Purpose of Section 402 of The Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986." (The pamphlet is attached to this FEDBIZOPPS announcement and may be obtained from the DOS Contract Specialist listed at the end of this notice.) If a Joint Venture (JV) is formed, the company having 51 percent or greater interest in the JV must be the one completing the pamphlet. This is a pass/fail evaluated area. Submissions from Offerors who do not receive a pass rating in this area will not be further evaluated.

IMPORTANT NOTE: Organizations that wish to use the experience or financial resources of any other legally dependent organization or individual, including parent companies, subsidiaries, or other related firms, must do so by way of a joint venture. A prospective offeror may be an individual organization or firm, a formal joint venture (where the arrangement among the co-venturers has been reduced to writing), or “de facto” joint venture (where no formal agreement has been reached, but the offering entity relies upon the experience of a related U.S. person firm that guarantees performance). To be considered a “qualified United States joint venture person,” every joint venture must have at least one firm or organization that itself meets all the requirements of a U.S. person listed in Section 402. The U.S. person co-venturer will be required to sign a guarantee making the U.S person individually responsible for performance of any contract awarded, notwithstanding the terms of any joint venture agreement.

5.B. Security Clearance Requirement. In order to be eligible to perform under this contract, the pre-qualified firm(s), including all entities which comprise a JV and the JV itself, must possess or be able to obtain a Defense Security Service (DSS) Secret facility security clearance (FCL) with Secret safeguarding capability, issued in accordance with the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), DoD 5220.22-M. Specifically designated personnel requiring access to classified information or to the Controlled Access Areas (CAAs) must possess a Secret personnel security clearance issued by DSS. Offerors already possessing the necessary FCL must submit their appropriate Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code, facility clearance and safeguarding level with the required pre-qualification documentation.

If an otherwise pre-qualified Offeror does not possess the necessary FCL, DOS will sponsor the firm for an FCL at the time the Offeror is determined to be pre-qualified. DOS will allow 90 calendar days from the notice of pre-qualification for firms to obtain the necessary FCL. Firms will not receive the classified portions of the Phase II RFP until they have been issued the appropriate FCL and received Defense Security Service (DSS) approval to safeguard classified documents. DOS sponsorship does not guarantee that the Offeror will receive the FCL, or that it will be received within the 90-day period. The Government will not be obligated to extend its solicitation schedule, or to make an award to a sponsored, pre-qualified firm, if that firm has not been issued a FCL.

NOTICE: The phase II apparent successful offeror selected for contract award must possess or obtain an Information System (IS) or standalone computer, approved by DSS, for processing classified information. Performance on this contract will require access to the Department’s ProjNet-C, for receipt and transmission of all classified information, and a DSS approved classified IS for processing classified information.

6. Closing Deadline for Submissions ALL SUBMISSIONS MUST BE RECEIVED BY 3:00 P.M. Eastern Time on February 16, 2012.

TRANSMISSION OF PROPOSALS: Offerors shall hand deliver or submit proposals by courier (FedEx, UPS Express Mail, DHL, ETC.) to the following address:

U.S. Department of State:

A/LM/AQM/FDCD/CON, Room L-600, SA-6 1701 North Fort Myer Drive Arlington, VA 22209

(DO NOT USE THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE (PO Box) ADDRESS) Include the project solicitation number(s) on the face of the package.

REQUESTS FOR CLARIFICATIONS must be submitted in writing to James Thomas, AND Lily Savic by email ThomasJG2@state.gov AND SavicL@state.gov.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .