S02 D.5 QASP.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Q515--Pathology Consult Services (Amarillo VAHCS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C25723Q0826
About this file
This document is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for pathology services at the Amarillo Veterans Affairs Health Care System in Texas. The contract will provide professional pathology services including anatomical and clinical pathology to maintain a high level of care for Veterans. Key performance standards include finalizing routine surgical pathology cases within three working days at an acceptable quality level of 95%, providing additional coverage on 50 days per year at 100%, and completing proper coding and synoptic reporting on specimens at an acceptable quality level of 98%. Performance will be monitored through methods such as direct observation, periodic inspections of reports, and validated user complaints. The QASP defines performance ratings and incentives, documentation procedures, and surveillance frequencies to ensure the contractor meets standards.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| S02 D.11 VA Handbook_0710_2_May_2016.pdf | ||
| S02 D.10 WD No 2015-5213 Rev No 22 6.30.2023.docx | DOCX document | |
| S02 D.9 52.222-55 MINIMUM WAGES FOR CONTRACTOR WORKERS UNDER EXECUTIVE ORDER 14026 [DEVIATION (OCT 2023)].docx | DOCX document | |
| S02 D.8 Privacy and Information Security.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25723Q0826 0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| S02 D.7 VA Directive 6500.pdf | ||
| S02 D.6 Contractor Rules of Behavior.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25723Q0826 0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25723Q0826 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| S02 D.4 Contractor Conflict of Interest Certification Statement.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25723Q0826_2.docx | DOCX document | |
| S02 D.1 6500.6 Appendix C.pdf | ||
| S02 D.3 FY 2024 Per Diem Rates for Texas.pdf | ||
| S02 D.2 Contractor Empl Legal Status.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN
For: Pathology Services
Contract Number: TBD
Contract Description: The Amarillo Veterans Affairs Health Care System (AVAHCS) Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Service (P&LMS) located in Amarillo, Texas has a need for the provision of professional services to include Anatomical and Clinical Pathology services. This is a specialized service to maintain a high level of Pathology services for our Veterans and the current pathology position is a solo Pathologist with no support for heavy workload or when the VA Pathologist is on leave or out of town.
Contractor’s name:
1. PURPOSE
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:
· What will be monitored.
· How monitoring will take place.
· Who will conduct the monitoring.
· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.
This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.
This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.
2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.
a. Contracting Officer (CO) – The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.
Assigned CO: Marisela Galarza Assigned CS: Nesha Nelson Organization or Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs, RPO West, NCO 17
b. Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COR) - The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.
Assigned COR: Brenda Brock 1-806-355-9703 X 7510
c. Other Key Government Personnel: Anthony W. Benderman, MD., MBA 1-806-354-7867
3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES
The following employees of the contractor serve as the contractor’s program manager for this contract.
a) Program Manager: TBA
b) Other Contractor Personnel: N/A
Title:
4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine if the contractor exceeds, meets or does not meet these standards.
The Performance Requirements Summary Matrix, paragraph 7.6.A in the Performance Work Statement (PWS), includes performance standards. The Government shall use these standards to determine contractor performance and shall compare contractor performance to the Acceptable Quality Level (AQL).
| TASK |
| ID |
| Indicator |
| Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level |
| Method of Surveillance |
| Incentive |
| PWS documentation |
Performance Standards
Section 2.1
| 1 |
| Routine Surgical Pathology cases shall be finalized within 3 working days |
| Case Turnaround time |
| 95% |
| Direct observation |
| Favorable incentive report in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) determined by compliance. |
| 2.1 - The Contractor shall provide all necessary labor, consultation, assistance, and expertise to provide pathology coverage, services, and routine reports within 3 (three) working days to include: |
Performance Standards
Section 2.1.c
| 2 |
| The Contractor shall provide services on 50 additional days during the year. This is expected to be used to cover any leave usage by the VA pathologist(s), but can be used at the discretion of the VA. Additional days will be paid in accordance with the per diem schedule |
| On each day that additional service is performed. |
| 100% |
| Direct Observation and billing invoice. |
| Favorable incentive report in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) determined by compliance |
| 2.1.c - The Contractor shall provide services on 50 additional business days during the year. This is expected to be used to cover any leave usage by the VA pathologist(s), but can be used at the discretion of the VA. |
Performance Standards
Section 2.5
| 3 |
| CPT, ICD10, Topography, Morphology and Tissue Committee on all work performed by the Contractor. CAP synoptic reports completed on applicable cases. |
| CPT, ICD10, Topography, Morphology and Tissue Committee codes will be included on reports. CPT, ICD10, Topography, Morphology and Tissue Committee |
| 98% |
| Direct Observation and specimen reports. |
| Favorable incentive report in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) determined by compliance |
| 2.5 - The pathologist finalizing the case will perform the CPT, ICD10, Topography, Morphology and Tissue |
Committee codes for all cases finalized for Amarillo VAHCS. Completed CAP synoptic reports will be provided on all malignant cases as requested by the VA, if applicable.
Performance Standards
Section 2.6
| 4 |
| Review of up to 10% of casework for the Amarillo VAHCS for the random review quality assurance program. |
| Up to 10% of AVAHCS random reviews. |
| 100% |
| Direct Observation and specimen reports. |
| Favorable incentive report in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) determined by compliance |
| 2.6 - Review of 10% of to APG case work (beginning to end) from AVACHS P&LMS for random quality assurance |
program amongst the APG pathologists.
Performance Standards
Section 2.8.h
| 5 |
| The finalized pathology reports will be returned to the VA electronically. |
| Specimen reporting methodology. |
| 100% |
| Direct Observation and specimen reports. |
| Favorable incentive report in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) determined by compliance. |
| 2.8.h - The finalized pathology reports will be returned to the VA electronically and remotely verified by the Contractor into VistA or any successor computer system. |
Performance Standards
Section 9.1, and 9.3
| 6 |
| Privacy Awareness Training |
| Completed within 30 days of contract approval and yearly thereafter. |
| 100% |
| Direct Observation and specimen reports. |
| Favorable incentive report in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) determined by compliance. |
| 9.1 - Privacy Training: Contractor and their sub-contractors assigned work under the contract are required to receive annual training on patient privacy as established by HIPAA statutes. Training must meet VHA’s and the Department of Health and Human Services Standards for |
Privacy of Individually identifiable health information. Contractor shall provide documented proof to the contracting officer that all employees assigned work and/or having access to Protected Health Information have received annual training. Proof of training is to be forwarded to the Contracting Officer. Information on fulfilling the training requirement as stated in this paragraph can be found at https://www.ees-learning.net. For contractors and sub-contractors who do not have access to VHA computer systems, this requirement is met by receiving VHA National Privacy Training, other VHA approved privacy training or contractor furnished training that meets the requirements of the HHS standards. Completed within 30 days of contract approval and yearly thereafter.
9.2 doesn’t apply to this contract since they do not have physical access to VA Computer system.
9.3 VA Cyber Security Awareness Training: Each contractor assigned work under the contract is required to receive and document completion of VA training on Cyber Security. The requirements for fulfilling this provision can be found at https://www.ees-learning.net Contractor shall provide documented proof to the Contracting Officer that all contractor employees servicing a VA contract have received annual training. Completed within 30 days of contract approval and yearly thereafter.
Performance Standards
Section 2.8.j
| 7 |
| Volume of cases |
| Number of cases sent to Contractor on annual basis. |
| Not to exceed 3000 cases per year |
| Direct observation and periodic inspection. |
| Favorable incentive report in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) determined by compliance. |
| 2.8.j - The workload figures identified in this PWS should not exceed 3000 cases per year. |
Performance Standards
Section 2.8. k
| 8 |
| Unannounced site visit. |
| Annual unannounced site visit to ensure quality. |
| Annual |
| Direct observation and periodic inspection |
| Favorable incentive report in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) determined by compliance. |
| 2.8.k - The vendor may expect an unannounced site visit by the Chief of P&LMS or his designee to ensure quality of testing per performance period. |
5. INCENTIVES
The Government shall continue contract performance based on past performance and/or any other incentive that was proposed as incentives. Incentives shall be based on exceeding, meeting, or not meeting performance standards.
6. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE
Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COTR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.
a) DIRECT OBSERVATION: Performed by COR, Chief of Surgery or O.R. Clinical Nurse Manager/O.R. Assistant Clinical Nurse Manager.
b) PERIODIC INSPECTION: Performed by either pulling up reports available in the electronic package, pulling log sheets and doing periodic audits.
c) VALIDATED USER/CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS: (Relies on the patient to identify deficiencies. Complaints are then investigated and validated.)
7. RATINGS
Metrics and methods are designed to determine if performance exceeds, meets, or does not meet a given standard and acceptable quality level. A rating scale shall be used to determine a positive, neutral, or negative outcome. The following ratings shall be used:
· Favorable
· Satisfactory
· Unsatisfactory
8. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE
a) ACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE The Government shall document positive performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action.
b) UNACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file.
When the COR determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR) and present it to the contractor's program manager.
The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CDR in writing. The CDR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CDR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the COR. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability.
Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO.
9. FREQUENCY OF MEASUREMENT
a) Frequency of Measurement.
b) During contract performance, the COTR will periodically analyze whether the negotiated frequency of surveillance is appropriate for the work being performed.
c) Frequency of Performance Assessment Meetings.
d) The COR shall meet with the contractor as needed to assess performance and shall provide a written assessment.
Signature – Contractor Program Manager
Signature – Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .