rfq24allames00067.pdf

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LAMESA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

TXDOT SOLICITATION NO.: RFQ-24ALLAMES-00067

1. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ANNOUNCEMENT

2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

3. INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESPONDING TO A SOLICITATION IN EGRANTS

4. AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN

TxDOT Solicitation No.: RFQ-«CSJ»-00067

TxDOT CSJ/Project No.: «CSJ»

Texas Department of Transportation

Aviation Division

Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Professional

Services

The of Lamesa and Dawson County through its agent, the Texas Department of

Transportation (TxDOT), intends to engage a qualified firm for services. This solicitation is subject to 49 U.S.C. §47107(a)(17) and will be administered in the same manner as a solicitation conducted under Chapter 2254, Subchapter A, of the Texas Government Code.

TxDOT Aviation Division will solicit and receive qualification statements for professional services as described below:

Airport Sponsor: City of Lamesa and Dawson County, Lamesa Municipal Airport;

TxDOT CSJ/Project No.: 24ALLAMES. The TxDOT Project Manager is Luis Camargo.

Scope: Prepare an Airport Layout Plan (ALP) Update with Narrative Report with tasks to include:

1. Prepare an ALP with Narrative consistent with the most current FAA Advisory

Circulars and Standard Operating Procedures;

2. Incorporate FAA AGIS requirements and data collection as needed, including an -

18B obstruction survey, and upload data to the FAA’s Airport Data and Information

Portal.

3. Develop a Capital Improvement Plan, including a recommended phasing plan and financial overview that considers local, state, federal, and alternative funding sources;

4. Prepare/update the airport property map (Exhibit A) consistent with the most current FAA Advisory Circulars and Standard Operating Procedures;

5. Establish phased, attainable goals for airport improvements and development based on a forecast for aviation demand and current and future critical aircraft; and

6. Develop and adopt into local zoning airport height hazard protection and airport land use compatibility measures, including associated maps, to ensure the protection of the public investment in the airport; and

Per FAA SOP 8.00, review any existing RSA determinations and update as needed or complete a determination for any runway that does not have one. If an RSA study is needed, that study will be conducted as part of this planning effort. A list of follow-on projects or studies will be a deliverable of this task.

The Agent, in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

(78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all respondents that it will affirmatively ensure that for any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit in response to this solicitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award.

The proposed contract is subject to 49 CFR Part 26 concerning the participation of

Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE).

The DBE goal is set at 0%.

To assist in your qualification statement preparation, the criteria and most recent Airport

Layout Plan are available online at http://www.dot.state.tx.us/avn/avninfo/notice/consult/index.html by selecting “Lamesa

Municipal Airport.”

Response Procedure:

The successful firms will be selected on the basis of a Response. A prime provider may only submit one Response. If a prime provider submits more than one Response, that prime provider will be deemed non-responsive. The Response must contain the required information, and should address the recommended information, as listed below. Response submissions will be scored accordingly. If the Response is non-compliant with any of the following requirements, the Response may be deemed non-responsive.

1. Qualifications Statement (QS) – The QS shall contain no more than nine 8.5x11-inch single-sided pages.

a. QS Format:

i. Readability – The submitter has latitude in formatting the QS for visual effectiveness. Graphics, tables, photos, and other visual aids are permitted within the nine allotted pages, except that Quick Response (QR) codes or other external link(s) are not permitted. There is no specific font, font size, color, or other formatting requirements, although a font size smaller than 10 is not recommended. Selection committee members may consider legibility and readability when scoring.

Unreadable text will not be considered and may cause the QS to be deemed non-responsive. It is the submitter’s responsibility to provide a legible, readable document.

http://www.dot.state.tx.us/avn/avninfo/notice/consult/index.htm

b. QS Content - It is recommended the QS include:

i. The RFQ number, airport name, name of firm, firm address, email address, telephone number and contact information for key personnel. The response shall also identify each proposed project team member, each proposed member’s time commitment to this project as a percentage of their total work week, and whether the proposed member is an employee of the responding firm or a sub-contractor to that firm.

c. QS Content – For scoring purposes, the QS must include:

i. Information showing the firm’s project understanding and technical approach, including similar project-related experience of the project manager and each task leader responsible for a major work category. For each project referenced, identify either the project manager’s or the task leader’s specific role(s) and work contributed. The project manager is required to be a Professional Engineer registered or licensed in

Texas, by the submission deadline. If applicable to project, an Architect, is required to be registered or licensed in Texas, by the submission deadline. License number(s) must be included in the response submission.

ii. In addition to individual project-related experience of the project manager and task leaders required under

(ii), list no more than ten relevant projects performed by the responding firm within the last 10 years. This shall include airport name, location, phone number, and airport contact person’s name, title, and phone number. It shall also include the original project completion time estimate vs. the actual completion time for the cited design project, as well as a brief narrative description of the project and whether or not your firm served as the prime or the sub on each project cited.

iii. Project Design Schedule: Indicate the number of weeks necessary to design the project in accordance with “Project Design Schedule Information” below.

The Response must be submitted in eGrants following the Submission Procedures at the end of this notice.

PROJECT DESIGN SCHEDULE

Based on the published project scope and your technical approach, indicate below the number of weeks necessary for each phase and total design time to design the project. Some of the basic responsibilities within each design phase are included for reference. Do not include review time. Assume, however, that your work will require some revision after review, and that the time required to address these comments should be included within your schedule. If time is required for specialized studies, indicate the additional time.

NOTE: This proposed schedule will set the basis for the contract deadlines in the professional services agreement if your firm is selected.

Preliminary Report Phase

• Attend pre-design conference

• Obtain and analyze necessary survey data

• Obtain and analyze necessary geotechnical data

• Prepare comprehensive report

Preliminary Design Phase

• Attend project meeting(s)

• Prepare project drawings (70%)

• Provide all technical specifications

• Provide project cost estimate

Final Design Phase

• Attend project meeting(s)

• Finalize drawings and contract documents (100%)

• Provide a revised opinion of probable total project costs

• Prepare a Construction Management Plan

• Update, if necessary, the Preliminary Report

• Prepare and submit airspace study to FAA

EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR AIRPORT PLANNING QUALIFICATIONS

1. Capability to perform all of the services required for this project and professional qualifications of key personnel assigned to this project relevant to the work to be performed. (25 points)

Does the consultant have the necessary resources to perform all of the services required (e.g.: planning, surveying, CAD, etc.)? Who are the professionals that will be working on this project on a daily basis and how do their qualifications and experience with general aviation airport planning projects compare with other respondents? [Sources of information: Aviation Planning Team, Recent Relevant

Airport Experience, Proposed Technical Approach, and possibly the Optional

Summary.]

2. Recent experience, within the last ten years, in the development of airport plans comparable to the proposed project. (25 points)

Does the consultant have direct experience developing general aviation airport plans and drainage studies similar to those proposed for this location?[Sources of information:

Aviation Planning Team, Recent Relevant Airport Experience, and possibly the Optional

Summary.]

3. Ability to meet the schedules and deadlines of this project and reputation for competence, timeliness, and quality of performance and work product. (25 points)

Does the proposed planning and engineering team have sufficient time to devote to this project in order to meet the schedule submitted in the qualifications? Is the proposed schedule realistic? Does the consultant consistently meet contractual timetables?

Has the work performed for other airports been satisfactory? [Sources of information:

Planning Team Form, Recent Relevant Airport Experience, Project Schedule, possibly the Optional Summary, and reference check.]

4. Proposed Technical Approach and Schedule to Accomplish the Project. (25 points)

Does the consultant show specific understanding and familiarity with the particular requirements of this project and how to address them? Is the consultant familiar with relevant planning and engineering? Is the schedule appropriate to accomplish the project? [Sources of information: Proposed Technical Approach, Proposed Schedule, and possibly the Optional Summary

Submission Procedure

The Response must be received in the TxDOT Aviation eGrants system no later than

July 10, 2024, 2:00 p.m. (CST).

Firms that wish to submit a response to this solicitation must be a user in the TxDOT

Aviation eGrants system no later than one business day before the solicitation due date. To request access to eGrants, please complete the Contact Us web form located at http://txdot.gov/government/funding/egrants-2016/aviation.html http://txdot.gov/government/funding/egrants-2016/aviation.html

The consultant selection committee will be composed of local government representatives.

The final selection by the committee will generally be made following the completion of review of responses. The committee will review all submissions responses and rate and rank each. The evaluation criteria for airport planning projects can be found at http://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/aviation/projects.html under Information for

Consultants. All firms will be notified, and the top-rated firm will be contacted to begin fee negotiations. The selection committee does, however, reserve the right to conduct interviews for the top-rated firms if the committee deems it necessary. If interviews are conducted, selection will be made following interviews.

Please contact TxDOT Aviation for any technical or procedural questions at (800)68-

PILOT (74568). For procedural questions, please contact Noemi Rios, Contract Specialist.

For technical questions please contact Luis Camargo, Project Manager.

For questions regarding responding to this solicitation in eGrants, please contact the

TxDOT Aviation help desk at 1-800-687-4568 or avn-egrantshelp@txdot.gov http://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/aviation/projects.html mailto:avn-egrantshelp@txdot.gov eGrants Workflow:

RFQ Response eGrants Role:

Subgrantee Administrator (SA)

Subgrantee Staff (SS) eGrants link eGrants help:

https://apps2.dot.state.tx.us/apps/egrants2/logout2.aspx eGrants help desk Monday – Friday 8AM – 4PM CD/ST (excluding state/federal holidays) avn-egrantshelp@txdot.gov or 1-800-687-4568

STEP ROLE ACTIONS NOTES

SA

Go to View Opportunities.

a. Select Apply Now to the opportunity

b. The RFQ Response Menu is opened

Very important to click on the name of the document and not the organization name

Make a note of the opportunity due date to ensure you respond in time

SA/SS

Click on View, Edit and Complete Forms

a. Select RFQ Applicant Form

b. Confirm Project information and address

c. Upload RFQ response

PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU SELECT THE

CORRECT PDF FILE BEFORE CHANGING

STATUS.*

d. Hit Save

You should print the proposal document to a PDF so that it becomes un-editable.

SA

When you are ready to submit your response, click on

"Save and submit to CS review". YOU ARE DONE

You will get an email saying the response was successfully submitted; the status must be changed to RFQ Response in CS Review by the due date and time posted in the solicitation.

04 SA/SS

WAIT UNTIL A SELECTION NOTIFICATION IS

SENT TO YOU

SS/SA

AFTER SELECTION NOTIFICATION IS RECEIVED

Log in to view status of response. Once the scores are verified, TxDOT will move the response to an interview, selected or not selected status of which you can log in to see the status of your response.

The selection notification will refer users to eGrants to view the status of their response.

User may also view the TxDOT website for selection information.

Aviation Division https://apps2.dot.state.tx.us/apps/egrants2/logo

*If the responder posts the incorrect file.

• If status has been changed and the due date for the response has not expired, contact the help desk to ask for the status to be administratively changed back to

Response in Process.

• If the incorrect submission was posted, the incorrect file may be deleted and the correct one posted as long as the status has not been changed to Response in CS Review.

Respondent will need to check the “delete” box and hit save. The page refreshes. Then post the correct submission, save, and change the status.

If you are not set up in eGrants and wish to respond to a posted solicitation, you may contact the aviation help desk for assistance by using the webform available at eGrants Help Desk Form

Some organizations will have many user members.

Each organization should determine which user member will submit the completed submission in eGrants. After the opportunity is selected for the organization, it will no longer appear on any other user’s home page unless the initiating user cancels the response.

https://form.jotform.com/62164883455160

RPZ

EASEMENT

1000'

ROAD ELEV. 2981.7'

SURFACE ELEV. 3010.B

CLEARANCE 29.1'

ROAD ELEV. 2982. T

SURFACE ElEV. 3010.8'

CLEARANCE 28.1'

ROAD ELEV. 2989.1'

SURFACE ELEV. 3017,4'

LEARANCE 28.3'

ULTIMAlE RPZ

EASEMENT

ROAD ELEV. 2990.2'

SURFACE ELEV. 3017.4

CLEARANCE 27.'Z

/P

/P

I] t /P

I ;JII I I I I

r '.;:

I

P/P

.1

I' 'K" I \

,f\, ' '

I o

: 75'

15'03'42" E c::::�- "

15'03' 42" W 725:5•/

700'

RUNWAY END

_ ELEV. 2991.8'

I I

I I

NO OFZ OBJECT

PENETRATIONS

ROAD ELEV, 2983, 7'

SURFACE ELEV. 3010.8'

CLEARANCE 27.1'

DIRT COUNTY ROAD

I l1

22;"

OB ANTENNA

14'8UILOING HEIGHT

AIRPORT BRNCH MARK TOP

OF BRASS DISK ON TOP OF

CONCRElE HEADWALL ON THE

SOUTH SIDE OF THE VEHICLE

PARKING ACCESS ROAD

ELEVATION 2995.41'

RL TAXJWAY "J" if •

- !O -- " -

PAVED COUNTY ROAD

oP

11 12

TAXIWAY A

b

RUNWAY END COORDINATES (NAD 83)

RUNWAY EXISTING ULTIMATE

LATITUDE 32"45'28. 7849" N 32"45'28. 7849" N

RUNWAY 7

101 '55'53.4827" W 101'55'53.4827" W LONGITUDE

LATITUDE 32°45'38. 7046" N 32'45'38.7046" N

RUNWAY 25

101"55'08.1408" W 101'55'08.1408" W LONGITUDE

LATITUDE 32'45'37.7331" N 32'45'37.7331" N

RUNWAY 16

101·55'05.8470" W 101 '55'05.8470" W LONGITUDE

LATITUDE 32'44'49.8745" N 32'44'49.8745" N

RUNWAY 34

101'54'51.0342" W 101'54'51.0342" W LONGITUDE

RUNWAY DATA

EXISTING

APPROACH CATEGORY B-[[

APPROACH VISIBILITY MINIMUMS VISUAL

RUNWAY DIMENSIONS, FEET 4,000 X 60

RUNWAY APPROACH SURFACE 20: 1 / 20: 1

SAFETY AREA, FEET 4,600' X 150'

OBJECT FREE AREA, FEET 4,600' X 500'

OBSTACLE FREE ZONE, FEET 4,400' X 400'

TAKE OFF RUN AVAILABLE (TORA) 4,000'

TAKE OFF DISTANCE AVAILABLE (TODA) 4,000'

ACCELERATE - STOP DISTANCE AVAILABLE (ASDA 4,000'

LANDING DISTANCE AVAILABLE (LOA) 4,000'

PAVEMENT MATERIAL ASPHALT

PAVE MENT STRENGTH (SW) LBS. 12,500

RUNWAY EFFECTIVE GRADIENT, % 0.0125

TOUCHDOWN ZONE ELEVATION 2998.8' / 2998.8'

MARKING VISUAL

LIGHTING MIRL

VISUAL APPROACH AIDS NONE

TAXIWAY LIGHTING GUIDANCE SIGNS

NOTES

1. TAXIWAY "A"-NOR1H 4,200' HAS AN EXISTING PAVEMENT

WIDTH OF 75'. MAINTAINED WID1H WILL BE 40'.

2. RUNWAY 16-34 - RUNWAY END ELEVATIONS - ELEVATIONS SHOWN

ON 1HIS DRAWING ARE 0.12' HIGHER THAN THE PUBLISHED ELEVATIONS

ON 1HE AERONAUTICAL DA TA SHEET DUE TO A 1 1 /2" OVERLAY.

BUILDINGS/FACILITIES

EXISTING ULTIMATE ELEVATION PROPOSED DESCRIPTION OBJECT DISPOSmON

1 3007.6' CONVENTIONAL HANGAR

2 3010.0' CONVENTIONAL HANGAR

3 3010.2° REQUEST FAA CONVENTIONAL HANGAR

AERONAUTICAL STUDY

4 3010.0' CONVENTIONAL HANGAR

5 3006.5' STORAGE BUILDING

6 3005.0' FBO HANGAR

7 3016. 1' FBO HANGAR

8 3052.5' REQUEST FAA BEACON

AERONAUTICAL STUDY

9 3014.0' CONVENTIONAL HANGAR

10 3011.6' CONVENTIONAL HANGAR

11 3008.5° T-HANGAR

12 3011.3' T-HANGAR

13 3004.2' T-HANGAR

14 3008.T T-HANGAR

15 3007.3' T-HANGAR

16 3009.8' CONVENTIONAL HANGAR

17 3004.7' T-HANGAR

18 T-HANGAR

19 T-HANGAR

20 T-HANGAR

21 T-HANGAR

22 3004.3' NOB RADIO BUILDING

23 3013.4' CONVENTIONAL HANGAR

24 3016.5' LIGHTED WINOCONE

25 3017.7' SUPPLEMENTAL WINDCONE

26 3010.4' REQUEST FAA VOR

AERONAUTICAL STUDY

RUNWAY 7-25 RUNWAY 16-34

ULTIMATE EXISTING ULTIMATE

B-II B-II B-[[

1 MILE 1 MILE 1 MILE

4,000 X 75 5,000 X 75 5,000 X 75

20: 1 / 20: 1 20: 1 / 20: 1 20: 1 / 20: 1

4,600' X 150' 5,600' X 150' 5,600' X 150'

4,600' X 500' 5,600' X 500' 5,600' X 500'

4,400' X 400' 5,400' X 400' 5,400' X 4QQ'

4,000' 5,000' 5,000'

4,000' 5,000' 5,000'

4,000' 5,000' 5,000'

4,000' 5,000' 5,000'

ASPHALT ASPHALT ASPHALT

12,500 20,000 20,000

0.0125 0.126 0.126

2998.8' / 2998.8' 2995.4' / 2993.8' 2995.4' / 2993.8'

NPI NPI NPI

MIRL MIRL MIRL

NONE PAPl-2 / PAPl-2 PAPl-2, REILS/PAPl-2, REILS

GUIDANCE SIGNS GUIDANCE SIGNS - LITL GUIDANCE SIGNS - LITL

TAXIWAY MARKING STD. W/ � REFLECTORS STD. W/ \: REFLECTORS STANDARD STANDARD

RUNWAY NAVIGATIONAL AIDS NONE GPS NOB - GPS NDB - GPS

N 74"55'30" E 50.0' 890.0

RUNWAY ENO

ELEV. 2985.5'

, LOW POINT)

S 14'59'50" E 810.0'

ROAD ELEV. 2978.1'

SURFACE ELEV. 3006.7'

CLEARANCE 28.6' S 14'59'52:_E_

810.0 �

--� S��:�Si" E ll.=26"41'49" R-1170.83' L-545.55'

N 74•57•30• E 425.36'

NOTES

200'

A=48'00'00" R-1090.83' L=913.83'

ILOING HEIGH

1000'

ROAD ELEV. 2977.8'

SURFACE ELEV. 3006.7'

CLEARANCE 28.9'

EXJSTING a/, �:�EMENT

10.0' ff--L,<J/ o u'//A

ROAD ELEV. 2978.0'

SURF ACE ELEV. 3006. 7'

CLEARANCE 28. 7'

1. DEPICTION OF FEATURES AND OBJECTS, INCLUDING RELATED ELEVATIONS AND CLEARANCES, W11HIN THE RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONES ARE DEPICTED ON 1HE INNER APPROACH PLANS.

2. RECOMMENDED LAND USES Wl1HIN THE AIRPORT ENVIRONS ARE DEPICTED ON 1HE AIRPORT

LAND USE PLAN.

3. BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE (BRL) IS ESTABLISHED IN ACCORDANCE Wl1H F.A.R. PART 77

CRITERIA. BUILDING HEIGHT SHOWN IS HEIGHT ABOVE THE ADJACENT RUNWAY CENTER LINE

ELEVATION. BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF RUNWAY 16-34 AND

ALONG 1HE SOUTH SIDE OF RUNWAY 7-25 IS BEYOND THE AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE.

4. ULTIMATE AWOS LOCATION IS SHOWN AT 1,000' SOU1H OF THE END OF RUNWAY 16 AND

525' WEST OF 1HE CENTERLINE OF RUNWAY 16-34. LAND ACQUISITION WILL BE REQUIRED.

AIRPORT DATA TABLE

ITEM EXISTING

AIRPORT DESIGN GU[-A

AIRPORT REFERENCE CODE B-[

AIRPORT ELEVATION, FEET MSL NAVA 88 2998.8'

MEAN MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE OF HOTTEST MONTH, JULY 95' F

AIRPORT REFERENCE

POINT (ARP) NAO 83

AIRPORT/TERMINAL VISUAL AIDS

AIRPORT /TERMINAL NAVIGATIONAL AIDS

EXISTING ULTIMATE ----

LATITUDE 32'45'23" N

LONGITUDE 101°55'13" W

ROTATING BEACON

NOB - GPS

LEGEND

ITEM

PROPERTY LINES

ULTIMATE

GU[-A

B-1[ 2998.8' 95' F 32'45°23" N 101 '55'13" W

ROTATING BEACON

NDB - GPS

z

0...

6\ AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT

t---�-;",-------t-t---�-----t-t-:=-:=-:--==----------j ROTATING BEACON

I Z 7 7 71

-- BRL --

0000 0000 r-ov c::J

-- BRL --

r-ov

AVIGATION EASEMENT (IF APPLICABLE)

BUILDING CONSTRUCTION

BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE (BRL)

FACILITY CONSTRUCTION

FENCING

THRESHOLD LIGHTS

SUPPLEMENTAL WIND CONE

2 BOX PAPI

RUNWAY END IDENTIFIER LIGHTS (REIL)

LIGHTED WIND CONE AND SEGMENTED CIRCLE

SAFETY AREA

TOPOGRAPHY

ELECTRIC VAULT

FUEL STORAGE AREA

GUIDANCE/HOLD LINE SIGN

.LON)I !i"O I s;z £11£

0 80

� l5 Ir/ ..,

0) Ir/ .., + r-- �

10.5 KNOT

LAMESA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT WIND DATA

NO.

COMBINED SOURCE: MIDLAND, TEXAS

LUBBOCK, TEXAS

PERIOD: 1988-1997 (ALL WEATHER)

RUNWAY 16-34 WIND COVERAGE 90.70%, 13 KNO TS

RUNWAY 7-25 WIND COVERAGE 75.93%, 10.5 KNOTS

COMBINED WIND COVERAGE 98.26%

PERCENT CALM 4.2%

MAGNETIC DECLINATION

JANUARY 1, 1999

ANNUAL CHANGE -0"2.9'

0 300 600

GRAPHIC SCALE: 1" = 300'

REVISIONS

BY CHK'D DATE

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

AVIATION DIVISION

AIRPORT SPONSOR

0 ALP APPROVED ACCORDING TO FAA AC 150/5300-13 CH 5

PLUS THE REQUIREMENTS OF A FAVORABLE EN\IRONMENTAL

FINDING PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY LAND ACQUISITION

CURRENT AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT DEPICTED ON THIS ALP IS

APPROVED AND SUPPORTED BY AIRPORT SPONSOR

OR CONSTRUCTION AND AN FAA FORM 7460-1 SUBMlfilD

PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ON AIRPORT PROPERTY

0 ALP APPROVED ACCORDING TO FAA AC 150/5300-13 CH 5

PLUS THE CONDITIONS/COMMENTS IN LETTER DATED,

/l . ✓ TITLE, AIRPORT SPONSOR'S REPRESEN::r

VE

. r,I ��...J..__/�-""-J.c'....:_:. ���=:::::::_7�2-bA�1/-'L½�o0 ClwL �0,4,,�, &:Ylis ;]�%-

DIRECTOR, AVIATION DIVISION DA TE SIGNATURE -Q.df('

PREPARED BY:

The Brannon Corporation ENOINURS. SURVEYORS, .ai: URBAN PLANNERS

1321 SOUTH BROADWAY e TYLi:R, TEXAS 715701

__,__ (IIU)--

B.F.L.

DESIGNED BY

R.L.R.

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

AIRPORT LAYOUT DRAWING

LAMESA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

LAMESA, DAWSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MARCH 1999

DAlE

MARCH 1999

DAlE

DAlE

Texas eparfment Transportation

A viatfon Division

SHEET 2 OF 11