RFP Score Sheet _ Architect Selection_CityofA.pdf

PDF 133 KB Posted

Attached to
City of Alma- Request for Proposals for Architectural Services
Solicitation number
PE-60350-NONST-2025-000000007
Issued by
Bacon County, Georgia

About this file

This document is a Qualification Evaluation Form for the selection of an engineer for the City of Alma's Fiscal Year 2025 Community Development Block Grant - Resilient Development Fund (CDBG-RDF) project. The form is designed to evaluate architectural firms based on six key criteria: ability to supply necessary disciplines, experience with the type of construction, knowledge of the community, staff expertise, prior experience with CDBG projects, and cost competitiveness. The evaluation uses a scoring system ranging from 1 (Poor) to 4 (Excellent), allowing reviewers to rate each criterion and calculate a total score.

The form includes additional verification questions about the firm's ability to meet the preliminary architectural report (PAR) deadline and whether they carry Errors and Omissions insurance. Reviewers are expected to provide the name of the firm, firm address, and their own contact information. The document is structured to help the City of Alma systematically assess and compare architectural firms for potential selection, with space for detailed comments and a comprehensive evaluation of the firm's qualifications for the CDBG-RDF project.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

QUALIFICATION EVALUATION FORM

SELECTION OF ENGINEER

FOR CITY OF ALMA FY25 CDBG-RDF

OWNER:___________________________________________________________

NAME OF FIRM:____________________________________________________

FIRM ADDRESS:__________________________________________________________________________

Evaluate the Architect and/or Architectural Firm based on the points assigned to each of the following selection criterion. Scoring of RFP’s will be as follows:

POINTS

CRITERION ASSIGNED

1. Architect and/or Architectural Firms ability __________ to supply all major disciplines necessary to perform the work.

2. Architect and/or Architectural Firms __________ experience with this type construction.

3. Architect and/or Architectural Firms knowledge __________ of community.

4. Architect and/or Architectural Firms Staff Expertise. __________

5. Has Architect and/or Architectural Firm had __________ experience with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Projects?

6. Is cost competitive? __________

TOTAL SCORE: __________

Firm can meet preliminary architectural report (PAR) deadline? ____ Yes ____ No

Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? ____ Yes ____ No

COMMENTS:

NAME OF REVIEWER: _____________________________ DATE OF REVIEW: _______________

Poor

Fair

Good

Excellent

1. Architect and/or Architectural Firms ability __________
2. Architect and/or Architectural Firms __________
3. Architect and/or Architectural Firms knowledge __________
4. Architect and/or Architectural Firms Staff Expertise. __________
5. Has Architect and/or Architectural Firm had __________
6. Is cost competitive? __________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .