S02 36C26121R0096--DB Interventional Imaging Surgical Suite--Unrestricted.docx

36C26121R0096

1. SOLICITATION NUMBER

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

3. DATE ISSUED

PAGE OF PAGES

4. CONTRACT NUMBER

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER

6. PROJECT NUMBER

7. ISSUED BY

CODE

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

a. NAME

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying number, date) 12a. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

12b. CALENDAR DAYS

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 8/2014)

STANDARD FORM 1442

Prescribed by GSA-FAR (48 CFR) 52.236-1(d)

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

SOLICITATION

SOLICITATION

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

9. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance within ____________ calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving award, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory negotiable. (See _____________________________).

YES

NO

a.

Sealed offers in original and ___________________copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by _____________ (hour) local time _____________________ (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, the date and time offers are due.

b.

An offer guarantee is, is not required.

c.

All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

d.

Offers providing less than _______________________ calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

36C26121R0096 X 11-02-2021 570-22-1-696-0001

570-CSI-416

Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Network Contracting Office 21 (NCO 21) 3230 Peacekeeper Way, Bldg. 209 McClellan CA 95652-2609 Submit proposal via email to james.rall@va.gov

James D. W. Rall 916-494-9362 Project Title: Design-Build Interventional Imaging Surgical Suite in Building 1 Place of Performance: Veterans Affairs Central California Health Care System, 2615 E. Clinton Ave, Fresno CA Project Number: 570-CSI-416

Description: Contractor shall provide all supervision, labor, materials, services, tools, equipment, and transportation for design and construction to upgrade OR #4 into an Interventional Imaging Surgical Suite in accordance solicitation, Scope of Work and applicable attachments.

IAW VAAR 836.204, Disclosure of the magnitude of construction projects, the magnitude of construction for this project is between $2,000,000.00 and $5,000,000.00.

The NAICS code is 236220, with a small business size standard of $39.5M.

Note #1 to OFFERORS: This RFP is being issued for Full and Open Competition.

Note #2 to OFFERORS: This project will be awarded IAW FAR 36.3 - Two-Phase Design-Build Selection Procedures.

Note #3 to OFFERORS: id Bonds, Payment Bonds and Performance Bonds shall be required under this solicitation and any resultant contract.

Note #4 to OFFERORS: The current wage rate requirement decision is included in the solicitation (CA20210018).

X X 52.211-10 X 0 (zero)

12:00 PM

PST

12-03-2021 X

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR

15. TELEPHONE NUMBER

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

CODE

FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of the solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within __________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

AMOUNTS

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

AMENDMENT

NUMBER

DATE.

20a. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER 20b. SIGNATURE 20c. OFFER DATE

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT

23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

ITEM

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( 41 U.S.C. 3304(a) (

26. ADMINISTERED BY

27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY

PHONE:

FAX:

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

29. AWARD

Your Contractor agrees offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further cont-this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract ractual document is necessary.

shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

30a. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31a. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

TO SIGN

30b. SIGNATURE 30c. DATE 31b. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31c. AWARD DATE

BY

OFFER

AWARD

STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 8/2014) BACK

(Include ZIP Code) (Include area code) (Include only if different than Item 14.)

(Insert any number equal to or greater than the minimum requirement stated in Item 13d. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13d.)

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each) (Type or print) (4 copies unless otherwise specified) (Type or print) (Type or print) (Contractor is required to sign this document and return _______ copies to issuing office.)

(Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

(Must be fully completed by offeror) (To be completed by Government)

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

Department of Veterans Affairs VA Sierra Pacific Network (VISN 21) VA Northern California HealthCare System 150 Muir Road Martinez CA 94553-4668 Department of Veterans Affairs FMS-VA-2(101) Financial Services Center PO Box 149971 Austin TX 78714-9971

Table of Contents

INFORMATION REGARDING BIDDING MATERIAL, BID GUARANTEE AND BONDS

1. Proposal materials consisting of drawings, specifications and contract forms may be obtained by general (prime) contractors interested in submitting proposals direct to the Department of Veterans Affairs and by suppliers and subcontractors for their use in preparing sub-bids for general (prime) contractors from the Governmentwide Point of Entry (GPE) website at https://sam.gov/ under solicitation number 36C26121R0096. By registering at https://sam.gov/, prime contractors, suppliers and subcontractors will have access to download plans, specifications and amendments

1. A Bid Bond, Standard Form (SF) 24, is required for this solicitation. A bid guarantee is required in an amount not less than 20 percent of the bid price, but shall not exceed $3,000,000.00. Failure to furnish the required bid guarantee in the proper form and amount, by the time set for the opening of bids, will require rejection of the bid in all cases except those listed in FAR 28.101-4, and may be cause for rejection even then. Copies of the SF 24 can be obtained at the U. S. General Services Administration website, https://www.gsa.gov/reference/forms. The bid guarantee must be submitted electronically with the proposal.

1. The offeror to whom award is made will be required to furnish two (2) bonds, a Performance Bond, to be executed on the proper SF 25, and a Payment Bond, to be executed on the SF 25A, each in the penal sum of 100% of the bid. Copies of the SF 25 and SF 25A can be obtained at the U. S. General Services Administration website, https://www.gsa.gov/reference/forms.

1. Description of Work: See attachment ‘SOW and RFP Documents--DB Interventional Imaging Surgical Suites.’

1. Disclosure of the magnitude of construction: In accordance with (IAW) FAR 36.204, Disclosure of the magnitude of construction projects, the magnitude of construction for this project is between $2,000,000.00 and $5,000,000.00.

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS TO BIDDERS/OFFERORS

1.1 GENERAL INFORMATION:

This procurement will follow the Two-Phase Design-Build selection procedures in accordance with FAR 36.3. The Government will evaluate Phase-One proposals and select a maximum of five (5) most highly qualified offerors to submit Phase-Two proposals. Phase-Two will select the best value offeror using the trade-off source selection process.

Approximately 35% of the initial design has been completed.

1.2 AVAILABILITY OF SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS:

All solicitation related documents will be published to, and only be accessible via, https://sam.gov/.

1.3 FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION:

This procurement is being solicited as Unrestricted; however, an offeror’s SDVOSB/VOSB Status will be evaluated.

1.4 TECHNICAL QUESTIONS:

Questions of a technical nature must be provided in writing, and shall be submitted by the prospective offerors, to James D. W. Rall. Questions shall be submitted only via e-mail, using the REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) form (see attachments) to: james.rall@va.gov. The subject line must read: DB Interventional Imaging Surgical Suites – Technical Questions. Oral questions of a technical nature are not acceptable. THE CUT-OFF DATE AND TIME FOR RECEIPT OF TECHNICAL QUESTIONS IS Monday, November 22, 2021 at 3:00 PM Pacific Standard Time.

1.5 AMENDMENTS:

Amendments to this solicitation will be posted at https://sam.gov/. Paper copies of the amendments will NOT be individually mailed. No other notification of amendments will be provided. Potential Offerors are advised that they are responsible for obtaining and acknowledging any amendments to the solicitation. Failure to acknowledge an amendment may result in your proposal being considered unacceptable.

1.6 PREPARATION OF PROPOSALS:

The Government will not pay for any costs incurred in preparation and submission of proposals.

The proposal must set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this solicitation. The Government will rely on such information in the award of a contract. By submission of the offer, the offeror agrees that all items proposed in response to the evaluation factors (including subcontractors with teaming agreements, project schedule, building design etc.) will be enforced for the duration of the contract. Any substitutions after contract award will be equal or better than as proposed and shall require Contracting Officer's approval prior to implementation.

(a) Submissions shall be made in pdf format.

(b) It is the offeror’s responsibility to insure the completeness of the proposal. The evaluation panel for the Government may evaluate solely on the information provided in the initial proposal and will not assume that an offeror possesses any capability that is not specifically identified in the proposal.

(c) Only one proposal will be evaluated for each offeror. Alternate methods of accomplishing the work required by this solicitation will not be evaluated.

Note 1: Missing, incomplete, or ambiguous information could result in an offer deemed deficient. The Government may NOT make an Award to a Deficient Offer; In addition, there may not be an opportunity to remedy deficiency if Government deems to make award without discussions.”

Note 2: Do not submit the SF-1442 or the Bid Bond during Phase-One. A cover page and acknowledgement of any issued amendments shall be used instead. No cost/pricing information shall be submitted during Phase-One of the selection process.

1.7 SELECTION PROCEDURES:

In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 36.3, this acquisition is based upon two-phase design-build selection procedures. The term “technical factors” refers to any non-price factor other than past performance. Four (4) factors will be evaluated in Phase-One and two (2) factors will be evaluated in Phase-Two. In making the best value award decision after Phase-Two, the Government will consider the all factors from both Phase-One and Phase-Two. The Government will award a firm fixed-price contract resulting from this solicitation to the offeror whose offer provides the best value to the Government.

In Phase-One, the Government intends to select a maximum of (5) most highly qualified offerors to submit proposals for Phase-Two without conducting discussions with any offeror; therefore, the initial Phase-One proposal shall conform to the solicitation requirements and shall contain the best offer. The Government intends to evaluate Phase-Two proposals and award a contract without conducting discussions; therefore, the initial Phase-Two proposal shall conform to the solicitation requirements and shall contain the best offer from a non-price and price standpoint.

The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions during Phase-One and/or Phase-Two if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. If the Contracting Officer determines discussions are necessary, the Contracting Officer may conduct discussions with offerors determined to be in the competitive range. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

IAW FAR 36.3, the contract resulting from this solicitation will be awarded to the offeror whose offer, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to be the most advantageous to the Government considering price and non-price evaluation criteria. Award may be made to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest non-price rated offeror. In determining the best value to the Government, the Government need not quantify the tradeoffs that led to the best value decision.

All proposals shall be subject to evaluation by a team of Government personnel. The proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the content provided in the solicitation. The Government intends to award a firm fixed price (FFP) contract, as required by the procedures pursuant to FAR Part 15.101-1, tradeoff process, and FAR Part 6.401(b)(1), sealed bidding and competitive proposals. The tradeoff process will be IAW FAR 15.3, Sources Selection, and the contract resulting from this solicitation will be awarded to that responsible offeror, pursuant to FAR 9.104, whose offer, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to be the most advantageous to the Government considering price and non-price evaluation factors. Award may be made to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest non-price rated offeror. Business judgments and tradeoffs will be used to determine the proposal offering the best value to the Government.

All offers will be evaluated individually on their own merit and in accordance with the following evaluation factors:

Phase-One Factor 1: Prime Contractor Project Experience Factor 2: Technical/Management Approach Factor 3: SDVOSB/VOSB Status Factor 4: Past Performance

Phase-Two Factor 1: Key Personnel Qualifications Factor 2: Price (This requirement has only one price factor)

Following a determination of Technical Acceptability of Factor 2 – Technical/Management Approach, a best value tradeoff process will be performed among Factor 1 – Prime Contractor Project Experience, Factor 3 – SDVOSB/VOSB Status, and Factor 4 – Past Performance. The evaluation will begin with a decision of Technical Acceptability for Factor 2. Among the offers that are rated as Technically Acceptable for Factor 2, a Phase One tradeoff evaluation will be conducted among Factors 1, 3, and 4. For the determination of Technical Acceptability, Factor 2 must be satisfied for non-price Factors 1, 3 and 4 to be evaluated. Phase-One Factors 1, 2, 3, and 4, and Phase-Two factor 1, when combined, are significantly more important than Phase-Two Factor 2 - Price.

The Government intends to award a contract without conducting discussions with offerors; however, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined to be necessary by the Contracting Officer. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer provides the best value to the Government utilizing the Best Value Tradeoff process, pursuant to FAR 15.308, source selection decision, after determination of responsibility by the Contracting Officer.

1.8 PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS:

A. Definitions:

Size is defined as any project over $2,000,000.00.

Complexity is defined as a design-build project that includes several phases of work, various of specialty trades and engineering.

Scope is defined as work or activities related, or closely related, to that which is outlined in the Statement of Work such as, but not limited to, demolition and installation required for upgrade of an operating room, to include design, finishes work, electrical work, plumbing work and other utilities work in a hospital environment..

Recency is defined as a project completed (100%) within the past three (3) years of the proposal issue date of the RFP.

Relevancy is defined, for purposes of this evaluation, as design-build repair, alteration, installation and related demolition of existing infrastructure completed (100%). Infrastructure is defined repair/alteration of a healthcare facility or improvements to a healthcare facility, such as utilities. Repair, alteration and related demolition include repair and/or modernization of an existing healthcare facility and replacement or upgrade to an existing healthcare infrastructure.

B. Phase-One Evaluation Factors:

The Phase-One evaluation factors from the solicitation are as follows:

Factor 1 – Prime Contractor Project Experience:

Evaluation criteria:

Offeror shall demonstrate Prime Contractor Project Experience by submitting a minimum of two (2) and a maximum of six (6) examples of “recent” and “relevant” completed and operational construction projects, with similar “size ($2M or greater),” “complexity” and “scope” to the Remodel of the Emergency Department for Observation Beds requirement. Construction projects that are still in progress will not be considered as demonstrations of experience.

Relevant experience must be demonstrated as a Prime Contractor or Joint Venture (JV) and not as a subcontractor.

Offerors shall use the attached Excel worksheet titled “P1 Factor 1 – Prime Contractor Project Experience” for submitting your response to Factor 1.

The information requested above is required for the Government to evaluate proposals for the Experience evaluation factor. General statements claiming experience of similar “size ($2M or greater),” “complexity,” and “scope” or similar “relevant” experience that do not include specific references to prior contract work, or that do not include the information required above, are not acceptable.

Failure to submit the information required above to support the offeror’s claimed experience may be viewed by the Government as evidence that the offeror the “relevant” experience to provide construction services for a project of this “size ($2M or greater),” “complexity” and “scope.”

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate Prime Contractor Project Experience based on recency and relevancy (size, scope and complexity) of the projects and based on confidence assessment of the offeror’s ability to successfully perform the requirement. The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information and context of the data. The assessment of the offeror’s Prime Contractor Project Experience will be used as a means of evaluating the offeror’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Factor 2 – Technical/Management Approach:

Evaluation criteria:

Offeror shall provide a high-level milestone plan of project execution to demonstrate the Offeror’s means and methods of approach, phasing, plan for maintenance of continuity of hospital operations, and relation to similar projects the Offeror has fully completed, to demonstrate a technical understanding of the project scope requirements for successfully managing and executing the project on schedule. Offeror shall include technical and qualitative descriptions of proposed methodology, deliverables, and delivery schedules. Offerors shall discuss proposed personnel or staffing assumptions with respect to this effort that shows a direct relationship between the approach and meeting the identified requirements and schedule. Offerors shall also discuss their quality control standards for accomplishing the requirements contained in the Statement of Work, Specifications and Drawings.

The high-level milestone plan of project execution shall include:

1. Sequencing and phasing of all the major work items (critical path), from Notice to Proceed to Contract Closeout, demonstrating continuity of hospital operations. Estimate Notice to Proceed date of March 15, 2022.

2. Key submittals for mobilization, such as acquisition of mobile trailer or to begin key features of work. Submittals shall include time for preparation and Government reviews/approvals.

3. Procurement times for long lead items.

Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation factor will be evaluated on a Pass / Fail basis The Government will evaluate whether or not the overall high-level milestone plan is concise, comprehensive, reasonable and demonstrates the offeror’s thorough understanding of all aspects of the project contained in the Statement of Work, Specifications and Drawings.

Factor 3 – Past Performance:

Evaluation criteria:

An Offeror’s past performance is important in determining the firm’s ability to successfully perform the required services. The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the types and amounts of projects previously completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts to the solicitation requirement and to how well a contractor has performed on those contracts. The information provided in response to this factor will be evaluated to determine the quality and usefulness as it applies to performance confidence assessment.

The Government is only interested in completed (100%) past performance experience that is recent (within the past 3 years of the proposal issue date of the RFP) and relevant (repair, alteration, installation and related demolition of existing infrastructure to an existing healthcare facility), and are similar in size ($2M or greater), scope and complexity, as it relates very closely to the requirements set forth in the Statement of Work and the degree of responsiveness to customer requirements.

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included for P1 Factor 1 - Prime Contractor Project Experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, offeror’s should request (on behalf of) that a P1 Factor 4 - Past Performance (Questionnaire) be submitted for applicable projects included in P1 Factor 1 - Prime Contractor Project Experience.

NOTES:

1. A P1 Factor 4 - Past Performance (Questionnaire) will not be accepted directly from the offeror. The questionnaire shall be completed and signed by the construction contract administrator of the entity (Government or civilian) for which the construction was completed.

2. A P1 Factor 4 - Past Performance (Questionnaire) will not be accepted for an offeror that performed the work as a subcontractor.

Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation factor will be evaluated on how well the offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under P1 Factor 1 - Prime Contractor Project Experience, AND past performance on other relevant projects currently documented in known sources. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the electronic means, using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), SAM.gov, and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the offeror’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the solicitation. If an Offeror’s contract history is more relevant, the greater ability the VA will have to measure whether the Offeror will satisfy this requirement. Therefore, if an Offeror’s contract performance record is more recent and relevant, the higher the confidence level the VA will have in the Offeror’s ability to successfully perform the required effort.

Factor 4 – SDVOSB/VOSB STATUS Evaluation criteria:

This factor will be used to assess the Offeror’s status as a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) or Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) concern, or the Offeror’s proposed use of eligible SDVOSB/VOSB concerns as subcontractors.

In accordance with Veterans Affairs Acquisition Regulation (VAAR) clause 852.215-70, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Evaluation Factors (OCT 2019) and VAAR 852.215-71, Evaluation Factor Commitments (OCT 2019), the Government will evaluate proposals for the SDVOSB/VOSB Status evaluation factor. General statements claiming that an Offeror will use eligible SDVOSB/VOSB subcontractors to perform work under this procurement that do not include the information required for this factor are not acceptable. Failure to submit the information required for this factor, including the Small Business Certifications and the Letter of intent, signed by both parties, may be viewed by the Government as evidence that the Offeror should receive no credit when evaluating proposals for the SDVOSB/VOSB STATUS evaluation factor.

To receive Full Credit as an SDVOSB/VOSB concerns, Offerors must:

1. Provide a statement claiming credit as an SDVOSB/VOSB concern, as appropriate;

2. Provide a statement certifying that the Offeror meets the size standard to be classified as a “small business” for the NAICS code assigned to this procurement;

3. Provide the Offeror’s full legal name as that name appears in the Offeror’s registration in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Vendor Information Pages (VIP) database (available at https://www.vetbiz.va.gov) and DUNS; and

4. Be registered and listed as “Verified” as an SDVOSB/VOSB concern in the VIP database (available at https://www.vetbiz.va.gov) on the date proposals are due (and prior to award).

To receive Partial Credit for proposed use of eligible SDVOSB/VOSB subcontractor(s), the proposed subcontractor(s) must be registered and listed as “Verified” in the VIP database (available at https://www.vetbiz.va.gov) on the date proposals are due (and prior to award) and must meet the size standard to be classified as a “small business” for the NAICS code assigned to this procurement. Credit for proposed use of SDVOSB/VOSB subcontractors is location-dependent and will be evaluated for the VA’s Central California Health Care Syatem campus in Fresno, CA. To receive credit for proposed use of eligible SDVOSB/VOSB subcontractor(s), Offerors must submit the following information with their proposals:

1. The Offeror must provide a statement claiming credit for use of an eligible SDVOSB/VOSB subcontractor identifying the VA’s Central California Health Care System campus in Fresno, CA, for which Offeror seeks to claim such credit;

2. For the VA’s Central California Health Care System campus location for which the Offeror seeks to claim such credit, the Offeror must provide the following information regarding its proposed SDVOSB/VOSB subcontractor(s):

The subcontractor’s full legal name as that name appears in the subcontractor’s registration in the VA VIP database (available at https://www.vetbiz.va.gov) and DUNS;

a. A statement certifying that the proposed subcontractor(s) meets the size standard to be classified as a “small business” for the NAICS code assigned to this procurement;

b. A narrative that describes the specific tasks each SDVOSB/VOSB subcontractor will perform in support of the PAD campus location where credit for use of SDVOSB/VOSB subcontractors is claimed;

c. A statement of the estimated dollar value of the subcontract that will be awarded to each SDVOSB/VOSB subcontractor where credit for the use of SDVOSB/VOSB subcontractors is claimed;

d. For each SDVOSB/VOSB subcontract claimed, the Offeror must provide a letter of intent signed by an authorized representative of the SDVOSB/VOSB subcontractor and signed by the Offeror committing the SDVOSB/VOSB subcontractor to perform the work described in (b)(iii) above and committing the Offeror to subcontract with the SDVOSB/VOSB concern to perform that work if the Offeror is awarded a contract under this procurement. The letter must specify the specific tasks the subcontractor will perform, the physical location where the work will be performed, the period of performance for the subcontract, and the approximate dollar value of the subcontract.

Offerors that cannot comply with the requirements for full credit or partial credit will receive No Credit for this evaluation factor.

Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation factor will be evaluated for Full Credit / Partial Credit / No Credit based on submission and verification of the documentation detailed above.

C. Phase-Two Evaluation Factors:

The Phase-Two evaluation factors from the solicitation are as follows:

Factor 1 – Key Personnel:

Evaluation criteria:

For each of the following Key Personnel, Offerors shall use the attached Excel worksheet titled “P2 Factor 1 – Key Personnel Qualifications Resumes” for submitting your response to Factor 1.

1. Construction Project Manager

2. Construction Project Superintendent

3. Construction Safety Manager

4. Quality Control Manager

Each Key Personnel listed above has its own separate tab in the Excel worksheet in which to provide the respective resume. Use only this form to provide Key Personnel qualification.

For each Key Personnel, provide up to two (2) completed projects for each of these individuals (1 project completed within the past 3 years and 1 project completed within 6 years of the proposal issue date of the RFP) and relevant to this project in terms of size, scope and complexity. To demonstrate relevancy, each resume shall demonstrate specific experience related to the construction, repair, alteration, installation and related demolition of existing infrastructure completed (100%). Infrastructure is defined repair/alteration of a healthcare facility or improvements to a healthcare facility, such as utilities. Repair, alteration and related demolition include repair and/or modernization of an existing healthcare facility and replacement or upgrade to an existing healthcare infrastructure.

All resumes must clearly demonstrate the breadth of education, training, certification, overall experience, relevant experience, and longevity with the proposed team. Include the company name that employed the individual while working on the project. Also state if there were any other Key Personnel included in your offer that this individual has worked with in the past and which specific project(s) they worked together on.

In addition, Offeror shall state if the individual is a current employee of the Prime Contractor or is not a current employee of the Prime. If the individual is not a current employee of the Prime Contractor, Offeror shall provide a Letter of Commitment with wet signature in their offer stating that the proposed individual will become an employee of the Prime Contractor prior to issuance of the Notice to Proceed (NTP). The Letter of Commitment shall clearly state that it is applicable to this project, shall reference the project number and project title, and shall be dated and signed by the Prime Contractor and proposed individual.

Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation factor will be evaluated on a Pass / Fail basis.

The Government will evaluate proposed Key Personnel based on recency and relevancy (size, scope and complexity) of the projects completed and based on confidence assessment of the proposed Key Personnel’s ability to successfully perform the requirement. General statements claiming Key Personnel qualifications involving operating room construction services that do not include specific references to prior contract work, or that do not include the information required above, are not acceptable.

Should any Key Personnel Qualifications resume be omitted entirely or not contain the required two (2) completed projects as described above, or not contain a Letter of Commitment, if applicable, the offer shall receive a “Fail” rating for this factor.

Factor 2 – Price:

Price proposals shall be submitted for the entire project only. Deductive alternates are not applicable to this requirement and all references to deducts/deductive alternates throughout the solicitation documents are to be ignored. .

The government expects that this contract will be awarded based on adequate price competition; however, Offerors shall submit with their proposal the attachment “P2 Factor 2 – Divisional Construction Costs,” which may be compared to the Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE) to determine that offered price(s) are fair and reasonable.

Basis of Evaluation:

Price will be evaluated separately from non-price factors in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b).

1.9 DETERMINATION OF RESPONSIBILITY:

A Determination of Responsibility will be conducted for the apparent “awardee” prior to award of the project. The required information from the proposal, along with other information obtained from Government systems, such as, but not limited to the OSHA and EPA online inspection history databases, as well as any other information the Contracting Officer has determined to be valid, will be used to make the Determination of Responsibility. Failure to affirm being within the guidelines in the proposal may result in a determination of “Non-Responsible” for the Offeror.

The offeror shall complete the attachment “Responsibility - Contractor Certification Regarding Safety and Environmental” document. Offeror shall have no more than three serious, or one repeat, or one willful OSHA or EPA violation(s) in the past 3 years and have an EMR of equal to or less than 1.0. Documentation shall include all open and final OSHA violations for the 3 previous calendar years.

NOTE: Any information received by the Government that would cause for a negative Determination of Responsibility may make the Offeror ineligible for award.

1.10 VETS 4212:

Title 38, USC Section 4212(d), codified at 41 CFR Section 61-300, requires that federal contractors report, at least annually, the number and category of veterans who are within their workforce. Submission of the VETS-4212 reporting information can be done electronically at: http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm. Award cannot be made unless the awardee has filed their VETS-4212 report. Therefore, all offerors are encouraged to file every year. The Contracting Officer may request a copy of the email confirmation of receipt notification, prior to awarding the project.

1.11 SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM):

Federal Acquisition Regulations require that federal contractors register in the System for Award Management (SAM) database at https://sam.gov/ and enter all mandatory information into the system. Offerors are required to be registered in SAM at the time an offer is submitted in order to comply with the annual representations and certifications requirements. The Offeror shall be registered at time of submission and award.

1.12 REVIEW REQUIRED REGISTRATION WITH CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (CPARS):

As prescribed in FAR Part 42.1502(e), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) evaluates contractor past performance on all construction contracts that exceed $750,000 and shares those evaluations with other Federal Government contract specialists and procurement officials. The FAR requires that the contractor be provided an opportunity to comment on past performance evaluations prior to each report closing. To fulfill this requirement VA uses an online database, CPARS, which is maintained by the Naval Seal Logistics Center in Portsmouth, Virginia.

Each contractor whose contract award is estimated to exceed $750,000 is required to register with CPARS database at the following web address: http://www.cpars.gov/. Help in registering can be obtained by contacting Customer Support Desk @ DSN: 684-1690 or COMM: 207- 438-1690. Registration should occur no later than thirty days after contract award and must be kept current should there be any change to the contractor’s registered representative.

For contracts with a period of one year or less, the contracting officer will perform a single evaluation when the contract is complete. For contracts exceeding one year, the contracting officer will evaluate the contractor’s performance annually. Interim reports will be filed each year until the last year of the contract, when the final report will be completed. The report shall be assigned in CPARS to the contractor’s designated representative for comment. The contractor representative will have thirty days to submit any comments and re-assign the report to the VA contracting officer.

Failure to have a current registration in the CPARS database, or to re-assign the report to the VA contracting officer within those thirty days, will result in the Government’s evaluation being placed on file in the database with a statement that the contractor failed to respond.

1.13 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS AND SPECIAL AGREEMENT CHECKS:

All contractor employees are subject to the same level of investigation as VA employees who have access to VA Sensitive Information. The level of background investigation commensurate with the level of access needed to perform the statement of work is: Low Risk. This requirement is applicable to all subcontractor personnel requiring the same access. As per VA Directive 0710, costs of background investigations will be borne by the contractor.

1.14 REFERENCES TO VA ENGINEER, RESIDENT ENGINEER OR PROJECT MANAGER:

Any reference contained within the solicitation/contract specifications and/or drawings to the “VA Engineer,” “Resident Engineer,” or “Project Manager” or their abbreviations shall be replaced with “Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR).”

1.14 VHA Supplemental Contract Requirements for Ensuring Adequate COVID-19 Safety Protocols for Federal Contractors:

All Contractor personnel, to include prime and subcontractors, shall comply with VHA DIRECTIVE 1193, CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 VACCINATION PROGRAM FOR VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL.

VHA Supplemental Contract Requirements for Ensuring Adequate COVID-19 Safety Protocols for Federal Contractors are as follows:

1. Contractor employees who work in or travel to VHA locations must comply with the following:

a. Documentation requirements:

1) If fully vaccinated, shall show proof of vaccination.

i. NOTE: Acceptable proof of vaccination includes a signed record of immunization from a health care provider or pharmacy, a copy of the COVID-19 Vaccination Record Card (CDC Form MLS-319813_r, published on September 3, 2020), or a copy of medical records documenting the vaccination.

2) If unvaccinated and granted a medical or religious exception, shall show negative COVID-19 test results dated within three calendar days prior to desired entry date. Test must be approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for emergency use or full approval. This includes tests available by a doctor’s order or an FDA approved over-the-counter test.

3) Documentation cited in this section shall be digitally or physically maintained on each contractor employee while in a VA facility and is subject to inspection prior to entry to VA facilities and after entry for spot inspections by Contracting Officer Representatives (CORs) or other hospital personnel.

4) Documentation will not be collected by the VA; contractors shall, at all times, adhere to and ensure compliance with federal laws designed to protect contractor employee health information and personally identifiable information.

2. Contractor employees are subject to daily screening for COVID-19 and may be denied entry to VA facilities if they fail to pass screening protocols. As part of the screening process contractors may be asked screening questions found on the COVID-19 Screening Tool. Check regularly for updates.

a. Contractor employees who work away from VA locations, but who will have direct contact with VA patients shall self-screen utilizing the COVID-19 Screening Tool, in advance, each day that they will have direct patient contact and in accordance with their person or persons who coordinate COVID-19 workplace safety efforts at covered contractor workplaces. Contractors shall, at all times, adhere to and ensure compliance with federal laws designed to protect contractor employee health information and personally identifiable information.

Contractor must immediately notify their COR or Contracting Officer if contract performance is jeopardized due to contractor employees being denied entry into VA Facilities.

DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/WORK STATEMENT

SEE ATTACHMENTS

2.1 52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

The Government contemplates award of a Firm-Fixed-Price, Requirements contract resulting from this solicitation.

(End of Provision)

2.2 52.222-5 CONSTRUCTION WAGE RATE REQUIREMENTS—SECONDARY SITE OF THE WORK (MAY 2014) (a)(1) The offeror shall notify the Government if the offeror intends to perform work at any secondary site of the work, as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of the FAR clause at 52.222-6, Construction Wage Rate Requirements, of this solicitation.

(2) If the offeror is unsure if a planned work site satisfies the criteria for a secondary site of the work, the offeror shall request a determination from the Contracting Officer.

(b)(1) If the wage determination provided by the Government for work at the primary site of the work is not applicable to the secondary site of the work, the offeror shall request a wage determination from the Contracting Officer.

(2) The due date for receipt of offers will not be extended as a result of an offeror's request for a wage determination for a secondary site of the work.

(End of Provision)

2.3 52.222-23 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1999)

(a) The offeror's attention is called to the Equal Opportunity clause and the Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction clause of this solicitation.

(b) The goals for minority and female participation, expressed in percentage terms for the Contractor's aggregate workforce in each trade on all construction work in the covered area, are as follows:

These goals are applicable to all the Contractor's construction work performed in the covered area. If the Contractor performs construction work in a geographical area located outside of the covered area, the Contractor shall apply the goals established for the geographical area where the work is actually performed.