J.4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 80 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Strategic Partners Acquisition Readiness Contract (SPARC) IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- RFP-CMS-2016-SPARC
About this file
Amendment 1 - Attachment J.4 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP-CMS-2016-SPARC
Attachment J-4 Past Performance Questionnaire
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Sample Cover Letter
[COMPANY LETTERHEAD (Prime or subcontractor)]
Reference Name, Address and Contact information Date
SUBJECT: RFP-CMS-2016-SPARC– Strategic Partners Acquisition Readiness Contract
(SPARC)
Dear _________________:
We are currently responding to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Request for Proposal number RFP-CMS-2016-SPARC (as a subcontractor to______ (If applicable)). The purpose of this contract is to establish a multiple award Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Strategic Partners Acquisition Readiness Contract (SPARC) program. This contract will provide strategic, technical, and program management advice, guidance and support services to CMS to facilitate the modernization of business processes and supporting systems and their operations. These systems will include the Federal Healthcare Exchange and Medicare/Medicaid information technology systems.
There is an increased emphasis on past performance in the federal source selection process. The CMS is requesting that customers and clients of Offerors provide the information as described within the attached questionnaire and return it to them for evaluation. We have identified you as one of our references and respectfully request that you complete and sign the attached questionnaire and then return it to CMS.
Questionnaires are due to CMS no later than ____________ (to be filled in by Offeror);
however, we would appreciate an earlier response if at all possible.
We sincerely appreciate your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely, Reference Name
Title
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 P a g e | 1
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 P a g e | 2
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail Stop B3-30-03 Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850
Office of Acquisition and Grants Management
SUBJECT: Solicitation RFP-CMS-2016-SPARC Questionnaire
To Whom It May Concern:
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) very much appreciates your time and thoughtfulness in completing the attached questionnaire. The information obtained from this questionnaire will be utilized to evaluate the past performance of Offerors/Contractors who wish to be awarded a contract with CMS.
CMS may engage in exchanges with offerors regarding past performance information submitted to CMS in connection with the subject solicitation. If CMS engages in such exchanges, CMS may share information disclosed in this survey with the Offeror to whom it pertains, as permitted or required by the FAR. Otherwise, CMS will only share information from this survey outside the agency pursuant to a protective order or as otherwise required by law
The questionnaire is arranged by Customer Service, Financial Management, Operational Excellence, and Innovations and Technology. Each area consists of a few basic questions relating to these aspects of performance with regard to the Offeror/Contractor with which you worked. Please complete the questionnaire as indicated on the form.
Finally, please sign your name and identify your position during your association with the referenced Offeror/Contractor. Once completed, please submit the questionnaire in one of the following manners:
Email PDF (Preferred): Aaron.blackshire@cms.hhs.gov
Mail Original: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Office of Acquisition and Grants Management
DISC
ATTN: Aaron Blackshire 410-786-8204
Contracting Officer 7500 Security Blvd., Mailstop B3-30-03 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850
Thank you for taking the time to complete the questionnaire.
Sincerely, Aaron Blackshire Contracting Officer
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CMS Solicitation No. RFP-CMS-2016-SPARC
(Company Being Evaluated) (Offeror)
Offeror/Contractor: ___________________________ Address: ___________________________ Name of Contracting Activity:____________________________________________________ Brief Description of Work:
Contract Type:________________________________________________________________________ Total Contract Value:___________________________________________________________________ Performance Period:____________________________________________________________________ Please complete the following questionnaire about the Offeror/Contractor and indicate your responses in the blocks or columns, as appropriate. Numerical ratings are as indicated in the Rating Scale below. Other Ratings are as indicated in each block.
Rating Scale:
N/A Not Applicable: Question does not apply to the contract discussed in this report
0 Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
1 Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
2 Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
3 Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government/Business Entity’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.
4 Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Business Entity’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
We request that you justify each of your ratings with a comment. Please be as specific in your comment as possible, especially in situations that warrant very high or very low ratings. Use extra pages as necessary or expand the form electronically as needed.
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 P a g e | 3
CUSTOMER SERVICE
How did the contractor work collaboratively with the “customers” of the contract?
“Customers” may include, but are not limited to, other stakeholders (such as Medical Providers in a health insurance contract) critical to the success of the contract in question and those members of your staff responsible for the administration of the contract.
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
Comments: Rating:
Is/was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction and would you hire this contractor again?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
Comments:
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Was the contractor timely and accurate in processing payments if the contractor administered funds and/or payments for services?
If the contractor administered funds and/or payments on this contract, was the contractor timely and accurate in submitting accounting reports?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give
OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE
How was the contractor’s quality of products/services? How well did the contractor meet the standards and requirements of the contract’s Statement of Work? Was the contractor timely in meeting its contract schedule and/or requirements?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give
How well did the contractor utilize internal controls to effectively manage its staff and systems?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give
INNOVATIONS
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 P a g e | 4
Agency/Company COMPLETING Questionnaire
Agency/Company Name: ___________________________
Address: ___________________________
Signature of Individual Completing the Questionnaire: _____________________________ Date
Name: ___________________________ Telephone No.: ________________________
Title: ___________________________ Email Address: ________________________
How well did the contractor develop and continually refine its internal business processes to improve the quality of the work delivered on the contract?
If the contractor did incorporate internal business processes changes, what was the impact of those changes on the daily operations?
If there are any instances that are of particular note, either positive or negative, please give specifics around the citation.
Comments: Yes/No:
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 P a g e | 5
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .