RFQ AE 2027-031M26.SL.docx

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

ARCHITECTURAL / ENGINEERING / CONSULTING SERVICES

State of Colorado Colorado Department of Human Services

(CDHS)

Notice Number: RFQ 2027000001 Project Number: 2027-031M26 Project Title: Building Stabilization, CMHHIP Buildings Ph1 of 2 Estimated Project Cost: $ 1,227,571

Table of Contents

Appendix C: Acknowledgement and Attestation Form…………………………………………………….C Appendix D: Scope of Work Program Plan etc. D

RFQ-AE R3 pg. 2

REV 9/2025

I. NOTICES

For State Public Works C.R.S. §8-17-101 - Colorado labor shall be employed to perform at least 80% of the work. Colorado labor means any person who is a resident of the state of Colorado at the time of the Public Works project.

All respondents accept the conditions of this RFQ, including but not limited to, the following:

a. All submittals shall become the property of the State of Colorado and will not be returned.

b. Late submittals shall not be evaluated.

c. The State reserves the right to reject any or all submittals on the basis of being unresponsive to this RFQ or for failure to disclose requested information.

d. The State shall not be liable for any costs incurred by respondents in the preparation of submittals and proposals nor in costs related to any element of the selection and contract negotiation process.

e. Any restriction as to the use of submitted materials must be clearly indicated as proprietary. The requested limitation or prohibition of use or release shall be identified in writing on a cover sheet. Blanket claims of proprietary submittals will not be honored. Fee proposals will be considered proprietary.

f. The respondent has reviewed Appendix B and by responding has agreed that the terms and conditions of the sample Architect/Engineer/Consultant Contract are expressly workable without reservation.

The respondent has reviewed Appendix B and by responding has agreed that the terms and conditions of the sample Architect/Engineer/Consultant Contract are expressly workable without reservation. Any exceptions to the contract must be communicated formally in writing before the solicitation closes. Bearing in mind any and all exceptions may be considered non-negotiable.

Per C.R.S. §24-92-117, a public construction project in the amount of five hundred thousand dollars or more shall be subject to the Buy Clean Colorado (BCCO) Act program requirements. The BCCO Act requires the Office of the State Architect to establish a maximum acceptable global warming potential (GWP) limit for each category of eligible materials, which include asphalt and asphalt mixtures, cement and concrete mixtures, glass, post-tension steel, reinforcing steel, structural steel, and wood structural elements. For any solicitation for a contract for the design of an eligible project, a State Agency or institution shall require the designer who is awarded the contract to include in project specifications when final construction documents are released, a current Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) that meets the maximum acceptable GWP limits for each eligible material specified for the project. A contractor that is awarded a contract for an eligible project shall not install any eligible materials on the project until the contractor submits an EPD for each eligible material procured for the project.

Preference shall be given to Colorado resident vendors and for Colorado labor, as provided by law.

II. PROJECT OVERVIEW

Introduction

This RFQ is for the stabilization of several buildings on the Colorado Mental Health Hospital in Pueblo (CMHHIP) Colorado campus. This project will be run by Project Managers for the Planning Design & Construction (PDC) department within the Colorado Department of Human Services (CDHS).

Background

Bldg. 54 (warehouse built in 1939): Conduct geotechnical assessment to diagnose the failing temporary shoring and an 82-foot-long horizontal crack in the basement. Solution involves permanently stabilizing the vertical wall, relieving soil pressure, repairing concrete cracks, and fixing site drainage.

Bldg. 1A (Superintendent’s Garage stone wall built in 1934): Requires historic engineering assessment and geotechnical testing. Stabilization of the 120 lf stone wall may involve temporary shoring, possible realigning the 5-inch-out-of-plumb stone wall (via jacks or tie-backs), reinforcing with structural steel, and performing masonry restoration.

Bldg. 33 (Grounds Maintenance shop built in 1939): Permanent foundation stabilization and stone wall repair to correct floor heaving. Scope includes full roof system repair of 9,000 sf stone building to stop leaks and replacement of perimeter runoff systems.

Bldg. 20 (Vacant High Security Forensic Institute building built in 1974) (assessment & recommendation): Propose demolition and construction of a new utility hub (between Bldgs. 1 and 26) to house steam heating equipment. This includes rerouting critical utility lines and replacing the obsolete 1974 emergency generator for Bldg. 26.

Bldg. 140 (current High Security Forensic Institute) (assessment & recommendation): Assess current floor failure with geotechnical testing. Provide Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) to find voids throughout the building. The full repair scope may involve removing the existing 6” concrete slab (fiber mesh – no wwf or rebar in it, excavating approximately 5" of ¾” gravel and an undetermined thickness of clay material, installing and compacting new road base, placing a 6" rebar-reinforced concrete slab, and finally installing new high-traffic finish flooring. Anticipate replacement of an undetermined percentage of the floor square footage.

The Colorado Department of Human Services (CDHS) anticipates using a Design / Bid /Build (DBB) approach to project delivery. The Architect/Engineer is expected to provide Basic Services as described in the sample Architect/Engineer/Consultant Agreement and Terms and Conditions of the Contract unless otherwise noted.

Additional work, similar in nature to this project, may be given to the awarded consultant at a later date without public advertisement. It shall be the sole discretion of the owner if additional work will be granted to the consultant based on, but not limited to, the consultant’s quality, and timeliness. The owner has the right to publicly advertise any additional work and the awarded consultant is not guaranteed additional work.

The process to be used in the selection of the Architect/Engineer/Consultant is comprised of two steps. In STEP I submittals will be screened and scored as described in detail in Section X. STEP II is the Oral Interview as described in detail in Section XI. A Jury Panel of individuals who will be involved in the project and/or understand the required services associated with the project will evaluate responses to this RFQ. Upon completion of the evaluation of the Submittals, a limited number of firms will be invited to the oral interviews.

III. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS

Notice is hereby given to all interested parties that all firms will be required to meet all minimum requirements to be considered for this project. Interested parties should be prepared to show evidence of the following to be considered as qualified, as a minimum:

1. Not previously terminated by the State for non-performance on a State Buildings contract or procurement.

1. The consultant must have been in the same business under the same name for the last two (2) years.

Demonstrated design experience in projects of similar scope and complexity for at least two (2) projects each in excess of $ 1,000,000 (hard costs), utilizing the expertise present in their Colorado Office; and Attended and signed in at the Mandatory Pre-Submittal Conference.

The Acknowledgment and Attestation Form, Appendix C is a mandatory requirement for a respondent to be considered responsive to this RFQ Prequalification Submittal.

a. Qualifications made by a respondent in executing this form may render a submittal non-responsive as determined by the State.

IV. MANDATORY PRE-SUBMITTAL CONFERENCE AND SITE TOUR

To ensure sufficient information is available to firms preparing submittals, a mandatory pre-submittal conference has been scheduled. The intent of this conference is to tour the site and to have CDHS – Planning Design and Construction (PDC) department staff able to discuss the project. Firms preparing submittals must attend and sign-in to have their submittals accepted.

A mandatory Pre-Submission Meeting will be held at:

Building Address: 1600 W. 24th Street, Building 49, Pueblo, CO 81003 Room: Conference Room B – B118 Date/Time Wednesday July 21, 2026, 9:00 am (MDT)

V. SCHEDULE

The following is a tentative schedule of events for the Submittal process and an outline of the schedule for the balance of the project. All dates are subject to change and changes in the schedule will be issued via addendum.

The above schedule is tentative. Responding firms shall be notified of revisions in a timely manner by email or posted on the ColoradoVSS website. Respondents may elect to verify times and dates by email, but no earlier than 36 hours before the scheduled date and time.

VI. QUESTIONS, CLARIFICATIONS AND ADDENDA

Owner initiated changes to this RFQ will be issued under numerically sequenced addenda.

Owner initiated changes to this RFQ will be posted in the form of addenda on ColoradoVSS.

Questions and requests for clarifications regarding this project shall be submitted before the deadline listed in the above Schedule.

Communication regarding the project during the procurement, outside of this submission process or scheduled procurement milestones is not permitted.

VII. POINT OF CONTACT/CLARIFICATION

VIII. SUBMITTALS OF QUALIFICATIONS

1. This RFQ document, it’s appendices, and any written addenda issued prior to the closing of the solicitation, and written clarifications shall serve as the only basis for the submittal.

1. All submittals should comply with the following items, a through h. The State retains the right to waive any minor irregularity, or requirement should it be judged to be in the best interest of the State.

Qualifications shall be formatted and tabbed in the exact form and numeric sequence of the Evaluation Form (1 through 7) in Appendix A. A one-sided single-page cover letter addressed to the Project Manager – Matt “Kotten”stette outlining the firm(s) qualifications is required at the front of the submittal. Not counting the cover letter and required Acknowledgement and Attestation form, the entire submittal is to be no more than 20 8 ½’ x 11” sized pages in portrait format, at least 10 font.

Qualifications shall be evaluated in accordance with criteria as indicated in PREQUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL CRITERIA and ranked on the corresponding Evaluation Form in Appendix A.

Response to all items shall be complete.

All references shall be current and relevant.

Complete and execute the Appendix C: Acknowledgment and Attestation Form and submit at the back of the Qualification Submittal.

An electronic copy of the qualification package is due August 4, 2026, and shall be received no later than 3:00 PM (MDT) to: jamie.gott@state.co.us.

Late submittals will be rejected without consideration. The State of Colorado assumes no responsibility for costs related to the preparation of submittals.

IX. METHOD OF SELECTION AND AWARD

A. Short List

1. From the submittals received, a short list of qualified respondents shall be identified using the scoring indicated on the enclosed Evaluation Form, Appendix A.

2. Firms failing to meet the minimum required qualifications will not receive further consideration.

B. Oral Interview

1. Mandatory oral interviews shall be conducted for the short-listed firm(s) only. Interview times and location will be arranged by the CDHS – Planning, Design, and Construction (PDC) Department and all short-listed firms will be notified in advance. At the option of the State, a visit to the short-listed firm(s) managing home office and/or representative field office may be required.

C. Method of Selection and Award

1. Submittals will be evaluated by a panel of individuals selected in accordance with state policies. The panel will review and score the submittals. Firms ranked the highest will be invited to an oral interview. It is anticipated that no fewer than three (3) or no more than six (6) will be interviewed.

X. EVALUATION OF QUALIFICATIONS

A. PREQUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL CRITERIA

Firms will be judged not only on their past experience for the type of work involved, but also on their ability to address issues critical to the success of the project requirements outlined in this RFQ document. The primary focus of the prequalification evaluation will be the firm(s) capability.

1. PROJECT TEAM

Identify the project principal, the project manager, key staff and subconsultants. Present a brief discussion regarding how the team's qualifications and experience relate to the specific project.

Qualifications and relevant individual experience.

Unique knowledge of key team members relating to the project.

Experience on projects as a team.

Key staff involvement in project management and on-site presence.

Time commitment of key staff.

Qualifications and relevant subconsultant experience.

The proposing Architectural/Engineering (A/E) firm must demonstrate extensive, documented experience in the assessment, stabilization, and rehabilitation of significant historic structures. Additionally, the firm must possess a proven track record of executing complex projects within active, occupied institutional or healthcare campus environments.

To be considered responsive, the firm must provide evidence of the following:

Minimum Historic Preservation Credentials:

Federal Standards: The firm’s Architect and Structural Engineer assigned to this project must meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards (36 CFR Part 61) for Historic Architecture and/or Historic Preservation.

Regulatory Coordination: Demonstrated successful experience coordinating with State Historic Preservation Offices (SHPO). Specific experience working with History Colorado and navigating the Colorado State Historical Fund (SHF) grant process, including the preparation of formal Historic Structure Assessments (HSAs), is highly preferred.

Secretary of the Interior’s Standards: Proven ability to design structural stabilization and weatherization interventions that strictly adhere to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, specifically prioritizing reversible treatments and the protection of historic fabric.

2. FIRM/TEAM CAPABILITIES

Organization charts and graphs depicting your capacity may be included.

Are the lines of authority and coordination clearly identified?

Are essential management functions identified?

Are the functions effectively integrated? (e.g., subconsultants’ role delineated)?

Current and projected work load.

3. PRIOR EXPERIENCE

Include the name and current telephone number of the owner’s project manager for every project listed.

Experience of the key staff and firm with projects of similar scope and complexity.

A "similar project" is defined as:

Structural stabilization or exterior envelope rehabilitation of a designated historic building (local, state, or National Register).

Projects involving archaic structural systems (e.g., load-bearing historic masonry, heavy timber).

Projects executed under the purview of a state or federal agency, utilizing public funds.

For each project profile, the firm must provide the original budget, final cost, original schedule, final completion date, and a client reference.

Demonstrated success on past projects of similar scope and complexity.

References.

4. PROJECT APPROACH

For the project and services outlined in the RFQ document, describe how you plan to accomplish the following project control and management issues:

Budget Methodology / Cost Control Establish and maintain estimates of probable cost within owner's established budget.

Control consultant contract costs Coordinate value engineering activities Budget Considerations Quality Control Methodology

0. Insure State procedures are followed Improve energy efficiency through the use of an integrated design process, life cycle costing, the use of an energy standard (current OSA energy code) and the specification of energy efficient materials, systems, and equipment Reduce embodied carbon emissions by utilizing and submitting Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) that meet the OSA’s maximum acceptable global warming potential (GWP) limits Insure the project is designed for durability and maintainability

Schedule

0. Manage the required work to meet the established schedule

5. EQUITY, DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION

0. Describe how your firm is incentivized to hire and promote diverse individuals

0. Describe how your team attempts to partner with Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses or historically disadvantaged businesses

6. WORK LOCATION

Describe where the prime and subconsultants will do the key work elements of this project.

0. Proximity of firms office as it may affect coordination with the State's project manager and the potential project location.

Firm's familiarity with the project area.

Knowledge of the local labor and material markets.

XI. ORAL INTERVIEWS EVALUATION CRITERIA

(Note that the primary focus of the Oral Interview will be the proposed project management team members’ capabilities).

It is anticipated that oral interviews will be conducted during the week of August 10, 2026. Interviews will be conducted at: Building 49 – SDFM Administration. The time for interviews is to be determined. Key personnel from the firm and major consultants who will be directly involved with the project should attend the interview. The interview panel will, in particular, be interested in knowing about the specific project approach proposed and in meeting the individuals who will act as the primary contacts with the CDHS PDC-Department at CMHHIP.

RFQ-AE R3

Rev 09/2025 Appendix A: Evaluation Forms

Appendix A1: Prequalification Submittal/Evaluation Form

Appendix B: Architect/Engineer/Consultant Contract (Standard Format)

Appendix C:

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ATTESTATION FORM

By responding to this RFQ, the respondent(s) certify that they have reviewed the Agreement and its Exhibits contained herein, and is familiar with their terms and conditions and finds them expressly workable without change or modification.

We certify and declare that the foregoing is true and correct.

Note: Use full corporate name and attach corporate seal here.

Offeror Acknowledges Receipt of Addendum No. ____, ____, ____, ____ (Addenda MUST be acknowledged)

(SEAL)

Appendix D: Scope of Work Program Plan etc.

Phase 1 – Initial phase will address work in Buildings 54, 1A, 33, 20 (assessment & recommendations), and 140 (assessment & recommendations).

The initial phase focuses on identifying and understanding the extent of structural issues across the affected buildings. It involves detailed inspections, engineering evaluations, ground penetrating radar (GPR) and the use of monitoring tools to assess movement and deterioration. The findings guide the prioritization of buildings based on risk levels and urgency. Once assessments are complete, design teams work with stakeholders to develop repair plans that address both immediate stabilization and long-term structural integrity. This phase also includes scope development, cost estimation, scheduling, and obtaining necessary permits.

image1.jpg