B02 ATTACHMENT 4 - RFQ PPQ AMD 0001.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
Classifying and Measuring Household Food Waste
Solicitation number
RFQ12319824Q0021
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for Solicitation Number 12319824Q0021 "Classifying and Measuring Household Food Waste". The PPQ is being provided by the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), Contract Management Division (CMD) to collect information on a vendor's past performance for consideration in a source selection. The PPQ requests evaluators to rate the contractor's performance in areas such as on-site management, working relationships with government personnel, ability to provide qualified personnel, quality control, meeting schedule, and problem resolution. Evaluators are also asked whether they would award another contract to the contractor. The related federal contract opportunity is a Request for Quote (RFQ) for commercial services under NAICS codes 541611, 541720, and 541990 with small business size standards ranging from $19.5 million to $28 million in annual receipts. The RFQ is being issued by the Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR SOLICITATION NUMBER 12319824Q0021

Classifying and Measuring Household Food Waste

THIS FORM IS PROVIDED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING TO

AND SUBMITTAL BY THE VENDOR REFERENCES

Our company is being considered in a Source Selection by the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), Contract Management Division (CMD). It would be appreciated if you would provide comments regarding our past performance. Your comments are considered Source Selection Sensitive; therefore, you are advised that the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) prohibits the release of the names of individuals providing reference information about a Vendors past performance. In order to maintain the integrity of the source selection process, respectfully request that you do not divulge the name of the contractor nor discuss your comments on this questionnaire with any other individuals.

This form shall be sent via e-mailed to: Danette Cole at danette.cole@usda.gov, no later than Monday, June 24, 2024, at 12:00 PM EASTERN.

Past Project Information:

1. Contractor name and address:

2. Contract Number and Project Title:

Evaluator (The following information will assist in the analysis of the data. Information will be kept confidential.)

1.Name of Evaluator:Date:
2.Phone Number:
3.Address:
4.Position held or function in relation to the project:

RATINGS:

Please evaluate the contractor’s performance using the following ratings:

(E)ExceptionalThe contractor’s performance greatly exceeded the stated requirements.
(HA)Highly Acceptable The contractor’s performance exceeded the stated requirements.
(A)AcceptableThe contractor’s performance met the stated requirements.
(M)MarginalThe contractor’s performance met the stated requirements, but withdifficulty.
(U)UnacceptableThe contractor’s performance did not meet the stated requirements.

Please rate and provide any supporting information for the following: (Use additional sheets as necessary)

1. The contractor’s on-site management and coordination of subcontractors.

2. The contractor’s ability to maintain a professional working relationship with Government personnel.

3. The contractor’s ability to provide qualified personnel to meet performance objectives as outlined in the Performance Work Statement or Statement of Work.

5. The contractor’s quality control ability.

6. The contractor’s ability to meet the performance schedule.

7. Was the contractor provided an opportunity to discuss any negative performance ratings? If so, what were the results?

8. The contractor’s ability to rectify identified problems in a timely fashion without further incident of the same.

9. Has the contractor been given any of the following: Cure notice; show cause, letters of reprimand, suspension of payments, termination? If yes, please explain.

10. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If no, please explain.

11. Was the contractor provided an opportunity to discuss any negative performance ratings? If so, what were the results?

12. The contractor maintained a professional working relationship with Government personnel.

OVERALL RATING: _________________________

Please provide any additional comments.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .