RFP Risk Quality Software Ranking Sheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 17 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-X06001-00016733
- Issued by
- Oregon
About this file
This is a risk and compliance software evaluation grading sheet for CTCLUSI and TRHC departments in Oregon. The document outlines a standardized scoring framework used to evaluate three competing software solutions: SQSS Risk Quality Software, Compliatric, and ComplianceBridge. Each vendor is assessed across identical criteria with a total possible score of 200 points. The evaluation framework emphasizes organizational preferences regarding tribal affiliations and cross-departmental functionality, followed by comprehensive functional requirements assessments including risk management capabilities (incident reporting, root cause analysis, risk assessment tracking, and e-signature closure), quality management features (performance improvement tracking, clinical quality measures, and audit tools), compliance management functions (policy management, regulatory tracking, and document control), reporting and analytics capabilities (customizable dashboards, automated reporting, and data export), and security and access controls (role-based access, audit logs, and HIPAA compliance). Additionally, vendors are evaluated on implementation methodology, company healthcare background, support structure, and pricing relative to platform capabilities.
The grading sheet indicates that all three software solutions are being scored against identical performance benchmarks, with Item 8 allowing evaluators to assess additional functionalities unique to each vendor compared to the others. Contact for all questions and bid proposals should be directed to Brianna Rivera at brivera@ctclusi.org. The document does not specify response deadlines, award dates, contract terms, renewal options, or pricing thresholds, suggesting this grading sheet serves as the evaluation instrument rather than the complete RFP document.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFP - RIsk Compliance and Quality.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SQSS
| Risk and Compliance Software Grading Sheet | ||||
| Staff Name: Company: | ||||
| Item # | Ranking Details Consideration | Notes to Support Score | Possible Score | Score |
| Organizational Preferences | ||||
| 1 | Identify if organization represented has Tribal affiliations and understanding. | 5 | ||
| 2 | Ability for all CTCLUSI and TRHC departments to utilize software | 5 | ||
| Functional Requirements | ||||
| 3 | Risk Management:(1) Incident/event reporting and tracking (2) root cause analysis tools (3) Risk assessment and mitigation tracking (3) esignatures for closure | 30 | ||
| 4 | Quality Management: (1)Performance improvement tracking (2) Clinical quality measures (3) Audit tools and reporting | 30 | ||
| 5 | Compliance Management: (1) policy and procedure management (2) regulatory tracking and alerts (3) Document control and versioning | 30 | ||
| 6 | Reporting & Analytics: (1) Customizable dashboards (2)Automated reporting (3) Data export capabilities | 30 | ||
| 7 | Security & Access: (1) Role-based access controls (2) Audit logs (3) HIPAA compliant security measures | 30 | ||
| 8 | Additional Functionalities compared to Compliatric and CompliancBridge | 20 | ||
| Vendor Evaluation | ||||
| 9 | Company background and experience in healthcare | 5 | ||
| 10 | Implementation methodology | 5 | ||
| 11 | Support structure | 5 | ||
| 12 | Pricing compared to platform size and capabilities | 5 | ||
| Total Scores | 200 | 0 |
Compliatric
| Risk and Compliance Software Grading Sheet | ||||
| Company: Compliatric | ||||
| Item/Details | Ranking Details Consideration | Notes to Support Score | Possible Score | Score |
| Organizational Preferences | ||||
| 1 | Identify if organization represented has Tribal affiliations and understanding. | 5 | ||
| 2 | Ability for all CTCLUSI and TRHC departments to utilize software | 5 | ||
| Functional Requirements | ||||
| 3 | Risk Management:(1) Incident/event reporting and tracking (2) root cause analysis tools (3) Risk assessment and mitigation tracking (3) esignatures for closure | 30 | ||
| 4 | Quality Management: (1)Performance improvement tracking (2) Clinical quality measures (3) Audit tools and reporting | 30 | ||
| 5 | Compliance Management: (1) policy and procedure management (2) regulatory tracking and alerts (3) Document control and versioning | 30 | ||
| 6 | Reporting & Analytics: (1) Customizable dashboards (2)Automated reporting (3) Data export capabilities | 30 | ||
| 7 | Security & Access: (1) Role-based access controls (2) Audit logs (3) HIPAA compliant security measures | 30 | ||
| 8 | Additional Functionalities compared to SQSS and CompliancBridge | 20 | ||
| Vendor Evaluation | ||||
| 9 | Company background and experience in healthcare | 5 | ||
| 10 | Implementation methodology | 5 | ||
| 11 | Support structure | 5 | ||
| 12 | Pricing compared to platform size and capabilities | 5 | ||
| Total Scores | 200 | 0 |
ComplianceBridge
| Risk and Compliance Software Grading Sheet | ||||
| Company: ComplianceBridge | ||||
| Item/Details | Ranking Details Consideration | Notes to Support Score | Possible Score | Score |
| Organizational Preferences | ||||
| 1 | Identify if organization represented has Tribal affiliations and understanding. | 5 | ||
| 2 | Ability for all CTCLUSI and TRHC departments to utilize software | 5 | ||
| Functional Requirements | ||||
| 3 | Risk Management:(1) Incident/event reporting and tracking (2) root cause analysis tools (3) Risk assessment and mitigation tracking (3) esignatures for closure | 30 | ||
| 4 | Quality Management: (1)Performance improvement tracking (2) Clinical quality measures (3) Audit tools and reporting | 30 | ||
| 5 | Compliance Management: (1) policy and procedure management (2) regulatory tracking and alerts (3) Document control and versioning | 30 | ||
| 6 | Reporting & Analytics: (1) Customizable dashboards (2)Automated reporting (3) Data export capabilities | 30 | ||
| 7 | Security & Access: (1) Role-based access controls (2) Audit logs (3) HIPAA compliant security measures | 30 | ||
| 8 | Additional Functionalities compared to Compliatric and SQSS | 20 | ||
| Vendor Evaluation | ||||
| 9 | Company background and experience in healthcare | 5 | ||
| 10 | Implementation methodology | 5 | ||
| 11 | Support structure | 5 | ||
| 12 | Pricing compared to platform size and capabilities | 5 | ||
| Total Scores | 200 | 0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .