RFQ Attachment 3 Assessor Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

M00264-25-Q-0057 - MARINE CORPS SNS TOOL

RFQ ATTACHMENT 3 – ASSESSOR PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions:

· Sections I through III are to be completed by the Quoter/Major Subcontractor and provided to the Assessor (Government personnel who had experience with the Quoter/Major Subcontractor on a relevant contract referenced on RFQ Attachment 3). The Quoter DOES NOT submit this attachment to the soliciting agency, instead the Quoter sends this to the assessor after completing I – III, then the assessor is to complete the instructions below and then submits this directly to the soliciting agency.

· The Assessor, in turn, will verify Sections II and III, review Section IV, and complete Section V of this Questionnaire. The assessor will submit the completed Questionnaire directly to the Marine Corps Installations National Capital Region – Regional Contracting Office, at monica.curley@usmc.mil

Message to the Assessor:

Your assistance is requested by the USMC to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail to the above email address.

I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)

II. Current or Historical Contract Information (Assessor: If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.)

Assessor: The information listed below is |_| Correct |_| Incorrect.

Contractor Name:

Contractor CAGE Code or UEI Number:

Contract Number:

Client / Agency:

Type of Contract (Fixed-Price, Cost Reimbursement, etc.):

Total Dollar Value of Contract (including options)

Total Dollar Value of work performed:

Period of Performance:

Program Title:

NAICS Code:

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

Project/Requirement Description:

III. Assessor Information

Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/Email Address

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Quality Assurance Specialist

Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor

Other (Specify)

IV. Evaluation Definitions

Use the following definitions in your assessment of contractor performance.

Note: “Very Good” and “Exceptional” shall only apply when the contractor exceeds the requirements of the contract, as described in their respective definitions. Additionally, use of “Very Good” or “Exceptional” requires comments to describe how the contractor exceeded contractual requirements.

V. Performance Evaluation

1. Quality of Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?

Quality of Performance

Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Quality of Performance in the following areas.

Conformance to Contract Requirements

Conformance to Specifications

Standards of Workmanship

Standards of Workmanship: Technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

2. Schedule Performance (Timeliness)

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?

Schedule Performance

Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.

Completion of Contract/Task Order/Delivery Schedule

Meeting Milestones and Schedules

Submitting Deliverables

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any Schedule problems identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

3. Management Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?

Management Performance

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Management Performance in the following areas.

Management Responsiveness

Subcontract

Program Management

Management Of Personnel

Integrated Product Team Management

Management Responsiveness: Timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND customer satisfaction.

Subcontract Management: Timely award and management of subcontracts and meeting subcontracting goals for small business, small disadvantaged business, etc.

Program Management: Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices Management Of Personnel: Ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget Integrated Product Team Management: Commitment and participation in the Integrated Product Team process

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

4. Cost Control

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?

Cost Control

Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Cost performance in the following areas.

Cost/Price Estimates

Cost Efficiency

Invoicing

Forecasting Management Cost Control

Cost/Price Estimates: Ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates.

Cost Efficiency: Realization of any cost reductions or operating efficiencies in accomplishing requirements of the Statement of Work.

Invoicing: Accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of invoices submitted.

Forecasting/Management/Cost Control

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.

VII. General Comments:

Assessor’s Name and Title