12_-RFP-200-1306-CS__Section_J _Attachment_7_-_Lowest_Price_Technically_Acceptable_Checklist.pdf

Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Checklist

Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

RFP Number:

Name of Offeror

Location of Facility

Period of Performance

Contracting Officer

Name and Signatures of

Evaluators

Determination

(Acceptable or Unacceptable)

Score each LPTA factor as to whether it is Acceptable or Unacceptable as defined below. Each proposal will be evaluated against the

Statement of Work (SOW) and the stated evaluation criteria. Each proposal is evaluated using the same standards.

Make a determination as to acceptability or unacceptability on each category of the quote.

Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Evaluation Standards

Determination Definition

Acceptable All of the minimum acceptable criteria are clearly met by the proposal. The offeror meets the performance and technical capability requirements defined in the SOW. Note: Once the quote has been determined to be

“technically acceptable,” the award will be based on cost only.

Unacceptable Not all of the minimum acceptable criteria are met by the proposal. An unacceptable proposal contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal fails to meet specified minimum performance and technical capability requirements defined in the SOW.

Evaluation Factors

Factors Acceptable/Unacceptable

1. The offeror has provided official documentation demonstrating their right to use their proposed site location. Right to use is limited to deeds, leases, bills of sale, option to lease, options to buy, contingency leases, or contingency deeds and must be signed by both parties.

Comments:________________________________________________________________________

2. The offeror has provided documentation of zoning approval.

Comments:________________________________________________________________________

3. The offeror has provided the Local Area Concerns Within a Half-Mile Radius Attachment.

4. The offeror has provided the Community Relations Plan. Plan describes the approach for educating and interacting with the local community.

Comments:________________________________________________________________________

5. The offeror has provided proof that local government officials and law enforcement officials have been notified of intent to establish RRC. Notification is required for the law enforcement agency with primary jurisdiction and at least two levels of local government officials.

Comments:________________________________________________________________________

6. The offeror has provided evidence of community support or acknowledgment. A minimum of one letter must be provided.

Comments:________________________________________________________________________

7. The proposal describes the procedures to ensure offenders are accurately accounted for while in the facility.

Comments:________________________________________________________________________

8. The proposal describes the procedures to ensure offenders are accurately accounted for while at work assignments.

Comments:

9. The proposal describes the procedures to ensure offenders are accurately accounted for while in all other activities outside the facility.

Comments: _______________________________________________________________________

10. The proposal describes the procedures to ensure offenders are accurately accounted for while under home detention.

Comments:

11. The proposal describes the method for assessing the individual needs of each offender, including the assessment instruments used.

Comments: _______________________________________________________________________

12. The proposal describes the approach to assist with employment.

13. The proposal describes the offeror’s approach to assisting with locating suitable housing.

Comments:

14. The proposal describes the offeror’s approach to developing improved life skills. Proposal must address life skills training in money management, parenting, and family reunification.

Comments:

15. The offeror provided copies of architectural floor plans, site plans, and photographs (interior and exterior) of the facility.

Comments:

16. The offeror provided the RRC Contract Facility Certificate of Compliance.

17. The offeror provided the plan for ensuring operational availability by November 1, 2015.

18. Based on the on-site inspection, the offeror’s facility is in compliance with applicable local, state, and national health, safety, environmental laws, regulations, Executive Orders, and building codes, including the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968.

Comments:

19. The offeror described the approach for ensuring all staff are aware of and abide by the Standards of Employee Conduct.

Comments:________________________________________________________________________

20. The offeror provided a staffing pattern. Staffing pattern must provide a minimum of two staff

(one male and one female) twenty-four hours per day, seven days per week, dedicated only to the supervision of federal offenders.

Comments:________________________________________________________________________

21. The offeror provided job descriptions for key personnel. This is a moderate use contract.

22. The offeror provided minimum personnel qualifications for all employees, including the facility director, who provide direct services to the offenders.

Comments:________________________________________________________________________