RFQ No. W9124BV279A001 Altus AFB KC-46A Aircraft Beddown Infrastructure 10.2.26.pdf

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. W912BV279A001

FY28 KC-46A Aircraft Beddown Infrastructure Program Altus Air Force Base, Oklahoma

PROGRAM SOLICITATION OVERVIEW INFORMATION

Federal Agency Name: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Tulsa District (SWT)

Project Title: FY28 KC-46A Aircraft Beddown Infrastructure Program Announcement Type: Initial Announcement Program Solicitation Number: W912BV279A001

Project Need:

The FY28 KC-46A Aircraft Beddown Infrastructure Program at Altus AFB is a national security imperative to establish the Department of the Air Force's premier training beddown for the KC-46A Pegasus next-generation aerial refueling tanker. Replacing Eisenhower-era KC-135s with the multi-role, digital-era KC-46A platform requires immediate modernization of flight-line and training facilities to ensure combat air crews remain mission-ready for global power projection.

The program consists of three critical projects to meet this strategic mandate.

The programmed amounts below are constraints that capture both contract and government administrative costs to be addressed during Phase 1 Services:

• FY28 Aircraft Maintenance Hangar ($109M): A fully enclosed, single-bay general maintenance facility to support multi-craft fleets (KC-46A, KC-135, and C-17), including high-strength airfield paving and a relocated 68,620 SF refueler parking area.

• FY28 Multipurpose Hangar ($104M): A highly complex single-bay facility engineered for high-risk corrosion control and open-tank fuel cell maintenance, requiring the relocation of the existing Liquid Oxygen (LOX) facility.

• FY28 Simulator Facility Phase 4 ($22M): A secure facility expansion to house high-bay Weapons System and Boom Operator Trainers, including specialized HVAC systems.

Project Location: Altus Air Force Base, Oklahoma Authority for Award: Title 10 U.S.C. § 2808a Type of Instrument: Firm-Fixed-Price, Other Transaction (OT) for Construction Delivery Model: Progressive Design-Build (PDB) NAICS Code: 236220 – Commercial and Institutional Building Construction PSC Code: Y1BZ – Construction of Other Airfield Structures Total Program Funding: Not-to-Exceed (NTE) $235,000,000.00

Anticipated Award:

The Government intends to award a Single OT for all three projects. The Government reserves the right to award one or more projects in this or separate OTAs based on funding and program needs. The Government reserves the right to select, not select, or continue discussions with any Design-Builder at any phase. This announcement, including all stated attachments and any websites incorporated by reference, constitutes the entire solicitation and forms the basis for all content resulting in the OT.

Solicitation POCs: Julie S. Hill | julie.s.hill@usace.army.mil Daniel Foyil | daniel.a.foyil@usace.army.mil)

1.0 PROGRAM INFORMATION

1.1 The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Tulsa District (SWT), on behalf of the Air Force Civil Engineering Center (AFCEC), seeks to identify a Design-Build Team for the FY28 KC-46A Beddown Infrastructure Program at Altus Air Force Base, Oklahoma, consisting of the FY28 KC-46A Aircraft Maintenance Hangar, the FY28 KC-46A Multipurpose Hangar, and the FY28 KC-46A Simulator Facility Phase 4.

1.2 Program Goals

GOALS /

OBJECTIVES

DESCRIPTION / KEY FOCUS AREAS

Collaborative Project Development

Facilitate early and continuous collaboration between the design-builder, stakeholders, and the Government to jointly develop the program’s design, costs, and schedule in a collaborative, solutions-focused environment.

Innovation, Speed, and Flexibility

Leverage the OT framework to emphasize speed, innovation (in materials, methods, and delivery), and optimal mission outcomes to assist in rapid mobilization once funds are available, and to complete the program in a timely manner to reduce the impact to current mission operations.

Qualifications-Based Selection

Prioritize the selection of a Design-Build Partner based on proven past performance, team merit, and technical approach rather than detailed construction price proposals at this initial stage.

Risk Management and Feasibility

Ensure the chosen team has a deep understanding of complex Military Construction (MILCON) requirements, coupled with proactive risk identification and mitigation strategies.

Integrated Team Execution

Establish a cohesive Progressive Design-Build (PDB) team structure (including Prime, Designer of Record, Key Subcontractors, and the Government) that demonstrates clear reporting lines, continuity, and collaborative execution capabilities.

mailto:julie.s.hill@usace.army.mil mailto:daniel.a.foyil@usace.army.mil

1.3 The total program amount for this award, including Phase 2 design, construction, and commissioning activities, should not exceed $235M. Statements of Qualifications, Pitch Presentations, and the selected Design-Build Team’s post-selection Phase 1 Proposal must demonstrate a credible approach to developing and delivering the project within this affordability constraint. The Government will not require a competitive Phase 2 construction price, GMP within a fixed price model, at the time of initial selection.

1.4 The Government intends to utilize a Progressive-Design-Build (PDB) project delivery method. This approach emphasizes early collaboration, qualifications-based selection, open-book pricing, and shared risk management between the Government and the Design-Build Team.

1.5 The Government reserves the right to:

1.5.1 Suspend, cancel, or modify the RFQ, requirements, evaluation approach, schedule, or selection process, at any time, with notice of material changes to affected Respondents.

1.5.2 Engage in communication(s) with one or more respondents, individually or collectively, as often as necessary to understand or evaluate a Response.

1.5.3 Request and consider additional information obtained through responses, communications, pitch presentations, or other exchanges conducted as part of this process.

1.5.4 Select none, one, some or all Design-Build Team(s) for Pitch Presentations or subsequent phases.

2.0 ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS

• A-E (Architect-Engineer): The licensed professional, firm, or team responsible for the planning, design, and technical drawings/specifications for the facility.

• CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information): Information that requires safeguarding or dissemination controls pursuant to and consistent with applicable law, regulations, and government-wide policies, but is not classified under Executive Order 13526 or the Atomic Energy Act, as amended.

• FFP (Firm-Fixed-Price): A pricing structure where the price is not subject to any adjustment on the basis of the design-builder’s cost experience in performing the contract. This places maximum risk on the design-builder and provides full responsibility for all costs and resulting profit or loss.

• GMP (Guaranteed Maximum Price): A pricing structure commonly used in Progressive Design-Build where the parties collaboratively develop the design, scope, and pricing prior to establishing a final construction price. Guaranteed Maximum Price will consist of an estimated cost of the work, allowances, and contractor contingency.

Once negotiated and incorporated into the Agreement through a modification, the GMP functions as a Fixed Price commitment for the defined scope of work. The Design- Builder assumes the risk for completing the work within the negotiated GMP and is generally responsible for cost overruns, except for Government-directed changes, differing site conditions, or other authorized modifications that formally adjust the GMP.

• Model OT Agreement Template: The Government’s baseline OT agreement template that will be provided as Attachment 4. The Model OT Agreement Template identifies anticipated terms and conditions for the resulting Phase 1 OT Agreement and future Phase 2 modification, as applicable. The final agreement will be completed after selection and negotiation with the selected Design-Builder.

• Off-Ramp: Refers to a contractual mechanism that allows the Government to discontinue the Progressive Design-Build relationship if a fair and reasonable GMP or FFP for construction cannot be achieved. Upon off-ramp, the Government retains rights to the completed design to continue the project through another delivery method or design-builder.

• Open Book: A transparent cost estimating methodology used during the Progressive Design-Build process where the Design Builder shares complete, detailed, and auditable cost information with the Government. This includes, but is not limited to, direct and indirect costs, subcontractor quotes, and fee structures, for the purpose of collaboratively validating and negotiating a final construction price.

• OT (Other Transaction) Agreement: A legally binding instrument other than a standard contract, grant, or cooperative agreement. OTs are not subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and provide significant flexibility in tailoring the procurement process and terms to the needs of a project.

• PDB (Progressive Design-Build): A two-stage project delivery method where the owner selects a Design-Build team based on qualifications. The team then works collaboratively with the owner during "Phase 1" to develop the design and establish a price for "Phase 2" (final design and construction).

• Post-Selection Phase 1 Proposal Instructions: The instructions issued only to the selected Design-Build Team after completion of the competitive selection process. These instructions identify the information required to support negotiation of the Phase 1 Design and Pre-Construction Services OT Agreement, which may include proposed scope, level of effort details, fee, schedule, assumptions, and related proposal information. This document is not a competitive Step 2 evaluation attachment.

• SAM (System for Award Management): The official U.S. government website where all entities must be registered to do business with the federal government.

• UEI (Unique Entity Identifier): The 12-character alphanumeric identifier assigned to all entities (public and private companies, individuals, institutions, or organizations) who register to do business with the federal government in the System for Award Management

(SAM).

• USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): The federal agency, acting as the engineering and construction agent for the Department of Defense, responsible for managing this solicitation and the resulting OT.

3.0 THE PROGRESSIVE DESIGN-BUILD (PDB) PROCESS

The PDB model is a collaborative project delivery approach in which the Government, designer, and constructor work together from the early stages of design to refine scope, reduce risk, and improve cost and schedule certainty. Under this OT, the process will be executed in two parts:

3.1 Phase 1: Design and Pre-Construction Services

• Scope: The selected Design-Build team shall collaborate with the Government to advance the design, perform site investigations, validate and refine project requirements, and develop progressively more detailed cost and schedule information.

• Design Advancement: This phase will begin at award with the initiation of the design and will continue through an agreed-upon design milestone to establish a fixed price model for construction.

• Purpose: The purpose of Phase 1 is to progress the project design, resolve key technical and scope issues, and align the parties on identified risks with a common path forward before establishing the final construction price.

• Open Book Costing: During Phase 1, the Design-Build Team shall develop a transparent, "Open Book" cost estimate, sharing subcontractor quotes, labor, equipment, material, and detailed pricing data to support cost reconciliation and scope validation with the Government to inform the final construction price.

• Pricing & Negotiation: Upon completion of the agreed design milestone(s) in Phase 1, the Design-Build Team will submit a formal price proposal for Phase 2 based on the "Open Book" cost model. The Agreements Officer will lead a formal negotiation with the Design-Build Team to finalize a fair and reasonable price.

• Award: If the parties successfully negotiate a fair and reasonable price, the Government may modify Phase 1 OT to authorize the awardee to complete the Phase 2 final design and construction activities.

3.2 Phase 2: Full Design and Construction

• Scope: Phase 2 consists of the completion of the final design and all physical construction activities required to deliver the fully functional facility.

• The Off-Ramp: The Government is not obligated to award Phase 2. The OT includes an off-ramp provision allowing the Government, if unable to reach an agreement on a fair and reasonable price for Phase 2, a lack of sufficient funds, or any other reason determined (in its sole discretion), to use the completed design and associated project information to pursue another acquisition approach, including a competitive solicitation for final design completion and construction.

4.0 OTHER TRANSACTION (OT) PROCESS

The Government will conduct a two-step qualifications-based competitive selection process to identify the most advantageous Design-Build Team for this PDB project. The competitive selection process consists of Statement of Qualifications evaluations and Pitch Presentations. The Pitch Presentations will serve as the final competitive evaluation step.

4.1 Statement of Qualifications Submission and Evaluation

Interested Design-Build Teams shall submit a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) in accordance with Attachment 1. The Government will evaluate SOQs to identify the most qualified Design-Build Teams to proceed to the Pitch Presentations.

4.2 Pitch Presentations - By Invitation Only

A target of three of the most highly qualified Design-Build Teams based on SOQ evaluations will be invited to participate in a Pitch Presentation in accordance with Attachment 3. The Pitch Presentation is the cornerstone of the evaluation, moving beyond a paper-based assessment to a direct evaluation of the team's expertise, problem-solving abilities, and collaborative chemistry. The Government will request project specific information management plans addressing design management, problem-solving capability, risk awareness, open book pricing validation, collaboration, and pre-construction staffing. The objective is to select a Design-Build Team that demonstrates a plan that will provide the greatest value to the Government in terms of cost, schedule, performance, and design excellence.

The Government will select the most advantageous Design-Build Team based on the totality of the Statement of Qualifications and Pitch Presentation evaluations.

4.3 Post-Selection Phase 1 Proposal and Negotiation

• After completion of the competitive Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) process, the Government will issue Attachment 5 – Post-Selection Phase 1 Proposal Instructions only to the selected Design-Build Team. The selected Design-Build Team will submit a Phase 1 Proposal for Design and Pre-Construction Services.

• The Phase 1 Proposal may include the proposed Phase 1 scope of services, staffing plan, labor categories, level of effort details, fee, schedule, assumptions, exclusions, and other direct costs and/or information necessary to support negotiation of the Phase 1 OT Agreement. The Phase 1 Proposal will not establish the final Phase 2 construction price, FFP, or GMP. Any target construction price, FFP, or GMP for Phase 2 will be developed later during Phase 1 and negotiated at a future design milestone.

• Attachment 4 – Model OT Agreement Template will serve as the baseline agreement template for negotiation and award of the Phase 1 OT Agreement.

• Attachment 5 - Post-Selection Phase 1 Proposal Instructions is not part of the competitive evaluation process and will not be issued to all shortlisted Design-Build Teams. It is a post-selection negotiation document used only with the Design-Build Team selected.

• If the Government and selected Design-Build Team cannot reach agreement on fair and reasonable Phase 1 terms, the Government reserves the right to discontinue negotiations and take any action in the Government’s interest, including engaging another highly qualified Design- Build Team, revising the acquisition approach, or cancelling the solicitation.

4.4 Award

• Phase 1 — Design and Pre-Construction Services: The selected Design-Build Team may be awarded an OT Agreement for Phase 1 after successful negotiation of fair and reasonable Phase 1 terms. No construction activities will be authorized under Phase 1. Subject to the availability of funding, Phase 1 will be funded with appropriated funds for planning, design, and preconstruction services, as applicable.

• Phase 2 —Design and Construction: Phase 2 may be added by modification to the OT Agreement upon successful negotiation of a fair and reasonable FFP or GMP at a future design milestone.

Phase 2 is subject to statutory authorization, required approvals, availability of Military Construction funds on or around FY28, and the Government’s determination that progression to construction is in the Government’s interest. Subject to the availability of funding, the Phase 2 modification may consist of the construction of one, two, or all three facilities.

5.0 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

5.1 Step 1: Statement of Qualifications

• Design-Build Teams shall submit their SOQ in accordance with Attachment 1.

• Compliance: The SOQ must address all requirements outlined in Attachment 1.

Incomplete submissions may be deemed non-conforming and disqualified from further consideration. Additionally, as discussed in Attachment 1, submissions that do not demonstrate the required bonding capacity will be disqualified from further consideration.

5.2 Step 2: Invitation for Pitch Presentations (By Invitation Only)

• Invited Design-Build Teams shall participate in the Pitch Presentation in accordance with Attachment 3 (provided only to the selected teams – a target of the three (3) most highly qualified). The Government will evaluate the Design-Build Team’s expertise, problem-solving abilities, and collaborative chemistry, to include qualifications, technical/project understanding and approach, risk management and budget control, innovation and schedule optimization and ability to serve as the Government’s Design-Build Team.

• The official requirements for the Pitch Presentations will be provided to the selected design-builders in Attachment 3 to this solicitation.

The Government intends to select the most advantageous Design-Build Team based on the Statement of Qualifications and Pitch Presentation evaluation.

6.0 EVALUATION CRITERIA – STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS AND PITCH

PRESENTATIONS

6.1 Each Design-Build Team will be evaluated using a qualifications-based selection methodology.

Please refer to Attachment 1 for the evaluation criteria for the SOQ.

6.2 A target of three of the most highly qualified Design-Build Teams based on SOQ evaluations will be invited to participate in a Pitch Presentation. The Design-Build Teams selected to participate in the Pitch Presentation will be provided Attachment 3 – Invitation to Pitch Presentations and Attachment 4 – Model OT Agreement Template. Attachment 3 will provide the specific requirements and evaluation criteria for the pitch presentations.

6.3 The Government will select the most advantageous Design-Build Team based on the totality of the SOQ and Pitch Presentation evaluations.

7.0 COMMUNICATIONS AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

7.1 Bidding Inquiry System:

• All questions regarding this Program Solicitation must be submitted through the ProjNet

Suite Bidder Inquiry System at https://www.projnet.org/projnet.

o Solicitation Number: W912BV279A001 o Bidder Inquiry Key: U848K5-Y78MKS

• Inquiry Deadline: ProjNet will be closed to new inquiries on 7 October2026 per the target schedule.

• The Government will post answers to questions received. Companies are encouraged to monitor ProjNet for updates.

• Any post-selection Phase 1 Proposal questions will be handled directly with the selected Design-Build Team during post-selection negotiation.

7.2 SOQ Submission:

• Due Date: SOQs are due no later than the time and date specified in the Request for Qualifications. Any changes due to the due date will be issued in the form of an amendment.

• Submission POCs:

o Julie S. Hill: julie.s.hill@usace.army.mil mailto:julie.s.hill@usace.army.mil o Daniel Foyil: daniel.a.foyil@usace.army.mil

• SOQs should be submitted via the PIEE Solicitation Module. The link to access the step-by-step instructions and other attachments are posted on SAM.gov and are provided in Attachment 1. ONLY PIEE submissions will be accepted for required competitive submissions, unless offerors request relief at least 24 hours in advance of submission and receive approval from the Government Submission POCs listed above. Step 2 Pitch Presentation logistics and any required materials will be provided to invited Design-Build Teams in Attachment 3. The post-selection Phase 1 Proposal process will be provided only to the selected Design-Builder in Attachment 5.

• All submissions should be in Adobe PDF format with Optical Character Recognition (OCR) applied to all documents that will enable word searches to be conducted using Adobe-compatible PDF software.

NOTE: Submissions that are generic, boilerplate, or fail to demonstrate project-specific understanding may be assessed with lower confidence. Greater consideration will be given to Design-Builder Teams who demonstrate proven success in DB Processes, collaborative Progressive Design-Build (PDB) delivery, and experience with complex, secure, or mission-critical facilities.

8.0 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS

8.1 Governing Documents and Registration

a) This announcement, its stated attachments, and any websites incorporated by reference constitute the entire solicitation. In the event of a discrepancy between the announcement, the attachments, or the websites, this main solicitation announcement shall take precedence.

b) All Design-Build team members must be registered in the System for Award

Management (SAM) at www.sam.gov and possess a valid Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) to be eligible for award. The selected Design-Build Team shall maintain an active SAM registration during contract performance and through final payment of the OT.

8.2 Cybersecurity Requirements

a) Authority & Applicability: The Department of War (DoW) has established the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) program, as codified in 32 CFR Part 170, to ensure that entities handling government information implement appropriate cybersecurity standards. As a matter of DoW policy, the principles of the CMMC program are applicable to the OT resulting from this solicitation. Performance under the resulting Agreement will require the handling of Federal Contract Information (FCI).

b) Required Level & Scope: The Government has determined that this project requires the implementation of cybersecurity practices equivalent to CMMC Level 1. The CMMC Level 1 requirements apply to all information systems owned or operated by the Design- Builder (and its subcontractors) that will process, store, or transmit FCI in the performance of the OT.

mailto:daniel.a.foyil@usace.army.mil http://www.sam.gov/

c) Security Controls: At a minimum, the Design-Builder must implement the 15 basic cybersecurity controls that constitute CMMC Level 1. These controls focus on safeguarding information through access control, identification and authentication, media protection, physical protection, and system and information integrity. The final OT will list these specific controls.

d) Self-Assessment and Attestation (Condition of Award): Prior to the award of the OT, the successful Design-Builder must conduct a self-assessment of their information systems against the CMMC Level 1 security controls. The Design-Build Team shall provide a signed attestation affirming that they have successfully implemented all CMMC Level 1 controls. A completed positive self-assessment and attestation are required to be eligible for the OT award. The Government may request additional information regarding the assessment at its discretion.

e) Flow-Down to Subcontractors: The successful Design-Build Team will be responsible for ensuring that any subcontractor, teaming partner, or vendor handling FCI in support of this project also meets the CMMC Level 1 requirements.

8.3 Government-Provided Resources for Cybersecurity and Contracting

The U.S. Government provides several no-cost resources to assist businesses in navigating the federal marketplace and strengthening their cybersecurity posture. Design-Build Teams are encouraged to explore these programs.

a) APEX Accelerators (Government Contracting Assistance): APEX Accelerators (formerly PTAP) offer free, expert guidance to businesses seeking to enter or expand their work within the government sector. Their mission is to help build a strong U.S. supply chain through confidential, one-on-one coaching (e.g., SAM.gov registration, finding opportunities, proposal processes). Find your local APEX Accelerator:

https://www.apexaccelerators.us/#/

b) Project Spectrum (Cybersecurity Compliance Support): Project Spectrum is a DoD-funded, vendor-neutral initiative dedicated to helping businesses in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB) improve cybersecurity readiness. They provide tools, training, and individualized dashboards to help small and medium-sized businesses meet DoD requirements, including CMMC. Access resources: https://www.projectspectrum.io/#/

8.4 Program-Specific Terms and Conditions

a) Congressional Authorization Limitation: Construction under any resulting OT is contingent upon statutory authorization and appropriation of funds. No construction activities shall be initiated unless and until the project is authorized in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and funded through applicable appropriations. Initial performance will be limited to planning and design activities (Phase 1), which may proceed using MILCON Design funds following Congressional notification. Transition to construction (Phase 2) is contingent upon satisfaction of these requirements. The Government is not obligated to proceed with construction, and performance of Phase 1 shall not be construed as a commitment to do so.

https://www.apexaccelerators.us/#/ https://www.projectspectrum.io/#/

b) Performance and Payment Bonds: The successful Design-Builder must demonstrate the capability to provide single project Performance and Payment Bonds of at least $300,000,000. Payment and performance bonding approach terms and conditions will be negotiated with the selected firm during Phase 1 negotiations.

c) Commitment to Small Business Participation: Small business participation is encouraged.

Design-Build Teams have full flexibility to structure their teams in a manner that best supports successful project performance. If a Design-Build Team identifies a small business partner, the partner’s role should be clearly described and may be incorporated into the resulting Agreement, as applicable.

d) Site Visit: Site visit information and logistics may be provided to Design-Build Teams invited to present pitches and/or to the selected Design-Build Team during post-selection Phase 1 proposal development and negotiation, as determined by the Government. The Government reserves the right to control timing, access, attendance limitations, and security procedures for any site visit. USACE will not reimburse the Design-Build Team for costs associated with the Site Visit.

9.0 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS CONTENT

Issuance of this solicitation is a Request for Qualifications only. The requirements contained in Attachment 1: Request for Qualifications is the only submission required to be submitted by the solicitation closing date stated in the posting.

***END OF SECTION***

TARGET SCHEDULE*

Milestone Date and Time Draft Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 21 SEP 2026 – 1 OCT 2026 Virtual Industry Day 25 SEP 2026 ProjNet RFI Submissions for Draft RFQ Closes 24 SEP 2026 Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 2 OCT 2026 – 13 OCT 2026 ProjNet RFI Submissions for RFQ Closes 7 OCT 2026 Request for Qualifications (RFQ) Due Date 13 OCT 2026 Notifications and Invitation for Pitch Presentations 19 OCT 2026 Pitch Presentation Preparation Duration 19 OCT 2026 – 26 OCT 2026 Site Visit (Only for Design-Builders Invited to Pitch Presentation)

26 OCT 2026 –29 OCT 2026

Pitch Presentations 30 OCT 2026 Award Agreement Phase 1 31 DEC 2026

The Government anticipates completing the competitive selection process and making an award within approximately ninety (90) days of RFQ release. Design-Builders who are interested in proposing but unable to meet the approximate timeline may be removed from consideration for award.

NOTE: This schedule is subject to change at the Government’s discretion.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Attachment 1: Request for Qualifications

2. Attachment 2: FY28 KC-46A Aircraft Beddown Infrastructure Overview

3. Attachment 3: Invitation to Pitch Presentations*

4. Attachment 4: Model OT Agreement Template*

5. Attachment 5: Post-Selection Phase 1 Proposal Instructions**

*Attachments 3 through 4 will be provided to teams selected to participate in pitch presentations.

**Attachment 5 will be provided to the design-build team selected as the most advantageous to the Government after completion of the competitive selection process.

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. W912BV279A001