RFQP_25-003_Tree_Inventory_and_Management_Plan.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
RFQP 25-003
Solicitation number
2025-ENGINEERING-004
Issued by
Kalamazoo County, Huntington Woods City, Michigan

About this file

The document is a Request for Qualifications and Proposal (RFQP 25-003) issued by the City of Jackson, Michigan, seeking qualified firms to develop a comprehensive tree inventory and management plan for the city's public rights-of-way. The project aims to create a detailed inventory of all trees, stumps, and potential planting sites within the city's 155 centerline miles of roadways, excluding trees in parks, city-owned parcels, and private lands. The inventory will include GPS locations, species, tree health, and other detailed characteristics, to be uploaded to the city's GIS system. The project is funded by the USDA Forest Service Urban & Community Forestry Inflation Reduction Act Grant, with a total project cost of $757,275. The proposal is due on December 12, 2024, with an anticipated council award on January 28, 2025, and the project is planned to span four years.

The project is specifically targeted at addressing historical disinvestment in Jackson's urban areas, with 85% of the city's census tracts identified as disadvantaged. The four-year implementation strategy includes developing a comprehensive tree inventory in the first year, followed by three years of reforestation, tree maintenance, and removal activities. The city plans to plant approximately 85 new trees annually and spend around $180,000 per year on urban forest improvements. A match waiver is requested due to the project's focus on disadvantaged communities. The city will use a competitive bid process to retain contractors and will focus on increasing urban forest biodiversity, mitigating urban heat island effects, and improving the resilience of the tree canopy. The communications plan includes a kickoff press conference, signage at city limits, and website announcements to highlight the funding source and project goals.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

All Consultants shall complete the Proposal and Award page(s) and submit all information requested herein in the proposal document in its entirety, IN ORDER FOR THE PROPOSAL TO

BE RESPONSIVE. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN THE PROPOSAL BEING

DECLARED NON-RESPONSIVE AND REJECTED.

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS and PROPOSAL

(RFQP)

PROPOSAL REFERENCE No.:

ISSUE DATE:

RFQP 25-003

October 27, 2024

PROPOSAL RECEIPT DATE: December 12, 2024

ANTICIPATED COUNCIL AWARD: January 28, 2025

PROJECT: Tree Inventory and Management Plan

ISSUING OFFICE: Engineering

CONTENTS

Page

Request for Qualifications and Proposal

Proposal Submission

Instructions to Consultants ......................................................................... 3 – 6

General Information

Scope of Services ...................................................................................... 8 – 10

Criteria for Selection ................................................................................. 11 - 12

Qualification Proposal Requirements

Qualification Questionnaire

Cost Proposal

Standard Terms and Conditions (5 pages)..................................... Appendix A

Grant Application Project Narrative (6 pages) ............................... Appendix B

Should any of the required documents be missing from your packet, immediately notify the Purchasing Department and request that they be supplied.

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSALS

RFQP 25-003

7BPROPOSAL SUBMISSION

The undersigned having become thoroughly familiar with and understanding the entire proposal documents attached hereto, agrees to provide the services as specified herein, for the cost as stipulated herein, subject to negotiation.

I hereby state that all of the information I have provided is true, accurate and complete. I hereby state that I have authority to submit this proposal which will become a binding contract if accepted by the City of Jackson. I hereby state that I have not communicated with, nor accepted anything of value from an official or employee of the City of Jackson that would tend to destroy or hinder free competition.

I hereby state that I have read, understand and agree to be bound by all the terms of this proposal document.

DATE:

FIRM NAME: (if any)

ADDRESS:

(Street Address) (City) (State) (Zip)

PHONE NO. ( ) FAX NO.: ( )

EMAIL:

SIGNATURE

PRINTED NAME:

TITLE:

Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 2024, a notary public in and for said county.

, Notary Public

County, Michigan

My Commission Expires:

INSTRUCTIONS TO CONSULTANTS

Use of RFQP Forms

These Documents represent the RFQP format which is for the convenience of Consultants. We request that Page 1 "Proposal Submission" be submitted with your proposal.

The Standard Terms and Conditions in Appendix A will become part of the contract.

Interpretations for Addenda

No oral interpretation will be made to any Consultant as to the meaning of the Documents or any part thereof. Every request for interpretation shall be made in writing to the City of Jackson, Purchasing Coordinator. Only those written inquiries received ten (10) or more working days prior to the date fixed for the opening of RFQPs will receive a response. Any interpretation made to a Consultant shall be in the form of an Addendum to the Documents and, when issued, will be on file in the City Purchasing Coordinator office at least five (5) calendar days before the proposals are opened. All Addenda will be transmitted to each person holding Documents, but it shall be the Consultant's responsibility to make inquiries as to the Addenda issued. All such Addenda shall become part of the Contract Documents and all Consultants shall be bound by such Addenda, whether or not received by the Consultant. All Addenda received shall be listed on the outside of the RFQP envelope. Any proposal received without each addendum listed by number and date received on the outside of the RFQP proposal envelope may be declared a non-responsive proposal.

REQUIRED TIME FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS

Each proposal must be submitted in three (3) bound paper copies with one (1) electronic copy (PDF format WITHOUT Cost Proposal) on disc or jumpdrive to the City of Jackson Purchasing Department, 161 W. Michigan Avenue, 8th floor, Jackson, Michigan 49201 no later than 10:00 am, local time on the date given on the cover, in a sealed envelope marked with the RFQP identification number. Any proposals received after this time will not be reviewed or considered by the City.

PROPOSALS

a) All QUALIFICATION PROPOSALS must be submitted following the RFQP Format supplied by the City in this document using figures attached (when provided) and shall be subject to all requirements of this Document including the INSTRUCTION TO CONSULTANTS and QUALIFCATION PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS sections. All proposals must be regular in every respect and no interlineations, excisions, or special conditions shall be made or included in the RFQP format by the Consultant.

b) The City of Jackson may consider as irregular any proposal on which there is an alteration of or departure from this RFQP Format, as provided in the RFQP Documents, and at its option may reject the same.

c) Each Consultant shall include in its COST PROPOSAL, in the format requested thereof, the cost of performing the work. The prices set forth in the proposal by the Consultant shall remain effective for 90 days from the time the proposals are opened.

ECONOMY OF PREPARATION

Each Proposal should be prepared simply and economically providing a straightforward concise description of the Consultant’s ability to meet the requirements of the RFQP. Decorative bindings, colored displays, promotional materials, etc. will receive no evaluation credit. Emphasis should be on the completeness and clarity of the content.

SUBCONTRACT AGREEMENTS

Before executing any subcontract, the successful Consultant shall submit the name of any proposed subcontractor for prior approval.

CORRECTIONS

Erasures or other changes in the RFQP form must be explained or noted over the signature of the Consultant.

TIME FOR RECEIVING PROPOSALS

Proposals received prior to the advertised hour of opening will be securely kept unopened. The officer whose duty it is to open them will decide when the specified time has arrived, and proposals received thereafter will not be considered. Late RFQPs will be returned to the Consultant un-opened.

OPENING PROPOSALS

The City of Jackson will open every eligible responsive qualification proposal received within the time set for receiving proposals. Cost proposals will only be opened for those Consultants who have deemed most qualified based on their qualifications proposal. All other cost proposals will be returned unopened to prevent potential FOIA exposure.

2BWITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS

Proposals may be withdrawn on written request dispatched by the Consultant in time for delivery in the normal course of business prior to the time fixed for opening.

3BAWARD OF CONTRACTS I REJECTION OF PROPOSALS

a) The City of Jackson reserves the right to reject any and all proposals and to waive any irregularity in proposals received whenever such rejection or waiver is in its best interests. The Consultant to whom the Award is made will be notified at the earliest possible date.

b) The City of Jackson reserves the right to consider as unqualified to perform the Contract any

Consultant who does not habitually perform with its own forces at least fifty (50%) of the work involved.

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

Attention of Consultants is particularly called to the requirements for ensuring that employees and applicants for employment are not discriminated on any illegal basis including race, national origin, color, religion, age, sex, height, weight, marital status, and physical or mental handicap as required by the City of Jackson's Ordinance Chapter 15-3.

DEFAULT TO CITY

It is understood that any Consultant who is in default to the City at the time of opening the proposal shall have the proposal declared null and void.

SIGNATURES

All proposal notifications, claims and statements must be signed as following:

a) CORPORATIONS: Signature of official shall be accompanied by a certified copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors authorizing the individual signing to bind the corporation. Each signature must be witnessed and notarized.

b) PARTNERSHIPS: Signatures of one partner shall be accompanied by a certified copy of the Power of Attorney authorizing the signing to bind all partners. If the proposal is signed by all partners no authorization is needed. Each signature must be witnessed and notarized.

c) INDIVIDUAL: No authorization is needed, but signature must be witnessed and notarized.

TAX LIABILITY

When the terms of this contract involve the lease of property, real or personal, to the City, it is understood that the Lessor shall be solely responsible for the payment of all taxes of any nature whatsoever that accrue on the property during the term of the lease. Sales Tax and Use Tax are applicable in this contract and are the sole responsibility of the Provider of services.

CITY ORDINANCE AND CHARTER REFERENCES

All City of Jackson Policies, Ordinances and Charter Sections applicable to this RFQP are available at the Jackson City Clerk's office for the Consultant's inspection and review, and the Consultant understands that it is its sole responsibility to understand and fully comply with all applicable City of Jackson Policies, Ordinances and Charter sections.

NOT TO EXCEED OR NON-APPROPRIATION

The Consultant hereby recognizes that the City is a political body corporate, and that in the event the City fails to appropriate monies sufficient enough to pay its obligations herein, that the City may terminate this agreement without incurring any liability thereof.

4BINCURRING COST

The City shall not be liable for any costs, including any travel, incurred by the Consultant prior to award of contract. The City does not intend to pay for any information obtained from the RFQP, though such may be utilized in determining the award.

NO THIRD-PARTY RIGHTS

It is agreed and understood that the contract is made solely for the benefit of the City and the Provider of Services; that it is not made for the benefit of any third party; and that no action or defense may be founded upon this contract except by the parties signatory hereto.

ORAL PRESENTATION

Those Consultants deemed most qualified based on their qualifications proposal may be required to make an oral presentation of their proposal to the City of Jackson. These presentations will provide an opportunity for the Consultant to clarify his proposal to ensure mutual understanding of its contents. The City of Jackson will schedule any such presentations.

5BACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL CONTENT

The contents of the proposal of the successful Consultant will become contractual obligations, if a contract is issued. Failure of the successful Consultant to accept these obligations will result in cancellation of the award.

NEWS RELEASES

News releases pertaining to this request or the work to which it relates will not be made without prior written approval of the Issuing Office.

GENERAL INFORMATION

INTRODUCTION

The City of Jackson is inviting qualified firms to submit proposals for a complete tree inventory and management plan. The tree inventory and management plan shall consider all trees, stumps and potential planting sites in the public rights-of-ways within the City of Jackson. Trees, stumps and potential planting sites located in parks, City-owned parcels or private land are not to be included in the tree inventory and management plan.

The City of Jackson maintains approximately 155 centerline miles of roadways. The Michigan Department of Transportation Maintains approximately 8 centerline miles of roadways within the City Limits. The tree inventory and management plans shall include all locations in these rights-of-ways in addition to the border roads of Brown Street and South Street.

This project is funded by the USDA Forest Service Urban & Community Forestry Inflation Reduction Act Grant. A copy of the project narrative from the grant application is included in Appendix B. The successful firm shall comply with Grant requirements and Project Narrative.

CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES

The City will have the following responsibilities in conjunction with a contract resulting from this RFQP.

1. Provide information as to the City's requirements for the project and make available all pertinent information, which may be useful in the project work, including any drawings or equipment data relative to the project. The City has GIS data layers and an ESRI shapefile of roads within the City. The City does not have information regarding current tree stock. The City does not have an arborist or urban forester on staff.

2. Designate in writing a person to act as the City's project Director with respect to the work to be performed. Such person will have the authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define the City's policies and decisions with respect to materials, equipment and other such elements pertinent to the work.

3. Coordinate as necessary the efforts of the consultant to make provisions to enter upon public or private land as required to perform the work.

4. Examine all studies, reports, estimates, proposals and other documents prepared by the consultant and render in writing, if necessary, decisions pertinent thereto within a reasonable time.

5. Direct the consultant in writing to begin the work on each phase of the project upon receipt of written evidence from the Consultant of the appropriateness of such action.

The consultant will develop or obtain from other agencies all other material, information and data necessary to perform the work.

SCOPE OF SERVICES

The scope of services to be performed by the Consultant shall be divided into tasks as follows

Task I Project Kick-Off Meeting

The Consultant shall attend an in-person meeting with City staff at Jackson City Hall. The key staff members of the Consultant shall attend this meeting. The objective of the meeting is to:

• Introduce project staff,

• Understand the Consultant’s method of approach;

• Review data collection process, schedule and deliverables; and

• Discuss communication plan;

• Finalize information to be collected during the tree inventory.

Task II Tree Inventory

Work for this task shall include field survey of all trees, stumps and potential planting sites in the public rights-of-ways within the City of Jackson. Trees, stumps and potential planting sites located in parks, City-owned parcels or private land are not to be included.

The Consultant shall determine how information will be collected.

The final tree inventory product delivered by the Consultant shall be delivered as a layer or set of layers using the City’s GIS geodatabase format. The final product will also be uploaded to the City’s GIS.

During the tree inventory process, the Consultant shall provide a weekly update to the City describing the work that has been completed and work anticipated for the next week. Work included under this task shall be completed by June 27, 2025.

Prior to beginning the tree inventory, the Consultant shall provide a list of fields that will be collected for the City’s review and approval. At a minimum, the following information shall be collected:

• Location: For each tree, stump and potential planning site, record GPS coordinates, address, street name and side of structure the tree, stump or potential plaint site is located.

• Species: Identify trees by genus and species using both botanical and common names and cultivar names, where appropriate.

• Tree/Stump Diameter: Measure trees to the nearest inch measured at 4.5 feet above the ground or diameter at breast height (DBH). Measure stumps to the nearest inch at the top of the stump. Organize tree/stump diameters into one of the following diameter classes:

o 0-5” o 6-10” o 11-15” o 16-20” o 21-25” o 26-30” o 31-35” o 35” or >

• Tree Height: Measure trees to the nearest foot. Organize tree height into one of the following height classes:

o 0-10’ o 10-20’ o 20-30’ o 30-50’ o 50-70’ o 70’ or >

• Multi-Stem Tree: Identify if the tree has multiple stems.

• Condition: Use criteria adapted from the International Society of Arboriculture’s

Guide to Plant Appraisal (10th Edition) as the basis for the field condition rating.

Classifications must be done as follows: Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair, Poor, Critical or Dead.

• Maintenance Needs: Assign at least one of the following maintenance categories for each tree:

o Tree Removal, Priority 1: Defective trees, dead trees, hazardous trees that must be removed immediately.

o Tree Removal, Priority 2: Trees that should be removed, but are not as great of a liability as Priority One Tree Removals.

o Tree Removal, Priority 3: Trees that should be removed but pose minimal liability to persons or property (i.e. small dead trees, failed transplants, large trees that are poorly sited or inferior quality and pose minimal threat to community).

o Prune, Priority 1: Trees that require removal of hazardous deadwood, hangers, broken branches, dead, dying or diseased limbs greater than 4 inches in diameter.

o Prune, Priority 2: Trees that have dead, dying, diseased or weakened branches between 2 and 4 inches in diameter.

o Prune, Priority 3: Trees that require routine pruning to correct structural problems, minimize future maintenance or interfere with utility wires or buildings.

o Stump Removal: Existing stump that should be removed.

o Planting Site: Record location of potential planting site. Note the approximate width of the parkway/greenbelt and any utilities observed.

• Defects: Identify any defects observed (i.e. broken/damaged branches, cracks, decay, etc.).

• Damage to Surroundings: Identify if tree has cause damage to the surroundings (i.e. heaved sidewalk, curb and gutter displacement, heaved driveways, etc.).

• Risk Assessment: For each tree, provide a risk assessment score based on the likelihood of failure and consequence of failure

• Further Investigation: Note if further investigation is recommended for a tree and the reason.

• Overhead Utilities: Identify if overhead utilities are present. If present, identify if the utilities impact the site.

• Photographs: Provide at least one photograph of each tree, stump or potential planting site.

• Date: Include date of observations.

• Comments: Provide any additional information not specifically listed above that may be beneficial

Task III Tree Management Plan After completion of the tree inventory, the Consultant shall develop a Tree Management Plan to encompass all trees, stumps and potential planting sites in the public rights-of-ways within the City of Jackson. The Tree Management Plan should support the City’s goal to restore, grow and diversify the urban tree canopy as well as address hazardous, diseased, and invasive trees.

The Consultant shall provide a draft Tree Management Plan for the City’s review and comments. The Consultant shall then attend an in-person meeting with the City to provide a summary of the Tree Management Plan, discuss the plan and receive feedback from the City. The Tree Management Plan shall then be updated by the Consultant.

At a minimum, the Tree Management Plans shall address the following:

• Executive Summary: Provide an overview of the project and the findings/recommendations.

• Introduction: Provide background and overview of the project.

• Urban Forrest Overview: Provide a summary of urban forests, the need for a healthy and diverse urban forest and their importance and benefits.

• Tree Inventory and Current Tree Stock Summary: Summarize the tree inventory program and the current tree stock.

• Management Plan: Provide a management plan to restore, grow and diversify the urban tree canopy. The plan should identify trees that should be removed, maintenance needs, and new planting sites. Include a tree selection guide that identifies appropriate parkway trees to be planted, pros/cons of each tree and appropriate planting conditions. The plan shall assume approximately 85 new trees planted per year and the City anticipates to spend approximately $180,000 per year over the next three years on the urban forest (excluding the costs of the Tree Inventory and Management Plan).

Work included under this task shall be completed by August 29, 2025.

CRITERIA FOR SELECTION

All Qualifications Proposals received shall be subject to an evaluation by the City of Jackson Department of Public Works and Engineering Division, assisted by other City personnel. The following factors will be considered in making the selection (review "Proposal Evaluation Work Sheet" attached as the next page of this document):

EXPERIENCE/QUALIFICATIONS

Experience and qualifications will be measured by the firm’s character, integrity, and competence in managing projects of similar size and scope; and experience of the principals and key staff assigned to the proposed operation. It will also be based on the experience and qualifications of the principals and key staff assigned to the individual tasks related to this project.

UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROBLEM

Based upon the understanding exhibited by the statements of work presented in the proposal.

METHOD OF APPROACH

Referring to the technical soundness of the Consultant's stated work plan for the project, the comprehensiveness of the proposed work tasks, the techniques to be used and the products to be delivered.

PRICE

The qualifications proposals will be evaluated using the four criteria listed above prior to review the cost proposals. The price proposals will be evaluated only for those Consultants deemed most qualified by their qualification proposal.

CITY OF JACKSON

PROPOSAL EVALUATION WORKSHEET

CONSULTANT:

PROJECT: RFQP 25-003 Tree Inventory and Management Plan

DATE:

EVALUATED BY:

ITEM

POSSIBLE

POINTS

WEIGHT

EVALUATION

POINTS

TOTAL

Experience/Qualifications 10 35

Understanding of the Problem

10 30

Method of Approach 10 35

COMMENTS

QUALIFICATION PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

Qualification proposals must be submitted in the format outlined below:

BUSINESS ORGANIZATION

State the full name and address of corporate or home office of your organization. Indicate whether you operate as an individual, partnership or corporation; if a corporation, indicate the state in which you are incorporated. If appropriate, state whether you are licensed to operate in the State of Michigan.

If applicable, provide the full name and address of any branch office or other subordinate element that will be performing part or all of the work. Indicate the relationship of the subordinate element to the corporate or home office as well as how much and what parts of the work it will perform.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

State in precise terms your understanding of the problem presented by this RFQP.

WORK PLAN

Describe in narrative form your technical plan for accomplishing the work. Explain the choice of methodology, particularly its strengths and weaknesses.

QUALIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE

State in precise terms your responses to the four questions on the Qualification Questionnaire.

PROJECT STAFF DESCRIPTION

Include the number of personnel, whether executive, professional, or technical, by skill and qualification that will be employed in the work. Provide an address of the workstation or base of operations for each of those listed as personnel. Indicate which of these individuals you consider key to the successful completion of the project. Identify key individuals by name and title and include resumes for each of the proposed project personnel.

AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATIONS

Include the names and phone numbers of personnel of your organization authorized to negotiate the proposed contract with the Issuing Office.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The consultant may also include any information and/or comments believed to be pertinent but not specifically requested elsewhere in the document.

QUALIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE

The Respondent shall provide the following information with the Qualifications Proposal for the purpose of evaluating the qualifications of the firm to perform the work provided in the RFQP.

1. Describe your firm’s experience in providing engineering services similar to the services requested by this RFQP. Describe only the experience of the project-lead office. Do not describe the experience of branch or corporate offices that will not have personnel directly involved in providing the requested services.

2. List the key personnel of your firm to be working on this project along with their degree-specialty-registration and the number of years of experience, both total years and years with your firm.

Indicate the physical location of each individual’s workstation or base of operations (project lead office, subordinate branch office, lab, field, etc) while working on the project. Attach resumes.

3. List representative projects your firm has completed within the last five years. List only those projects completed by the proposed project-lead office. Do not describe projects completed by branch or corporate offices. The list will include name and type of project, location, year completed, name and address of owner and costs.

FIGURE A - SUMMARY OF STAFF-HOUR DISTRIBUTION

RFQP NUMBER: RFQP 25−003

TITLE: Tree Inventory and Management Plan

FIRM:

Name of Company Authorized Signature Date

LEVEL OF EFFORT AND TASK BREAKDOWN

Name of Principal

Staff Members

Role in Study Task

I

Task

IIA

Task

III

NOTE: ALL TIMES SHALL BE GIVEN IN PERSON−HOURS

RESUMES OF EACH MEMBER SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE STAFFING PROPOSAL

COST PROPOSAL

This portion of the proposal must be submitted in a sealed and separate envelope inside your submittal and clearly marked “RFQP 25-003: Tree Inventory and Management Plan”

Cost proposals will be evaluated after a review and evaluation of each Consultant’s Qualifications Proposal. Cost proposals will only be opened for those Consultants who have been deemed most qualified based on their qualifications proposal. All other cost proposals will be returned unopened to prevent potential FOIA exposure.

The Cost Proposal Portion must include a task-by-task summary of costs in a readable format as indicated in Figures B.I through B.IV of this document and a breakdown of costs in as described below:

1. Manpower Costs: Itemize so as to show the following for each category of personnel with a different rate per hour:

a. Category, i.e., project manager, senior analyst, etc.

b. Rate per hour

2. General and Administrative Burden or Overhead: Indicate percentage and total.

3. Costs of Supplies and Materials: Itemize.

4. Other Direct Costs: Itemize the boring and related laboratory testing fees.

5. Transportation Costs: Show travel costs and per diem separately.

FIGURE B.I - SUMMARY OF COSTS

RFQP NUMBER:

TITLE:

RFQP 25−003

Tree Inventory and Management Plan

TASK: Task I – Project Kick-Off Meeting

Name of Company

Authorized Signature

Date

Name of Principal

Staff Members

Role in Study TOTAL

HOURS

HOURLY

RATE

DIRECT

LABOR COST

OVERHEAD

RATE

OVERHEAD

COST

COST

SUBTOTAL: NA NA

MATERIAL & DIRECT COSTS:

TRANSPORTATION COSTS:

TOTAL ALL COSTS FOR TASK I: 1

FIGURE B.II - SUMMARY OF COSTS

TASK: Task II – Tree Inventory

Role in Study TOTAL

HOURS

HOURLY

RATE

DIRECT

LABOR COST

OVERHEAD

RATE

OVERHEAD

COST

TRANSPORTATION COSTS:

TOTAL ALL COSTS FOR TASK IIA:

FIGURE B.III - SUMMARY OF COSTS

TASK: Task III – Tree Management Plan

Role in Study TOTAL

HOURS

HOURLY

RATE

DIRECT

LABOR COST

OVERHEAD

RATE

OVERHEAD

COST

TRANSPORTATION COSTS:

TOTAL ALL COSTS FOR TASK IIB:

APPENDIX A

CITY OF JACKSON

STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS

FOR

PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT

FOR

These Standard Terms and Conditions for Professional Service Agreement (Standard Terms) are incorporated into the Contract for Professional Services between City of Jackson (Owner) and the undersigned, Professional Service Provider (PSP) and are to be part of said Owner - PSP Contract (Contract). If the Standard Terms conflict or are inconsistent with the Contract or any other terms, conditions, specifications or contract documents, the Standard Terms shall govern.

In the absence of a Owner - PSP Contract, the Standard Terms shall serve as the Contract between the undersigned parties.

Notwithstanding any other provision contained herein, it is understood and agreed between the undersigned parties that the Contract dollar amount identified in PSP's proposal dated , (Proposal) constitutes a NOT TO EXCEED Contract dollar amount and shall be deemed full remuneration for all professional services provided, including, but not necessarily limited to, labor, services, out-of-pocket expenses, activities and work described or identified in the Proposal and the Owner’s Request for Proposal (RFP) dated . Said RFP is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in full and shall be deemed part of the Standard Terms.

1. SERVICES: The PSP shall perform the services, activities and work set forth or identified in the Proposal and RFP.

2. COMPENSATION: In consideration of labor, services, activities and work provided by PSP, the Owner shall pay PSP the dollar amounts identified in the Proposal in accordance with the terms of payment set forth herein.

In consideration of any extra or additional services provided by PSP that are beyond the scope of the RFP and Proposal, Owner shall reimburse PSP on a time and material basis for all actual and reasonable labor and out-of-pocket expenses.

Provided however, preliminary cost estimates for providing extra or additional services shall be presented to the Owner for review and written approval prior to performance by PSP.

3. TERMS OF PAYMENT: Invoices shall be submitted not more often than monthly to Owner for the services performed and the expenses accounted for under this Agreement during the preceding monthly period. Owner shall pay the full amount of the invoice within 60 days of the invoice date, unless Owner disputes same.

Pursuant to Charter Section 2.15, Owner may deduct from the amount paid to PSP any invoices, judgments, or taxes currently owed by the PSP that are delinquent.

4. PROFESSIONAL STANDARD: PSP will perform its professional services under this Agreement by the exercise of due care and skill in accordance with applicable professional standards for services of this type under these circumstances.

5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: It is agreed between the Owner and PSP that employment by Owner of Construction Contractor(s) to construct work and perform maintenance constitutes them as independent contractors and as such they are completely responsible to Owner. The PSP will provide general engineering observation of the work by the Contractors as construction progresses, and, if applicable, will provide resident construction observation (RESIDENT AGENT) for the compensation set forth in the Proposal. The PSP does not guarantee the performance of the contractor(s) by PSP’s performance of such construction observation. Provided, however the PSP is responsible to promptly notify the Owner of substandard performance by the contractor(s) that PSP knew or should have known was unacceptable. The PSP’s undertaking hereunder shall not relieve the contractor of its obligation to perform the work in conformity with the drawings and specifications and in a workmanlike manner. The PSP shall have authority on behalf of the Owner to reject work by the contractor(s) which does not conform to Contract Documents.

6. INSURANCE: Where Owner requires that project construction Contractor(s) provide liability insurance, Contractor(s) shall name PSP as an additional insured.

Owner shall require Contractor(s) to submit certificates evidencing proof of such coverage directly to PSP who shall be responsible for ensuring required language is included in Owner’s contract documents to satisfy this requirement.

The PSP shall demonstrate that they have obtained professional liability insurance coverage which insurance shall provide coverage for negligent acts, errors or omissions committed or alleged to have been committed by the PSP, with minimum limits of liability of $1,000,000 per claim for all projects with an estimated total dollar cost of $100,000 or greater; and minimum limits of liability of $500,000 per claim for all projects with an estimated total dollar cost of less than $100,000.

The professional liability coverage shall extend coverage to loss of interest, earnings, profit, use and operations and interruptions, and other special, indirect and consequential damages resulting from negligent acts, errors or omissions of the PSP.

The PSP shall provide evidence of commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance coverage with minimum limits of liability for each policy of $500,000 for each occurrence. Commercial General liability coverages shall name the Owner as an additional insured. The insurance shall protect the Owner from claims for bodily injury, death or property damage which may arise from performance of the work by the PSP.

The PSP shall demonstrate a valid Worker's Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance coverage, as required by the State of Michigan, is in force for all its employees.

All insurance policies shall be issued on an occurrence basis by financially responsible insurance companies licensed or approved by the State of Michigan and acceptable to the Owner.

7. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT: The Owner may at any time, upon seven (7) days prior written notice, terminate this Agreement. Upon such termination, Owner shall pay to PSP all amounts owed PSP under this Agreement, for all work performed to Owner’s satisfaction up to the effective date of termination.

8. DOCUMENTS OF SERVICE: The PSP agrees that all reports, drawings, letters, work sheets, plans, preliminary material tables, supportive data, documents, and other materials produced by the PSP in the course of and for the purpose of meeting this Agreement, are the property of the Owner, but PSP shall have the right to use same. Owner may obtain copies of any of the above named material for a nominal reproduction charge. The above documents are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by the Owner or others on extensions of the Project or on any other project. Any reuse without written verification or adaptation by the PSP for the specific purpose intended will be at the Owner’s sole risk.

9. OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST: Opinions of Probable Cost prepared by PSP represent PSP’s best judgment as a design professional familiar with the industry.

It is recognized, however, that neither PSP nor Owner has control over the cost of labor, materials or equipment, over contractors’ methods of determining bid prices, or over competitive bidding, market or negotiating conditions. Accordingly, Owner understands that PSP does not warrant or represent that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from the cost estimates prepared by PSP.

10. OWNER OBLIGATIONS: Owner shall at no cost to PSP:

A. Provide all information to PSP as identified in the RFP.

B. Provide to PSP, in a reasonably prompt manner, all data and information in the possession of Owner as may be required by PSP to perform the services under the Contract.

C. Provide PSP personnel with access to the work site so that they may perform the work under the Contract without interference.

D. Upon written request of the PSP, designate a person to act as Owner representative, who shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define Owner policies and decisions with respect to the services under the Contract.

E. Furnish to PSP prior to any performance by PSP a copy of any engineering, design, and construction standards which Owner shall require PSP to follow in its performance of services under the Contract.

11. INDEMNIFICATION: To the fullest extent permitted by law, PSP expressly agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Owner harmless against all claims, suits, damages, expenses, costs, attorney fees, losses and liabilities arising out of bodily injury or property damage, pollution, contamination of or adverse effects on the environment or any violation of governmental laws, regulations or orders resulting from PSP’s performance of this Contract, based upon any act or omission, negligent or otherwise, of PSP or any employee, subcontractor or other person acting on PSP’s behalf in connection with or incident to this contract or the work to be performed hereunder. PSP shall not be obligated to indemnify Owner for the Owner’s own negligence. PSP’s obligation to indemnify, hold harmless and defend Owner shall survive the expiration or termination of this Contract. By entering into this Contract, the parties do not waive any immunities provided by law.

12. VOIDABLE AND RESCINDABLE FOR FAILURE TO DISCLOSE CITY

EMPLOYEE AS PARTY TO CONTRACT. This contract or agreement shall be voidable or rescindable at the discretion of the City at any time if a City employee who is a party to this contract or agreement or has a financial interest in this contract or agreement fails to disclose his or her interest as required by the City of Jackson Code of Ordinances (“the Code”). This contract or agreement is also voidable or rescindable if a lobbyist for the Contractor (as defined in Section 2- 555 of the Code), or an agent of the Contractor, offers a gift, gratuity, honoraria or payment that is prohibited by the Code to a City employee, the Mayor, an Elected Official, an Appointed Official, or a member of a board or commission of the City.

13. GOVERNING LAW: The Contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of

Michigan.

14. NO ASSIGNMENT: Neither party shall assign its rights, interests or obligations under the Contract without the express written consent of the other party. Any assignment made without such written consent shall be void; however, such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.

15. NO WAIVER: The failure of either party to enforce, at any time, the provisions of the Contract shall not constitute a waiver of such provisions or the right of Owner or PSP at any time to avail themselves of such remedies as either may have for any breach or breaches of such provisions.

16. VENUE: The parties agree that any action relating to the Contract shall be instituted and prosecuted in the courts of the County of Jackson, State of Michigan, and each party waives the right to change of venue.

17. NEGOTIATED: It is agreed by the parties hereto that the Contract is a result of negotiation between the parties, and accordingly, it will not be construed against either party in the event of a dispute or litigation arising out of the Contract.

18. CONFLICTING TERMS. If any term or provision of these Standard Terms and

Conditions are in conflict with the Proposal/Contract Agreement between the parties, or any addendum thereto, the provisions or terms of the Standard Terms and Conditions shall control.

19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the parties and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, negotiations and representations of any kind, both written and oral, with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any agreements submitted by the Contractor, and in the event of conflicting provisions, the provisions of this Agreement as drafted by the City shall control even if an agreement, specification or proposal submitted by the Contractor was executed contemporaneously with this Agreement and even if the agreement, specification or proposal submitted by the Contractor claims to supersede this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument signed by the PSP and the Owner.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day of , 20 .

Project Identification:

Professional Service Provider, (PSP)

By Witness

Its

City of Jackson, (OWNER)

By

Witness Daniel J. Mahoney

Its _MAYOR

Approved as to Substance Approved as to Form:

Jonathan Greene, City Manager Matthew Hagerty, City Attorney

APPENDIX B

GRANT APPLICATION PROJECT NARRATIVE

PROJECT NARRATIVE

IRA - UCF Project Narrative 2023 - Page 1

1. Project Scope Alignment:

Describe the issues this project is seeking to address and how the project will contribute to the goals in this funding opportunity, including congressional, Justice40, State Forest Action Plans, and Ten-Year Urban and Community Forestry Action Plan (2016-2026) priorities.

The City of Jackson, Michigan was founded and established in 1829. In the 1920s and 1930s, the City of Jackson grew from a small farm town into a mid-size manufacturing city with over twenty auto manufacturers. The City of Jackson was once a prosperous neighborhood with many businesses and well-built and maintained homes. The neighborhoods has changed and struggled to regain their early economic and community stability due to historic disinvestment and disenfranchisement of its residents. Disinvestment occurred through the "Residential

Security Maps" classification that, from 1935 to 1940, created risk maps which identified

"redlined" areas where banks were advised against lending. Due to its size, Jackson was one of

239 cities that received a risk map for lenders. The redlined area in Jackson resulted in reduced resources and denying residents access to capital for housing or businesses.

Years of poor urban planning in the form of the Urban Renewal and community disinvestment resulted in the demolition of 546 homes. The loss of homeownership in the community directly impacted the neighborhood's economy. Based on the U.S. Census Bureau of Reports, homeownership remains the number one builder of wealth. Prior to Urban Renewal, homeownership in the community was 77%. Today, it is under 15%.

Current demographic, economic, and environmental indicators show that residents of the redlined community still face challenges and disadvantages and have lower expected life outcomes. Strategic investment is needed to help counter the historic disinvestment. The reforestation of the City is recognized as an important tool in reversing shortcomings of the past to aid to revitalize the neighborhoods and the region.

During a similar timeframe as the neighborhood residents were being impacted by community disinvestment, the urban forest adjacent to the neighborhood homes was under attack by a number of tree borne “diseases” starting with Dutch elm disease in the 1960s and 1970s and the emerald ash borer in the 2000’s. Both of these diseases took a significant toll on the urban forest in the City of Jackson and, unfortunately with the other economic impacts on the community and its growing loss of tax base from industry and population, there was no interest or funding to expand the urban forest let alone replace the trees lost to these diseases.

The Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEJST) identifies 12 census tracts within the

City of Jackson (see Figure 1). A summary of the data from CEJST by census tract is shown in

Table 1. This data shows all but one census tract (CT 8) is identified as disadvantaged. Based on census tract data, 85% of the City of Jackson is considered disadvantaged based on the federal definition.

IRA - UCF Project Narrative 2023 - Page 2

Figure 1. Census Tracts from CEJST

Table 1. Summary of Census Tract Population from CEJST

Census Tract 2010 ID Total Population

Percent of Total

Population

Identified as Disadvantaged without Considering Neighbors

26075000100 (CT 1) 3,220 9.9% TRUE

26075000200 (CT 2) 2,785 8.5% TRUE

26075000400 (CT 4) 3,995 12.2% TRUE

26075000500 (CT 5) 1,750 5.4% TRUE

26075000600 (CT 6) 1,001 3.1% TRUE

26075000800 (CT 8) 4,633 14.2% FALSE

26075000900 (CT 9) 3,068 9.4% TRUE

26075001000 (CT 10) 2,313 7.1% TRUE

26075001100 (CT 11) 1,989 6.1% TRUE

26075001200 (CT 12) 2,284 7.0% TRUE

26075001300 (CT 13) 2,683 8.2% TRUE

26075006900 (CT 69) 2,952 9.0% TRUE

Total Population: 32,673

Disadvantaged Population: 28,040 (excludes Census Tract 26075000800)

Percent Disadvantaged: 85.4%

IRA - UCF Project Narrative 2023 - Page 3

This project proposes to work with trained arborists to develop and populate software to prepare a complete inventory of the current urban forest within the public rights of way utilizing current technologies including laptops, GPS equipment, forestry data collection applications, and GIS software. This city-wide inventory will allow the City to evaluate their current forest and make planning decisions on the best use of funds to strengthen the current tree canopy. By collecting and creating this city-wide information, the City will be equipped to choose planting locations and tree species to begin reforestation. This will also allow the bundling of existing resources and the grant funds to begin a four-year program to increase and improve the current urban tree stock. It will also prepare the City for future investment in the urban forest.

The objectives of the Urban Reforestation Program would be:

1. Create a tree inventory and management plan;

2. Plant a diversified selection of trees;

3. Conduct maintenance such as trimming, pest & disease control, fertilizing, etc.; and

4. Remove stumps and hazardous, diseased, and invasive trees.

These objectives would improve the low number and quality of the existing tree canopy throughout the City of Jackson. This program will also improve the resilience of urban forest by diversification of the tree stock within the City. These ideas are in direct alignment with the

“Ten-Year Urban and Community Forestry Action Plan.”; specifically, Goal 3 and Goal 4.

Goal 3. Cultivate Diversity, Equity, and Leadership Within the Urban Forestry Community

A: Increase diversity, equity, and accessibility in urban and community forestry.

B: Engage underserved communities in urban and community forestry.

The tree inventory will be conducted across the entire city. A city-wide inventory is necessary to assess the condition of the current urban forest and ensure an even distribution of trees throughout the City. Tree planting, maintenance, and removals will occur in areas identified as

“disadvantaged.”

Goal 4. Strengthen Urban and Community Forest Health and Biodiversity for Long-Term

Resilience

A: Increase the biodiversity, health, and resilience of trees in urban and community forests.

B: Foster resilience, restoration, and sustainability of urban and community forests facing climate change

The addition to the tree canopy will aid in mitigating the urban heat island effect to protect the health of the community.

IRA - UCF Project Narrative 2023 - Page 4

2. Implementation Strategy/Methodology/Timeline:

Provide a detailed explanation of the proposed approach, methodology, operations strategies, project schedule/timeline with goals/milestones, expected accomplishments or measurable outcomes, and project assessment/evaluation methods.

The City proposes a 4 year project approach. The first year involves the development of a city-wide tree inventory, which after its completion in the first year, would then be used on an annual basis to manage and upgrade the urban forest of the City of Jackson. Reforestation will occur in each of the 4 years. Additional details for each year are discussed below. This project would be a total cost of $757,275 and a match waiver is requested as tree planting, maintenance, and removal will occur in “disadvantaged communities.” Additional information regarding match waiver is discussed in Section 5, Evidence of Disadvantaged Community Status.

Year 1: Issuance of a Request for Proposal (RFP) to contract with a forestry company to complete a computerized inventory of all of the trees within public rights of way. The inventory would include GPS locations, genus, species, caliper size and tree health of every tree. This information would be uploaded to the city-wide GIS system to provide a complete database of the urban forest. The information would be available to share between all the various City departments. Upon completion of the inventory, it will be reviewed by the company that prepared it and a tree management plan will be developed. This will allow ease and consistency in determining planting sites and the appropriate tree species based on site size and location. Utilizing the tree management plan, the City will start an initial reforestation program and removal of some of the most hazardous trees.

Years 2-4: The existing inventory and tree management plan will be reviewed to determine planting sites and appropriate tree species for those sites. The City would continue with the reforestation program and contract with a certified arborist to identify tree species based on size of planting area, existing utilities, overhead obstructions. Using these factors, a group of diverse species would be identified that would be best suited for planting based on the location factors. This continued approach would assure the greatest success of developing a healthy and resilient urban tree stock. A portion of the funding would also be used for tree maintenance activities such as trimming, pest & disease control, or fertilizing. In addition, funding would be used to remove any hazardous, unhealthy, or invasive tree along with stump removal and related restoration. This would allow these previous locations that included trees to be prepped and included as sites for future consideration of tree plantings. The activities proposed in years 2-4 will be completed by City staff and contractors retained through competitive bid process.

3. Capability and Capacity:

Describe how each contributing organization is suited for (mission) and qualified to deliver the project. Provide the names, titles, and organization affiliation and specific roles of key personnel for the project. Include qualifications and experience of key personnel to implement, monitor, and assess/report project outcome.

IRA - UCF Project Narrative 2023 - Page 5

The City of Jackson has extensive experience and staffing that has successfully utilized federal funds for community improvement projects. The City is an entitlement community and has been the recipient of CDBG funds since 1974. The City has received funding from numerous other sources including transportation funding which have included STP, HISP and the City’s

Major Street fund.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .