RRB11R004 Amendment 1 questions and answers.doc
DOC document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Actuarial Audit Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- RRB11R004
- Issued by
- Railroad Retirement Board
About this file
This is the attached document for Amendment A-1 which includes the OIG's responses to questions submitted by vendors.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RRB11R004 Amendment A-1 SF-30.pdf | ||
| RRB11R004 Attachment C - June 2010 Section 502 Report.pdf | ||
| RRB11R004 Attachment B - 24th Actuarial Valuation.pdf | ||
| RRB11R004 Actuarial Audit Services.doc | DOC document | |
| RRB11R004 Attachment D.doc | DOC document | |
| RRB11R004 SF 1449.pdf | ||
| RRB11R004 Attachment A - RRB FY 2011 PAR.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation No. RRB11R004
Amendment A-1
OIG’s Response to Vendor Questions Regarding Solicitation Number RRB11R004 Question 1:
Is this work a recompete of an existing incumbent contract or a new opportunity? If there is an incumbent, please provide the following information:
· Name of the incumbent contract
· Contract number
· Award date
· Expiration date
· Total value, including any and all options
· Technical or PM POC
Answer 1:
No, this is not a recompete.
Question 2:
It appears that the Contracting Officer under Section G has authority under Section G.1.1(d) to change any of the expressed terms, conditions or specifications of the contract. Is the Contracting Officer willing to entertain any of the following modifications, deletions, and/or additions:
a. Dispute resolution via final and binding arbitration pursuant to the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. Sections 571-583? If not, then would consideration be given for a federal bench trial?
Answer 2a:
No.
b. Limiting the contractors liability to an agreed upon dollar amount?
Answer 2b:
No.
c. Illinois law as the applicable law?
Answer 2c:
No.
d. Modifications to the Information Privacy Certification by Contract to permit the Contractor to retain one copy of documentation, electronic data and information received from the Agency to the extent necessary to comply with professional work product documentation requirements?
Answer 2e:
Yes.
Question 3:
Please clarify the minimum experience requirements in Section L5. Section L5.2 states “Qualifying experience is not restricted by type of plan sponsor or beneficiary group. Such experience includes, but is not limited to, multi-employer, single employer, Federal, state, public, corporate and union plans”. Section L.5.3 provides minimum experience requirement for the Principal actuary with respect to the valuation of a multi-employer plan, and Section L.5.4 provides minimum experience requirements for the Firm with respect to actuarial audits of multi-employer plans. For the purposes of Section L.5.3 and L.5.4, does qualifying experience include, but is not limited to, multi-employer, single employer, Federal, state, public, corporate and union plans?
Answer 3:
For purposes of L.5.3 and L.5.4 the qualifying minimum experience specifies multi-employer plans.
Question 4:
Please provide a copy of the 1997 actuarial audit report produced by Watson Wyatt.
Answer 4:
This report will not be provided. Reference to this report is deleted.
Question 5:
What is the extent of data review required for this assignment? Is any review of individual data needed?
Answer 5:
There are eight EXCEL workbooks in the actuarial model. Each workbook that projects benefits has four worksheets: one to provide census input; one to provide actuarial assumption; one to do the calculation and one to accumulate the results. Other workbooks may have up to 12 worksheets. Individual data will need review during the option years of FY 2012 and FY 2015 only.
Question 3:
Should the fee proposal be submitted in the format of Section B of the RFP, on Form 1449, or both?
Answer:
The fee proposal should be submitted on both.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .