Tech Exh 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 19 KB Posted

Attached to
Strategic Communications Support to Defense Health Agency
Solicitation number
RFP_HT001119R0029
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire template and details of a solicitation for strategic communications support services. The Defense Health Agency seeks proposals for support to provide strategic, operational, and tactical communications services to meet the challenging mission of the Military Health System. Services include developing and executing communication strategies and plans to educate audiences and personalize the experience of users of the Military Health System. Proposals are due by the date listed on the first page of the solicitation numbered RFP_HT001119R0029. The support services are intended to enable central coordination and alignment of communications across the Military Health System in achieving goals of increased medical readiness, improved population health, enhanced patient experience, and managed healthcare costs.

View the file

Other files

Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PART 7, TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 3

Past Performance Questionnaire

Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation HT0011-19-R-0029, Military Health System Strategic (MHS) Strategic Communications Office Operational Support II: <<Prime Contractor fill in your company name here>>

The Defense Health Agency, Contracting Operations Division is conducting an evaluation of this company’s previous record of performance as part of a source selection process to award a contract for similar services. We respectfully request the reference fill out Part 2 and the reference forward this questionnaire: No later than the offer due date and time listed on the Page 1 of the subject solicitation, via email to pedro.m.godinez.civ@mail.mil and robert.e.leblanc6.civ@mail.mil. For questions related to this form, please contact: Pedro Godinez, Contract Specialist, at (703) 681-8768 or Robert LeBlanc, Contracting Officer, at (703) 681-1790.

PART I: THIS PART FOR COMPLETION BY PRIME OFFEROR ONLY. OFFERORS SHOULD COMPLETE ONE COPY OF THIS FORM FOR EACH REFERENCE PROVIDED.

Name of Individual/Firm being evaluated: __________________________________________________ Name of Firm/Agency for which the referenced work was performed:_____________________________ Name, address and phone number of the COR: _______________________________________________ Name, address and phone number of the Contracting Officer: ___________________________________ Was this work with a: Commercial __ Fed. Govt ___Local/state Govt __ entity.

Name, Title, Employer and Contact Information for Individual Providing Reference: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Period of Performance: ________________________________________________ Contract Award Date: _________________________________________________ Contract Completion Date: _____________________________________________ Check Contract Type: Fixed Price (FP)_ FP Incentive_ FP Economic Price Adjustment_ Award Fee_ Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) completion_CPFF Term_ CP Incentive Fee_ Cost Plus Award Fee_ Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity_ Basic Ordering Agreement_ Requirement_ Labor Hour_ Time and Material_ Sealed Bid_ Negotiated_ Competitive_ Non-competitive_ Contract Amount: ___________________ Prime Contractor: YES NO PWS paragraph(s) that the reference applies to: __________________________________________ The contract number and services provided: _________________________________________________________ Relevance of the referenced contract to the current requirement: ____________________

PART II: THIS PART FOR COMPLETION BY REFERENCE ONLY. References are asked to complete all items set forth in this Part II and return the completed form by No later than the offer due date and time listed on the Page 1 of the subject solicitation. The reference must remit this form via email; filled out in its entirety, directly to pedro.m.godinez.civ@mail.mil, the Contract Specialist and robert.e.leblanc6.civ@mail.mil, the Contracting Officer. The past performance questionnaire must NOT be sent by the Offeror to the Contract Specialist.

For each performance element identified below, references should evaluate performance of the firm or individual identified in Part 1 of this form. Where the reference lacks sufficient information to provide an evaluation for a particular performance element, this should be noted. Where any deficiency or unfavorable information is identified, the reference should identify any mitigating factors that may weigh in favor for the person/firm on whose behalf the reference is provided (i.e., problems due to causes outside the contractor’s control). An individual within your organization that is knowledgeable of the contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall performance should complete this questionnaire.

Name of Respondent: _______________________________________________ Position and Title: __________________________________________________ Telephone Number: _______________________FAX Number: _____________ Email Address:____________________ Address:________________________________________________________ Date Questionnaire was Completed: _____________ Detailed description of Work/Requirement: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Contract Amount: ___________________ Was a Subcontracting Plan Required?__________ Contract Award Date: ____________Contract Completion Date: ________________________ On what basis are you qualified to evaluate the performance of subject firm/individual? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The following chart depicts the ratings that are to be used to evaluate the contractor’s performance:

E
VG
S
N
M
U
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Neutral
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many. Problems, if any, were negligible, and were resolved in a timely and highly effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some. There were few minor problems, which the Contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems; corrective actions taken by the Contractor were satisfactory.
No record of past performance, or the record is inconclusive.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements.

There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.

Performance did not meet contractual requirements.

There were serious problems, and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

When responding to the questions listed, circle the letter that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. For any neutral, marginal, or unsatisfactory rating, please provide explanatory narratives in the remarks block. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. If a question is not applicable, circle N/A. If you circle a Yes/No answer that is marked with an asterisk (*), please provide a corresponding explanation in the remarks block. If more space is required, use the back of the questionnaire or attach additional pages. Handwritten responses to this questionnaire are acceptable. However, if responses are handwritten, please print legibly.

Your time and effort in providing this vitally important information are greatly appreciated.

PERFORMANCE ELEMENTS:

QUALITY OF SERVICE

1. Contractor’s ability to meet minimum quality standards specified for E VG S N M U N/A performance.

2.Contractor’s ability to effectively control the quality of services provided. E VG S N M U N/A
3.Contractor’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions. E VG S N M U N/A
4.Quality of products furnished. E VG S N M U N/A
5.Overall rating of contractor’s standard of workmanship. E VG S N M U N/A
6.Overall rating of contractor’s quality of services. E VG S N M U N/A

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

1.Contractor’s ability to meet specific response times andE VG S N M U N/A
scheduled time frames for completion of specific tasks.
2.Contractor’s responsiveness/timeliness for providingE VG S N M U N/A
administrative reports/documents requires by the contract.
3.Contractor’s adherence to delivery schedules?E VG S N M U N/A
4.Contractor’s timeliness in responding to emergency servicesE VG S N M U N/A
requirements.
5.Overall rating of contractor’s responsiveness/timeliness.E VG S N M U N/A

BUSINESS RELATIONS

1.Contractor’s ability to identify problems and potentialE VG S N M U N/A
problems, and promptly notify the Contracting Officer.
2.Contractor’s ability to correct problems and prevent orE VG S N M U N/A
mitigate potential problems in a timely manner.
3.Contractor’s willingness to improve and correctE VG S N M U N/A
noncompliance issues or concerns.
4.Contractor’s ability to use effective approaches and provideE VG S N M U N/A
technical expertise and resources to solve contract problems.
5.Extent to which the Contractor has demonstrated reasonableE VG S N M U N/A
and cooperative behavior.
6.Contractor’s effectiveness in interfacing with the ContractingE VG S N M U N/A
Officer, quality assurance personnel, and customers.
7.Contractor’s flexibility in satisfying the requirements of itsE VG S N M U N/A
customers.
8.Extent to which the Contractor provided prompt and courteousE VG S N M U N/A
service when responding to customer complaints.
9.Contractor’s ability to coordinate, integrate, and provide forE VG S N M U N/A
effective subContractor management.
10.Overall rating of customer satisfaction.E VG S N M U N/A
11.Overall rating of business relations.E VG S N M U N/A

MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

1.Contractor’s ability to select and retain cooperative andE VG S N M U N/A
effective key personnel, such as the contract manager and
quality control personnel.
2.Extent key personnel were knowledgeable about contractualE VG S N M U N/A
requirement.
3.Contractor’s ability to meet appropriate staffing levels withE VG S N M U N/A
qualified personnel in order to provide required services.
4.Rate the contractor’s ability to provide continuity of keyE VG S N M U N/A
personnel on the contract.
5.Rate the contractor’s ability to replace key personnel in aE VG S N M U N/A

timely fashion.

6.Contractor’s ability to effectively manage subcontractors.E VG S N M U N/A
7.Rating the level of the functional expertise of theE VG S N M U N/A
contractor’s staff.
8.Overall rating of contractor’s management of key personnel.E VG S N M U N/A

COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY, HEALTH, AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

1. Has the Contractor ever received an Notices of Violations YES NO for Compliance with environmental laws or regulations?

2.Contractor’s compliance with environmental requirements?E VG S N M U N/A
3.Contractor’s compliance with health requirements?E VG S N M U N/A
4.Contractor’s compliance with safety requirements.E VG S N M U N/A
5.Contractor’s compliance with security requirements.E VG S N M U N/A

COST MANAGEMENT

1. Extent to which the Contractor provided reliable, supportable E VG S N M U N/A cost estimates or proposals.

2. Extent to which the Contractor met the proposed cost estimates? E VG S N M U N/A

CONTRACTUAL CONSIDERATIONS

1. If a subcontracting plan was required, extent to which E VG S N M U N/A Contractor met applicable goals for small business participation.

2. Has an election even been made not to exercise an option YES No or continue relations due to contractor’s poor performance?

3.Has Contract Discrepancy Report ever been issued?YES No
4.Has a cure notice or show cause notice ever been issued?YES No
5.Has this contract been partially or completely terminatedYES No

for default or convenience?

Partially _________ Completely ___________

6.Are there any pending terminations?YES No
7.Overall rating of contractor’s performance under this contract.E VG S N M U N/A
8.Would you hire this Contractor again?YES No

*REMARKS

PART III: FOR COMPLETION BY GOVERNMENT:

Additional Comments (Please continue on a separate page if necessary).

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .