RFP_200-1229-CS_Amendment_0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

PAGE OF PAGES

1 10

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

07/31/2013

4. REQUISITION / PURCHASE REQ. NO.

740/Fulgum

PROJECT NO. (If Applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

Federal Bureau of Prisons Residential Reentry Contracting Office 320 First Street, NW Room 5005 Washington, DC 20534

CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

Same as Item 6

CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

X

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO

RFP 200-1229-CS

9B. DATED (See Item 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

CODE

FACILITY CODE 10B. DATED (See Item 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

[x] The above number solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers [ X ] is extended, [ ] is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods.

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copy of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OR CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THE CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify Authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor [ ] is not [ ] is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible).

The above numbered solicitation (RFP-200-1229-CS) is amended as set forth in item 14. The purpose of the amendment is to correct parts of the Solicitation and revise Attachment(s). RFP-200-1229-CS, for Residential Reentry Center (RRC) and Home Detention services located in Memphis, Tennessee, within Shelby County.

Please see continuation sheet(s) for the summary of changes.

Except as provided herein, all items and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Robert Bland, Chief Contracting Officer

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

NSN 7540‐01‐152‐8070 30‐105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10‐83)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT - Continuation

2 10

1) Page One (1), Block Eleven (11) of the SF 33, Section J, List of Attachments, number of page(s). The number of pages has changed from forty-seven (47) to forty-six (46).

2) Page One (1), Block Nine (9) of the SF 33 has changed. The closing date for solicitation no. RFP-200-1229-CS has changed from September 30, 2013, 2:00 p.m. EST to October 14, 2013, 2:00 P.M. EST.

3) Section I – Contract Clauses – Clauses by Reference:

To incorporate the following clauses in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-67, 2005-68 and 2005-69.

52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards (Jul 2013).

52.244-6 Subcontracts for Commercial Items (Jul 2013) 52.232-33 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer – Central Contractor Registration (Jul 2013) 52.232-25 Prompt Payment (Jul 2013) 52.229-3 Federal, State and Local Taxes (Feb 2013) 52.219-9 Alt II Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Jul 2013) – Alternate II (Oct 2001) 52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns (Jul 2013) 52.209-6 Protecting the Government’s Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment (Aug 2013)

(cont’d) Section I – Contract Clauses – Clauses by Full Text:

FAR 52.209-9 Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters (Jul 2013)

(a) The Contractor shall update the information in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) on a semi-annual basis, throughout the life of the contract, by posting the required information in the System for Award Management database via https://www.acquisition.gov.

(b) As required by section 3010 of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (Pub. L. 111-212), all information posted in FAPIIS on or after April 15, 2011, except past performance reviews, will be publicly available. FAPIIS consists of two segments—

(1) The non-public segment, into which Government officials and the Contractor post information, which can only be viewed by—

(i) Government personnel and authorized users performing business on behalf of the Government; or

(ii) The Contractor, when viewing data on itself; and

(2) The publicly-available segment, to which all data in the non-public segment of FAPIIS is automatically transferred after a waiting period of 14 calendar days, except for—

(i) Past performance reviews required by subpart 42.15;

(ii) Information that was entered prior to April 15, 2011; or

(iii) Information that is withdrawn during the 14-calendar-day waiting period by the Government official who posted it in accordance with paragraph (c)(1) of this clause.

(c) The Contractor will receive notification when the Government posts new information to the Contractor’s record.

(1) If the Contractor asserts in writing within 7 calendar days, to the Government official who posted the information, that some of the information posted to the non-public segment of FAPIIS is covered by a disclosure exemption under the Freedom of Information Act, the Government official who posted the information must within 7 calendar days remove the posting from FAPIIS and resolve the issue in accordance with agency Freedom of Information procedures, prior to reposting the releasable information. The contractor must cite 52.209-9 and request removal within 7 calendar days of the posting to FAPIIS.

(2) The Contractor will also have an opportunity to post comments regarding information that has been posted by the Government. The comments will be retained as long as the associated information is retained, i.e., for a total period of 6 years. Contractor comments will remain a part of the record unless the Contractor revises them.

(3) As required by section 3010 of Pub. L. 111-212, all information posted in FAPIIS on or after April 15, 2011, except past performance reviews, will be publicly available.

(d) Public requests for system information posted prior to April 15, 2011, will be handled under Freedom of Information Act procedures, including, where appropriate, procedures promulgated under E.O. 12600.

(End of clause)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

3 10

(cont’d) Section I – Contract Clauses – Clauses by Full Text:

52.219-28 Post-Award Small Business Program Rerepresentation (Jul 2013)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause— Long-term contract means a contract of more than five years in duration, including options. However, the term does not include contracts that exceed five years in duration because the period of performance has been extended for a cumulative period not to exceed six months under the clause at 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, or other appropriate authority.

Small business concern means a concern, including its affiliates, that is independently owned and operated, not dominant in the field of operation in which it is bidding on Government contracts, and qualified as a small business under the criteria in 13 CFR part 121 and the size standard in paragraph (c) of this clause. Such a concern is “not dominant in its field of operation” when it does not exercise a controlling or major influence on a national basis in a kind of business activity in which a number of business concerns are primarily engaged. In determining whether dominance exists, consideration shall be given to all appropriate factors, including volume of business, number of employees, financial resources, competitive status or position, ownership or control of materials, processes, patents, license agreements, facilities, sales territory, and nature of business activity.

(b) If the Contractor represented that it was a small business concern prior to award of this contract, the Contractor shall rerepresent its size status according to paragraph (e) of this clause or, if applicable, paragraph (g) of this clause, upon the occurrence of any of the following:

(1) Within 30 days after execution of a novation agreement or within 30 days after modification of the contract to include this clause, if the novation agreement was executed prior to inclusion of this clause in the contract.

(2) Within 30 days after a merger or acquisition that does not require a novation or within 30 days after modification of the contract to include this clause, if the merger or acquisition occurred prior to inclusion of this clause in the contract.

(3) For long-term contracts—

(i) Within 60 to 120 days prior to the end of the fifth year of the contract; and

(ii) Within 60 to 120 days prior to the date specified in the contract for exercising any option thereafter.

(c) The Contractor shall rerepresent its size status in accordance with the size standard in effect at the time of this rerepresentation that corresponds to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code assigned to this contract. The small business size standard corresponding to this NAICS code can be found at http://www.sba.gov/content/table-small-business-size-standards.

(d) The small business size standard for a Contractor providing a product which it does not manufacture itself, for a contract other than a construction or service contract, is 500 employees.

(e) Except as provided in paragraph (g) of this clause, the Contractor shall make the representation required by paragraph (b) of this clause by validating or updating all its representations in the Representations and Certifications section of the System for Award Management (SAM) and its other data in SAM, as necessary, to ensure that they reflect the Contractor's current status. The Contractor shall notify the contracting office in writing within the timeframes specified in paragraph (b) of this clause that the data have been validated or updated, and provide the date of the validation or update.

(f) If the Contractor represented that it was other than a small business concern prior to award of this contract, the Contractor may, but is not required to, take the actions required by paragraphs (e) or (g) of this clause.

(g) If the Contractor does not have representations and certifications in SAM, or does not have a representation in SAM for the NAICS code applicable to this contract, the Contractor is required to complete the following rerepresentation and submit it to the contracting office, along with the contract number and the date on which the rerepresentation was completed:

The Contractor represents that it o is, o is not a small business concern under NAICS Code ______________ assigned to contract number

[Contractor to sign and date and insert authorized signer’s name and title].

(End of clause)

4 10

4) Section J – List of Attachments:

The number of pages for Identifier number 7 entitled “Compliance Matrix” has changed from 12 to 11.

5) Section K – Section K – Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors, Provisions By Full Text:

52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications (Jul 2013)

(a)(1) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 623990.

(2) The small business size standard is $10.0M.

(3) The small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, other than on a construction or service contract, but which proposes to furnish a product which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.

(b)(1) If the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management, is included in this solicitation, paragraph (d) of this provision applies.

(2) If the provision at 52.204-7 is not included in this solicitation, and the offeror is currently registered in the System for Award Management (SAM), and has completed the Representations and Certifications section of SAM electronically, the offeror may choose to use paragraph (d) of this provision instead of completing the corresponding individual representations and certifications in the solicitation. The offeror shall indicate which option applies by checking one of the following boxes:

[ ] (i) Paragraph (d) applies.

[ ] (ii) Paragraph (d) does not apply and the offeror has completed the individual representations and certifications in the solicitation.

(c)(1) The following representations or certifications in SAM are applicable to this solicitation as indicated:

(i) 52.203-2, Certificate of Independent Price Determination. This provision applies to solicitations when a firm-fixed-price contract or fixed-price contract with economic price adjustment is contemplated, unless—

(A) The acquisition is to be made under the simplified acquisition procedures in Part 13;

(B) The solicitation is a request for technical proposals under two-step sealed bidding procedures; or

(C) The solicitation is for utility services for which rates are set by law or regulation.

(ii) 52.203-11, Certification and Disclosure Regarding Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions. This provision applies to solicitations expected to exceed $150,000.

(iii) 52.204-3, Taxpayer Identification. This provision applies to solicitations that do not include the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management.

(iv) 52.204-5, Women-Owned Business (Other Than Small Business). This provision applies to solicitations that—

(A) Are not set aside for small business concerns;

(B) Exceed the simplified acquisition threshold; and

(C) Are for contracts that will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.

(v) 52.209-2, Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations—Representation. This provision applies to solicitations using funds appropriated in fiscal years 2008, 2009, 2010, or 2012.

(vi) 52.209-5, Certification Regarding Responsibility Matters. This provision applies to solicitations where the contract value is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

(vii) 52.214-14, Place of Performance—Sealed Bidding. This provision applies to invitations for bids except those in which the place of performance is specified by the Government.

(viii) 52.215-6, Place of Performance. This provision applies to solicitations unless the place of performance is specified by the Government.

(ix) 52.219-1, Small Business Program Representations (Basic & Alternate I). This provision applies to solicitations when the contract will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.

(A) The basic provision applies when the solicitations are issued by other than DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard.

(B) The provision with its Alternate I applies to solicitations issued by DoD, NASA, or the Coast Guard.

(x) 52.219-2, Equal Low Bids. This provision applies to solicitations when contracting by sealed bidding and the contract will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.

(xi) 52.222-22, Previous Contracts and Compliance Reports. This provision applies to solicitations that include the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.

(xii) 52.222-25, Affirmative Action Compliance. This provision applies to solicitations, other than those for construction, when the solicitation includes the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.

5 10

(xiii) 52.222-38, Compliance with Veterans’ Employment Reporting Requirements. This provision applies to solicitations when it is anticipated the contract award will exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and the contract is not for acquisition of commercial items.

(xiv) 52.223-1, Biobased Product Certification. This provision applies to solicitations that require the delivery or specify the use of

USDA–designated items; or include the clause at 52.223-2, Affirmative Procurement of Biobased Products Under Service and Construction Contracts.

(xv) 52.223-4, Recovered Material Certification. This provision applies to solicitations that are for, or specify the use of, EPA–designated items.

(xvi) 52.225-2, Buy American Act Certificate. This provision applies to solicitations containing the clause at 52.225-1.

(xvii) 52.225-4, Buy American Act—Free Trade Agreements—Israeli Trade Act Certificate. (Basic, Alternates I, II, and III.) This provision applies to solicitations containing the clause at 52.225-3.

(A) If the acquisition value is less than $25,000, the basic provision applies.

(B) If the acquisition value is $25,000 or more but is less than $50,000, the provision with its Alternate I applies.

(C) If the acquisition value is $50,000 or more but is less than $77,494, the provision with its Alternate II applies.

(D) If the acquisition value is $77,494 or more but is less than $100,000, the provision with its Alternate III applies.

(xviii) 52.225-6, Trade Agreements Certificate. This provision applies to solicitations containing the clause at 52.225-5.

(xix) 52.225-20, Prohibition on Conducting Restricted Business Operations in Sudan—Certification. This provision applies to all solicitations.

(xx) 52.225-25, Prohibition on Contracting with Entities Engaging in Certain Activities or Transactions Relating to Iran-Representation and Certifications. This provision applies to all solicitations.

(xxi) 52.226-2, Historically Black College or University and Minority Institution Representation. This provision applies to—

(A) Solicitations for research, studies, supplies, or services of the type normally acquired from higher educational institutions; and

(B) For DoD, NASA, and Coast Guard acquisitions, solicitations that contain the clause at 52.219-23, Notice of Price Evaluation

Adjustment for Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns.

(2) The following certifications are applicable as indicated by the Contracting Officer:

[Contracting Officer check as appropriate.] __ (i) 52.219-22, Small Disadvantaged Business Status.

__ (A) Basic.

__ (B) Alternate I.

__ (ii) 52.222-18, Certification Regarding Knowledge of Child Labor for Listed End Products.

__ (iii) 52.222-48, Exemption from Application of the Service Contract Act to Contracts for Maintenance, Calibration, or Repair of

Certain Equipment Certification.

__ (iv) 52.222-52, Exemption from Application of the Service Contract Act to Contracts for Certain Services–Certification.

__ (v) 52.223-9, with its Alternate I, Estimate of Percentage of Recovered Material Content for EPA–Designated Products (Alternate I only).

__ (vi) 52.227-6, Royalty Information.

__ (A) Basic.

__(B) Alternate I.

__ (vii) 52.227-15, Representation of Limited Rights Data and Restricted Computer Software.

(d) The offeror has completed the annual representations and certifications electronically via the SAM website accessed through https://www.acquisition.gov. After reviewing the SAM database information, the offeror verifies by submission of the offer that the representations and certifications currently posted electronically that apply to this solicitation as indicated in paragraph (c) of this provision have been entered or updated within the last 12 months, are current, accurate, complete, and applicable to this solicitation (including the business size standard applicable to the NAICS code referenced for this solicitation), as of the date of this offer and are incorporated in this offer by reference (see FAR 4.1201); except for the changes identified below [offeror to insert changes, identifying change by clause number, title, date]. These amended representation(s) and/or certification(s) are also incorporated in this offer and are current, accurate, and complete as of the date of this offer.

6 10

FAR Clause # Title Date Change

Any changes provided by the offeror are applicable to this solicitation only, and do not result in an update to the representations and certifications posted on SAM.

(End of provision)

52.209-7 Information Regarding Responsibility Matters (Jul 2013)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision— “Administrative proceeding” means a non-judicial process that is adjudicatory in nature in order to make a determination of fault or liability

(e.g., Securities and Exchange Commission Administrative Proceedings, Civilian Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings, and Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings). This includes administrative proceedings at the Federal and State level but only in connection with performance of a Federal contract or grant. It does not include agency actions such as contract audits, site visits, corrective plans, or inspection of deliverables.

“Federal contracts and grants with total value greater than $10,000,000” means—

(1) The total value of all current, active contracts and grants, including all priced options; and

(2) The total value of all current, active orders including all priced options under indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity, 8(a), or requirements contracts (including task and delivery and multiple-award Schedules).

“Principal” means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager; head of a division or business segment; and similar positions).

(b) The offeror [ ] has [ ] does not have current active Federal contracts and grants with total value greater than $10,000,000.

(c) If the offeror checked “has” in paragraph (b) of this provision, the offeror represents, by submission of this offer, that the information it has entered in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) is current, accurate, and complete as of the date of submission of this offer with regard to the following information:

(1) Whether the offeror, and/or any of its principals, has or has not, within the last five years, in connection with the award to or performance by the offeror of a Federal contract or grant, been the subject of a proceeding, at the Federal or State level that resulted in any of the following dispositions:

(i) In a criminal proceeding, a conviction.

(ii) In a civil proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in the payment of a monetary fine, penalty, reimbursement, restitution, or damages of $5,000 or more.

(iii) In an administrative proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in—

(A) The payment of a monetary fine or penalty of $5,000 or more; or

(B) The payment of a reimbursement, restitution, or damages in excess of $100,000.

(iv) In a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding, a disposition of the matter by consent or compromise with an acknowledgment of fault by the Contractor if the proceeding could have led to any of the outcomes specified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), or (c)(1)(iii) of this provision.

(2) If the offeror has been involved in the last five years in any of the occurrences listed in (c)(1) of this provision, whether the offeror has provided the requested information with regard to each occurrence.

(d) The offeror shall post the information in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (c)(1)(iv) of this provision in FAPIIS as required through maintaining an active registration in the System for Award Management database via https://www.acquisition.gov (see 52.204-7).

(End of provision)

6) Section L – Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Offerors- Provisions by Reference:

52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition (Jan 2004)

7 10

7) Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award, Provisions By Full Text:

The following Provision replaces M.5 Evaluation Criteria and their Relative Importance.

The following Provision is incorporated by Full Text:

M.5 Evaluation Criteria and their Relative Importance

Offeror proposals will be evaluated in three areas: Past Performance, Technical/Management and Price. Technical/Management and Past Performance, when combined (Non-Price), are significantly more important than Price. In the Non-Price areas, Past Performance is more important than Technical/Management. The Technical/Management areas are composed of the six factors, listed in paragraph

2.0. Offerors should recognize that Price, although of lesser importance than Technical/Management and Past Performance, might contribute substantially to the Source Selection Official's (SSO's) contract award decision. As the evaluation of competing offeror proposals in the Technical/Management and Past Performance areas become more equal in rating, the more important Price will become in selecting the best value for the Government. The Government will assign an adjectival rating to each of the factors/sub factors identified below as well as assigning an overall adjectival rating to each of the evaluation areas. The adjectival rating depicts how well the offeror meets the evaluation areas/factors/sub factors and solicitation requirements. The adjectival definitions are defined below:

EXCEPTIONAL: Offeror's technical proposal exceeds requirements of the solicitation in many areas. Benefits to the Government/Bureau of Prisons (BOP) are identifiable.

VERY GOOD: Offeror's technical proposal meets requirements of the solicitation and exceeds requirements in some areas. Benefits to the Government/BOP are identifiable. Problems may exist, but are minor, and may be resolved through discussions.

SATISFACTORY: Offeror's technical proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation. Some minor problems exist, but can be resolved through discussions.

MARGINAL: Offeror's technical proposal does not meet some of the requirements of the solicitation. Contractor's technical proposal has identified problems that may result in a negative impact on service delivery (a negative impact on the Government). Problems are serious but can be resolved through discussions.

UNSATISFACTORY: Offeror's technical proposal fails to meet most of the requirements of the solicitation. Technical proposal has problems that will result in a negative impact on service delivery (a negative impact on the Government). Problems are serious, and it is not likely that they can be resolved through discussions.

1.0 Past Performance Evaluation Area

The Past Performance area addresses the Government's confidence in the offeror's probability of successfully performing the effort as proposed based on their record of performance in current and past relevant contract efforts. The Past Performance evaluation will be accomplished by reviewing aspects of an offeror's relevant present and recent past performance, focusing on and targeting performance that is relevant to the Past Performance factors outlined below.

The recency and relevancy of Past Performance information is critical to the Government's evaluation. More recent, more relevant performance information will have a greater positive impact on the Past Performance evaluation than less recent, less relevant performance. The Government may consider efforts performed by the offeror for agencies of the federal, state, or local governments and commercial customers as potentially relevant to the Past Performance evaluation. Where relevant performance record indicates performance problems, the Government will consider the number and severity of the problems and the appropriateness and effectiveness of any corrective actions taken (not just planned or promised). The Government may review more recent contracts or performance evaluations to ensure corrective actions have been implemented and to evaluate their effectiveness. Offerors without a record of relevant company past performance or for whom information on Past Performance is not available will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on Past Performance. The specific Past Performance factors for 1.1 through 1.5 for In-House RRC services are described below and are equal in importance to each other. Past Performance factor 1.6 for Home Detention services is described below as well. The evaluation factors for elements related to the In-House RRC services will be given greater significance over those related to Home Detention services. However, all elements will be considered when determining the overall rating. Each factor considers the offeror's record of performance and level of success in:

1.1 FACTOR: In-House RRC – Accountability

The offeror's record of performance and level of success in developing and implementing offender accountability programs.

8 10

1.1 FACTOR: In-House RRC – Programs

The offeror's record of performance and level of success in assisting offenders in successfully reentering the community. The offeror's ability to leverage and network with other relevant community resources to offer offenders a more comprehensive and robust support structure.

1.2 FACTOR: In-House RRC - Community Relations

The offeror's record of performance and level of success in acquiring and maintaining public support for residential reentry programs.

1.3 FACTOR: In-House RRC – Personnel

The offeror's record of performance and level of success in recruiting, training and retaining an adequate staff of personnel with the necessary skills and integrity to ensure successful, continuous performance of the contract.

1.4 FACTOR: In-House RRC - Communications and Responsiveness

The offeror's record of performance and level of success in ensuring open communications about and rapid response to customer needs and requirements.

1.5 FACTOR: Home Detention

The offeror's record of performance and level of success in developing and implementing offender home detention accountability programs.

The offeror's record of performance and level of success in assisting offenders in successfully reentering the community through home detention. The offeror's ability to leverage and network with other relevant community resources to offer offenders a more comprehensive and robust support structure.

2.0 Technical/Management Evaluation Area

The Technical/Management area is composed of six factors: (1) Site Location; (2) Accountability; (3) Programs; (4) Facility; (5) Personnel;

and (6) Home Detention. Site Location is composed of two sub factors, which are equal in importance: (1) Site Validity and Suitability; and

(2) Community Relations Program. Home Detention is composed of two sub factors which are equal in importance:

(1) Home Detention Accountability; and (2) Home Detention Programming. The evaluation factors for elements related to the In-House RRC services will be given greater significance over those related to Home Detention services. However, all elements will be considered when determining the overall rating. The specific Technical/Management area factors are described below.

2.1 FACTOR: Site Location

This factor is composed of two sub factors: (1) Site Validity and Suitability and (2) Community Relations Program.

2.1.1 SUBFACTOR: Site Validity and Suitability

The Site Validity and Suitability sub factor evaluates the proposed site location and considers the validity of the offeror's Right-to-Use and Zoning approval. The assessment of validity includes both the legality of the instrument and the nature of the interest and appropriate zoning as it relates to any potential risk it poses to the Government. This sub factor also evaluates the Suitability of the Site Location with regards to environmental impacts and the responsiveness to proximity requirements defined in the SOW and RFP Section J.

2.1.2 SUBFACTOR: Community Relations Program

The Community Relations Program sub factor evaluates the innovativeness, credibility and effectiveness of the offeror's proposed program for educating and interacting with the local community in order to acquire and maintain public support.

2.2 FACTOR: Accountability

This factor evaluates the comprehensiveness, credibility and effectiveness of the offeror's offender accountability program. The offeror will be evaluated on the plans, procedures and practices they will employ to ensure that offenders are accurately accounted for, at all times, while (1) in the facility; (2) at work assignments; (3) in all other activities outside the facility; and (4) under home detention.

9 10

2.3 FACTOR: Programs

This factor evaluates the quality and effectiveness of the offeror's plan for assessing the individual needs of each offender to assist their reentry into the community. This includes an evaluation of the offeror's programs for assisting with employment and housing, and developing improved life skills to include, but not limited to, money management, parenting and family reunification. This factor also includes an evaluation of the offeror's understanding of and ability to leverage and network with other relevant community resources in order to offer a more comprehensive and robust support structure for the offender.

2.4 FACTOR: Facility

This factor evaluates the offeror's proposed facility with regard to (1) overall quality; (2) degree of compliance to applicable local, state, national health, safety, environmental laws, regulations, Executive Orders, and building codes; and (3) the soundness and credibility of the offeror's plan for ensuring operational availability within 120 days after contract award.

2.5 FACTOR: Personnel

This factor evaluates the offeror's quality, credibility and innovativeness of the offeror's approach for recruiting, training and retaining an adequate staff of Community Correction Programs (CCP) personnel with the necessary skills to ensure successful, continuous performance of the contract. This also includes evaluating the effectiveness of the offeror's plan for ensuring all personnel will be aware of and abide by the standards of employee conduct as defined by the SOW, Chapter 2.

2.6 FACTOR: Home Detention

This factor is composed of two sub factors: (1) Accountability and (2) Programming.

2.6.1 SUBFACTOR: Accountability

The factor evaluates the comprehensiveness, credibility and effectiveness of the offeror's offender accountability program while on home detention. The offeror will be evaluated on the plans, procedures, and practices they will employ to ensure that offenders are accurately accounted for at all times while (1) on home detention, (2) at approved work locations, and (3) in all activities outside of the home detention location.

2.6.2 SUBFACTOR: Programming

This factor evaluates the quality and effectiveness of the offeror's plan for assessing the individual needs of each offender to assist them in successful reentry into the community. This includes an evaluation of the offeror's programs for assisting with employment and developing life skills to include, but not limited to, money management, parenting, and family reunifications. This factor also includes an evaluation of the offeror's understanding of and ability to leverage and network with other relevant community resources in order to offer a more comprehensive and robust support structure for the offender.

3.0 Price Evaluation Area

The Government will evaluate the offeror's price for the overall requirement to ensure it is reasonable. The offeror's evaluated price will be assessed against the evaluation results of the non-price areas in conducting possible tradeoff analysis and determining best value to the Government. The competitiveness of the offeror's price for In-House RRC Services is significantly more important than the competitiveness of the offeror's price for Home Detention Services. However, as offerors' proposals become more equal in the non-price factors, the overall price of the entire contract will be given greater importance.

Risk Assessment Area

The Government will conduct a proposal risk assessment. The proposal risk assessment reflects the Government's degree of confidence in the offeror's ability to perform the effort described in their Technical/Management proposal. Proposal risk considers if any aspect of the proposed Technical/Management solution could pose potential adverse impacts on price, schedule or performance of the effort. A separate proposal risk assessment and rating may be applied to all evaluation criteria, with the exception of the sub factor "Site Validity and Suitability." In this sub factor, the level of risk associated with the offeror's proposal is inherent in the sub factor definition and will thus be reflected in the sub factor color/adjectival rating and rationale. The findings and results of the proposal risk assessment will be a general consideration in determining the best value offeror to the Government.

[END OF SECTION]

10 10

8) A revised copy of the Compliance Matrix is attached.

9) A revised copy of the Bid Cover Sheet is attached.

All other terms and conditions remain the same.