RFPAtt D-S-63500-00009991-Reference Check Form~2.doc

DOC document 55 KB Posted

Attached to
GPS Satellite Tracking Collars for Blue Mountain Elk
Solicitation number
S-63500-00010428
Issued by
Umatilla County, Oregon

About this file

This document is an Attachment D - Reference Check Form for an RFP issued by the State of Oregon, Department of Fish and Wildlife for the purchase and delivery of 240 GPS iridium satellite tracking collars for adult Blue Mountain Elk and associated data collection services for up to three years. The collars must be delivered by January 1, 2025 for deployment in February-March 2025. Proposers are required to submit completed reference check forms from three references, which will be evaluated on an 0-10 scale across eight criteria including overall quality of services, adherence to timeline, responsiveness to customer service issues, satisfaction with the business relationship, likelihood of future use, and technical performance metrics related to battery life and mortality identification.

The RFP does not provide details on pricing terms, set asides, incumbents, funding sources, or other salient commercial information. The evaluation of references is a key component of the proposal evaluation process, with the reference check form accounting for 30 total points possible out of the overall RFP evaluation criteria.

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title]

ATTACHMENT F - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

OregonBuys RFP # S-63500-00010428 GPS SATELLITE TRACKING COLLARS FOR BLUE MOUNTAIN ELK AttD

ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

Grand Total Points Possible (30) As required in Section 3.3.2 of the RFP, Proposer shall submit completed Reference Check Forms from three (3) References.

Proposer must submit one (1) Attachment D for each Reference.

Proposer Name:

Reference Entity:

Reference Contact Name:

Contact Telephone Number:

Contact Email Address:

Agency will make three (3) attempts to contact each of the references provided by the Proposer. If these attempts are unsuccessful, the Proposer will receive a score of zero for that reference.

When Agency contacts each Reference, the following questions will be rated on a scale of 0-10:

0 = Poor - 10 = Excellent

1. How would you rate the Proposer’s overall quality of services provided and your overall relationship with the Proposer?

2. How well did the Proposer stay within the proposed timeline?

3. How would you rate the Proposer’s responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests (e.g., reported problems, changes billing, etc.)?

4. Describe your satisfaction with the business relationship with Proposer.

5. How likely would you be to use Proposer’s services again?

6. What percent of collars stopped transmitting due to battery failure prior to the minimum estimated battery life of the collars?

7. What percent of collars stopped transmitting as a result of firmware or software issues associated with the transmitters?

8. What percent of the collars incorrectly identified mortality of the individual?

COMMENTS \* FirstCap \* MERGEFORMAT DAS Procurement Services, Version 2.0 – December 9, 2016

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .