RFPAtt D - Reference Check Form.pdf
PDF 115 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-63500-00006055
- Issued by
- Jackson County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an attachment to a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the State of Oregon, Department of Fish & Wildlife, for chartering a vessel to support video surveys of seafloor habitats near Heceta Bank and Cascade Head. The agency is seeking a contractor to provide a vessel, crew, and technical support for up to 9 days of at-sea surveys between May 1 and June 30, 2023. The RFP requires proposers to provide at least two current professional references and one professional reference for prior work supportive of their ability to comply with the requirements.
The contract opportunity covers Lincoln County and Newberg City in the State of Oregon. The RFP does not provide details on pricing terms, set-asides, incumbents, funding requirements or sources, or any other salient financial information.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP #S-63500-00006055 Vessel for Video Surveys Heceta Bank and Cascade Head AttD
DAS Procurement Services, Version 2.0 – December 9, 2016 Page 1 of 1
ATTACHMENT D –
REFERENCE CHECK FORM
Proposer must provide at least two current professional references and one professional reference for work (from different firms and clients) supportive of Proposer’s ability to comply with the requirements of this RFP. Proposer must submit one (1) attachment D for each Reference.
Proposer Name: __________________________________________
Reference Entity: __________________________________________
Reference Contact Name: __________________________________________
Contact Telephone Number: __________________________________________
Contact Email Address: __________________________________________
Proposer shall submit reference names and contact information. Agency will make three (3) attempts to contact each of the references provided by the Proposer. If these attempts are unsuccessful, the Proposer will receive a score of zero for that reference.
The following questions will be rated on a scale of 0-10:
0 = Not satisfied 5 = Moderately satisfied 10 = Extremely satisfied.
1. How would you rate the Proposer’s overall quality of services provided and your overall relationship with the Proposer?
Score: __________
Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
2. How would you rate the Proposer’s delivery of service?
Score: __________
Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
3. How would you rate the Proposer’s responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests (e.g., reported problems, changes billing, etc.)?
Score: __________
Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .