RFPAtt G - Responsibility Inquiry.doc

DOC document 75 KB Posted

Attached to
Black-tailed Deer Fecal Collection with Trained Dogs
Solicitation number
S-63500-00001778
Issued by
Marion County, Oregon

About this file

This document is an Attachment G - Responsibility Inquiry from RFP #Bid REQ-63500-00022056 for Deer Fecal Collection with Trained Dogs, issued by the State of Oregon. The RFP is seeking proposals from qualified vendors to provide services related to collecting deer fecal samples using trained dogs. The agency will determine the responsibility of the offeror prior to contract award, and may require additional documentation such as financial statements, performance history, and other information to assess the offeror's capability to meet all contract responsibilities. Offerors must respond to a series of questions related to their financial, material, equipment, facility, and personnel resources, as well as any relevant legal or performance issues within the past 3-5 years. Failure to provide the requested information or demonstrate responsibility may result in a finding of non-responsibility and rejection of the proposal.

The RFP is for a contract opportunity in Douglas County, Oregon. No specific pricing, set-aside, incumbent, or funding details are provided in this document. However, the agency requires that offerors possess all necessary licenses, insurance, and legal authorization to conduct business in the state of Oregon. Additionally, if the prospective contract value exceeds $500,000, the offeror must possess a valid Pay Equity Certificate issued by the Oregon Department of Administrative Services.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP #Bid REQ-63500-00022056 - Deer Fecal Collection with Trained Dogs

AttG

ATTACHMENT G - RESPONSIBILITY INQUIRY

Agency will determine responsibility of an Offeror prior to award and execution of a Contract. In addition to this form, Agency may notify Offeror of other documentation required, which may include but is not limited to recent profit-and-loss history, current balance statements and cash flow information, assets-to-liabilities ratio, including number and amount of secured versus unsecured creditor claims, availability of short and long-term financing, bonding capacity, insurability, credit information, materials and equipment, facility capabilities, personnel information, record of performance under previous contracts, etc. Failure to promptly provide requested information or clearly demonstrate responsibility may result in an Agency finding of non-responsibility and rejection.

1. Does Offeror have available the appropriate financial, material, equipment, facility and personnel resources and expertise, or ability to obtain the resources and expertise, necessary to demonstrate the capability of Offeror to meet all contractual responsibilities? YES / NO .

2. Within the last five years, how many contracts of a similar nature has Offeror completed that, to the extent that the costs associated with and time available to perform the contract remained within Offeror′s control, Offeror stayed within the time and budget allotted, and there were no contract claims by any party? Number: ____ How many contracts did not meet those standards? Number: ____ If any, please explain.

Response:

3. Within the last three years has Offeror (incl. a partner or shareholder owning 10% or more of Offeror’s firm) or a major subcontractor (receiving 10% or more of a total contract amount) been criminally or civilly charged, indicted or convicted in connection with:

· obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, state, or local) contract or subcontract,

· violation of federal or state antitrust statutes relating to the submission of bids or Offerors, or

· embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, or receiving stolen property? YES / NO .

If "YES," indicate the jurisdiction, date of indictment, charge or judgment, and names and summary of charges in the response field below.

Response:

4. Within the last three years, has Offeror had:

· any contracts terminated for default by any government agency, or

· any lawsuits filed against it by creditors or involving contract disputes? YES / NO .

If "YES," please explain. (With regard to judgments, include jurisdiction and date of final judgment or dismissal.)

Response:

5. Does Offeror have any outstanding or pending judgments against it? YES / NO .

Is Offeror experiencing financial distress or having difficulty securing financing? YES / NO .

Does Offeror have sufficient cash flow to fund day-to-day operations throughout the proposed contract period? YES / NO If "YES” on the first question or second question, or “NO” on the third question, please provide additional details.

Response:

6. Within the last three years, has Offeror filed a bankruptcy action, filed for reorganization, made a general assignment of assets for the benefit of creditors, or had an action for insolvency instituted against it? YES / NO .

If "YES," indicate the filing dates, jurisdictions, type of action, ultimate resolution, and dates of judgment or dismissal, if applicable.

Response:

7. Does Offeror have all required licenses, insurance and/or registrations, if any, and is Offeror legally authorized to do business in the State of Oregon? YES /NO .

If "NO," please explain.

Response:

8. Pay Equity Certificate. This certificate is required if Offeror employs 50 or more full-time workers and the prospective contract price is estimated to exceed $500,000. [This requirement does not apply to architectural, engineering, photogrammetric mapping, transportation planning or land surveying and related services contracts.] Does a current authorized representative of Offeror possess an unexpired Pay Equity Certificate issued by the Department of Administrative Services? YES / NO / N/A . [If the certificate was provided with the Bid or Proposal submitted for a solicitation related to the prospective contract, then it is not necessary to resubmit it. Just indicate “see Bid” or “see Proposal” in the response field. Otherwise, if applicable, submit a copy of the certificate with this form.] Response:

AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

By signature below, the undersigned Authorized Representative on behalf of Offeror certifies to the best of his or her knowledge and belief that the responses provided on this form are complete, accurate, and not misleading.

Offeror Name:

RFP:

Project Name:

Authorized Signature

Date

Print Name

Title DAS Procurement Services, Version 1.0 – December 9, 2016

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .